Islamic supremacists cry "entrapment" over New York jihad terror plot

Islamic supremacists are sure that Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis, the Muslim who was arrested today for plotting to blow up the Federal Reserve Bank in New York City, was entrapped:

Entrapment0.jpg


Cyrus McGoldrick works at Hamas-linked CAIR's New York chapter. He is an open enemy of free speech, as well as a bullying thug.

Entrapment1.jpg


Mona Eltahawy, of course, is the fascist who spraypainted our pro-freedom ad in New York City.

How do they know? They don't. They just know that they oppose any and every anti-jihad effort, and believe that Muslims are only and always victims.

| 57 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

57 Comments

| Leave a comment

Funny how the FBI can only "entrap" members of the jihad......

Funny that Moaning Mona thinks the police in the UK could never get away with it. Tell us why Mona.

Funny that Mona wants to live in the US, which is so awful to Muslims. She even wanted citizenship of that evil place. Funny that she got it, and went straight to work trying to bring it down..

Note: Now, to sign in with TypePad you have to check the "remember me" box.

It was the muslim's "religion" that entrapped him.

It was the muslim's "religion" that entrapped him.

"Police ... never get away with it in UK"

Mona is a bitch for blaming the police for entrapment. She has zero evidence to prove her case. Take your evidence to the court, if you have any Mona. Now they are trying silence the police from chasing the terrorists. Why do we have Muslims in the West?

Mona's high on pink paint fumes.

UK police regularly "get away with" sting operations, though stings are not so frequently used as in US law enforcement.
In English Law, entrapment has never been recognised as a defence.
To avoid the case being thrown out for abuse of court process it has to pass a test.
The test (established in a landmark 2001 case) is whether the police officers did no more than to present the defendant with an "unexceptional opportunity" to commit a crime.
In 2007, Kazi Nurur Rahman was jailed for nine years after trying to buy three Uzi sub-machine guns from undercover officers posing as Muslim arms dealers.
BBC April 30, 2007

Remember these people who complain about entrapment. When the security services next fail to stop one of these terrorists, it will be because they did not manage to entrap the scum before the event.

I believe that the appropriate level of outrage is not being felt in the west, because these perps get caught before they kill hundreds of people. It means that we just keep on shipping in more muslims, not realising how serious are the dangers which are being averted (averted for now, that is). At some point there will be far more muslim terrorists operating than can be entrapped, and by then things will be even further down the road to civil war.

Entrapment is luring us into a false sense of security.

SALAH, THANK YOU. you are right. click the box, whether you want to or not. shiver-me-timbers, i thought i was banned. ouch. thanks for the cure.

mona and cyrus,two clueless individuals, who it seems to me,would rather these "entrapped" morons carry out their
barbarity with real explosives.hey you two,this is how we
catch scum like this in the real world,before they harm innocent people.deal with it.

Islamic supremacists cry "entrapment" over New York jihad terror plot

Islamic supremacists are sure that Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis, the Muslim who was arrested today for plotting to blow up the Federal Reserve Bank in New York City, was entrapped
...................................

What absolute crap.

I'm rather leery about claims of entrapment, in any case. But the claim of "entrapment" only makes *any* sense when it is about something that a reasonable person could be understood to want—i.e., responding to someone selling cheap TVs off the back of a truck or a prostitute trolling for Johns.

Why? Because one can make a case for the average person being interested in having sex or in finding a great deal on consumer goods.

Of course, finding these things on the street is shady at best—but still, these are normal human desires.

But murdering innocent Infidels? Would anyone here do such a thing, even if they thought they could get away with it?

No, NO, and *HELL NO*.

Only a vicious Jihadist would want to do such a thing, under *any circumstance*.

I agree. Mona entrapped the United States into granting her citizenship. She is ugly.

Pedohammedans are always the victims, no matter what, even if they're caught red-handed, with their hands in the cookie jar.

What kind of a name is "Cyrus McGoldrick" I thought? I Googled his image, and I see he's a Whuslim. Noticed he's shaved his Jewstache lately, just keeping the Amish beard going, looking natty with that ethnic skullcap thingie on his head. Clown.

Add "entrapment" to the ever growing list of other misused words and phrases like "bigot", "islamophobe" and "hate speech", etc ...as they relate to islam and company!

Salah wrote:

Note: Now, to sign in with TypePad you have to check the "remember me" box.

SpeakUpForThem wrote, replying to Salah:

SALAH, THANK YOU. you are right. click the box, whether you want to or not. shiver-me-timbers, i thought i was banned. ouch. thanks for the cure.
..............................

Dumbledore's Army has been unable to log on to TypePad, as well. I let her know about clicking "remember me"—hopefully that will do the trick.

I have to re-log on to TypePad every couple of weeks or so, usually. I just always click "remember me" as a matter of course. Still, this is an odd problem—it should make no difference in our being able to log on. I wonder how many other posters are having trouble with this?

I'm having trouble on my PC, i can't log in with Google. I'm writing this from an iShit device and i'm using Chrome so the saved cookies are letting me post here otherwise i couldn't comment.

Oh, thank you, Salah for that sign-in tip. For two days, I was banging my head wondering if I have been banned from JW.

muslim are always playing victim, while they are the biggest oppressors. Despicable lot, these green slimes.

Thanks, I'm another who benefited from your comment.

Thanks, salah. I was not able to sign in for days.

Yes Champ, the Leftists and the Muslims have developed quite a lexicon, rather consciously -- and the non-Leftist PC MCs follow dutifully along like sheep led by the nose.

I was thinking about this. It was not long ago that we were all reading about how there was no need for undercover agents in the mosques, it was upsetting people and so on. Will that subject be revisited? Any one?

Cyrus and Mona want fame by supporting Islam and Jihad. That's the shortcut to a celebrity status, adored by Muslims. (However, in an Islamic regime Mona could get beaten or even stonned, for her stonned looks, clothes, outspokenness, and just being a woman.) They can't be famous by supporting counter jihad because that calls for intellect, appreciation of freedom, and a love for the country like USA, they seriously lack all these...

So true, LemonLime ...

Yeo,

And here I am!

Thanks for passing on salah's tip to me.

It worked!

Quazi Nafis must have set off some serious alarm bells way before the FBI got on his case. It'll interesting to read the details when it comes to court.

Oops. .silly me, I should have read the previous article first.

I wanna see Mona spray paint her hair ...

hotpink!

hot pink!

(whatever:)

OK, so the Feds tricked him into thinking they were selling him a real bomb. I think I'm glad they sold the dummy a dummy.

But what I just can't get is how you could ever remotely entrap anyone who is legally sane into wanting to bomb a bank or a temple or a community center. No way, no how could you "trick" somebody into doing that deed. The apologists are speaking their own prejudice, for they themselves would have a predisposition to such terror.

The Feds better be watching that women more closely if she thinks that way, it reveals a seditious and violent mindset.

The Feds must be wondering: now what would motivate such a nice student to want to bomb the Fed? Hmmm, will they continue to look past the camel in the room? "Can't you smell that smell?"


@LL,
you wrote,
'the non-Leftist PC MCs follow dutifully'

i know PC. what's MC?

Entrapment: "In criminal law, entrapment is conduct by a law enforcement agent inducing a person to commit an offense that the person would OTHERWISE HAVE BEEN UNLIKELY TO COMMIT."

This is obviously not "entrapment". The FBI didn't coerce or induce the Bangladeshi to commit the crime. He came here expressly to do it. It was his wish and desire. They just facilitated (seemingly) what he wanted to do in order to catch him legally.

Mona Eltahawy needs to be educated on "entrapment" and also the difference between vandalism and free speech.

Vandalism against free speech is the suppression of free speech not the expression of free speech.

Entrapment:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrapment

PS Who is A E Wallace? (Mona Eltahawi's tweet)

Entrapment:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrapment

PS Who is A E Wallace? (Mona Eltahawi's tweet)

lookmann,

My essay The PC MC Paradigm will answer your question (probably with more information than you want to know!).

If you want the short version, just read #9 and #12 of my list in that essay.

lookmann, I forgot to mention that "MC" stands for "Multi-culturalist" or "Multi-culturalism".

You know, Peter King, (R) from New York, said many years ago there are too many mosques in the U.S.

He was right then, and he is more right now. We are crawling with muslims. Once they achieve 10% of the host nation, look out!

The world is asleep. Why let these consummate assholes in our country at all? We don't have enough FBI/CIA/Police/Secret Service, etc., to watch all these bastards, and WATCH them you must!

911, FT. Hood, barry hussein, muslim demographics, ... does anybody here think we are winning?

Alan Lake and the people at 4Freedoms have been working on an Islamic Lexicon.

http://4freedoms.ning.com/group/admin/forum/topics/islamic-lexicon

https://twitter.com/a_e_wallace

Alexander Wallace
@a_e_wallace
#Russianist, #Czechist, #socialist, though not Socialist. (Sometimes reluctant) #Labour activist. #Heterophobe. Like #Scandinavian TV series. #Browncoat.
Kent, UK

He tweeted (twittered, twattered or whatever) in response to Mona hence her reference to the UK. He seems to have given her the impression that rules on entrapment are "stricter" in the UK.

In fact, in English Law, entrapment has never been recognised as a defence. (see my previous coment).

oops ... that last should have been "comment".
P.S. Wallace is apparently an Oxford student studying Czech and Russian and currently in Brno on Erasmus exchange.

"normal" people can be entrapped to buy a bag of weed, or even perhaps to offer a "donation" to that hot babe on the corner. but who the hell gets entrapped trying to blow a building full of innocent people to smithereens??? Mona Eltacrazy!!!

From the previous JW article JW Oct 17, 2012 :
The suspect ....who came to the U.S. on a student visa in January for the specific purpose of launching a terror attack here ......
Entrapment ? Good luck with that.

LOVE IT! Love it, Love it, Love it;

Play the scumbags at their own devious games and beat them. How good it is to hear them squealing like the pigs they are. MORE, please.

Feel really bad for Mona Eltawahy - maybe the judge will be kind enough to allow her conjugal visits with Quazi Mohammed.

The Eltahawy bint says:

''We've seen ** so many** (my emph. Jan ) of these entrapments in the US''

Can she *hear* herself ? Rather puts the kibosh on all these 'moderates', and leftards, and apologists, moaning and whining about 'islamophobia'.

It's clearly *not* irrational to be wary of muslims, when ''so many'' of them, by her **own admission**, are prepared to buy bombs and weapons from those they *think* are al-Qaeda operatives, or some other islamic terrorist group, in the hope of murdering thousands of innocent people.

And as has been reiterated by many posters above, and long since pointed out by Mr. Spencer himself, what kind of person can be 'entrapped' into setting a bomb he believes will detonate and murder other human beings ?

As gravenimage has noted, one could make a case for 'entrapment' if someone was being inveigled into buying stolen goods, in the full knowledge they *were* stolen, that is merely venial and dishonest human nature, and a *far* cry from setting a bomb for the *express* murder of other human beings.

The fact that the Eltahawy, and this McGoldrick, are calling this murderous, evil bas*&%$s intent 'entrapment' merely underlines, once again, for those who have the wit to see, the moral imbecility, and downright *evil* of the muslim mindset.

The Fort Hood maniac was to have his beard removed forcibly- what happened with that? Gillette needs to market a special Islamic gel- made from pork fat...

Well, it's essentially the same scam they pull with "insults" to Islam somehow automatically leading to riots and killing, isn't it. Muslims have no will of their own. Push the Mo' button and they go off like bombs, either figuratively or literally. Islam teaches mindless submission to the Unknowable. But you can't say that, it's an "insult" to Islam. On the other hand, you can't say anything about the all-too-knowable Mo', that's an "insult" too. Would this kind of behavior be tolerated by otherwise intelligent people if it did not come with that big fat "RELIGION - RESPECT IT!" label attached?

Like Pat Condell's characterization of Islam- "The Religion of Permanent Offence"

He is simply using the only legal defense possible in his situation. He has no justification (or even rationalization) under U.S. law for what he was doing. Under Shariah law, which enforces Islamic principles such as jihad, he would not be prosecuted for his "defense" of Islam. To work so hard to commit jihad and then to claim the U.S. coerced him into doing something he would not have otherwise done (entrapment) is conveniently denying his jihad motivation (hey, it works for honor killing). In claiming the U.S. made him do it, he is also seeking to confuse the useful idiots who believe the empty rhetoric that Muslims are always victims merely defending themselves. Such convoluted deceit is sanctioned under Islam, and that is what we are up against.

Perhaps the word savage provokes such ire by jihadists because it denies the diabolical, convoluted deceit they employ. They think it makes them smarter than the average savage.

Yes, and this McGoldrick cretin calls Nafis an ''idiot''.

Does he mean he is an idiot for getting caught ? Or falling for the FBI sting ?

No doubt McGoldrick and Eltahawy would have secretly, (or perhaps *not* so secretly) been glad if the bomb had been real, and this monster had succeeded in his murderous intent.

You can't trick someone into doing what they would do anyway...No one really cares what you think, but they do care what you do...It is not a diagnosis that is dealt with in the institution, it is behavior...and like the police, the custodians cannot afford to lose...We are the custodians of the institution called America, not Mahoundians... violence and threat of violent behavior from that quarter will be dealt with...We can't afford to lose...The FBI and other agencies are doing the right thing...

Jan wrote:

And as has been reiterated by many posters above, and long since pointed out by Mr. Spencer himself, what kind of person can be 'entrapped' into setting a bomb he believes will detonate and murder other human beings ?
.............................

Jan, Robert Spencer actually wrote an excellent essay a year or so ago on just this subject. It was called something like 'what would it take for you to commit Jihad?'. Unfortunately, I have been unable to find it in the archives, but it is an absolute classic.

For most of us, it would take a gun to the head, or a gun to our children's heads—and many of us would refuse, even then.

No normal person would ever want to do such a thing. An FBI agent on the corner with a come on of "Psst! Wanna blow up some Infidels?" would find no takers, and would probably find himself reported to the police almost immediately.

But Muslim apologists start from the point where they posit that the average Muslim could be entrapped by such a come on. Is this *really* something they want to openly admit?

Thanks Petra.

A few years ago, Henry Kadoch came out with an Islamic lexicon, which I spruced up and added a few entries to. Kadoch's I think is better than the 4Freedoms one in that it's more comprehensive, and it also brings out the Orwellian double-speak inherent in Islamic propaganda.

An Islamic-Western Dictionary

From i read about Mona, she is a civil right advocate except when it comes to Jews,Israel and anything against islam.
She finaly shows her true color ( not PINK)
She is like most of the muslims,they hate America,but they all want to come here.
I would like to see her back in egypt dressed like she does,and see what kind of entrapment she will get.

She not only sprayed the ad, she sprayed the woman standing in front of it. That is a criminal assault and battery. I hope they throw the book at her, put her in jail and put salt water in the lock. I hope also that the person sprayed brings a civil suit against her and gets a big judgment.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter