Toronto: Muslim mother’s throat slit for letting children adopt Canadian culture

Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. A manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that "retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right." However, "not subject to retaliation" is "a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring." ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2). In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law.

The Palestinian Authority gives pardons or suspended sentences for honor murders. Iraqi women have asked for tougher sentences for Islamic honor murderers, who get off lightly now. Syria in 2009 scrapped a law limiting the length of sentences for honor killings, but "the new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour 'provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.'" And in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that "Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values."

In light of all this, until authorities get the courage to tell the truth about honor killing, there will be many more such murders.

"Toronto mother’s throat slit for letting children adopt Canadian culture, court hears in alleged honour killing trial," by Joe O'Connor in the National Post, October 10 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Randjida Khairi was stabbed five times in her chest and back. She had her throat cut, a wound so ugly and deep that it sliced through her neck muscles, voicebox and windpipe — stopping only at her spine.

She was stabbed with two different knives. She drowned in her own blood; a process a pathologist would later determine took between five and 10 minutes. Police discovered Ms. Khairi’s body lying on a bloody cot in her family home, a 16th floor apartment in the northwest corner of Toronto, otherwise all tidy and neat, with a kitchen full of pots.

The victim was the mother of six. The victim was married to her killer for 30 years.

On Wednesday, Peer Khairi, a silver-haired man and an Afghan immigrant, sat in the defendant’s box of a downtown Toronto courtroom following the proceedings through a Dari interpreter, fingering a parade of gruesome crime scene photographs of his dead wife, taken by police on March 18, 2008, and presented to the court as evidence.

The 65-year-old jabbed at some photos with his index finger, and turned others this way and that, uttering a few words to his lawyer, rubbing his chin with his hand. Mostly he sat with his legs crossed, tracing his left thumb across his fingertips.

On the opposite side of the courtroom sat a 12-person jury consisting of four women and eight men. They represented a tapestry of ethnicities — of Canadians. Old and young, brown and white and black and all hues in between, contemplating the same images as the defendant while sitting in judgment of a case that marks the latest chapter in Canada’s ever-expanding book of alleged honour killing trials.

Mr. Khairi doesn’t dispute that he killed his wife. On that the Crown and the defence agree. At issue is how, precisely, her death occurred and what was going through her husband’s mind when he killed her. The accused has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder.

The Crown has told the court that, as a new arrival to this country, Mr. Khairi struggled with Canadian ways, often fighting with his wife over how she allowed their children to dress, to become more Western — to drift from the “culture and the rules of their birth place.”

That place is Afghanistan, a patriarchal society where women, be they wives or teenagers or young girls, disobey their husbands, any man, really, at their own peril. This is not an over-simplification. This is a tragic fact....

Ms. Khairi, the court was told, had been thinking of leaving her husband. She spoke to other people, complete strangers in some cases, about her plans. Mr. Khairi told police upon his arrest that he felt disrespected, wronged by his children and betrayed by a wife who had turned against him. Now she is dead.

| 36 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

36 Comments

| Leave a comment

How horrid is this account!!!

Muslims commit 99.9% of all so called "honor killing" and not 91% as stated here. Every account of honor killing, anywhere in the world, is done by a Muslim!!!

Why have these savages been allowed to enter the civilized world and even now it is not stopped!! Why??

Mr. Spencer, Thank you for publicizing this story. I was shocked to see it on SUN News yesterday, hearing that the crime was committed in 2008 and that the defendant pleads not guilty. That the court is charging him with 2nd degree murder? The defense attorney saying it had "nothing to do with religion or a particular culture" ??????

The fault for this tragedy, and all the other Islamic barbarisms in the West, lies with us. Islam and Muslims, right through history, have been quite open of their intentions, by word and deed, towards the non-Muslim world.

If, despite all the warnings of history, of statesman such as Churchill and John Adams, we allowed them Muslims into the West, then we have no one to blame but ourselves.

Now it can be argued that the fault lies with the treasonous politicians. But the fact remains, that we re-elected them, or their kind, in election after election.

Why in heaven's name do these wretches immigrate to western societies that they despise?

Why in heaven's name do western societies accept these wretches as immigrants when the cost to our societies is so huge and the benefits of admitting these people are nonexistent?

What is gained by admitting savage religious fanatics who despise your culture and will be dependent upon social welfare for their entire lives even as they curse and even attack the society that has granted them admission and support?

I am not some sort of bigot, but I believe that our governments owe us some sort of answer.

F***ing savages.

That a Muslim savage from Afghanistan would commit such a bloody, unspeakable crime is not the essential issue because he was only doing what was implicit in the Koran. The real issue here is that a civilized Western court, such as this Canadian example (U.S. included), would even consider as evidence this monster's flimsy excuse that he was simply confused because of his native "culture and the rules of their birth place” Insane! As Thomas Mann once said: "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" Indeed, Canada!

This does bring to mind what Brigtte Gabriel stated in her book THEY MUST BE STOPPED. For it reads "Honor killinga are executed by slitting the victims throat...or by any other means imaginable."

Toronto: Muslim mother’s throat slit for letting children adopt Canadian culture
...........................

My God—I hadn't heard about this case. I wonder how many other cases there are in the West that even savvy Anti-Jihadists miss?

More:

More:

In light of all this, until authorities get the courage to tell the truth about honor killing, there will be many more such murders.
...........................

I've seen this characterization of Honor Killing penalties here at Jihad Watch many times before.

But—with respect—this implies that the authorities in Muslim countries *really want* to rigorously prosecute Honor Killings, but lack the courage to push for it. This may indeed be true in the case of a very few individuals, but I imagine most of the authorities in Dar-al-Islam fully share the same creed as the general populace, and believe these cases should be treated lightly—or even that the murderers should be *lauded* for "cleansing their honor".

More:

Randjida Khairi was stabbed five times in her chest and back. She had her throat cut, a wound so ugly and deep that it sliced through her neck muscles, voicebox and windpipe — stopping only at her spine.
...........................

Pious throatcutting—and its related atrocity, beheading. It sounds as though Randjida's murderer might have beheaded her outright if he'd had a bigger knife.

That most Islamic form of slaughter—used by devout Jihadists on their victims all over the world. Ugh.

More:

She was stabbed with two different knives. She drowned in her own blood; a process a pathologist would later determine took between five and 10 minutes.
...........................

Poor thing. Islam is vicious, and pitiless.

More:

The victim was the mother of six. The victim was married to her killer for 30 years.
...........................

"Honor killing", woman killing, spousal slaughter—all as perfectly Islamic as the method of murder...

More:

Mr. Khairi doesn’t dispute that he killed his wife. On that the Crown and the defence agree. At issue is how, precisely, her death occurred and what was going through her husband’s mind when he killed her. The accused has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder.
...........................

In other words, Khairi doesn't deny that he slaughtered his wife—he's just denying that slaughtering her *was a crime*.

More:

The Crown has told the court that, as a new arrival to this country, Mr. Khairi struggled with Canadian ways, often fighting with his wife over how she allowed their children to dress, to become more Western — to drift from the “culture and the rules of their birth place.”
...........................

And yet, Muslims keep coming to the West. They seem to believe that they can somehow keep our economic opportunities while turning our societies into the same Islamic sh*tholes that they fled.

Of course, decent Infidels and our societies are the ones who will suffer from this.

More:

That place is Afghanistan, a patriarchal society where women, be they wives or teenagers or young girls, disobey their husbands, any man, really, at their own peril. This is not an over-simplification. This is a tragic fact....
...........................

This is a relatively intelligent characterization—more so than many we see in the mainstream press—but it completely misses the fact that Afghanistan is one of the most completely Islamic places on earth, and that all its brutal oppression of women and children stems from their embrace of this vile creed.

More:

Ms. Khairi, the court was told, had been thinking of leaving her husband. She spoke to other people, complete strangers in some cases, about her plans. Mr. Khairi told police upon his arrest that he felt disrespected, wronged by his children and betrayed by a wife who had turned against him. Now she is dead.
...........................

No one can be allowed to escape Islam, entirely, or even in part—not apostates, not wives, and not children. Anyone who attempts to escape can expect just the sort of treatment that poor Randjida Khairi received from her Islamic owner.

savages and their respect.
m

Message to Joe O'Connor of the National Post:

"...sitting in judgment of a case that marks the latest chapter in Canada’s ever-expanding book of alleged honour killing trials."
______________

Ever-expanding "book" of "alleged" honor killings?

What's the title of the book, Joe? "How to be slightly politically incorrect and still keep your writing gig"?

How many chapters does the "book" have right now?

How many more are needed to finish the "book"?

Will it need a "culturally sensitive" editor?
____________________________________________

What books did the victim read, if any, Joe?


I'm sure they weren't something about "alleged honor killings".

Such a pity we don't have the death penalty up here in the Great White North.

More like horror killings, my gawd ...

this is so evil, just like islam and company.

Cut out his testicles, force them down his throat, then force him to defecate on a Koran. Then deport him.

When people immigrate, migrate or move, it is usually to better their positions than the ones they have now...They think the grass is greener over there, so that's where they go to cure their ills...This is 'the environmental cure'...
The environmental cure does not work, because you have to take yourself with you when you go...In the case of Mahoundian immigration, they also bring Islam and all it's baggage with them...When they move into your community you get to see them unload the baggage...They keep honor killing in a special box and only bring it out on special occasions, as in the article...But there is nothing savage about it, depraved, despicable, unspeakable evil maybe, but certainly not savage...Savage has its limits, beyond that is is just plain evil...

Duh Swami wrote:

When people immigrate, migrate or move, it is usually to better their positions than the ones they have now...They think the grass is greener over there, so that's where they go to cure their ills...This is 'the environmental cure'...
The environmental cure does not work, because you have to take yourself with you when you go...
...........................

Actually, Swami, the 'environmental cure', as you put it, *often does work*. Just look at the success of most immigrants to the West.

If someone is genuinely "yearning to breath free" as Emma Lazarus so memorably phrased it in her poem "The New Colossus"—which is engraved on a plaque on the Statue of Liberty—then they can quickly unlearn most of what is holding them back from success in a free country.

If, however, that person not only brings all their ugly mental baggage with them, but also intends to impose as much of it as they can on their wife, their children, and any vulnerable Infidels they come in contact with—as do all too many Muslims—then it is indeed hopeless, and they can only violently drag down the society they relocate to.

In fact, most Muslim immigration is less "immigration" in the sense we have come to understand it than it is a "Hijira"—an invasion of the host country, which Mohammedans are intent on "Islamoforming" as thoroughly as possible.


The CBC has portrayed this as Domestic Violence by all those abusive males in canada that di this every day.
The gutless CBC refused to use the M word or I word and even worse, the failed beheading deosn't even get mentioned as an Honour-Killing like in the Afghan Shafia mass murders by Daddy Dearest.

These types hate canada and think they can live under Shariah Law in canada to sanction pedophilia, kill homosexuals, and the final solution to convert all non-muslims in canada to islam , or kill them as the enemy of allah.
These beheading are becoming too common and it's time to stop some Pro-Shariah jihadist muslims from the Middle east to even get into canada as a Bogus Refugee fleeing oppression only to become the oppressers that kill their wives and daughters rightr here in canada.

It's NOT domestic violence and the FemiNazis would love to exploit for the man-hating agenda, it's the quran and Shariah law.

In any War against civilized girls and Savages
support the girls

Suppot females
Defeat Jihad and honour killings.

We cannot continue to call ourselves elightened, civilized societies with this violence--this savagery--in our midst. Arrest, convict, incarcerate, then deport with no right-of-return. And make sure that's well-publicized. And, stop importing Afghanis (or any other muslims), for God's sake!

The killing occurred in 2008, and it's only now coming to trial? Why?

Second-degree murder? What constitutes first-degree murder under Canadian law? Or would that be under Ontarion law?

What's the maximum penalty?

The defendant is described as "newly arrived". So when did he and his family arrive in Canada? Why did they come to Canada, knowing it's not a Moslem country? And why did Canada admit them?

Did he, or any of the family, work? At what?

Why does Canada let them in ?

Islam is propagated by terror, always hes been, always will. There is no 'religion of peace', nor is it a religion. First and foremost it's a fascistic ideology based on supposed Muslim superiority. The kind of 'superiority' that stopped all Islamic progress in the 12th century and now seeks to do the same to the entire world.

Dreadful as it sounds, the West may have to resort to the ultimate sanction to expunge this madness, as America did with Japanese fanaticism

I'd seriously like to hear from a Canadian official the answer to this. The only government I've heard explain it at all was the British Labour party, who admitted they wanted to "rub the noses of the British people in diversity", in other words they hated the British people & wanted to destroy the current way of life. Does the Canadian government hate it's society too? Do all Western governments hate their societies, because that is what it looks like to me?

Stockholm Syndrome seems to be the default position of victims of Islamic violence.One of the daughters,who is supposed to be a crown witness is now defending her father having now donned the hijab.
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/10/11/daughter-changes-tune-on-dad-at-murder-trial


But Islam is special. According to the news media Islam can say or do what every they wish. Because if they don't get their way there will be riots, and murders. We can expect that Islam wii rewrite law books worldwide.

Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide.
But that's O.K., because Islam is very special... Right?

I had seen this incident mentioned in an article by Tarek Fatah:

http://www.torontosun.com/2012/10/09/honour-killings-are-dishonourable

I don't know what to make of Fatah. Some of what was written here by him is rather disengenious, but what stood out to me were two comments in the comments section, by the same commenter:

1st comment:Anyone should renounce Islam if they believe that God has given permission to hit women. Fatah is a hypocrite for believing what he wrote and still remaining a Muslim.
Below, is the correct translation of the verse.
"Men are to support women by what Allah has bestowed on them over one another and for what they spend of their money. The righteous women are obedient/dutiful women (Qaanitaat); they keep private, the matters for which Allah would keep watch over. As for those women from whom you fear desertion, then you shall advise them, and abandon them in their sleeping place, and go away from them. Then if they yield to you, do not seek a way over them; Allah is High, Great." (Qur'an 4:34

The Arabic word "Qaanitaat" which means obedient or dutiful is referring to obedience to God, not obedience to man.

That same word is used to describe Mary, the Mother of Jesus.
" Maryam, daughter of Imran, she guarded her chastity, so We breathed Our spirit into her. She accepted the truth of her Lord's words and Scriptures: she was truly obedient/dutiful." (Qur'an 66:12)
Mary was never known to have a husband. The word as used in this verse can only refer to her being obedient to Allah alone.

"Qaanitaat" is also used to describe Abraham:
"Abraham was truly an example, obedient/dutiful to Allah and true in faith. He was not an idolater." (Qur'an 16:120)
It is absolutely wrong to use that word to mean that women should submit to men as the Bible has stated.
Please see my post below where I explained Fatah's mistranslated use of the Arabic word for "strike or beat."

2nd comment: Here is the translation 4:34 by Bakhtiar a woman scholar.

"Men are supporters of their wives because God has given some of them an advantage over others and because they spend of their wealth.
So the ones who are in accord with morality are the ones who are morally obligated; the ones who guard the unseen of what God has kept safe.
But those whose resistance you fear, admonish them, then abandon them in their sleeping place and then go away from them."

The Arabic word "Qaanitaat" refers to people who are obedient or dutiful to God. The word as used in the verse talks about wives being obedient to God, not men. That same word is used to describe Mary, Jesus' Mother, in 66:12
The word is also used to describe Abraham in 16:120.
Both Mary and Jesus were in accord with morality and were obedient/dutiful to God.

To say that "Qaanitaat" mean that wives should be "devoutly obedient" to their husbands is a stretch when compared to how the word is used elsewhere in the Koran.
I have already explained the Arabic word "idribuhunna" which is wrongly translated to mean "strike" or "beat."

===

I have never seen this translation before, and I'm guessing that those who commit the 91% of honour killings haven't either. Has anyone else ever come across this?

Hopefully, the precedent set by the Shafia trial that Canadian law does not tolerate killing, especially honour killing, will be continued here. Even if it is acceptable in Afghanistan, even there it must be known that in Canada and the West, it is not. How can he seriously claim not to know? No, he certainly does know, but is hoping that we're still too asleep not to notice.

DSH

This is just a great Religion isn't it? This is what there loving God teaches them? Isn't that great! His name isn't Lucifer is it! Yo! What happen to LOVE and PEACE!!!
God Bless America!!!

Your 'correct translations' couldn't matter less.

It's your vicious co-religionists, who *do* believe they have koranic authority to beat their wives, you should be trying to convince.

In any war between the civilized man and the savege,support the civilized man.
Support Canadian values. Defeat Jihad.

Jan, I am a born-again Christian who is *fully* aware of what Islam is. I am not a supporter of Islam in any way, shape, or form. Nowhere in my post did I say that I supported that (previously unknown to me) translation. I stated that those who commit honour killings did not agree with it either, assuming they knew about it. All I wanted to know was if anyone else had heard this before, and I would also like to see a rebuttal to it.

I also stated my hope that Canadian law would find this man guilty, just as it did in the Shafia murder trials. How all that leads you to assume that I am a muslim, or at least a supporter, is confusing. It has been quite some time since I commented in this forum, and did so rarely, but if anyone remembers me, they will know that I definitely do not support Islam.

DSH

dsh wrote:

I have never seen this translation before, and I'm guessing that those who commit the 91% of honour killings haven't either. Has anyone else ever come across this?

...All I wanted to know was if anyone else had heard this before, and I would also like to see a rebuttal to it.
.........................

dsh, these bowdlerized "translations" of the Qur'an—like the ones you cited here by Tarek Fatah and Bakhtiar—are usually intended more to whitewash Islam's image for Infidels than to actually reform Islam in any way.

In fact, Muslim apologists often present just such "translations" here as Taqiyya. It is, sadly, no wonder that Jan thought your posting this sort of thing was an example of just that.

The fact is that Muslims regularly take Qur'an 4:34 to condone wife beating.

And the idea that the "obedience" in question is to "Allah", rather than her husband, seems weak at best. For one thing, it is the husband in this case who is tasked with evaluating his wife—she cannot judge how obedient to Islam *he* might be.

Secondly, it is common throughout Islamic texts to conflate the two—for instance, a woman refusing to sleep with her husband is "cursed by the angels all night". So, there is hardly any separation of religion and a woman's obedience to her husband in Islam.

Also, your "translation" says "as for those women from whom you fear desertion", when every other translation clearly notes that this refers to "disobedience", not desertion.

And if leaving the marriage would constitute disobedience to "Allah", then it would appear to be a distinction without a difference, in any case.

The main thing is that this "translation" just carefully—and without explanation—elides the entire reference to wife beating.

If you look into the Jihad Watch archives, you will find that Tarek Fatah is a pretty equivocal character.

And Laleh Bakhtiar has openly stated that her translation of the Qur'an is intended to "not push non-Muslims away from Islam"—in other words, it is a form of misleading Da'wa.

In any case, though, she is not taken seriously as an Islamic scholar by most—well—Islamic scholars. For one thing, the mere fact that she is a woman would disqualify her being taken seriously by most Muslims.

The head of the Islamic Society of North America (Canada), ISNA, Mohammad Ashraf, said he would not permit Bahktiar's book, The Sublime Quran, to be sold in the bookstore of ISNA and that their bookstore would not allow this kind of "woman-friendly translation", and that he will consider banning it.

So, much as I understand your being excited over this vision of a kinder, gentler Islam, it is utterly rejected by most Muslims. Moreover, it strongly appears that this sort of thing is not really intended to sway Muslims, in any case, but just to serve to make credulous Infidels more likely to embrace Islam.

My apologies. I misunderstood your post.

The Canadian people should demand that his cell be strewn with pig-dog and monkey fical matter. and when he crocks,make sure his orange crate coffin is filled as well. Hows that for disrespecting. Oh wait, can't forget the 72 dogs,72 monkeys and 72 pig's.

These women can't wait, There needs to be women groups that can help them and their children escape these throw backs.We always here after they have been killed that they spoke to other people.For the women out there, life is better than death.I pray for the day when honor killings is a thing of the past.

Well, I never thought it meant a gentler, kinder Islam. My first thought when seeing this 'translation' is rather unprintable, but "fornicating male bovine excrement" is a gentler, kinder way to say it. That, and excrement cranium. I was definitely not excited. :) Bewildered, maybe. I knew it was definitely taqqiya, make no mistake. As if a woman could prove all those honour killers of the past 1400 years wrong in their understanding of the Quran. If nothing else, you could always chalk up her translation to the fact that women are only half as intelligent as men. Or so it says in the Quran (assuming that verse is translated correctly. Please note the sarcasm. :)

If you had the chance to read through Fatah's article (I only skimmed it), you may be surprised that he was candid enough to admit that Surah 4:34 did indeed sanction violence against one's wife or wives. The translation was mentioned by a commenter who seemed to be muslim, and who disapproved of Fatah.

What I found disingenious was Fatah's statement that the Quran did not support honour killing. Mr Spencer (I believe it was) has on this site mentioned the following on more than one occasion:

"Honor killing is not discussed directly in the Qur'an, although it is given strong implicit support by 18:74, 80-81, when the mysterious figure known in Islamic tradition as Khidr, traveling with the prophet Moses, kills a young man Moses terms "innocent" (18:74). Khidr explains: "And as for the lad, his parents were believers and we feared lest he should oppress them by rebellion and disbelief. So we desired that their Lord would give them in exchange (a son) better in purity (of conduct) and closer in affection." The young man is murdered because he is an unbeliever, so that his parents may be given a believing child in exchange. (Why the unbelieving son has to be killed before the believing son can be given to them is not explained.) Thus the precedent is set: a child who is an unbeliever is killed for his unbelief."

So, no, I am no fan of Tarek Fatah, to say the least. I have not ever dealt directly with his writings. The story of his I referred to was linked to on the TROP website.

Gravenimage, to you and Jan, in retrospect, I admit that my initial posting was a little vague in intent. Hopefully, I have clarified this. No apologies necessary on your parts. I have actually been lurking on this website for about five years at least, and have shared much of what I have learned with as many as I can.

DSH

Thanks so much for your erudite reply, dsh. I will look for your comments in the future.

Unbeliever

you wrote - "Stockholm Syndrome seems to be the default position of victims of Islamic violence.One of the daughters,who is supposed to be a crown witness is now defending her father having now donned the hijab."

http://www.torontosun.com/2012/10/11/daughter-changes-tune-on-dad-at-murder-trial

Thanks for the link - I read it - very creepy.

And I *also* came across something else. Remember the *other* trial that's going on? - Afghan Muslim mama charged with *attempting* to 'honor' murder her insufficiently-Islamic daughter? That girl, too, is now busy defending her murderous mama.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/10/01/stabbed-daughter-defends-mother-she-could-not-hurt-a-fly/

I don’t blame myself, but it’s maybe 1% my fault’: Stabbed daughter defends Afghan-Canadian mother


I would like to know how much pressure from the *rest* of the Mohammedan Mob is being exerted upon these witnesses. Quite a lot, I would think.

Even so, *both* the girl's accounts of the attack -the original and the revision - actually have something in common. They are eerie, chilling.

This is how the injured girl *originally* described the attack.

"Close the door and don’t come back until I tell you to,” she said, according to Ms. Ebrahimi. “She approached me with these really wild eyes,”

Ms. Ebrahimi said. Her mother told her she loved her and wanted to talk. She had her daughter lie on her stomach on a carpet, her arms outstretched.

“I felt something in my back…. It really hurt,” Ms. Ebrahimi told police. She was thinking, “I’m not even 20 years old. I’m dying, and it’s my mother who is going to kill me.”

'During the attack, she said, her mother said things like, “You’re not happy in this house,” and, “You don’t deserve this life.” She described her mother’s face as “crazy, mental.”..

And her rejigged statement doesn't make things any better..In fact, I think it makes it worse.

'At the preliminary inquiry, Ms. Ebrahimi supported the defence position that her mother was overtired and out of sorts the day of the attack.

“She was taking, like, really deep breath and she was looking, like, really weird to me,” she said. Her mother’s voice was raspy and her eyes bulged. “It did not seem human. It did not seem like my mother.”

'Overtired'? 'Out of sorts'? 'Crazy', 'Mental'. Not 'she' ...'it'.

Other words, I must say, occur to me. Words like 'possessed'.

duh-swami, regular commenter here at jihadwatch since the beginning, has worked in secure facilities where dangerous psychiatric patients are housed. He has often proclaimed that 'allah' 'produces psychotic episodes in Believers'.

I think this girl's mama was having what duh-swami calls an 'allahgasm'.

The description makes my hair stand on end: 'It did not seem human. It did not seem like my mother'.

'It'. Not 'she'.

When M Scott Peck describes his encounter with what he identifies as the demonic, in his book 'People of the Lie', his description is eerily reminiscent of this girl's account. A sense of something alien and utterly malevolent, sneering out from behind the face of the human it has inhabited and is controlling and devouring. And he argues that this entity, whatever one may call it, *is* ..an 'it'. Not a he or a she but simply an 'it', sterile and destructive, hostile to all life and growth.

Bohra, overcome by terror, a terror against which she had no spiritual defences, and which was all the more terrifying because it manifested through her mother, has **submitted**. And although she goes on about how her relationship with her mother is 'close', and so on, I think that deep down she knows that if she puts so much as a toe out of line, her mother's smiling face will melt away, and there will only be the monster with the knife.

I'd say Khairi's daughter, now frantically rejigging *her* story to try to get her murderous father off the hook, is the same.

Who knows *what* has been said to her, or threatened?

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter