Sharia in the U.S.: Blasphemy police pick up Muhammad filmmaker

Again: If Nakoula Basseley Nakoula gets sent back to jail, no matter what priors he has, no matter how checkered his past, make no mistake: he will be a political prisoner. He will be in prison not for the meth or the fraud or for the technicality of the probation violation, but for insulting Muhammad. His imprisonment will be a symbol of America’s capitulation to the Sharia.

The protests are not about the film. The protests are to intimidate the U.S. into criminalizing criticism of Islam. If Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is imprisoned, he will be nothing more than the fall guy who became the first offender against the new federal crime of blasphemy against Islam.

“Suspected anti-Islam filmmaker questioned by Feds,” by Samantha Tata for NBCLosAngeles.com, September 15 (thanks to BDT):

Updated at 6:25 a.m. ET: The man purported to be the filmmaker behind an inflammatory anti-Islam video being blamed for sparking violent unrest in the Middle East and North Africa was escorted by deputies from his Cerritos, Calif., home shortly after midnight Saturday morning, NBCLosAngles.com reported.

Media and law enforcement had been staking out the home at the end of a cul de sac in the Southern California city for about 48 hours when the man emerged wearing a coat, hat, scarf and glasses.

According to property records, the home is owned by Nakoula Besseley Nakoula.

L.A. County Sherrif’s Department spokesman Steve Whitmore confirmed to NBCLA that Nakoula was taken to the Cerritos sheriff’s station for interviewing by federal probation officers aimed at determining whether he violated the terms of his 5-year probation by uploading a video to the Internet.

“We are in an assist mode,” he said.

At least seven reported killed in regional protests over anti-Islamic video

Whitmore added that Nakoula agreed to the interview prior to the deputies arriving at his home, that the move was “entirely voluntary” and the man was “very cooperative.”

Deputies in two marked cars and one unmarked vehicle pulled up to the home around midnight, according to witnesses. The group left the home through the side gate because the front door was not working, Whitmore said. NBC4 went to the home this week and saw the front door was missing a knob….

Pamela Geller: "You cannot ask me to sacrifice my freedom so as not to offend savages" UPDATE: Fight the Islamic supremacist attempt to silence Geller
Sunspots? Google rejects Obama's request to pull Muhammad video clip
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    Wealthy men without visible means of support are known to police. Nakoula most likely was an informant for a shadowy intelligence agency. His probation officer was told to look the other way, while Nakoula followed instructions. He most likely will disappear in a federal lockup to prevent him from ratting out his network.

  2. says

    What is this ? I believe and sincerely hope that this unlawful arrest, is a means to protect this man from possible repercussions. If it’s not, it’s stark tyranny.

  3. says

    This man’s people, the Copt’s, are under an unbelievable totalitarian assault from Muslims. If the world was not semi-watching, the Muslims would murder vastly more Copts than they already have.

    Regardless of his previous violations, Nakoula is a patriot to the suffering Copts when he could forget about them. It’s probable he has family still in Egypt under assault. And Hillary Clinton, et al have the unmitigated gall to say he is provoking Muslims with a “abhorrant” film?

    Muslims, have you no conscious? Do you understand you are zombies to your blood-thirsty, perverted imams? When will you send your imams to hell?

    Politicians, diplomats, law enforcement, have you no shame? No cojones? Why not try to side with Nakoula in this instance, rathar than the Muslim Brotherhood.

  4. says

    Is this America or Soviet Union or any other communist/fascist country? Is there any difference? BTW, what the charges against this man that the man has been arrested? Sickening!!!

  5. says

    Using religion, for political gain, Islam’s political fundamentalists have managed to incite good people, muslim and non muslim alike, against each other. This should be the message coming from our political leaders, instead of falling prey to their ostensive tactics, thereby aiding and furthering their theo/political agenda.

  6. says

    Given Nakoula’s role in this film it certainly ended up putting a spot light on him.

    “Law enforcement cannot act against him for making the film since it is a first amendment right.

    The perception of course is different thing here because of the film, but if there is an outstanding warrant or some probation issue, law enforcement has the right to act or investigate. The time period is interesting because under normal warrant requirements there are serving time frames during a 24 hour period that apply unless there is a serious felony or officers are following what is deemed a “hot trail” or crime just committed within an hour or so.

    At this time it is strictly voluntary and should not be defined as an arrest. I would not read to much into this in regards to the film.

  7. says

    Washington Post editorial this morning (“Romney’s missing worldview”), instead of standing for freedom of speech / freedom to criticize, wrote the following imbecilic statement:

    “(Mitt Romney) appealed to the worst in the American people when he failed to stand up for religious tolerance by condemning the bigoted anti-Muslim movie trailer that incited riots this week, even as he rightly condemned the violence itself.”

    Nonetheless, WaPo editors link to the following story from “Foreign Policy Magazine” which quotes Romney aid Richard S. Williamson, a former George W. Bush Special Envoy to Sudan. Can’t Romney find decent advisers? Does he have to look to failed Bush people for advise on Islam and the region? Obama “de-emphasized the Bush administration’s “Freedom Agenda.” That is what they want? Freedom? Not shariah?

    “(Romney senior foreign policy advisor Rich) Williamson said that the Obama administration had reduced funding for civil society and democracy programs in the Middle East during its first years in office and de-emphasized the Bush administration’s “Freedom Agenda.” Romney expressed the same sentiment in an interview in Israel in July, where he expressed concern about the path of the Arab Spring.

    “The Arab Spring is not appropriately named. It has become a development of more concern and it occurred in part because of the reluctance on the part of various dictators to provide more freedom to their citizens. President [George W.] Bush urged [deposed Egyptian President] Hosni Mubarak to move toward a more democratic posture, but President Obama abandoned the Freedom Agenda and we are seeing today a whirlwind of tumult in the Middle East in part because these nations did not embrace the reforms that could have changed the course of their history, in a more peaceful manner.”

    In Egypt, the Obama administration stood by Mubarak for too long, thereby alienating the revolutionaries and reducing U.S. capacity to influence the new government, Williamson argued. In Libya, the administration “led from behind” and was dragged into intervening by Britain and France, he said, and then failed to follow up sufficiently to support their transition to a stable democracy.

    Regarding Syria, Williamson referred to Romney’s call in 2011 for the administration to engage more with the opposition, and said that the administration’s limited supported for the opposition now was “a day late and a dollar short” — insufficient to respond to the brutality of the Syrian regime and the deaths of more than 20,000 Syrian civilians….

    http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/09/12/romney_campaign_links_embassy_attacks_to_obama_s_failed_middle_east_policies

  8. says

    Well, what are the terms of his probation? Every law agency has access to that, and it only takes them seconds to find it out…So, I wonder what they are ‘interviewing’ him about?

  9. says

    While we all get our panties in a wad about about the sanctity of the First Amendment, our attention is, once again, being diverted from the real truth: This film was designed for the SOLE PURPOSE of being the “match” thrown into a cauldron of “extremely flameable liquids” the already fully fomented muslims everywhere.

    The results themselves reveal the purpose: riots in 30 countries, American casualties and another huge embarrassment for American people, with unwitting assistance from the eunuchs Obama and Clinton.

    The shadowy figure Nakula achieved his purpose with spectacular results. To focus only on asking him questions is to ignore the obvious: he got what he intended, which is to advance the Islamic Jihad. If the FBI cares to find this out it should not be too hard. Oh wait, they don’t. They will create a myriad of false motives, the Jews did it, the Copts did it, and Americans will go back to sleep until next outrage occurs……..

  10. says

    Somehow, when times are ripe, we come across a message that relates EXACTLY to the situations at hand.

    I came across this from Christopher Hitchens(R.I.P.), from his book Hitch-22 p. 99:

    “In the 1970s there was considerable nuisance from fascist and neo-Nazi groups in Britain, which mounted disgusting attacks on emigrants from the Commonwealth and began the recirculation of moth-eaten (or rather vermin-infested) anti-Semitic
    and Holocaust-denying screeds.

