New anti-jihad ad campaign to roll out across NYC

very smart!!!!
M

Go, Pamela!! ..yes, other groups need support, as well--thank you, dear Pamela!

All over the world - everyone is being asked to show special respect for Islam - from Australia, to Thailand - Europe - Russia - the US - Canada - and everyone else is at fault - everyone else needs to change - and to do things better - so that Islam and Muslims can be accommodated.

See if you can spot what is wrong with this picture!

Excellent news! Go Pamela!

I wish you guys would leave the "mohammad is a manifestation of allah" Bahai's out of it.

You can't defeat jihad if you embrace messianic muslims (Baha'i) who's mission is to convince Christians and Jews to accept mohammad as a prophet/manifestation.

No matter what happens to Baha'is in Iran (the only place they are bothered), they will continue to push the faith of multiculturalism "Unity in Diversity" onto unsuspecting Christians and Jews.

It's their mission to have all Christians and Jews embrace islam as an equal faith.

You can never convince the Baha'i to denounce and walk away from islam because the Baha'i Faith is based completely on "Progressive Revelation"

If mohammad is not a prophet, then Baha'u'llah is not the second coming of Isa.

One day even Robert and Pam are going to have to acknowledge all that I have written in this comment is totally true. One day the baha'i New World Order will have to be defeated.

So, the disclaimer means that an allowable implication is that the MTA supports the genocidal imperative to push the Jews into the sea as history's most recent incarnation of a Final Solution. Thus the definition of Jihadist Savage can be construed to include the MTA and many suicidal Jews who support the MTA's message evidenced by the disclaimer, by implication of course.

The MTA disclaimer could be clarified by replacing ENDORSEMENT with ENDORSEMENT OR NONENDORSEMENT.

The federal constitution demands content neutrality.

Those ads cover so many bases ...

Good work, Pamela! ..yeah it reveals just how many areas of our lives islam and company have negatively impacted us (which is certainly putting it mildly).

islam and JIHAD are of course connected, so islam be gone!

WOW! Good work. We can add even more to the list.

Very clever. Positing jihad which is, let's face it, a form of evil, against a myriad of what jihad can result in harm to, shines the light of truth on things exceedingly well. Only deluded Muslims, dumbass leftists and dimwitted dhimmis (some overlap between these last two) will oppose this very smart approach to bring home to most everyone what a menace Islam (yeah, it's ultimately Islam; without Islam there's no damn jihad shit) is to so many and to so much.

It is interesting to note who turn out to be enemies of free speech, of our constitution, of America. It is none other than mainstream medias “moderate muslim” darlings, those of that “majority”.
Up on stage and well illuminated, the likes of aslant, ibrahim cooper and the recently activated mona eltahawy perform for an ever awakening American public to whom their cloak of "moderate muslim" has worn down to a flimsy transparency.
I guess that these individuals are suffused with so much Islamic culture that it makes it impossible for them to realize the fight they face in their attempts to defend their Islamic murderous culture whilst trampling on our cherished American rights.

"Support the Bahais" ...."Support the Copts"......"Support the Hindus"....."Support the Nigerian Christians".........Excellent. This is the way to defeat Islamofascism- by ALL religions coming together and shaming the 'Ummah'.

P.S.Apparently the vast majority of Brits are now "Islamophobes".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/02/poll-islam-negative-britain

When will someone start printing "PROUD TO BE AN ISLAMOPHOBE" T-shirts? I think they just might sell very well.....

Go brave heart Pamela, go! I admire your tenacity and guts. My check is on the way to support this noble cause. May God always protect the freedom fighters like you and Robert.

Defend Common Sense ...

I'm kidding of course, as far as having that be an ad; but more often than not, common sense is completely forsaken where islam and company are concerned.

Thanks Pamela!!!In a sane world there would not be one single dispute about these ads which are TRUE if we want to defeat savages = JIHADISTS = ISLAMISTS = YES MUSLIMS.

Defend universal human rights. Defeat jihad, sharia.

Defend democracy, freedom and individual liberties. Defeat jihad, sharia.

Awesome.

Once you get Main Street to support you, beware of the Clintons, the Bushes, the Obamas, and other dhimmi politicians of all stripes. They will all want to climb on board and push you off, pretending they have not been in bed with the Islamists all this time.

The future must not belong to those who pander to the false profit of Islam.

I would love to see the ad with a caption:

"defend underage girls - defeat jihad"

Great! Just a suggestion:

In any war between civilised men and women against barbaric/inhuman/vicious/immoral/abhorrent/hateful (choose one)Jihadists support civilised men and women.

The rest is fine.

Great! Just a suggestion:

In any war between civilised men and women against barbaric/inhuman/vicious/immoral/abhorrent/hateful (choose one)Jihadists support civilised men and women.

The rest is fine.

Repulsive how the media keeps whitewashing islam. The muslims who perpetrated the terror attack, where 46 people were massacred, in Nigeria today are labeled as "attackers or gunmen" instead of muslims or islamists, islam is hardly or never mentioned:

https://news.google.com/news/rtc?ncl=dlQ_M43tfRf1nzMERQm3M4ZxsQ_lM&topic=w

And check this out:

"... the gunmen wore military attires and told the students to identify themselves by name. He said some of them were spared after mentioning their names... "

They didn't kill those with muslim names, they kill every non-muslim on sight but remember... keep mum about islam or muslims, don't mention them... or else!.

Haven't read all the details yet but just by scanning down the list of new ads I can see that this is a brilliant move. By shifting the focus away from Israel alone and onto all the other countries/groups/religions facing jihad the problem is immediately highlighted: it's a global phenomenon of terrorism and persecution, the common denominator of which is Islam.

Congratulations, Pamela. Absolutely brilliant!

Pamela,
Please make this ad up in bumper sticker size. I will buy 50.

@Wellington @thomas_h

Or you can use the same verbiage of american pro-jihadis:

Defeat the war on women, defeat jihad.

Support savagery, defend jihad

Support chattel slavery, defend jihad

Support wife beating, defend jihad

Support child marriage, defend jihad

Support islamic supremacism, defend jihad

Support gay bashing, defend jihad

Support killing free thinkers, defend jihad

Bull...Dog.

Bravo Pam and Robert!

DEFEND HUMAN RIGHTS
DEFEAT JIHAD

This is one kick ass woman. Holy s**t!

I don't think this could have been done any better. An inspired move, really.

If you ever wondered if Obama is a conscious political manipulator, check out this 2007 video. In front of a black audience, he uses a voice with a cadence and accent very different from what the national audience has become familiar with in his speeches.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/02/obama_2007s_race_speech_no_more_highways_out_in_the_suburbs.html

Here's how the Daily Caller describes the video:

The racially charged and at times angry speech undermines Obama’s carefully-crafted image as a leader eager to build bridges between ethnic groups. For nearly 40 minutes, using an accent he almost never adopts in public, Obama describes a racist, zero-sum society, in which the white majority profits by exploiting black America. The mostly black audience shouts in agreement. The effect is closer to an Al Sharpton rally than a conventional campaign event.

Target other cities - in fact, pick 2 or 3 random cities in all 50 states. Don't just make it the battle of New York

Love the expansion!

woops, I hit the two zeros on my keyboard instead of the hyphens 00 --

Support Pamela

Defeat Juggernauts

Support Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.
Defeat dimwittitude!

Remember the 1993 WTC attacks --Defeat jihad!

Remember 9/11 --Defeat jihad!

Remember Ambassador Christopher Stevens --Defeat jihad!

Remember Daniel Pearl --Defeat jihad!

Remember the USS Cole --Defeat jihad!

Remember the USS Philadeplhia --Defeat jihad!

Remember Election 2012 --Defeat jihad!

Since Atlas is not Shrugging controversy, here are two more:

Support Atheists
Defeat Jihad

Support LGBT People
Defeat Jihad

The one other suggestion that I have is that the multiple variations occur too deep in the message to be noticeable. Perhaps the text needs to be reversed:

Support Thai Buddhists
Defeat Jihad
In any war between the
civilized man and the savage,
support the civilized man

Brilliant, again!!!

"Defend Freedom: Defeat Jihad" summarizes and defines this total all out war of unprecedented scale.

Bravo, Pamela.
And it is a brilliant plan to include many others apart from Israel in the ads.

But I, too, agree with some other posters :
1. Exclude Baha'ís. Even though they suffer at the hands of muslims, they will almost never criticise islam.
2. The word 'savages' was used for us Indians prior to 1947 by the British. Please think about avoiding mention of savages. Many other words exist which can replace it.

But even as they are, the ads are AWESOME.
More power to you and Robert.

The most wonderful thing about these ads is that they have got people talking about jihad.
Instead of being a taboo topic, it is being freely discussed and at all such discussions, if any islamorealist is present, he/she can put their point forward far more easily than they could before the ads.

One can, of course, use the term "savage", to accurately describe racist totalitarian supremacists such as Islamic supremacists.

But using that term may turn off people who are ignorant who otherwise, if other language -- other speech -- were used, would not be turned off and who would listen.

The point is not to "make a point". That is, the point is not to vent -- no matter how accurate the vent. The point is to communicate the truth to others.

On this, I agree with Rich.

One needs to choose one's words wisely.

Perhaps at some point it may be beneficial to accurately use the term "savage" to describe Islamic supremacists. But one should discern when it would be beneficial to do so.

In communicating to others, "how" one says something is as important as, or more important than, "what" that something is that one says. I, myself, have needed to learn that and I still need to learn how to do that.

But everyone has their own style.

But it's good for everyone to strive to communicate the truth as effectively as they can.

----

Check out the following talk by Eric Allen Bell. It's an excellent talk.

Eric Allen Bell - "Islamophobia or Islamo-Reality?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxBLJP0t03w

Marvelous, marvelous series of ads.

Very inclusive—and they give a very good sense of the many peoples, all over the world, who are suffering at the hands of Islam.

My very favorite is the last, which says it all: "Defend Freedom, Defeat Jihad".

As for the comments re the Baha'i—I understand the point being made.

But recall—pious Muslims are not attacking Baha'i because they whitewash Islam, or because they respect Islam and the "Prophet"—they attack Baha'is because they are peaceful, and are not orthodox Muslims.

They are *certainly* victims of Islam, and, moreover, victims of utterly unprovoked oppression and violence.

That does not mean that they are particularly good allies for the Anti-Jihadist movement, for all the reasons cited—but this is, to my mind, a somewhat separate issue.

In any case, I believe these series of ads are marvelous at showing that *everyone* is threatened by Jihad, and are likely to lead many people who might otherwise believe this is just about Israel, or just about Western "foreign policy", to take another look.

Simple but brilliant. I hope these signs become vastly popular.

LemonLime, yes. That is: I think, essentially, yes.

I was just trying to say that one needs to know when to say what to whom.

And Eric Allen Bell talked about this in a way in his talk that I listed. It's a very good talk. He talked about his background and how he came to learn about the situation and how to talk to "Liberals" about the situation.

----

gravenimage, yes. That is: I think, essentially, yes.

And one needs to vigorously, rigorously, firmly, clearly, tell the facts of the history and current reality of the situation that Israel is in.

----

"Conquer anger with lack of anger;
bad, with good;
stinginess, with a gift;
a liar, with truth."

-- The Buddha

Alternative English translation:

"Overcome the angry by non-anger; overcome the wicked by goodness; overcome the miser by generosity; overcome the liar by truth."

-- The Buddha

I heartily agree with the poster who, above, requested that bumper stickers should be produced and put on sale.

Actually, for bumper stickers, just the simple four-word slogan - Defend Freedom - Defeat Jihad, and all the other variations, such as 'Defend Human Rights - Defeat Jihad, Defend South Sudan - Defeat Jihad', 'Defend Hindus - Defeat Jihad' - would work best.

They could also be made up into posters for private use: e.g. an Islamosavvy and sufficiently bold doctor, dentist, or other professional could put one up in his waiting room or in his office. (It would tend to put off any Muslim customers/ clients...but then, they tend to be the customers from hell, anyway).

And there is no reason at all why counter-jihad organisations in other countries, such as Australia, could not follow Pam's example, either by doing some kind of deal with Pam to carry the campaign to their own countries, or by coming up with their own set of statements: e.g. 'Remember Beslan 04 - Resist Jihad', 'Remember Mumbai 08 - Resist Jihad', 'Remember London 05 - Resist Jihad', 'Remember the Armenians - Resist Jihad', 'Remember Bali 02 - Resist Jihad', 'Remember Madrid 04 - Resist Jihad'.

A further idea (for this, we need artists).

This is for use in cafes, waiting rooms, and other places where people are bored and have time to hang around and look at things.

A pair of posters representing 1/ a non-sharia community and 2/ a fully sharia-compliant community.

Under the second is 'if Islam won'.

Like one of those spot-the-difference games, only in-your-face.

Show what Islamic conquest *DOES*.

Both need to be very detailed paintings, in a naive style, like Grandma Moses, or a double spread in the 'Where's Wally?' books.

The first painting, set in high summer on a fine sunny morning somewhere in the western world, represents a park with a lake and fountain with statues in the middle, and a war memorial (another statue), and Town Square. People are walking their dogs. Lovers both straight and gay are walking hand in hand, or kissing one another. Scattered about the gardens, or by the fountain, wedding parties from different cultural groups- Jewish, Christian, East Asian, Black, Hindu Indian - are having their photos taken. There are joggers. Women are wearing normal summery western dress, and some are on their own. There are buskers - someone with a violin, and someone with a flute, while someone sings - and somebody on a soapbox touting atheism (waving about a book by Richard Dawkins), and somebody else (wearing a clerical dog collar) is replying. A couple are setting up a picnic - with wine, and a nice ham. Some children and teenagers - boys and girls - are frolicking in the fountain, and a lady in a bikini is sunbathing by the lake. There is a church - with a cross, and bells in its tower, ringing merrily as a bridal couple emerge. Elsewhere, a synagogue is visible. In the park, a group of Hare Krishnas are doing their thing. There is a police station, a courthouse and a bank; a pair of cops are gently 'proceeding' along one of the paths; Election posters - 'Vote For Joe for Mayor!' are stuck to trees and posts. An artist has his easel set up and is painting someone's portrait, and elsewhere in the park a sculptor is creating a new statue. There is a row of shops, including a butcher with a sign saying 'Best Quality Bacon'. If you look closely, you find out that some of the people in this busy, idyllic scene are wearing crosses; there are a few with the Star of David (and one has an IDF T-Shirt); and those in the Hindu and the Sikh wedding parties are wearing their insignia. And if you look carefully, you discover that one of the people sitting on a bench reading is reading Mr Spencer's "Did Mohammed Exist?'; somebody else is reading 'The Satanic Verses'; and somebody else is wearing the Mohammed Turban-Bomb T-shirt.

The point of the picture is this: practically every object, institution and practice shown in the picture - all of them either positively good, innocent/ neutral, or non-criminal, in the eyes of non-Muslims - is forbidden - criminalised, rejected, attacked and slated for eventual erasure - by the sharia of Islam.

The second picture would show exactly the same landscape- the same scene - as it would appear if the sharia-pushers got what they want.

The youngsters playing in the fountain would be all male. There would be almost no women anywhere, and those few who were there, would be covered up in assorted versions of the Slave Rag, and walking behind a man. There would be no sun-bathers, no people reading 'blasphemous' anti-Islam books, no musicians (stringed instruments, flutes and the 'songstress' are condemned by the hadiths). The statues would be gone, or smashed. The church would be looking very run-down, and its cross and bells would be gone. The synagogue would be minus its star of david. There would be no dancing hare krishnas. No artists. Where the pub had been, there would be a three-storey mosque. The butcher's shop would have an Arabic sign. The bank is gone ('interest' is haram..).

There would be an imam ranting, and an all-male mob listening to him.

On one of the paths, a group of bearded 'Morality Police' with sticks might be seen beating up on a lone woman who is not wearing hijab; and on the edge of the park a crowd of leering, shrieking boys are throwing rocks at a frightened, starved-looking stray dog.