Pamela Geller: "You cannot ask me to sacrifice my freedom so as not to offend savages" UPDATE: Fight the Islamic supremacist attempt to silence Geller

Pamela Geller on Fox and Friends this morning explains how Barack Obama is sanctioning the motive behind the murderous Muslim riots by trying to silence the Muhammad filmmakers.

UPDATE: Islamic supremacist hate propagandist Reza Aslan is in a tizzy, calling upon his marks to harass Tucker Carlson for having Geller on. Aslan's tweets are "protected" so that I cannot see them, but he cannot protect against my Zionist black arts:

AslanGeller.jpg

Once again, the pathetically outmatched Aslan lies about his foes who defend freedom. Watch the clip and see: Pamela Geller is not saying that Obama's "promotion of Shariah, luv for Islam led to Emb attack." She is making an entirely reasonable point: that by going to YouTube and trying to get them to take the Muhammad video down, and by having the filmmaker arrested, Obama is sanctioning the motive behind the embassy attacks: to intimidate the West into criminalizing criticism of Islam and adopting Sharia blasphemy laws.

Aslan's purpose here is to harass Carlson so much that he will not dare have Pamela Geller on again. So fight back for truth and freedom: tweet @tuckercarlson and thank him for featuring Geller telling truths that others fear to tell. While you're at it, tweet @rezaaslan and tell him what you think of his smears and defamation of freedom fighters, and his water-carrying for Sharia censorship.

| 67 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

67 Comments

| Leave a comment

GREAT JOB!!

Pamela your clarity could not have been clearer, America's Freedoms must and should be defended at all times.

It remains deeply troubling when I hear politicians and Hillary Clinton refer to the film as disgusting and reprehensible, that is not and should not be the full answer, her answer should have included that she defends the right of the film maker to do so however.

At what point do we stop with the so called diplomatic discussions and stand up for our Western Principles instead of giving the weak perception of being sharia compliant????

Very clear presentation and good question-handling.

The president's comments were merely the latest abomination from the Obama nation. With the election coming up I do hope the electorate will keep in mind that this is the man who, as head of state and representing the citizens of the United States, bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia and he's bowing still!

Enough! Do not bow on my behalf!

She did not let him conflate the two issues, the al-Qaeda murders of a U.S. ambassador in Libya (Obama helped al-Qaeda rise to power in Libya, joined by John McCain, Marco Rubio, etc.) and the riots in Egypt, Yemen, etc.

Embarrassed parole officials must explain why Nakoula was able to violate the terms of his parole by using the media. How was Nakoula able to gather enough funds to make the film? Powerful forces must have given Nakouli the green light to anger a billion Muslims.

The film is meeningless. Only used a pretext, it did not light the anger of the savage mobs, someone lighted that fare using it (and the could have picked much better ones).

It does not matter who made it, if it was an incopetent idiot, US, Copts, Muslim Brotherhod. The source does not matter, all of them are protected by the freedom of speech.

This is not about offence this is about principles.

Rasool Obama fakes anger but lacks rage...He talks a lot but has no spark...The same with the lackluster Hillary who looks and sounds very robotic...

Excellent, Pamela. Excellent!

Mackie, Hillary did include a defense of the filmmaker's right of free speech in the very same statement with the "reprehensible" quote:

I know it is hard for some people to understand why the United States cannot or does not just prevent these kinds of videos from ever seeing the light of day. 

Now I would note that in today’s world with today’s technologies, that is impossible, but even if it were possible, our country does have a long tradition of free expression which is enshrined in our Constitution and our law, and we do not stop individual citizens from expressing their views, no matter how distasteful they may be. There are, of course, different views around the world about the outer limits of free speech and free expression, but there should be no debate about the simple proposition that violence around free speech is never acceptable.

Now that you know you were grossly misled about what she said, I hope you will start questioning where you get your information from.

"It remains deeply troubling when I hear politicians and Hillary Clinton refer to the film as disgusting and reprehensible"

politicians AND Hillary Clinton: Is that a dig at Hillary? Hee, hee!

It's not Hillary's job to define free speech for us...She also said that Islam is one of the worlds greatest religions...It is not her job to talk to us about religion...By claiming that, she is conducting da'wa...that is not in her job description either...What happened to the separation of church and state?

Apologies for the off-topic post - important link from the religion of peace site.

From
http://twocircles.net/2012sep15/six_die_muslimpolice_clash.html

Yet another quran burning incident - this time in India with 6 people killed....

[Ghaziabad: Six people were killed as police opened fire to break up a rampaging mob denouncing the desecration of a holy book, police and witnesses said Saturday.

The violence erupted around 7 p.m. Friday in Masuri area of Ghaziabad district adjoining Delhi.

The dead were identified by authorities as Asif, Waheed, Luckman, Amir, Wasim and Hayat. Two of them belonged to Meerut.

Three policemen were also critically injured in the violence. One of them almost had his head severed with a sharp-edged weapon.

According to Divisional Commissioner Mratyunjaya Narain, some "anti-social elements" in the mob started the violence after hundreds marched to the police station to complain against the desecration.

Even as the community leaders and police were discussing the modalities of the complaint, a section of the crowd went on the rampage, burning vehicles parked in the police station, police said.

Some people also fired at policemen, burnt the police barracks and mess, and moved towards the police residential premises.

The police then restored to firing. ]

Separation of church and state went fine. Separation of mosque and state is the issue here.

This is the second interview I've seen of Pam on FOX since this started and she is doing us all proud.

As for our sorry excuse for a Secretary of State, THIS is the overall context of her "defense of the filmmaker's right of free speech":

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/state-dept-aims-denounce-offensive-speech-while-upholding-free-expression

Mrs. Clinton is a two-faced liar with a "policy advisor"/girlfriend, Huma Abedin, thoroughly embedded in the Muslim Brotherhood:

http://counterjihadreport.com/2012/07/20/rep-bachmann-blasted-for-mentioning-muslim-brotherhood-ties/

Clinton will "uphold the right of free speech" when she senses that she can't get away with shilling for sharia-based anti-blasphemy statutes quite yet. Meanwhile the Obama regime's response has already passed well beyond "peer pressure and shaming".

http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-imam-warns-muslims-against-violent-overreaction-to-film-20120915-25yww.html


''We should not fall into the trap of people who want to portray Muslims as violent people,'' Imam Mohamed Magid told hundreds of followers at the Adams Centre, Virginia, adding that the Californian man who made a film insulting the prophet Muhammad was trying to provoke a clash of civilizations.

I think Muslims are doing a good enough job of it on their own.

As Pam notes over on Atlas, here's Al Azhar U. calling for the imposition of U.N. Resolution 16/18 (look it up if you haven't heard of it yet). In broken English, yet -- "to prohibit insulting symbols and sanctitties of Islam by some fools and misguided" -- so fitting for these pompous savages determined to establish the primacy of mysticism, superstition, and violence over reason by whatever means will suffice.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/09/obamas-most-revered-islamic-university-calls-for-un-to-issue-sharia-law-banning-insulting-symbols-of.html

Pamela Geller: "You cannot ask me to sacrifice my freedom so as not to offend savages" UPDATE: Fight the Islamic supremacist attempt to silence Geller
...................................

I love how Pam Geller just cuts through the bs and gets to the heart of the matter, and then has the courage to say so. Always inspiring.

On the other hand, there is poster chowching, who wrote:

Embarrassed parole officials must explain why Nakoula was able to violate the terms of his parole by using the media.
...................................

This is ridiculous. Parolees violate their parole in minor ways all the time. Using the internet is especially difficult to track—and parole officers *don't* track it as a rule. It simply becomes a factor if the parolee is rearrested.

More:

How was Nakoula able to gather enough funds to make the film? Powerful forces must have given Nakouli the green light to anger a billion Muslims.
...................................

Again, what crap. He could have made this film with a few friends and a few hundred bucks. Have you actually seen the trailer? Pretty low tech, to put it mildly.

The idea that "powerful forces" had to be behind the making of this film is like claiming that "powerful forces" were behind your kids making a low-budget horror movie in your backyard using a camcorder, a few of their buddies, and doing the "special effects" on a laptop.

And "angering a billion Muslims" is not hard. Remember, the Danish Muhammed cartoons "angered a billion Muslims", and they were produced for the cost of illustration board, ink pens, and brushes. You can buy these supplies for under five bucks at any art supply store.

Horrors! "Powerful forces" must have been involved! sarc/off

Want to see me "anger a billion Muslims"? Here you go:

http://s478.photobucket.com/albums/rr144/gravenimageartist/?action=view¤t=AishasWedding-1.jpg

@David

Translation:

Hey guys, remember about taqiyya *wink *wink*, we should hide our inherent, intrinsic bigoted, intolerant and sociopathic behavior the best we can, ok guys? *wink* wink*...

How refreshing it would be if our President or Hillary would say: "While it is historical fact, in Islamic theological texts, that Mohammad murdered, robbed and married very young girls...etc. Muslims today do not have to imitate his 'reprehensible' and 'disgusting' behavior when they don't like a movie or some imagined insult. Hasn't Islamic culture advanced beyond such primitive reactions?"

@rubiconcrest

"Hasn't Islamic culture advanced beyond such primitive reactions?"---

Involution, that's how Islam rolls; No steps forward , two steps back.

"You cannot ask me to sacrifice my freedom so as not to offend savages"

Why aren't Muslims asked to sacrifice violence instead?

And if YouTube videos can incite one's enemies to violence, is al-Qaeda planning on producing movies to get Americans to die in violent riots instead of flying planes into buildings?

You're a clown and a troll!

It's not about 'powerful forces' or dark deeds, it's about free speech as well as telling the truth about your so-called prophet!

And how many more murders will be committed in the name of Islam? There have been 250 million, so far, over the last 1,400 years.

Keep up the Zionist black arts Robert! You must be 8th Dan by now, easy!
hehe.

I loooove Pamela! ...she is always so spot on and beautiful, as well :)

Pamela chose her words poorly. Obama did denounce the attacks saying there was "no justification for them, none !" I would agree with her if she said the prez was not forceful enough in defence of free speech and in not condemning those who use the videos as pretext to incite anti-American (now, anti-Western) violence and riots. Those who lead the mob know full well the hysterics are out of all proportion, and on display only to further their political agenda of imposing sharia and caliphate on the West.

See my view of the US response here: http://jiriseverasblog.blogspot.ca/

WOW !

That partial interrogation would've taken the starch out of anybodys shirt. Not so with Pamela, her quick, accurate and to the point responses, mirrors her dedication and her unshakable resolve.

What I love about Pamela is, that she never loses her composure, knows when and how to listen to others, with the emphasis on "how"

I feel Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, certainly didn't understand who really took over Libya in the so called Arab Spring. Following the attack on the US Consulate in Libya Clinton said, "Today, many Americans are asking - indeed, I asked myself - how could this happen? How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction? This question reflects just how complicated and, at times, how confounding the world can be."

Clinton comes a across as being confused or bewildered about US foreign policy,especially after she said with certainty that there is nothing to be concerned about,huh? Then she doubled down saying "This was an attack by a small and savage group - not the people or government of Libya," Never mind of course that the rebels began imposing strict sharia law in the aftermath and raised Al Qaeda flags on government buildings.

The misnomer that drives Obama and Hillary is one of shear fantasy more then likely precipitated by her boss who seems to hear no evil or see no evil when comes to the majority of the actors in the Islamic World. No doubt Hillary is wined and dined by the master of taquiya and kitman at every turn who influence her every move,. The Arab spring plays more like the jihad Spring, yes they may be a minority but theY are the ones in charge.

This is an election year and all eyes are on Obama who has sworn to protect the US Constitution. Not only when the going is good - but the real test is when the going gets tough.

Geller is right - the rioters are calling for an end to our freedoms - with respect to the Shari'a.

And Obama would seem to be obliging.

Is the US government going to take on the responsibility - of sorting out what is and is not okay under Islam - for US citizens and citizens of the free world to watch on youtube!!

That all videos have to pass through some sort of Islamic authorization process first!

Lest people riot!

::

The Salafists demolished a Sufi shrine and burnt its library a few days before the attack on the Embassy. It was clear that the Libyan government did not have a hold on security.

In the aftermath to focus on how nice the Muslims there were and the Ambassador liked the Muslims/Libyan people - to focus on "Islamophobia" - is nonsense. The fact is the Ambassador was killed because there was not sufficient security and possibly even an adequate escape route. The security ran off - apparently!

And that is were they faltered.

Now let's ban the movie to top it off!!


Anyone who claims that free speech should be curtailed to prevent Muslim thuggery is as exactly the same as someone who claims that women should not dress provocatively to prevent rapists from raping them.
The outcry should be against Muslim savagery and NOT against any film maker, any cartoon, any koran-burning or any such thing.
Bullies bully because they can, they intimidate because they can, and they demand concessions because they can.
President Obama and Hilary Clinton have proven by their speech and actions that they are not fit to be governing the United States or indeed any free nation. This should be quite clear to all but imbeciles.

Please, please someone arrange for me to meet Asslan in a boxing ring.

This supremacist twerp needs not just a smack down. He desperately deserves a smack down from not just a najis female but a najis kafir female.

Christmas is coming up and the opportunity to put this supremacist in his place would be the best Christmas present ever!

Actually, Nakoula is not the first nor will he be the last parolee who has or will violate their parole without assistance.

What I want to know is who's verified that he's actually a Copt, or the one who produced and uploaded the movie? Which btw had me rolling in laughter. Loved the bit with Khadija's thighs and determining if Jibreel was an angel or djjin.

I think it's safe to say that muslims are rageaholic's ...

So, lets get a summary of events.

We are expected to believe barry hussein:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se5zvGF6u9g&feature=related

and his faithful wife:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=6M7Rp_Ghv6k&feature=endscreen

that barry would never compromise American interests to islam because, after all, he is POTUS:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKqFBpk_1Eo

and Sec. of State Clinton, wife of this guy:

http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm

assures us the barry hussein administration understands the situation.

Oh, I am so relieved.


Again, what crap. He could have made this film with a few friends and a few hundred bucks. Have you actually seen the trailer? Pretty low tech, to put it mildly.

I watched the first five minutes, and it actually looks like it required quite a bit of money, with location shots, many different actors, professional camera work, etc. -- unless the filmmaker stole scenes from other movies or something. Sure, it's no multi-million-dollar blockbuster, but it's also not the low-budget student film some seem to be describing it as, either.

David D .... It's not inbreeding it is the age old Islamic technique handed down for centuries of enforcing blasphemy. Rioting and killing at the behest of their religious leaders is how the minority keep the majority in line. The rationale behind the technique is slowly beginning to dawn on the masses in the West.

Just saw the Pam Geller interview. Who's that balding bozo in the pink tie sitting the middle? And why do they need him to run interference? FOX News makes me sick.

gravenimage,

Because it batters my personal sensibilities--as I had mentioned before--I wish that drawing could be a bit less shocking.

But, in order to further irritate them, do you have some method of getting it published in the "Muslim" world (if you haven't already)?

re: Hilary (finally) throwing in some mention of free speech,

It's all about spin control. The growing outrage by large numbers of Americans and the few journalist out there telling it as it is, threatens to reduce obama's votes and gives lots of ammo to anyone wanting to unravel his carefully constructed islamic fable.
Hilary is a master player inside the political arena, it would be very difficult for her not to see the political blowback arising form the latest isalmic conflagration and murder of an American ambassador being judged by the public as her and obama's fault.
This is what is really terrifying the certifiably inept team obama and the press working for him.

Everything coming out of the obama camp recently is about spin and DAMAGE CONTROL.
With the help of the press they are distracting, deflecting, obfuscating, spinning, and saying anything but hey, we created this mess!

It is classic obama, blame this, that, him or those, and NEVER, oops, I screwed this one up big time.


Obama better wake-up to the new reality since 9/11 because the 6'000'000'000 non-muslims on Earth should not have to live in fear of being murdered by the "Few" misunderstanders among the 1'200'000'000 muslims that appear to have neither the will, nor, brains to seek-out the "Few" and boot them from their mosques and social groups.

Here in canada we have yet to see any counter protest by the "Moderate" muslims to denouce these riots and murders by their brothers.
Enough with the riots and murders by muslims, and enough with CAIR's predictable "Backlash" alerts they spew after every rampage by those savage muslims around the world.


No Shariah - Know Justice
Know Shariah - NO justice

If the film helped to dispel the lie that islam is not at war with the west, if the film revealed the raging hatred against America hidden just under the surface inside the muslim mind, if the film has helped to unravel the fiction that obamas policies and “smart” power will bring peace and security to America, then this film is a Godsend.
The situation is very critical, obama has allowed the lunatic islamic regime of iran to continue with their nuclear bomb factories. Americas enemies are more emboldened than ever and gaining in their capacity to kill more of us. Their opportunities are arising, as our leaders are failing us.

Salah wrote:

Want to see me "anger a billion Muslims"? Here you go...

Cheers!
......................................

Bwahahahahah! Thanks for that, Salah. Cheers back at ya...

LemonLime wrote:

I watched the first five minutes, and it actually looks like it required quite a bit of money, with location shots, many different actors, professional camera work, etc. -- unless the filmmaker stole scenes from other movies or something. Sure, it's no multi-million-dollar blockbuster, but it's also not the low-budget student film some seem to be describing it as, either.
................................

No location shots, LemonLime. If you look closely, you can see that the actors and a few props were stripped into a desert background featuring palm trees and camels. My guess is that the exterior scenes were shot on green screen (that is, against a neutral background). If you look cloesly, you can see that the lighting doesn't match up and there are no shadows cast.

The interiors don't use this technique, but the settings—tents, etc—are pretty basic, as are the costumes.

I'm a visual artist, not a film maker—although the fields are related, and I have done a bit of storyboarding work (no famous films—just some company in-house stuff).

It may have cost a bit more than a few hundred bucks—probably a few thousand if the actors got paid. But this being touted—as it has been—as a "$5 million" production is ridiculous. This *may* have been what Nakoula was planning on spending on a full-length production. There certainly isn't anywhere near $5 million on the screen in that YouTube trailer.

Also, the actors really are pretty bad. I've read that at least some of them are professionals, but that probably means they get paid for appearing in Hollywood films in bit parts or as extras, *not* that they are up for carrying a professional movie themselves—especially a historic epic.

And the "special effects" are really terrible. If a viewer didn't know the story of Umm Quirfa being drawn and quartered by camels, they might not even realize what was going on in this scene. Her legs are show tied and parted, but the camels are off-screen. She screams—quite unconvincingly—and the scene ends.

The best scene—not surprisingly—is of modern day Copts under threat from Muslims in Egypt. This scene is used as a framing device, and all the action is described rather than seen. This is usually a terrible choice of storytelling in a movie, but with a budget of this size it is probably a good call.

There are actually quite a few ultra-low budget film makers around. My husband and I know several people in the Bay Area who make straight-to-DVD horror films and thrillers.

My only point was that there is no reason to believe that Nakoula was backed by any sort of world-class money interests to produce his "opus".

"If you look closely, you can see that the actors and a few props were stripped into a desert background featuring palm trees and camels. "

Maybe I saw a different film, but I saw a bunch of Muslims at one point walking through a street of what looked like a Muslim town or city.

I think it's absolutely ridiculous that any law authorities could tell someone they can't use the internet, whether it's a felon or not. That's like telling somebody they can't use pen-and-paper, which is akin to what the Taliban have forbidden.

Why shouldn't a felon be allowed to use the internet just as they should be allowed to use pen-and-paper? Should the guy be forbidden from calling into a radio talkshow as well? You shouldn't suppress somebody's political freedom of expression just because they're a felon. That's not right.

Sanman, it depends on what the parolee was imprisoned for, and what the conditions of his parole are. Parole means he was released from his sentence early under certain conditions.

I disagree that a parolee's political freedom of expression shouldn't be supressed. In America, if someone violates the law or the freedom of others, he or she forfeits some of their rights and privileges. That's the law. One of the privileges convicted felons forfeit is the right to vote. That's a political privilege. Who wants murderers, rapists, kidnappers, drug dealer/distributors and armed robbers voting?

The claim is that Nakoula is parolee. I've not read anywhere for exactly what he was paroled. I've read somewhere that he was incarcerated for drugs, check forgery, and illegal porn distribution/making. If that's the case, quite frankly, he shouldn't be allowed near the internet. Lots of nasty stuff on the net that heartbreakingly involves children. Best to keep felons with a history of sex related crimes, including porn sex, away from an avenue that all too easily gives them access to children.

I don't have a problem with the movie. I still chuckle at the bit with Khadija's thighs. It needed to be made. It's unfortunate that the person who made it, is being painted as a scumbag (if he's guilty of all he's alleged to be guilty of he *is* a scumbag)because that's all the left is focusing on.

They are not focusing on the content of the film, whether it's true or not (it is albeit poorly executed), why someone would make such a film (shedding light on muslim supremacist persecution of Copts and the mental gymnastics muslim supremacists apologists engage in to paint mo the putrid as an "ideal man").

It's unfortunate, that if he did violate the terms of his parole, he wasn't bright enough to just have someone else upload it from a location he had no access to and create it using a pseudonym.

If these were white redneck Ku Klux Klanners rioting over a cheap film mocking the founder of the KKK made by a man with a prison record, none of this would be an issue. The entire Western mainstream would condemn the rioters, and praise the film-maker.

It's all because it's a perceived Brown People being supppsedly insulted, and an Honorary White (a Coptic Christian) with the support of a solidly white redneck (Terry Jones) and innumerable other nameless white Islamophobes, doing the insulting.

That's all it's about. Until we get that, we will be spinning our wheels forever, while Rome burns.

You know that, I know that, but most people don't know that. I used the "brown people" vs white supremacist and the left's reaction analogy and pointed out that the film maker was also a "brown person" to a particularly smug leftist over on USA Today.

The leftist loons just don't grasp what I mean when I tell them that their some people are more equal than others modus operandi is getting threadbare. They really believe with their evil little hearts that they, the champions of equality, are morally superior heroes incapable of inequality or racism!

Of course, he called me the obligatory racist. He threw out a xenophobe, as well. Even accused me of "hate speech."

I told him to call 911.

I can't agree more that HRC is a mistress of spin control. Further, the Whitewater business, rapid accumulation of money in trading, and other things suggest she's probably also corrupt. One liberal lawyer from NY whom I knew once said he felt utterly disgraced to find himself represented by her in the Senate--after telling another such one that he thought HRC should've been disbarred long ago.

Frankly, the dance among the Clintons and the O makes me think of some kind of intrigue more likely to have been found in the palace of a Roman or ancient Chinese emperor rather than among leaders of a free republic.

A WAY TO BRING DOWN THE PRICE OF GAS AND BREAK OPEC's POWER OVER THE U.S. TRANSPORT SECTOR:

By asking your representative in the U.S. House of Representatives to help pass H.R. 1687 – and your senator to help pass S.B. 1603 -- the Open Fuel Standards bill -- you do something very practical to resist sharia and jihad.

The bill currently has 27 Republican and Democratic co-sponsors in the House of Representatives, including Allen West! Get your rep to co-sponsor it too! H.R.1687 is also supported by Brigitte Gabriel.

The Open Fuel Standard bill (HR 1687 and SB 1603) would require car makers to stop disabling the flex fuel capacity currently built into new cars. Cars would be able to run not only on gasoline, but also on methanol, ethanol, or bio-diesel. Why are the car companies disabling a flex-fuel functionality they build into their own cars? Because the car companies are owned to a significant extent by oil interests, including Arab nations in the Middle East and major Wall Street firms with $700 billion in energy holdings. These interests do not want competition at the pump between gasoline and other fuels like methanol.

Flex fuel vehicles would break OPEC's power over the price of transport fuel and drive down the price of gas.

The Open Fuel Standard bill is supported by a coalition of strange bedfellows who normally might not agree with each other: former national security officials, environmentalists, military bigwigs, evangelicals.

To see why to support the Open Fuel Standard Act (HR 1687), check out this video featuring Frank Gaffney, Robert McFarlane, James Woolsey, Anne Korin, and others:

Video: America's Fuel Choice: Breaking Oil's Monopoly on the Transport Sector

And check out this website: http://www.setamericafree.org

Set America Free is a coalition including Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum; Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy; former National Security Advisor Robert McFarlane (under Ronald Reagan); former CIA head James Woolsey (under Bill Clinton); former secretary of Energy Admiral James Watkins; former commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet Admiral James Lyons; Orson Swindle, Former Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission and Vietnam POW; and others.

See also this website: http://www.openfuelstandard.org

CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AND YOUR TWO SENATORS:

You can find an email webform or, a hundred times better, the phone number, for your representative and your two senators if you:

1) Click here:
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/directory/congdir.tt

2) When you get to that website, just put your zipcode in the box, hit enter, then images of your representative (and your two senators) will appear.

3) Then click on your representative's or senators' pictures, and several tabs will appear, including a "contact" tab.

4) Click on the contact tab and you'll see phone numbers and a webform or email address.

If you telephone, politely ask the name of the staffer who handles flex fuel issues or energy issues, then ask to speak to that staffer. Politely tell the staffer of your representative that you support passage of H.R. 1687, the Open Fuel Standard bill. Tell your senators' staffers that you support Open Fuel Standard bill in the Senate: S.B. 1603.

And have a look at this page: How to Influence Your Representative.

Useful article:

A Conspiracy in Restraint of Trade

As one commentator in an Israeli news paper said:
"We will take the OIC's cries that offending religious feelings should be outlawed seriously when Muslims TV stations (many of which are fully controlled by OIC governments) will stop insulting other religions"

She could have explained herself a little better by saying right off the bat that Obama has whole heartedly supported Islam, saying "Islam is not our enemy" hence "sharia is not our enemy" when in fact it is one in the same thing and THE cause of this "unrest". His support of the "religion of peace", his appeasement policies, oppologizing for America, allowing Islam to infiltrate our universities and every level of government has pretty much facilitated all that we see going on today. I would have put a plug in for David Horowitz's Freedom Center and his pamphlets.

I've been printing and pasting the following books like religious tracts. The contents of these books, including the last two, is the reason this country is in decline.

And we can't even blame Obummer. Bush is as much to blame as he is. We can mostly blame ourselves. This "Nation of Sheep."

I've gone and raised hell at city and county meetings for years. Trying to address the "issues". The council chambers have alway been empty. It just makes me sick to see these smug assholes strutting around with those little "I Voted" stickers the old ladys pin on them at the polling places. Because I know that for the next four years they all go home and sit on their ass failing to hold those they voted into office ACCOUNTABLE!

This is why our cities are going bankrupt. Why institution of family is becoming extinct. Why there's a war on our religious belief...and we're LOSING!!!

Here are some books:

The Haj by Leon Uris
Slavery, Terrorism and Islam by Peter hammond
The Legacy of Jihad by Andrew G. Bostom MD
The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism by Andrew G. Bostom
The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America by David Horowitz
Ivory Towers On Sand: The Falure of Middle Eastern Studies in America by Martin Kramer
Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Muslim Mafia by Gaubatz and Sperry


The two most important books you'll ever read. At least go online and read the Introduction and Preface and first chapter respectively: Taken Into Custody by Stephen Baskerville and The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers

Here's the whole list:

New American Standard Bible
NLT Study Bible
Tortured For Christ by Richard Wurmbrand
The Al Qaeda Reader by Raymond Ibrahim
Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law
The Koran: Pickthall
The Quran: Yusuf Ali: Translated byProf Syed Vickar Ahmed
Holy Qur'an with Commentary: Maulana Muhammad Ali
The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran by Robert Spencer
The Second Message of Islam Mahmoud Mohamed Taha
The Meaning of the Koran: Abdullah Yusuf Ali
Geronimos Story of His Life
The Looming Tower by Lawrence Wright
Slavery, Terrorism and Islam by Peter hammond
Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance by Pamela Geller
Muslim Mafia by Gaubatz and Sperry
The Legacy of Jihad by Andrew G. Bostom MD
The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism by Andrew G. Bostom
The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America by David Horowitz
Ivory Towers On Sand: The Falure of Middle Eastern Studies in America by Martin Kramer
Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage and the Family by Stephen Baskerville
The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men by Christina Hoff Sommers
Infiltration: How Mulim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington by Paul Sperry
American Jihad: The Terrorsits Living Among Us by Steven Emerson
Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores by Michelle (the hottest woman on the planet) Malkin
Snitch: Informants, Cooperators & the Corruption of Justice by Ethan Brown
Plunder: How Public Employee Unions Are Raiding Treasuries, Controlling Our Lives and Bankrupting the Nation by Steven Greenhut
Term Limits Vince Flynn
Mean Justice: A True Account of a Town's Terror, a Prosecutor's Power and a Betrayal of Innocence by Edward Humes
No Matter How Loud I Shout by Edward Humes
The Innocent Man: Murder and Justice in a Small Town by John Grisham
The Government Racket: Washington Waste From A to Z by Martin L. Gross
One Nation Under Arrest: How Crazy Laws, Rogue Prosecutors and Activist Judges Threaten You Liberty by Paul Rosenweig & Brian W. Walsh
Taken Into Custody by Stephen Baskerville
The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers

DUPE DU JOUR: Bill Maher

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHQIdku1eH8

He bought into it hook, line, and s[T]inker. Poor guy.

Islam: where freedom ends and slavery begins.

'Allah you magnificent bastard, I read your book'...Then I burned it...

"I told him to call 911."

Funniest thing I've heard all day!

Hope you're doing well, IC.


- R. K. MacUalraig

Poor Obama, he doesn't want canadian Oil but will rush in to buy the Oil from murderous thugs and islmofascists.
November can't come soon enough.

LemonLime wrote:

Maybe I saw a different film, but I saw a bunch of Muslims at one point walking through a street of what looked like a Muslim town or city.
...................................

I believe you're referring to the brief scene in the framing device. I don't believe this was actually shot in the Middle East.

Here's what I saw:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAiOEV0v2RM

PGuud wrote:

DUPE DU JOUR: Bill Maher...
........................

Yes, PGuud. And this is especially dispiriting, seeing as how Maher seemed to—by liberal standards, at least—understand at least part of the Jihad threat in the past.

And yet, in the very same episode of his show "Real Time" where he covers the riots outside US embassies all over the Muslim world, the burning of American embassies, *and* the murder of four of our diplomatic staff, including the American ambassador to Libya, he cluelessly and smugly sneers that "We won the War on Terror'.

What the hell does he think this explosion of violence in the Muslim world is, if not Jihad terrorism?

PRCS wrote:

gravenimage,

Because it batters my personal sensibilities--as I had mentioned before--I wish that drawing could be a bit less shocking.
........................................

Again, sorry to personally upset you, PRCS. As I've noted previously, this *is not* my intent, although the content—Muslim perversions—is necessarily offensive.

Here are two more of my critiques of the "Prophet"—a rather less explicit comment on his pedophilia, and a scene of his mass murder of the Banu Qurayza tribe:

http://s478.photobucket.com/albums/rr144/gravenimageartist/?action=view¤t=JWswing.jpg

http://s478.photobucket.com/albums/rr144/gravenimageartist/?action=view¤t=BanuQurayza.jpg

More:

But, in order to further irritate them, do you have some method of getting it published in the "Muslim" world (if you haven't already)?
........................................

This might be difficult, PCRS. In the wake of the publication of the Danish MoToons, a couple of newspapers in the Middle East reprinted the cartoons, and the publishers *were arrested and their papers shut down*. this, despite the fact that the newspapers condemned the cartoons. And this was well before the "Arab Spring"—things would likely be even worse now.

Most of the work that comes to the attention of apoplectic Muslims comes through the internet these day. Of course, my work *is* posted online.

One of the notable points about this sort of Muslim rage is how arbitrary it can be. So far, I've suffered nothing worse than some nasty comments from Muslim trolls such as Rezali Mehil and Mensch Keymelon so far; tomorrow I could have a Somali Jihadist battering my door down with an axe as has happened to cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, or have an international conspiracy of Jihadists plotting my murder as happened to to "MoDoggie" artist Lars Vilks.

Derek Devereaux's scathing painting "Portrait of Muhammad" has oddly gotten very little attention from Muslims, yet gentle cartoonist Molly Norris has been forced to change her name and go into hiding.

Here's Devereaux's work:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MzxspybHr6Y/S9DlgRttdiI/AAAAAAAABx0/3qIq3FmtqUM/s1600/revenge7.jpg

Partially, this is because pious Muslims are so chaotic in their actions and because their investigative skills are so slovenly. But partly, it is because they understand how fear works—enough cases of world-wide rioting and murders of artists like Theo van Gogh, and they realize critics will *censor themselves*, out of shear fear.

But yes, I should get my Anti-Jihad work "out there" more than I have. We *all* have to speak out against this Muslim savagery and attempts to crush our ability to speak out.

What the hell does he think this explosion of violence in the Muslim world is, if not Jihad terrorism?

Demonstrations against a ban on medical marijuana dispensaries?

Even an ostensibly intelligent person (such as Maher) can turn out to be a fool. Ahhh, leftist lunacy.

THE LEFTIST VIEW: Those aren't rampageous rioters; they're people--advocates of human riots--er, rights!--just like you and me.

Clowns, for sure.

Islam: where freedom ends and slavery begins.

Anti-Freedom Riots. Precisely!

America is an idea, not a place. America is the single greatest symbol of freedom. To be anti-American is to be anti-Freedom (worldwide), which is a belief held by Obama and so too a huge number of his voters.

Pamela's answers were superb. The critical audience remains Obama's committed supporters, those few among them who show at least a hint of doubt at Obama's supernatural powers.

(Random thought alert.) Think of the Spanish elections where Islamic aggression apparently produced a win for socialist government. Do the world's frenzied Imams think they can assure an Obama reelection by going bat shit crazy? Perhaps they know that Obama's term is already effectively over and want to help him? You know, by being Islamic. Time's up. This is the peak of the latest rise of Islam, one last time, before it is aborted once again.

Eugene Volokh explores the notion that rewarding violence begets more not less violence here. Invite Eugene Volokh, and ask him to explain cause and effect, etc.

I love this lady. Never heard her before.

Thanks.

Promotion is what was done with that film to help ignite the riots, and I should have used "promoted" instead of "published", as you've already done that.

You're right, of course, having your name too heavily associated with your drawings has risks.

That particular drawing certainly would get them riled them up, though!

BTW: I definately did like the "my arms are tired" drawing.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter