White House spokesman endorses "efforts" to ensure that "all faiths" are "respected": "This work takes on added urgency given the truly abhorrent video that has offended so many people"

White House spokesman endorses "efforts" to ensure that "all faiths" are "respected"

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil"
(Thomas Mann, German writer)

ISLAM IS 100% PURE EVIL WITH ZERO HUMANITY

Islam is a terrorist organization
Q. 3:151, 59:2, 8:12, 8:59/60

http://www.schnellmann.org/counterjihad.html

Why can't out SecState take to the airwaves and tell the world that we in the USA have something called the First Amendment? While _Innocence of Muslims_ may have been crude (but downright genteel compared to the ways too many Muslims are demanding respect--"Call us a religion of peace, or we'll slit your throats"), and Terry JOnes' burning of the Qur'an foolish, people like Bacile and Jones have the same right to speak their minds as those imams who declare that Jews are relatives of apes and pigs or that Christians practice Shirk. They have the same free speech rights as all those loyally Democratic Hollywood Leftists who daily insult all the rest of us.

Could it be, Dame Hillary, that you really think the First Amendment is an evil, benighted, white male plot to keep "wymyn" and "minorities" (including a billion Muslims) down? Could it be that for you, Free Speech is only a tactic to use while on the rise, and something to be denied to the other guy once you have power?

Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, the subject dhimmi "white house spokesman" needs to be locked into a room, reminded under enforcement of treason laws, the current-occupants/staff-of-the-White House must uphold their oath to support and defend The Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" . . .then bring in Sultan Knish to remind him what how foolish his dhimmitude is :

Better Than They Are

"On these shores, Americans commemorated the cold-blooded gleeful murder of thousands of their fellow men and women by bowing their heads and enlisting in one of the free work projects of the National Day of Service listed at Serve.gov, a combination that says all that needs to be said about our present day relationship with our government.
In newly liberated Benghazi, the city that Obama named as his moral imperative for fighting an illegal war against the will of the American people, gunmen opened fire on the American embassy and killed an American security guard. That dead man is the first American casualty in the Libyan War-- a casualty that will be acknowledged and honored around the same time that someone in the media calls the Libyan War, a war, instead of sticking to the shameless lie of a No Fly Zone.
In Cairo, a mob of a thousand climbed the wall, tore down the American flag, tore it to pieces, burned it and tried to replace it with their own flag with the words, “There is no God but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger”. That message was the same one that the murderers of Americans have shouted, written and videotaped themselves chanting in one form or another.
As befits a great power, the US Embassy in Cairo responded by condemning "the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims." The US Embassy's statement was virtually indistinguishable from the one issued by the beleaguered Christian Copts of Egypt. The Christians of Egypt act that way because they live at the merciless mercy of Muslims. Apparently so do we.
When the Prophet-Criers climb our walls and murder us, we apologize for having offended their religious feelings. The same religious feelings that took down the World Trade Center as part of a murderous crusade going back over a thousand years. They kill us and we elect a man with a Muslim background to tour the world and explain to all the angry Muslims that we're really very nice people once you get to know us.
If they want to be ruled by Muslim governments under Islamic law, we'll give that to them. If they want a billion dollars, we'll send it to them. If they want us to apologize for having free speech, we'll do that too.
If they burn a couple more embassies, we'll even do something about that Bill of Rights which does not permit the gendarmes of tolerance to arrest a man for blasphemously calling Mohammed a pedophile and burning a Koran bought and paid for with his own money. Not like our more enlightened European cousins who put a stop to that behavior long ago and are sniffing around the flanks of Sharia law to see which parts of it can fit safely into their tolerant order.
And of course burning a Koran is ridiculous. So what if they burn American flags. So what if they burned 3,000 people, the ones who didn't jump or kill themselves some other way. So what if their great ambition in life is to climb over all our walls and kill most of us and enslave the rest because the Koran, that most holy book which unlike New Yorkers must not be burned, tells them to do it. So what?
They can kill us because someone somewhere insulted their prophet. But when they kill thousands of us, then we must feel eternal shame because we renditioned some of the perpetrators, put them in a room and then, under medical supervision, poured water on them until they eventually told us about all their other plans to kill us.
The answer, you see, is that we are better than they are. And we get plenty of opportunities to show off how much better than them we truly are.
They kill us and we apologize to them. They kill us and we spend a fortune developing drones that will be able to take out the leader who ordered the attack with as little collateral damage as possible. And then when the natives dig up the daughters they murdered last week and the brother-in-law they beat to death last month in a clan feud, and dump them on the smoking vehicle, and the local stringers who have arrangements with Al Qaeda and the Taliban snap away at the wreckage, we will feel bad because after all the billions we spent developing and deploying a weapon meant to kill as few people as possible-- there are the bodies that prove we are terrible people.
And when Karzai, whose prisons are full of raped and mutilated women, yells at us in front of the camera, before taking a hit of coke, and going off to have sex with one of his dancing boys, and tells us that we are terrible people, we will believe it. Because we are better than them and we have a conscience.
This collective conscience does not responds to the mutilated bodies of Americans, in Afghanistan or in New York. It is a conscience deaf to the pain of the thousands of soldiers and their families who died or suffered crippling injuries because the new administration wanted to win the hearts and minds of Muslims, the only people who truly matter, by minimizing civilian casualties. But show that conscience a naked Muslim with women's underwear on his head and it will shriek and clutch its pearls. It will turn that Muslim into the shame of America, while looking away from the Rape Rooms that same Muslim supervised.
After September 11 we could have struck back, the way we struck back at Japan, without mercy or empathy, with no concern for the enemy as anything but a faceless mass that hurt us. We could have leveled their cities, brought their civilization to the ground and done it with no more concern than a government legislator deciding how much money to squeeze out of the taxpayer for this year.
But we didn't do that. We did not come to hurt them, but to save them from themselves and teach them how to be good people like us. We wanted to make them into the kind of kind noble people who only respond with the minimal amount of violence possible to an attack. The kind of people who will let thousands of their own people die rather for the sake of their conscience. Good people like us.
Our experiment at civilizing the savage failed miserably in Iraq and Afghanistan. It will go on failing as often as we keep attempting it. And at the end of the experiment, there will be burning embassies and savages crying, "There is no God but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger", the same words that the bearded bandit who was one of the first Muslims and their many times great-grandfather was crying out as he was raping the shamelessly unveiled tribal woman who would become their many times great-grandmother.
"There is no God but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger" means that the Muslim need not waste time worrying about his conscience. His conscience is a Koran and that book says that he's entitled to kill any time that an infidel offends Islam by mocking his prophet, walking in front of him or building a skyscraper that is taller than a mosque. The Muslim need not waste time pondering the ethical implications of killing another human being to know that he is better than we are. His little black book assures him that he is better than us, that he has every right to kill us and that if he fails, he will be raping demon virgins who are so anorexic that their bones can be seen through their flesh.
But, we oh what good people we are, we will apologize for having an embassy and for having free speech and for getting our embassy in the way of their mob and our free speech in the way of our religious sensibilities. And we will see about getting all of the above out of their way. After Muslims killed thousands of Americans we did everything we could to learn about their religion, to celebrate it and soothe their ruffled feathers. Like an anxious host, we are still rushing around to see that our Muslim guest has enough coffee and egg rolls while promising to do something about that free speech that offends him.
Like all good people, we are expert at blaming ourselves. Aside from the rabble who claim that there really were no Muslims on those planes and possibly no planes at all, just a vast conspiracy by the people in our own government who were not at all Muslims, there are the other rabble who claim that our foreign policy motivated the attacks. One way or another, we are to blame. That is how we know that we are good people... by blaming ourselves. The more we apologize and ask our murderers to forgive us, the better people we know ourselves to be.
One day, and this is our highest hope, we will look a Muslim terrorist in the eye right as he shoots us and beam into his soul a message of hope and peace, and just as the life bleeds out of our veins, the Muslim will fall at our feet and be filled with the understanding that all life is precious and sacred. And even if we are the last of our kind, our deaths will have been worthwhile if by the final sacrifice of our civilization we can elevate the savage out of his savagery.
We are you see, good people. Not moral people nor sane people. Morality requires values and sanity demands contact with some outpost of the real world outside the simulacrum of outraged noise on all the channels, real and virtual. Morality is hard, goodness is easy. Morality is about right and wrong, but goodness is about condemning those most like you in order to feel better about yourself.
Goodness is childishly easy. Go to a movie theater and wait for people to talk. Then feel good about not being one of the talkers. Goodness is watching thousands of people getting killed and feeling good because unlike those crazy rednecks or the bridge and tunnel crowd, you feel no yearning for vengeance. Goodness is watching Americans die and then picking out a Muslim convenience store and offering him whatever support he needs against all those bigots who are sure to show up with American flags and torches sooner or later, because unlike you, they aren't good people at all.
We are a nation led by immoral people who think they are good, by politicians, professors, priests, rabbis, pundits, crackpots and activists who having no values are determined to excuse all the evil that they do by being relentlessly good people. When they sacrifice something, whether it's a night out or your life, then they will make sure that everyone knows it. And when you protest, they will tell you about all the sacrifices that they are making, because despite all the blood and filth on their hands, they are good people. Good amoral sociopaths who learned everything they know about right and wrong from television and feel-good slogans.
The bigger their hypocrisies, the bigger their sacrifices, and they love nothing so much as sacrificing others. Their conscience is always bothering them and they put it to sleep with showy acts of public goodness. They will not feed a beggar on their street, but they will go around the world to feed an orphan, especially at someone else's expense. And that way they remember that they are good people. Not just good people, but better people than us, the miserable mob waving torches and flags who don't know the value of condescending to an Imam at an Iftar dinner or feeding Bangladeshi orphans on someone else's dime or spending thousands of lives to enable Muslims to be the good people that they must be somewhere underneath all those ugly layers of murder, child-murder and mass murder.
So, no we will not fight back after September 11. Nor will we fight back when our embassies are attacked. The good people running things will take stock of what we have done that could have caused this and apologize for it and remind us to feel good about being such good people who diplomatically apologize to others instead of bombing them from the sky. They will feel worse about a burnt Koran than about a dead American because they are sociopaths with no more understanding of right and wrong than the teleprompters who feed them their lines. All their morality is learned behavior and their teachers were liars, morons and lunatics who passed on their disease to the next generation.
Embassies can burn and so can skyscrapers, but like all amoral people, they will cling to the moral high ground with their fingernails because it is the only thing between them and the abyss. They will tell us that we act the way we do because we, as a nation, are better than they are. We don't lash out, we don't get angry, we don't go to war for revenge. We are not meant to feel anything except for the satisfaction of serving others, whether it's picking up trash outside an inner city school on a National Day of Service, that happens to coincide with something called 9/11, or dodging Taliban bullets so that Afghan schoolgirls can get a proper education.
We are meant to be good people and that is what good people do. They give until it hurts and then die knowing that their giving natures kept them on the moral high ground of being six feet under.
We are good people. Too good to fight. Too good to defend ourselves. Too good to keep our laws and retain our traditions. Too good to be angry when we are killed. Too good to want to do anything but make our killers understand our pain. Too good to respond to our own murder with anything but immediate guilt.
We are better than they are. Not better at survival, but better at rationalizing our own destruction. We are so good that we open up our cities to our own murderers and close our eyes at the airport so as not to make a single one of them feel bad. We could fight back, but we're too good. And if we start defending ourselves, then we will be forced to ask, "What is the difference between us and them?" Once we start killing, we will become murderers and it is better to be murder victims, it is better to mourn in defeat than to celebrate a victory, it is better to serve as Dhimmis than to live as conquerors.
We could fight back, but we are better than they are. That is a decision that our leaders have made and they remind us of it every September 11. They remind us that they are too good for victory. We could object, but they would only remind us that they are better than we are.

Lan Astaslem.

So does this mean that Muslims will have to stop referring to Jews as the "Descendants of Apes And Pigs." ??
Or does it apply only to Islam?

So, where is the respect for Judaism and Christianity when the disrespect for both is written into the Koran, the aHadith, the Sira and the Sunna? Does Islam get a free pass to dictate whatever it likes and decide what these other religions believe, even when this directly contradicts the traditional teachings of both of those other religions?

Will it come down to (the state) protecting the hurt feelings of those who threaten to disrupt the most of civilization and threaten to kill or injure the most people, as it seems to be at the moment?

Although both Christianity and Islam are both supposed to be protected by Pakistan's blasphemy laws, we all know how lopsided the actual enforcement is, and know that there is little or no chance of a Christian successfully having a Muslim prosecuted for blasphemy against the Christian Jesus (not the same as the Muslim Isa). Could a Muslim bring blasphemy charges against a Christian who claimed that Jesus died on the cross and is the son of God as this contradicts the Muslim version that god has no sons and that someone died on the cross instead of Jesus?

How can you have all faiths respected when the teachings of some faiths directly contradict each other? Who is going to adjudicate who gets to be prosecuted for having the "wrong" beliefs?

This morning, on MSNBC, Zbigniew Brezeinski noted that we must defend the first amendment:

But that we must (paraphrasing) control incitement to violence.

How idiotic is that?

Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough endorsed efforts to create "a world where the dignity of all people—and all faiths—is respected."

http://www.bic.org/statements/eliminating-religious-intolerance-0

Eliminating Religious Intolerance
Statement to the forty-fourth session of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights
17 February 1988
Geneva

.....
In the Baha'i­ view, a crucial means for implementing the 1981 Declaration is the development of tolerance among individuals and the abolition of religious exclusivity and fanaticism. Dr. Ribeiro has rightly pointed out that intransigent attitudes, the claim of religious believers to an absolute and exclusive hold on truth, and the denial of the right of everyone to be different are root causes of religious discrimination.

Indeed, human beings have a tendency to view their own beliefs as right, and all others as wrong. They have, we suggest, erroneously interpreted the tenets of their own faiths as advocating such exclusivity, and sometimes as giving them the right to persecute others under the banner of upholding their version of truth. The Baha'i­ writings admonish humankind to abandon such intolerant attitudes and replace them with mutual respect and forbearance.

How can religious dogmatism be banished from human minds and hearts? In the first place, we believe that all the world's major religions have proceeded from the same Source, worshipped alike by Baha'i­, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jew and Moslem, as well as members of other religions. The core teachings of every religion -- for example, the teaching to love one's neighbor - are essentially the same, and we submit that they reflect one universal truth.

Understanding of this point will enable each individual, whatever his or her religion, to view other religions with due respect. This perspective fosters tolerance among people of various beliefs, despite the differences that may exist in their outward religious practices. For this reason, we welcome Dr. Ribeiro's suggestion that interreligious dialogue should be fostered and that such discussions should aim at "emphasizing the similarities among various religions and beliefs rather than their differences."

==============================

And people wonder why I keep bringing up the baha'i

Humor is under attack in America; Muhammad has become off limit for jokesters. Fear of inciting riots has curbed freedom of speech, but some fun lovers are still committing Blasphemy after a few drinks.

The muslim reaction to the film, and the craven attitude of those who are entrusted with protecting and supporting the constitution of the United States, are "truly abhorrent".

Please stop buying into the narrative that this was a justified response to blasphemy. Nothing about the name ("Sam Bacile") associated with the You Tube trailer for "Innocence of Muslims" has been verified independently. Apparently the complete film itself has not been uploaded or otherwise publicly accessible.

The preparation for a coordinated 9/11 attack on the US embassies and consulates could not have been started on 9/6 which is when this got visibility in the Arab world.

Malkin on Hannity. She's goes off and it's inspiring. At least somebody's pissed off:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j80Ol62eqy4&feature=g-all-u

Ten to one, that few , if any, of these 'officials', have actually seen this film...The idea is to protect the image of Islam at all costs...Just a small group of savages, according to Hillary...a minute minority of religion twisters, according to others...Just something they misunderstood in the Quran...
Unfortunately there are a number of Americans, mostly liberals, who buy into that pap...The complete denial of reality can mean only two things...Either the gov and fellow travelers are suffering a group psychosis, or they are following a plan...The question then, is, 'who's plan is this anyway'? If you support Islam, you are, on a basic level, supporting Allah...If you support Allah, you support his causes...Jihad is fighting for Allah's causes...Are Rasool Obama, Hillary and fellows, fighting in Allah's causes? I don't know...Do they support Islam?

"In other words, the freedom of speech is a goner."

Nah! They have just shown us again what they are and what they stand for. IMO - they are beginning to awaken the sleeping giant bear again.

Time for TRUE {not PC} documentaries on national telecasts to inform ALL about Islam and its 1400+ year history.

It would be at a horrible cost, but I am truly ready for some Meccan glass work..

So let's see ... I have to pay (in taxes) for a display of a crucifix in a jar of urine, or a picture of the Blessed Virgin Mary covered in elephant dung and photos of female genitalia, but I must be prevented with the full rigor of the law from saying anything negative about a Muslim's hero?

Everyone in the media saying Bacile's film is "stupid and ridiculous" is calling Mohammad the same. They should say that. A movie based on the Islamic records of Mohammad's stupid and ridiculous life.

Allah bless Sam Bacile!

"Crazy film by some kooky director." - Guy on FOX right now.

Translation: Mohammad was crazy and kooky and so are his followers.

Allah bless Sam Bacile!

BO WHITEHOUSE: Cowards of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your freedom!!! Who needs freedom when you have a wise leader to watch over you!! There is nothing wrong with being a coward!! The meek shall inherit the world!! Not that we believe the rest of that stuff in the Bible!! But the Koran...muahh, beautiful!! BO for Caliphate!!

FYI--The film, while little more than a school project budget wise, is nonetheless accurate as to the scenes played out. If the truth is abhorrant, then Muhammad is abhorrant. This was the entire point of the film. There would be no point in making up things about Muhammad that aren't in Islamic scripture.

Thank you BO White House for confirming Muhammad is abhorrant. And thank you Muslims for agreeing Muhammad is abhorrant, which is exactly what you did by disagreeing with the behaviour of the Muhammad in this film, even if you don't recognize this fact yet.

Exactly how many people need to be offended before the White House issues a statement like this? Or is it how many people need to be killed by murderous fanatics? Does it matter if those offended are near and dear to our wise leader or not? If only, say, 10 million non-violent Christians from the American heartland didn't agree with something, would they merit a statement or moral support?

Muslims: Find one thing inaccurate in this film.

Sadly, you will not. I feel sorry for you, but you'll get over it. But you may not get over the bloody imam who calls for your death when you leave Islam.

So,the administration dhimmis are blasting Bacile's film, calling it disgusting and a myriad of other words denoting their distaste. Of course they're not going to refer to the first amendment.

I wonder if these same dhimmis willing bought tickets, cheered, and were ignorant enough to believe they were seeing true history unfold as they watched Ridley Scott's 2005 moronic film Kingdom of Heaven.

Clearly, Obama's operating assumption is that Islam respects other religions, which it clearly does not. Indeed, Islam seeks their destruction or submission to an Islamic world order.

Sura 9, Verse 33:

It is He [allah] who sent His Messenger [Muhammad] with guidance [Koran] and the true religion [Islam only] in order to make it superior to other systems of belief.

Get a reality check Obama - you are playing with treason.

Obama said: "This film is not representative of who we are and our values, and I think it's important for us to communicate that."

I think he meant to say: "We are not Muslims and do not embrace Islamic values. Americans do however speak out against Satan and so we will continue to exercise our God given right to do so."

Obama would have said that if he were American.