    It was one of one’s standard duties as a leftist to turn out on weekends and block the efforts of this rabble to stage a march or to put up a platform in a street market. Stones and fists would fly, posters would be ripped down: it was all part of a storied socialist tradition that went back to street combat with the Blackshirts in the 1930s.

    The police often seemed to me partial to the fascists: you could be arrested “for your own protection” if you even looked as if you were going to make a fight of it.

    Then one day I read in an American newspaper that, in the town of Skokie, Illinois, the American Nazi Party was going to hold a swastika-flourishing parade. They had chosen this particular suburb of Chicago because it had an unusually large population of Jewish refugees from Germany. Nice work. A temporary ban on the march had, I read, been imposed. But the same injunction was being contested in court by… the American Civil Liberties Union!

    That had to be some kind of mistake. Socialist Worker (which I still read though I no longer helped to edit or sell it) published a viperous paragraph saying that this exposed the empty sham of American liberalism.

    I went into the thing more closely, out of curiosity, and read an excellent defense of the ACLU by its director, Aryeh Neier, himself a refugee from Nazism.

    The First Amendment to the Constitution, he said, enshrined the right of all citizens to free expression and to free assembly. If this protection was withdrawn from anybody, perhaps especially somebody repulsively unpopular, then it would be weakened or diluted in general.

    It took me a space of time to assimilate this simple Jeffersonian point, if only because I had been raised in a culture where the law governing free speech and free
    assembly was whatever the nearest policeman happened to say it was.”

    This simple Jeffersonian point is what the Muslim world HAS to be willing to accept if they want to be part of a modern, civilized society; and not the other way around.

    This is the definition of Backbiting & Slander, according to Islam:

    Prophet Muhammad said :”Do you know what backbiting is?” They said, “God and His Messenger know best.” He then said, “It is to say something about your brother that he would dislike.” Someone asked him, “But what if what I say is true?” The Messenger of God said, “If what you say about him is true, you are backbiting him, but if it is not true then you have slandered him.” (Muslim)

    The western world can not abide by the Islamic definition of “slander”, if it expects to survive as a bastion of FREEDOM for all mankind.

    As a point aside, the ACLU is defending the KKK in Georgia in a highway cleanup effort lawsuit:

    http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/weird-wide-web/aclu-supports-ku-klux-klan-highway-clean-lawsuit

    Just like in the past, and as now, the ACLU will have to step front and center in the defense of ALL those that are being attacked by the mad dogs of modern PC.

    The persecution and demonization of those that are TELLING the TRUTH about Islam is an undeniable and well documented FACT, even if the MSM doesn’t want to acknowledge it and insists on keeping their collective heads buried in the sand.

    As my Mom used to say; if you walk like a duck, quack like a duck, behave like a duck; don’t complain when you are called a duck.

  11. says

    Let us recall the woman cartoonist, I believe up in Washington who called for a “draw Mohamad day” which the stories can be found inthe Jihadwatch archives. She of course was encouraged to change her identity and go into hiding by federal authorities for her own safety from the rabidness of Islamic fundamentalism.

    The same could possibly occur here for the safety of Mr. Nakoula not with standing his federal probation situation.

  12. says

    Guys, I am starting to wonder if the reason why our government is making such a fuss about Nakhoula isn’t in order to start curtailing First Amendment freedoms for the rest of us.

  13. says

    There was no purpose for this film to be made but to mock Muhammad, anger Muslims, and blame the Jews. But the plan went wrong, an ambassador was murdered, and Nakoula the government informant has been disgraced. Michaiah!! the Jewish people have narrowly escaped another blood libel.

  14. says

    @n.a. palm

    Cool ad hominem, bro!

    Individuals are responsible for their actions, not movies, concepts, inanimate objects or other individuals exercising free speech. Muslims have been throwing a “match into a cauldron of “extremely flameable liquids” -if you wanna call it that- for decades, centuries and millenia against non-muslims, but non-muslims don’t defend the undefendable, ergo they don’t threat, assault, commit battery, murder, mass murder… etc. against those muslims who continue to throw a “match” at them.

    Besides thief, buffoon.

    Next time try harder on your trolling, be more creative and less conspicuous, dissimulate a bit. Work on the taqiyya a lil bit more. Ok papa?.

  15. says

    @chowching

    “There was no purpose for this film to be made but to mock Muhammad, anger Muslims”—

    I haven’t seen the film -and i’m sure you haven’t either- and don’t plan to, don’t care about it, so i can’t comment about the film per se but even if that’s what the film is all about -mocking” pedohammedans- that’s free speech. People have the right to insult and be insulted, to offend and be offended, to disrespect and be disrespected, to mock and be mocked, to satire and be satirized, to parody and be parodied, to hate and be hated… that’s all part of free speech, it’s a two way street, but for scumbags like you who defend and justify the undefendable and unjustifiable free speech is a one way stret where pedohammedans can say and do whatever they want against non-muslims and non-muslims… well… they better STFU or else!.

  16. says

    Dear decent people trapped in Islam,
    It’s time to take a chance and leave Islam. It’s time to send the blood-thirsty, perverted imams to hell where they belong. They threaten, they fall. It’s that simple. It doesn’t matter if they live or not, but they must go. Every single one of them.

    The Western powers are cowards and quislings, but its really your war to win. You know you hate Islam. You know this Coptic filmmaker is factually correct about Islam. You know he has every right to make this film as a human being, and especially as a Copt whose people exist under a constant genocidal threat from the imams.

    Will you become fully human and throw off your Islamist masters?

  17. says

    Nakoula’s movie is absolutely true, he’s got it all right about Muhammad. What he needs is linking to the islamic sources so that he can prove his point to the average viewer.
    Check out this PPS “the Perfect Man of Islam”. All the links are there, proving that Nakoula’s movie is 100% true.

    N.B. Download the PPS or the DOC version, click on any link. It will take you directly to the source.

    http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/12/perfect-man-of-islam.html

  18. says

    Have we thought about the possibility that maybe this person who put out this film is not in fact a Coptic christian? That it’s another media scam? Just some rhetorical questions: Why are the media emphasizing the Copt angle? First it was a “Jew” who made it, then a “Coptic Christian” who was financed by “100 Jews” then they report that he is a felon who went by various aliases? a felon who turns into a film maker? and who previously was convicted of fraudulent checkwriting scams?Just your average Copt. I am not convinced about this person being a Coptic Christian. This film is so lame it’s unwatchable. It would not surprise me in the least if it comes out that he is an islamist,no one else could make such a lame film. It just so happens that murderous muslims in thirty countries riot over this? Why this film? Why now? Will the next media move be to have this person publicly denounce the film, like a good Copt? Is it another tactic manufactured by islamists? Just asking.

  19. says

    I have not read the whole comment stream, so just in case nobody has already pointed out the obvious …

    The legacy media, and the officers of the federal gov’t have exposed this guy’s name and painted a target on his back.

    They are acting in collusion with the rioters and those who would like to kill him. They are openly collaborating.

    Furthermore, by revealing that he is a Copt, they are also painting a target on the entire Coptic population of Egypt. Not as if there weren’t one there already. But they will have inspired additional anti-Coptic rioting over and above the normal levels of violence.

    All they had to do was NOT to expose the guys name and ethnicity. To refrain from publicizing those two facts.

    But the went public. Voluntarily and deliberately.

  20. says

    Wow. The pic of this guy being led away from his house in the middle of the night by the authorities provides horrible, un-American “optics” for the rest of the world. Even Nixon didn’t pull this kind of crap. Shame on Obama.

    Show the pic, RS.

  21. says

    n.a.palm wrote:

    “This film was designed for the SOLE PURPOSE of being the “match” thrown into a cauldron of “extremely flameable liquids” the already fully fomented muslims everywhere.”

    First of all, only the filmmaker knows for certain what his “SOLE PURPOSE” was. Regardless of his intent, these muslims are solely responsible for their acts of violence in response to ‘whatever’ they are responding to, so “n.a.palm” shouldn’t even attempt to blame the filmmaker. And btw, it doesn’t take much to set a muslims hair on fire. An insult here, hurt feels there …they are always getting upset over something.

    Secondly, I find it rather humorous and ironic that said poster refers to muslims as “extremely flameable liquid” …yes, he has that right–they are indeed, lol!

  22. says

    Robert, I have to disagree with you a bit. You wrote:

    “He will be in prison not…for the technicality of the probation violation, but for insulting Muhammad…If Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is imprisoned, he will be nothing more than the fall guy who became the first offender against the new federal crime of blasphemy against Islam.”

    No, the truth is that if he is in violation of his probation then he in fact would be returned to prison for that violation, and not for any other reason. We cannot fall into that trap.

    You see, the stealth jihadists and their dhimmi friends WILL say that he was sent to prison for blasphemy – or rather, some form of incitement, which will make a better precedent to use against us. You are very correct to point out exactly the arguments that they will use. But they will still be wrong, and we will need to say so.

    Should Nakoula Basseley Nakoula return to prison we MUST NOT allow the idea to gain traction that he returned because he insulted Islam or Muhammad or some such thing, because that is exactly what the stealth jihadists want the American people to believe. We MUST maintain that “had he not been on probation and been prohibited from using the internet he would be a free man today”, should the worst befall to him.

    I know that you are attempting to describe a real philosophical truth here, but there is no reason for it to become a legal truth, and if it does we will all be very sorry.

    BTW, there is one way in which you may turn out to be very correct. Suppose that the terms of probation prohibit certain internet transaction, and it turns out that those prohibited transactions never happened in the making of the movie and its posting to the internet. A decision to imprison him using a broad interpretation of these probation terms by the authorities would be a sign that a sharia compliant motive would be in effect. That would be the time to really protest the government’s actions.

  23. says

    Who coined the phrase “Blasphemy police”? Was it Robert??

    Its absolutely brilliant. Evokes shades of Czarist Russia, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Hitler and his Third Reich which somehow missed “existing for a Thousand Years” – as Hitler had promised, and a host of equally dangerous lesser lights,historical and contemporary; the ultimate opposite to the Founding Fathers (USA),the British Parliament especially in more recent years, and the Rule of Law still common to most Western Democracies.

    However phrases such as the “war on terror” emanating from the present US Administration, belong to the same family as the term “blasphemy police” and royally obfuscate the sources of our present danger which are Islamist extremism, born of and carefully nurtured for example by the Muslim Brotherhood since its initiation in Egypt 40 odd years ago, reared in the Arab world, spread by “da’wa” – a non-militant process designed to infiltrate, among others, Western Establishment organizations leading ultimately to a take-over by Muslim Brotherhood personnel and ideology. A stunning example of success is the organization C.A.I.R which is a frequent representative/guest at the U.S. White House and may well exert some consultative functions therein.

  24. says

    duh_swami

    Nakoula has done federal time for bank fraud and is on a five year probation. One of the probation requirements may have possibly been violated as court records say he is under supervised probation and is not allowed to use the internet for certain things.

    The LA County Sheriffs are giving 24 hour security to the house at this time .

  25. says

    n.a. palm, whether or not the film was designed for the SOLE PURPOSE of being the “match” thrown into a cauldron of “extremely flameable liquids” the already fully fomented muslims everywhere, it is instructive, is it not?

    We are constantly reminded this is the most important election of our lifetime. Indeed it is. I am one who believe the major threat Obama poses to this nation is not on his disastrous economic policies but his disastrous foreign and national security policies. Whether the film-maker intended to make foreign policy / national security a campaign theme in the days leading to the November elections (I doubt it; hasn’t this video been out for a while?) he has indeed made it a central issue.

  26. says

    Come on. There are a million videos, websites, books and articles similarly offensive to Islam. Why don’t we see a million riots? And how could Nakoula guess his video would be the one chosen from all the numerous availabe ones? This video itself was online for a while, so why did they remember to get so upset about it right on the anniversary of 9/11? Isn’t that an interesting coincidence?

    Anyway, Muslims seem to be perpetually enraged, so it could have been that video or another video, or some book, or someone accidentally dropping a Quran from the top shelf, or an ad or an anti-Islam political gathering, or a Muslim who just happens to be a criminal accidentally getting killed by the police on a chase (see France). They always find some reason to commit violence and murder against infidels, and if they can’t find one they make one up (Zionist sharks, aphrodisiac bubble gum, Copts kidnapping Muslim girls and forcibly converting them, whatever). Only Muslims could have invented an annual Day Of Rage (see Pal-Arabs).

  27. says

    You wrote: ‘There was no purpose for this film to be made but to mock Muhammad, anger Muslims, ……’

    It wouldn’t have mattered if the film had been made by Cecil B Demille with a star studded cast in Widescreen with full dolby surround sound and a version in 3D to follow.

    The point is: Was the content true? Answer: Yes!

    So, mocking Muhammed, it wasn’t!

    The Ummah is throwing the toys out of the pram because the false image of peaceful Islam founded by a man of blameless character has been exposed for what it is!

    (This is the second post you’ve written in the last couple of days I’ve noticed is compromised by dubious content. I think you’re a troll?)

  28. says

    Where/when did the rot start?
    I suppose if you keep tracking the problem back in time/history a philosopher/theologian would speak of some event at the dawn of time that set mankind along the wrong track ie the Fall.
    One thing I like about this approach is that it tries to get to the root of the problem.
    Contrast that approach with today’s 3 minute culture that sees no history to anything and demands that we accept everything as a given.
    And so we end up with PC/MC.
    More recently than the “Fall” one can see particular moments when things started to go bad. People will dissagree on these points, of course. Nevertheless a good social historian can pinpoint turning points.
    At the recent SION conference Mordechai Kedar pointed to the falling birthrate in europe. This led the way for immigration and the influx of muslims.
    We also have the more or less takeover of the universities by the Left in the 60s which remains with us today and of course the Leftist Media.
    What was the “Fall” in modern times that enabled the rot that we now have, to set in?
    I would say simply it was the destruction of the Church which began with the Reformation.
    After the Reformation came the godless philosophies which claimed to be “enlightened” and led to Marxism and other forms of atheism. Religion was considered to belong to the less well educated. The “dims” as the clown Dawkins would say.
    All the atheistic “isms” have failed. Secularism has failed.
    As one commentator put it (I’m afraid i can’t remember author): The future will not be either secular or Judaeo-Christian. It will be either Judaeo-Christian or Islamic.

  29. says

    you are absolutely right.

    AP said the justice dept told them ONLY about check kiting. Which is incidentally what a rundraiser for hizbollah had been arrested for on sept 10, a day before.

    It’s a coincidence but a pretty big one.

    As I was saying the justice department told AP that the guy did chek kiting. There was no mention of credit card fraud or drugs.

    Now all of a sudden he did credit cards and drugs?

    I call shenannagans.

    Oh and the justice dept wasn’t supposed to tell AP his name or anything about him because he was involved in an investigation.

    AND the justice dept employee’s name was withheld by AP BECAUES HE WASN’T AUTHORISED TO TALK TO THE PRESS.

    Yet he did.

    So AP witheld someones name who was knowingly putting a man’s life in mortal peril yet put the man who was in danger’s full name AND the photo of his house into the public sphere.

    I reminded of the Movie Flame Over India. You know that movie. PBS played it all the time after 9/11.

    In that movie the terrorist turned out to be the journalist all along.

    I am hoping a)some mythical “they” made this personal up and have whoever did the movie somewhere safe or b)they know he’s an islamist and wanted to out him and scare him enough to come in for questioning.

    It would be bizzare but not anymore bizarre than what’s happened already.

    Oh what a tangled web we weave. When first we practice to deceive.

  30. says

    It is entirely within the realm of possibility that a jihadi could make a film that insults Islam so that the mobs can be stirred up. They have created false evidence before with Muhammad cartoons and with burnt Qurans for just this reason.

    It would seem reasonable that law enforcement would want to investigate such a filmmaker to exclude this possibility.

    This does not seem to be true in this case – so far – but this remote possibility needs to be acknowledged.

  31. says

    To me this short film version of 14 minutes is worthy of an Oscar. no , not for ay technical reason, but for reasons of finally showcasing the real muhammed.

    Nakoula is a hero, he is the only one who has the guts to bring out this poorly done but important film. Can you imagine asking a famous director like Spielberg or John Cameron to make a film about the real muhammed? They would turn white as ghosts and run away like they were being chased by wolves.

    No one, and I mean no one, including independents would approach this subject. you would not get financing, No one would want to distribute it, no movie house would want to show it, they all are so scared of the reactions of the “peaceful” muslims.
    This amateur attempt is all we got and all we will probably get to showcase the awful truth about muhammed and islam.

  32. says

    Thank you Truthiocity, There is still many questions about this ostensible investigation. And thank you Robert Spencer and all the commentors at JW!

  33. says

    Hello MP: Apparently you completely failed to understand my post brecause your response in totally incoherent. But I admit since I write in compund-complex sentences, it may be too hard for you to follow my drift, as it were.

    Let me re-state my point in simplest possible terms that even you might understand. There’s an old saying that if you want to find out who is committing a crime etc, follow the money, or, follow the motive.

    In the case of this shadowy (insert noun here) the motive was Jihad Against America. I don’t care what religion he is or isn’t, or what else he has done. History is replete with examples of single persons altering the course of history with but one act or deed.

    This is why America is in deep trouble. What should be obvious is lost on you.

    Don’t call me a troll, you imbecile.

  34. says

    Nakoula has not been charged with anything, as per the article:

    ‘Whitmore added that Nakoula agreed to the interview prior to the deputies arriving at his home, that the move was “entirely voluntary” and the man was “very cooperative.”‘

  35. says

    Thats a great video.

    The US Govt, Hillary Clinton, Obama – the burning of the Quran is wrong, holy books should be treated with respect only crazy bigots do that. Except when it comes to burning Bibles when the US govt does that because they are trash.

    Do not burn the Quran Muslims might riot and kill you. But do burn Bibles because if you dont, Muslims might riot and kill you.

    The US Govt gives special status to one religion – Islam.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErzxOz3Dzv8

  36. says

    Well said, and I agree mostly. But also Terry Jones is to be commended for supporting this film. He too understands it’s importance.

    And over at Faith Freedom International Ali Sina has divulged HIS intention to soon bring a film about Mohammed, showing his ….. well, misdeeds and shortcomings, all based on Islamic sources.

    And in Holland a year ago Geert Wilders spoke about some kind of movie about exposing Mohammed. It would be his next provocative film after Fitna.

    And Geert Wilders lost big in the elections on 12 september. In my opinion at least partly because his campaign was not much anymore about defense against Islam, but about being against Europe, against helping the Greeks out. But Europe and the Greeks are of the same Judeo-Christian culture as he is. And in this way he, in my opinion, weakened his anti-Islam-stance a lot, by showing that he not only was against that, but against a lot of other situations too. Making him vulnerable to the complaint of him being basically negative, about many things, not just Islam. That’s why I did vote for the prime minister Mark Rutte and not Wilders any more. I suppose many more Dutch did this and Rutte won 10 seats whereas Wilders lost nine.

    Wilders now could consider to make a high-publicity-comeback by making and showing a technically reasonable movie exposing Mohammed well, like he planned a while ago. In that way he would again be focusing on his big issue with Islam, which made his party big in Holland in 2010, going as it did from 9 seats to 24.