Pamela Geller on CNN: Segment abruptly cut when she started speaking about Hamas-linked CAIR

What an interesting place to end the interview -- just a coincidence, I'm sure! But it actually didn't end there. Pamela Geller has the story:

Here is the video of my interview with Erin Burnett on CNN earlier. The video cuts off at the end of the description of the ADL. Here is a transcript of the portion that CNN didn't run. I secretly recorded my interview and included the audio of the missing portion in the video as well. The interview was 14 minutes long, but CNN cuts it off at discussion of Hamas-CAIR, 9 minutes in. Much thanks to Big Fur Hat for dropping the secretly recorded audio of the entire interview into the video above.

This is what CNN's Erin Burnett censored:

PG: And CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood group --
 
EB: That is the organization, right, Council on American-Islamic Relations, they said these are hate ads and part of a larger problem.
 
PG: CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist funding trial in our nation’s history. They were named as Muslim Brotherhood. They’re a Hamas group in America. Hamas is – the first paragraph of their charter calls for the annihilation of Israel. Is CAIR ever gonna support me and support freedom? Of course not. They’re not -- to me, they’re not a legitimate group. To me they’re a subversive group whose stated goal, according to an internal captured document in the Holy Land trial, was to eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within. So that is a compliment. Seriously.
 
EB: OK, let me ask you about this issue about savages again, because I think that is part of the problem here. At least -- when people look at that ad -- it is a word chosen – will you admit this? – to make people recoil and pay attention.
 
PG: No.
 
EB: To poke up. To perk up and say, Look at this.
 
PG: No, it’s an accurate word. The definition of savage works, because any war on innocent civilians is savagery. Would you call those that beheaded a colleague, Daniel Pearl, savages?
 
EB: I would call them murderers.
 
PG: You wouldn’t call them savages? I would. I would call them savages. I would call Nazis, that slaughtered millions and millions of Jews and gypsies and homosexuals, I would call them savages. So I think now it’s not arbitrary: I think when you go to a dictionary and you look up what savage means, and that’s the definition –
 
EB: Uncivilized and barbarous.
 
PG: That’s right.
 
EB: So lemme ask you something else. When people see your name, you are a controversial person, which I know that you say that you’re not, but you are. I’m gonna say that I think that that is the case.
 
PG: You’re allowed, you’re allowed.
 
EB: All right. You have done other things as well. Obviously, as I mentioned, you were against the Ground Zero Mosque.
 
PG: I was against the Ground Zero Mosque.
 
EB: You have questioned the authenticity of President Barack Obama being born in the United States.
 
PG: No, that’s not true. That is absolutely not true. I ran a digital forensic examination calling into questions alterations that were made to the Certification of Live Birth. I don’t know what’s on the long form. I don’t know what’s on the vault copy. But I did say – and I didn’t say it, an actual digital forensic examination specialist said, there were alterations made to the original COLB. All I said was, What’s on the original vault copy that he doesn’t want us to know? That was all I said. Now, they change it, and they morph it – listen, I’ve written hundreds of articles. Two books. I update Atlas Shrugs, my blog, every day. You don’t have to guess as to my position. There’s no ambiguity to my position. You can read me.
 
EB: You said the president was a Muslim.
 
PG: I never said that. I never said he was a Muslim. I said, whether he is or he isn’t, what would he be doing differently? And--
 
EB: But isn’t that – but see, that, this -- these are the rhetorical games that one can play. Saying that let’s look into a digital forensic of an American citizen’s birth certificate is calling into question whether they were born here. Saying whether you are or aren’t a Muslim when you’ve been very passionate about your Christian faith is raising the question of someone, whether someone is or isn’t a Muslim, as if somehow being a Muslim is perceived as being negative.
 
PG: But you’re accusing me of something I never said. Let’s discuss what I said. I’m happy to discuss everything that I said. The same thing with Barack Obama. I don’t know what’s on the vault copy. Every other president has released the vault except him. It makes you question. Now you’re gonna say, “Pamela, you’re not allowed to question.” This is America. I can question. And frankly, I still think it’s a question. I do, I think it’s a question. And I do think that Obama is Islamophilic – yes, that’s what I said. I didn’t say he was a Muslim. There’s no way to know what’s in the man’s heart. And frankly, by their fruits ye shall know them, so we know him. I don’t know what’s in his heart, and I don’t care.
 
EB: The Center for American Progress calls you an “Islamophobia grass roots organizer.”
 
PG: Yeah. And American Center for Progress is an uber left-wing, Soros-funded, subversive organization. I mean, these are not legitimate organizations if you’re a rational, thinking person that loves individual rights, that believes in individual rights over statism, that believes in individual rights over collectivism. I’m sorry, but these are not legitimate organizations.
 
EB: Who you gonna vote for?
 
PG: Really? I’m voting for President Romney. So here we go: Geller Endorses Romney, there’s your headline!

| 38 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

38 Comments

| Leave a comment

Pamela Geller was on the TV news tonight in Australia! Amazing!! The news was full of liars and scoundrels and then Pamela came on. It was a wonderful moment!

Pamela and Robert should start their answer to any question with

"CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist funding trial in our nation’s history. They were named as Muslim Brotherhood. They’re a Hamas group in America."

and then give their answer. They are censoring this in the media.

CNN - what a shame! PG's comments are so direct, thruthful and significant.

Go on Pamela, let them know the truth!! Hopefully you will be in many other interviews too.

Brilliant. That was a brilliant job by Pamela.

Also, watch Erin Burnett’s body language in that clip. Look how freaked out she becomes starting at around 2.5. Haha. Love it. Go Pamela.

Pamela, you were amazing! Erin was outmatched. That's what will happen when CNN tries to outwit Pamela.

What has been the effect of the global Muslim tantrum?

Romney probably means more war over a wider area in the Muslim world.

If that strikes you as futile and a gross waste of treasure and blood, Obama is certainly the lesser evil of the two.

But the Muslim stampede since 9/11/12 has probably helped Romney even though polls say Americans are sick of the neocon wars and don't want more war because the stampede has made Americans angry.

They get angrier with every day that it continues in the headlines.

And because even Americans (and there are many, especially on the Christian right) who agree speech offensive to religion ought to be prohibited and punished are not happy to see an American president missing the moment when what he is supposed to do is stand up for his country.

No, the administration has not been apologizing.

But the administration's efforts to deflect Muslim wrath from them, from the government, from America, from the American people, and maybe even from Christians onto the schmuck who made that silly movie are a disgraceful spectacle with too much the look of shouting, "Hey! I didn't do it! Shoot him!"

Worse, we know that they know it was and is not really about the movie, either in Benghazi where what happened was an al-Qaeda attack or in Cairo where Muslims in a coordinated way chose the 11th anniversary of 9/11 to put on a mass demonstration of their hatred for America.

Though their stupid, their stupid, global arrogance in making their demands is real, and though the demands themselves are seriously meant, it is not and has not been all about that one little film.

What these outbursts have been saying to us and all the world is this.

“It’s September 11th, America. Many happy returns.”

And despite it all this disgraceful exercise in blame-shifting is what liberals want Obama to do, it seems, pretty much to a man.

Not just bloggers and pundits but “wise men” of the liberal establishment.

And that will hurt the president and the Democrats, and probably already has, despite the fact that Romney's foreign policy would doubtless be much stupider and certainly more bellicose than his and polls say, as I noted, that Americans are heartily sick of all that.

Romney told the truth.

For the swing voters it's more about emotion and "do they like the guy."

Obama has made them ashamed, at least of him if not of their country, and he continues to make them ashamed every day the administration continues its wave of “It wasn’t us! We didn’t do it!” propaganda addressed to the screaming masses of the Muslim world.

Anger and disgust at Muslim behavior combined with rejection of that shame will together drive people to vote for the guy who is not Obama.

And they will do that even though he is by far the greater evil, even in this matter of dealing with global, psychopathic Islam.

I watched this interview last night. Pamela was so articulate
and truthful, telling it like it is, fact-based and realistic.
I was disappointed when the interview ended,(rather abruptly).
As a Christian from the middle of the USA...God bless you!!

From post above...Anger and disgust at Muslim behavior combined with rejection of that shame will together drive people to vote for the guy who is not Obama.

That's fine with me...The guy who is not Obama, has not forged any documents, nor committed fraud on the American people, nor has he committed any acts of treason...he is not wrecking the country and is not responsible for any of America's problems...But we know who is...The guy who is not Romney has to go...If we don't like Mitts actions, we can get rid of him later...providing we actually have a 'later'...

No other President or party-nominated candidates have had to release "vault copies" because no other President or party-nominated candidates have had their citizenship questioned.

And no other President or party-nominated candidate has been African-American, either.

Watch his hands carefully, folks, as he shuffles the deck...why, look there...he's pulling out the RACE CARD!
Never mind that most folks here would vote for Allen West in a microsecond. I'm standing by for Buraq to administer the clown oath...

I never realized that Erin Burnet was so ignorant and dense. Muslims know that jihad means violent struggle (essentially holy war), that other stuff is just for dumb infidel consumption that even, unfortunately, cowardly professors (almost a redundant phrase these days) willingly fall for.

Erin looked like a thick headed child before a polished professional intellectual. Ms Geller is a very impressive responder while Erin doesn't seem to have a clue. Erin illustrates the kind of thick headedness we're up against.

Burnett is an interesting character. She used to work for CNBC and is engaged/married to a Citigroup executive. In that respect, she and Geller are exactly alike, two people who believe that banksters should be allowed to take over the world. Both of them believe that Ayn Rand was someone to be greatly admired, while in reality she was a vindictive, inconsistent witch.

But other than that, Burnett is a typical liberal. I suspect her tortured body language in the video was caused by her solidarity with Geller on the Wall Street front mixed with her disagreement with her on social issues.

I have never understood why Geller does not realize she is as inconsistent as Rand was. Randians believe that people should be allowed to do as they wish with no government interference. But Geller also thinks, like many of us, that Islam is a cancer on the entire world. One cannot have it both ways; the only way Islam can be defeated is via government intervention, a concept anathema to Randians.

I forgot to include in my above post that Randians, like libertarians, believe in free and unfettered immigration. Ayn Rand's bizarre theories would allow for boatloads of Muslims to enter the USA each year. I suspect Geller would not agree with that.

And for those who do not believe that Geller is a crazed Randian, check out the name of her main website:
http://www.atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

That's because no matter how hard people try to disguise it as something else, race is the only reason his citizenship is questioned.

This CNN interviewer was obviously ignorant about Jihad because she was poorly educated, both in school and as an adult.

However, one thing to her credit is her view on economics. Here is a quote from an address she gave 10 years ago as a commencement speech:

"Live within your means. You never need more
than one credit card and in college you don’t need one at all. Living on a debit card means you’re living off the money you have and establishing a credit history. And always, always pay your credit card in full. That should be a religion."
Tell that to Obama!

"the only way Islam can be defeated is via government intervention, a concept anathema to Randians."

At the moment Jihadists are succeeding WITH the aid of government intervention (see the Obama admin during the past week). Brotherhood operatives are influencing the highest levels of U.S. government.

The EPA is preventing private companies from drilling our own oil. THAT is the sort of government intervention Ayn Rand was against.

Rand did not consider upholding the First Amendment, or enforcing a rational immigration policy, undue "government intervention." See her appendix on Man's Rights and Government, in Capitalism, the Unknown Ideal.

Rand was a staunch supporter of the U.S.-Israel alliance, and she was disgusted that we allowed brutes to nationalize our oil fields in the middle east.

You have conflated Libertarians and Objectivists. Now that was anathema to Ayn Rand.

By the way: The private citizen passengers of Flt 93 defeated the jihadist scum on 911 with no government help.

You assert that Romney told the truth but then aver his foreign policy would be stupider than that of Obama's. First of all, it would be exceedingly difficult to have a stupider foreign policy than that of the Anointed One. His foreign policy is in a shambles everywhere. Even Western Europeans don't pay attention to him anymore. The Czechs and Poles will never trust him again. The Russians think he's a fool and the Chinese have had to lecture him on fiscal policy. Particularly ironic is that polls show America is now hated in many Muslim nations even more than under Bush. So much for outreach to the Muslim world, a world which needs to have the riot act read to it, something Obama will never do.

Second, you offer no evidence that Romney's foreign policy would be stupid or worse than that of Obama's. None.

Third, Obama is most definitely apologizing to the Islamic world. His entire Presidency has been one gigantic brown-nosing of Islam and the following of that stupidest of lines of thought that Islam is wonderful but it's just that it's been hijacked by a few fanatics here and there.

Fourth, by now it shold be apparent to all but the most dense that Obama is not a staunch defender of the First Amendment. While I'm not saying Romney would be sterling in this regard, I have no doubt he would be far better than Obama, whom I would argue has done more harm in more ways (e.g., piling up more debt in four years than over two hundred years of Presidents did) to the American Republic than any other person in all of American history. Yes, he's that bad. Four years of him will be quite enough. Virtually anyone would be better than him, Romney almost infinitely so.

I guess they cut it because Erin wasn't prepared to effectively rebut. She underestimated what Pamela's arguments would be. Maybe they didn't want to deal with the backlash that would result from Muslim Brotherhood CAIR, Muslims, and those with the most common leftie biases on this issue.


The Muslim Brotherhood in America: Ten Part Video
Overview
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10

Utter nonsense! Obama has chosen to be secretive--to the point of retianing big $ full-time legal counsel--with information that citizens should have a right to know about their chief executive. His bona fides are in question because he's hiding stuff, not because of his skin-color.
Oh, did I mention that he's an incompetent socialist boob who spends money as if we had it, apologizes for our freedom, abandons our friends and kisses ass with our enemies? There, I just did...

The shallowness and superficiality of the interviewers comments and questions was depressing.

It was as though she had memorized a list of slogans without ever finding out what they referred to.

And this is what the public is expected to regard as dialogue!

This is worse than fast-food for the mind.

In Canada we have the CBC that gives air-time to CAIR's pro-hamas mouthpieces that spew lies and fabricate hate-crimes where not one person has yet to be arrested and convicted for these "islamophobic" acts.

Erin is one of the useful idiots that will be the first ones beheaded by the jihists if they get their way. Erin also changed the subject when she was losing the debate and not getting her way, this tactic is common for leftists because it then allows them to rewrite history and claim that the guest failed to answer the question and jumped to a new subject.

I would have asked Erin if rapists were savages,then ask her if the victim deserved to be raped from Prevoking a response from males to rape her.


6'000'000'000 non-muslims are fed-up with these riots and murders, if these savages can't behave they will cause a World war to purge the earth of this cancerous quranimals because the Human Rights were meant for HUMANS and not inbred village idiots.


It takes a village idiot to raise a child with a Quran.


NO islam - Know Peace


BTW
I still say that Iran and the bomb reminds me of the "Beneath the Planet of the Apes" where the Apes want to use a Nuclear bomb to rid the world of non-apes and themselves so their Ape-God can re-populate it with the pure and peaceful simians as the devine will of the Ape-god since they were the super-race to rule the world.

The recent global riots are much like the scenes where the Apes riot and go nuts to finally fire off the bomb.
Damn them, damn them all to hell.

give me doughnuts, the fact is that the long form birth certificate that BO/white house presented has been shown by numerous experts the be a forgery. It is people like you who make his failures, lies, and deceptions all about race. Shoot the truth tellers with the golden, race bullet. Brilliant.

Hi you said you have no choice but to vote for the lesser of two evils. I assume you meant Romney. IMO when it comes to political candidates, it is difficult as impossible to find a perfect one. We have to go with whoever seems the best among the bunch.

I think we have to prioritize things that are important to us. Right now, protecting Free Speech is what is most important to me. Defeating (subdueing) Islam is another thing very important. Putting a stop to Bernanke's QE3 is another one. And so is supporting Israel against Iran. I believe as much that we should work to bring a regime change in Iran (topple the Imams and put liberals in-charge).

I do not know much about Romney but I have a feeling that he will be a lot more protective of Free Speech than Obama is. I also believe that he will support Israel, as opposed to betraying her as Obama is doing. I do not know much about what else he will do.

At the moment, these two things are important enough that other issues can be put on the back burner and dealt with later.

Hi you said you have no choice but to vote for the lesser of two evils. I assume you meant Romney. IMO when it comes to political candidates, it is difficult as impossible to find a perfect one. We have to go with whoever seems the best among the bunch.

I think we have to prioritize things that are important to us. Right now, protecting Free Speech is what is most important to me. Defeating (subdueing) Islam is another thing very important. Putting a stop to Bernanke's QE3 is another one. And so is supporting Israel against Iran. I believe as much that we should work to bring a regime change in Iran (topple the Imams and put liberals in-charge).

I do not know much about Romney but I have a feeling that he will be a lot more protective of Free Speech than Obama is. I also believe that he will support Israel, as opposed to betraying her as Obama is doing. I do not know much about what else he will do.

At the moment, these two things are important enough that other issues can be put on the back burner and dealt with later. So I would vote for Romney!

Concerning Ayn Rand, nothing more need be said or written than what the brilliant, underrated Whittaker Chambers wrote back in 1957, published in the National Review. Anyone who would admire Rand's ideas after reading that piece better have a damn good counter-argument; though I can't think of how they'd cobble one together to match it.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/222482/big-sister-watching-you/flashback?pg=1

Buckley remarked in a late interview that, after that article was published, whenever Rand found out that Chambers (or Buckley himself) was going to be at an event or party she was going to, she'd promptly cancel or leave.

WHAT an idiot. I sent her a reading list.

As a non-intelectual who envies these kinds of back and forth; that was brilliant. I truly believe that "debate" is the heart and soul of our democracy. It's what "courage" as in the "courage of our convictions" is all about. Standing up for what you believe. All we have in government, and this Nation of Sheep for that matter, is a bunch of weiners. And Obummer and his ilk is the result.

A few people have commented on Erin Burnett's body language. For some reason the way Burnett was talking to Geller reminded me of the same mannerism & style Burnett used when she interviewed Elmo from Sesame Street!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGeJWdiOeow

Except Burnett treated Elmo with much more respect than she showed to Geller, and was more receptive to Elmo's ideas.

Thanks for that link to the Chambers article, LL. I read it and found it somewhat small-minded. It seems that Chambers, having done a 180, simply couldn't tolerate anyone who might not believe that God was important. Now, while I certainly am not one who accepts all or even most of Rand's ideas, I would argue that she often made valid points, for instance that evil is not the real problem in the world but rather the hesitation to deal with evil is.

I have too much of the Jeffersonian in me to accept her complete elitism, and I have admiration for certain philosophers she dismissed (e.g., Kant), but Chambers' article went in the opposite direction by verging on demonization of Rand. As usual, the truth is more complex than even first-rate minds would have you believe, minds like those of Chambers and Rand.

It is obvious from her ignorant remarks about Islam (e.g. jihad means only 'internal struggle') that Ms. Burnett is a liberal 'useful idiot,' 'apologist for Islam,' and a 'quisling' to her own country. Yes, Pamela they are all savages, but I would add 'bloodthirsty' savages (would be more accurate) who have no place in any Western society! Stop immigration into the West and deport all of the bloodthirsty savages. Thank you for taking Ms. Burnett to school and educating her!!

It is obvious from her ignorant remarks about Islam (e.g. jihad means only 'internal struggle') that Ms. Burnett is a liberal 'useful idiot,'...

At that point, Pam should have snapped her fingers, her head bobbin’ an’ weavin’, and retorted: "That's sooo last decade, gurlfrin! I mean Sistah, that's older than yo ugly ass shoes!"

Wellington,

"Now, while I certainly am not one who accepts all or even most of Rand's ideas, I would argue that she often made valid points, for instance that evil is not the real problem in the world but rather the hesitation to deal with evil is."

I don't think she coined that truism; indeed, I can't think of anyone who would disagree with it -- even those we deem evil; who on the contrary think of themselves as righteous championing and/or fighting for a righteous cause, however twisted it may be seen to be from a healthy perspective (only a tiny minority of evil people actually would describe themselves as evil and revel in it).

Perhaps the apter truism here pace Rand's is that "the road to hell is paved with good intentions" -- which I think was more the point Chambers was getting at, among other acutely apposite insights.

"It seems that Chambers, having done a 180, simply couldn't tolerate anyone who might not believe that God was important."

That characterization seems unfair if not a straw man. He's doing not much more, as I see it, than expanding on the respect for religion and its role in civilization which I've seen you defend in JW comments many times; his expansion happens to be at the expense of Rand's political philosophy, propagandized in a fiction novel, in which, on the contrary, an intolerance for those who believe in God seems to be one apodictic qualification for her Brave New World as the only way to defeat her mirror image bête noire Doppelganger, Marxism and all its subsidiary spawn. Chambers is noticing and describing (then critiquing) her rather simplistic (albeit grandiosely and cinematically depicted) vision of Superman vs. Superman -- one atheist and anti-Communist, the other atheist and Communist.

I think he's right to suspect that if these two don't cancel themselves out in a silly cartoonish way (as they must), they could well become translated into actual policies that may cause considerably more of a mess than the messy world already has.

"As usual, the truth is more complex than even first-rate minds would have you believe, minds like those of Chambers and Rand."

I think that was his point, pace her turgidly simplistic epic.

Ah, our debates never end, do they? Better this way, I would argue.

Meanwhile, we agree on one thing and that is that Islam sucks. What to do about this "fact" inspires some disagreements between us, but that Islam sucks seems to be a given we have no disagreement about. I will allow this to be a sign of an encouraging future rather than a future history that is bleak throughout because Islam has triumphed.

If Erin Burnett really cares, I would suggest that she interviews and listens to former Muslims (apostates)or those who have lived under the oppression of Islam like Bridget Gabriel,Wafa Sultan,Ayaan Hirsi Ali and so many more who have put their lives at risk to warn the West of the scourge of Islam and sharia. But to go to CAIR, a propaganda arm of the Muslim Brotherhood for answers is outrageously nave on her part.

Read books like Eurabia By Bat Ye'or,---The sword and the prophet by Serge Trifkovic,---Why I am not a Muslim by Ibn Warraq,---Islam and the Bible,why two faiths collide by David Goldman,---Stealth jihad by Robert Spencer,---A God who hates By Wafa Sultan,and delve into the 164 jihad alas in the Qu'ran for starters.

Wellington,

I'll second, and drink to, that.

LemonLime wrote:

Concerning Ayn Rand, nothing more need be said or written than what the brilliant, underrated Whittaker Chambers wrote back in 1957, published in the National Review. Anyone who would admire Rand's ideas after reading that piece better have a damn good counter-argument; though I can't think of how they'd cobble one together to match it.
.......................................

Well, I can, LemonLime. Almost everything Chambers wrote about Rand and her ideas was not just a mischaracterization, but completely false.

Starting with his title, "Big Sister is Watching You", and characterizing her as a fascist who advocated dictatorship, when she actually advocated limited government.

A lot of what he says is innuendo, as well—such as balefully saying, "From almost every page of Atlas Shrugs, a voice can be heard...commanding, 'to a gas chamber, go!'". This must be a voice only he can hear, because it's nowhere in her writing.

She never advocated any sort of 'dictatorship of the technological elite". Instead, she was a staunch defender of individual rights.

He also claims she is advocating a "class war"—I don't even know where he gets this. She was very much for individual rights and the sort of social mobility one finds in a free society—she didn't believe in permanent "classes" at all, and believed that statism hurt rich and poor alike.

The implication that she was a eugenicist is equally baseless—she never believed that man needed to be "genetically perfected"—she believed that the only thing man needed was a rational philosophy.

In addition, she was very much an advocate of the bedrock freedom to choose whom to love. This would *never* jibe with eugenics.

So—where does he get the idea that she believes in eugenics? From many of her heroes being attractive figures, nothing more.

He also says she had reverence for "raw force", which could not be further from the truth. She consistently condemned the use of force save in self-defense, and believed that one of the greatest evils was the unprovoked initiation of force.

Chambers wrote, "we struggle to be just", which seems odd, since he didn't "struggle" very hard, from anything I can see.

Much of the rest of it comes to his own values—his belief that a life without organized religion is not worth living, that it is about nothing but range-of-the-moment pleasure seeking and consumption. This is fine. But he cannot claim—as he does—that this is what Rand advocated.

Like Wellington, I don't agree with her on all points, either. But it is at least worth taking the time to see what she actually wrote.

I know you are a careful scholar, as a rule—but, with respect, not in this case, if you believe that Chambers' offers a accurate assessment of her ideas.

But I am well aware that this is not "Misunderstanders of Objectivism Watch", so I'll end here.

LemonLime, I should also note that I very much agree with Wellington here, and that I raise a glass to you both.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter