White House was told two hours after Libya attack that it was jihad terror

And their lies and cover-up began immediately, with Obama Administrations blaming the Muhammad video, in an implicit attack upon our freedom of speech. Clearly they could not and would not own up to having used American military might to enable the ascendancy of al-Qaeda in Libya. Re-elected? Are you kidding? How about impeached?

Obama lied, Americans died.

“White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails,” by Mark Hosenball for Reuters, October 23:

(Reuters) – Officials at the White House and State Department were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack, official emails show.

The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a “terrorist” attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

While officials did mention the possible involvement of “extremists,” they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28….

By the morning of September 12, the day after the Benghazi attack, Reuters reported that there were indications that members of both Ansar al-Sharia, a militia based in the Benghazi area, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African affiliate of al Qaeda’s faltering central command, may have been involved in organizing the attacks….

Taliban top dog: "Increase your efforts to expand the area of infiltration in the ranks of the enemy"
Hamas-linked CAIR, other Muslim Brotherhood-linked Islamic supremacists frequently welcomed at Obama White House
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    Oh sure- just because a jihad group claimed credit for the attack, verified by our own monitoring system recording our people being attacked, as well being supported by camera footage from our drones overhead- you want to leap to the conclusion that the administration’s 100% false narrative is some sort of lie.

  2. says

    When will the American people WAKE UP and vote this bounder out of office? Robert is right—he should have been impeached long ago. Too many Americans are ignorant and irresponsible, and vote for any mediocrity that will offer them benefits. I have long argued that the franchise should be earned and not freely given, unless some sort of minimal qualifications are met, similar to what immigrants have to demonstrate. If our own citizens are too ignorant to learn about how their government is supposed to work—and what the founding principles are—then they forfeit this right. After all, one cannot drive a car unless they pass a licensing test. Voting should have similar strictures.

  3. says

    And yet the obama administration chose the bogus *it’s-all-over-this-video* narrative. Boy what liars. This should make us all very angry; along with being a total game changer for obama.

    *NOBAMA 2012*

  4. says

    Lies? The frauds life is full of them…He started out life with a forged birth certificate, later he altered his Selective Service card…after that he lied on his law license application…There have been so many lies, it’s easy to lose count…So why should we be surprised by his lies about Libya? But now that he and his gang have been tripped up, and their lies exposed, Congress needs to do something quickly…It takes to long to impeach him, he should be removed for being too incompetent for the position…Once removed he should be charged with multiple treason…

  5. says

    It seems that ever since Watergate, people have become inured to the lies of politicians, and their dirty tricks.

    It’s almost as if they’ve come to expect it, and simply yawn.

    Reprehensible as Watergate was, it merely involved money, and graft. Yet it brought down Nixon.

    But it seems that *this* scandal, which involves an attack on a *sovereign Embassy, which has historically been seen as an *act of war* and the **murder** of the Ambassador, and three other Americans, which obama **knew** the motivation for, and has **clearly lied about**, leaves the majority of the American electorate cold.

    I am utterly bemused. It would seem obama is truly teflon. And why ?

    I am

  6. says

    The problem is that although there is enough evidence for Obama to have been impeached long ago, the facts aren’t getting out. Sure, you mention it on sites like this, but here you’re preaching to the converted.
    Any important facts about Obama’s incompetency or deceit are not been told by the MSM, or if they are they’re been subjugated to small single-column, well-hidden press articles.
    At least, I believe that’s the case but not being American I couldn’t say for certain. Maybe U.S. readers of Jihad Watch could enlighten me.
    All we seem to hear in the British media is how wonderful Obama is! If I want to find any real news about anything at all, I have to trawl the internet, and I mean trawl. I have to check several different websites before I can believe anything that I have read.

  7. says

    ‘Daily Telegraph':-

    “Tunisia makes arrest in connection with Benghazi consulate attack.
    “Tunisia has arrested a 28-year-old man reportedly linked to the US consulate attack in Libya which killed US Ambassador Christopher Stevens.”

    [Excerpt]-

    “This week, official emails obtained by Reuters showed that both the White House and State Department were advised two hours after the attacks that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the assault.
    “By the morning of Sept. 12, the emails revealed there were indications that members of both Ansar al-Sharia, a militia based in the Benghazi area, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African affiliate of al-Qaida’s faltering central command, may have been involved in organising the attacks.”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/tunisia/9632007/Tunisia-makes-arrest-in-connection-with-Benghazi-consulate-attack.html

  8. says

    More *dirt* on obama …

    This information was emailed to me last night, and it blew me and my husband’s minds!

    It is a lot of data to read through; but like a good book–once you get started–you won’t be able to put it down:

    “EXPOSING THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!!”

    http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/oct2012/ronr1024.htm

    Excerpt, written by Ron Reese:

    “Hi, Over the course of the next two weeks, I feel led to forward to you several articles, which have appeared in my inbox over the past several months, regarding Barack Hussein Obama. We are now facing the most crucial election in my lifetime. It is my firm conviction that the United States will not survive another four years with Obama at the helm. I have decided to not even bother, at this time, to tell you all of the negative things that I have learned about Obama. I want you to read for yourselves what so many others are reporting.

    These are reports that you will not read or view in your mainstream media, because Obama has the vast majority of the media in his back pocket. Most of what I am forwarding to you, will not even appear on Fox News. These reports are not meant to extol the virtues of Mitt Romney.

    Please do not bother responding with all of the reasons why you cannot vote for Romney, or why you will be voting for a 3rd Party candidate (which, in effect, is a vote for Obama), or why you will not be voting at all. If it is not already clear to you the vast differences in the stances, the values, and the morals, of these two men, I am extremely confident that, if you will take the time to read these reports, you will come away convinced as to who we MUST vote for.”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Please read, and then pass it along …

  9. says

    Well the thing to do is vote Obama out. It looks touch and go to me. And things are not being helped by @#$%^&*! like your – Pregnancy after rape is “something God intended to happen” Republicans.

  10. says

    Well the thing to do is vote Obama out. It looks touch and go to me. And things are not being helped by @#$%^&*! like your – Pregnancy after rape is “something God intended to happen” Republicans.

  11. says

    And this:

    “Richard Mourdock’s comment that if rape leads to pregnancy it’s “something God intended” put Republican candidates from Romney on down on the defensive and sent them scrambling to protect their recent gains among female voters. It was not what most Republicans wanted to be discussing days before an extremely close election largely hinging on concerns about the weak U.S. economic recovery.

    President Barack Obama’s campaign jumped on Mourdock’s remark, calling it “demeaning to women.” ”

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10842701

  12. says

    High crimes and misdemeanors…How high of a crime is it to fraudulently present a forged birth certificate to the American people, presented as real and authentic? How high of a crime is it to get Americans killed by your ideological incompetence, as in Libya and Afghanistan? How high of a crime is it to give aid and comfort to the enemy as in Muslim Brotherhood? Impeachment is not good enough…

  13. says

    @Wellington: I’m with you 100%. However, don’t be too hard on Softly Bob, since he seems to be from the other side of the Atlantic.

    But, while Obama has not been an overt criminal (as opposed to a doofus getting a free pass from most of the world’s socialist media), I sense a very subtle probing of the First Amendment being carried out by this administration.

    We’ve had Elena Kagan, an advocate of hate speech laws, put on the Supreme Court. We’ve had an HHS order demanding that religious employers buy contraceptive and abortion coverage for employees, regardless of qualms of conscience. When the Islamic Street blows up over the burning of the Qur’an, we have an administration with a greater penchant for hauling the justly obscure Terry Jones into the limelight and publicly bullying him than for letting the world know that we have such a thing as the First Amendment. When the Ansar al-Sharia murder our ambassador to Libya and pointedly remind the world on 9//1 that Islamoterror is alive and well (RPG’s and all), the O’s administration tries to blame it all on another obscure American, Nakhoula Nakhoula.

    This kind of nibbling at the edges of the First Amendment is the one thing at which the O administration seems halfway competent, and, in its competence, downright sinister. But nobody can notice a thing like that unless it blows up into something big and flashy. That’s part of the whole trouble with our American system of government, courts, a free press that has gone voluntarily slavish, and perhaps even our American people, who have been dumbed-down, made entertainment-drunk, sports-crazy, and media-sedated. Take that as an agonized crie de couer.

  14. says

    What Wellington means to say is that none of the allegations thath would be sufficient to use to impeach Obama are currently able to be substantiated with sufficient evidence. It’s a very frustrating situation to be in, when you know someon’e guilty, but you can’t yet quite do anything through legal channels. If only Trump hadn’t wimped out (perhaps he was bribed or threatened), and Breitbart hadn’t conveniently died. So now we’re banking the future of the entire free world on a healthy, chipper politically correct Mormon. Great. We deserve what we get, frankly.

  15. says

    AND …

    obama’s lies over the Benghazi jihad attacks also served to foment more violence from muslims worldwide; which means obama should be held accountable for the deaths that resulted from his evil lies! My God, what an evil man he is!

  16. says

    Sorry to disagree with you, Softly Bob, but your contention that “there is enough evidence for Obama to have been impeached long ago” is simply not in accord with the facts.

    Look, I can’t stand Obama and I can’t wait to vote for Romney. Obama has only borrowed ideas and virtually all of them are wrong. He has done great damage to the American Republic with his silly ideological positions which he has acted upon in numerous instances. In fact, it’s arguable that he has done more damage to America than any other single individual in all of American history (I would argue such).

    He’s a divider. He’s not nearly as smart as many people still think he is. In short, he’s a doofus. And so on and so on. BUT, there is nothing to date that he has done which is impeachable. Not even remotely.

    High crimes and misdemeanors are the standard put forth by the Constitution for impeachment of federal officers, including the President. Obama has not committed high crimes or misdemeanors which are provable beyond a reasonable doubt (the criminal standard). Therefore, calling for Obama’s impeachment is, at best, a distraction and, at worst, a guaranteed failed strategy. I do wish that most everyone would finally realize this.

    After all, stupidity and foolishness are not impeachable offenses in and of their own right. The way to handle Obama within the confines of the law is to vote this highly overrated, foolish man out of office come November 6th. I’ll be there for that.

  17. says

    Here’s #4 from the link above …

    4. Acts of preferentialism for Islam:

    >May 2009 – While Obama does not host any National Day of Prayer event at the White House, he does host White House Iftar dinners in honor of Ramadan.[47]

    >April 2010 – Christian leader Franklin Graham is disinvited from the Pentagon’s National Day of Prayer Event because of complaints from the Muslim community.[48]

    >April 2010 – The Obama administration requires rewriting of government documents, and a change in administration vocabulary, to remove terms that are deemed offensive to Muslims, including jihad, jihadists, terrorists, radical Islamic, etc.[49]

    >August 2010 – Obama speaks with great praise of Islam and condescendingly of Christianity.[50]

    >August 2010 – Obama went to great lengths to speak out on multiple occasions on behalf of building an Islamic mosque at Ground Zero, while at the same time he was silent about a Christian church being denied permission to rebuild at that location.[51]

    >2010 – While every White House traditionally issues hundreds of official proclamations and statements, on numerous occasions, this White House avoids traditional Biblical holidays and events, but regularly recognizes major Muslim holidays, as evidenced by its 2010 statements on Ramadan, Eid-ul-Fitr, Hajj, and Eid-ul-Adha.[52]

    >October 2011 – Obama’s Muslim advisers block Middle Eastern Christians’ access to the White House.[53]

    >February 2012 – The Obama administration makes effulgent apologies for Korans being burned by the U. S. military,,[54] but when Bibles were burned by the military, numerous reasons were offered why it was the right thing to do.[55]

    *Many of these actions are literally UNPRECEDENTED. This is the first time they have happened in four centuries of American history. The hostility of President Obama toward Biblical faith and values is without equal from any previous American president.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~

    Shocking!

  18. says

    I’ve always liked the idea of additional votes for certain citizens: everyone would have one vote, but taxpayers — defined as those who pay more to the government in taxes than they receive from the government in benefits, wages, or pensions — would get a second vote. Wounded combat veterans would get a third vote. With perhaps extra votes for other qualifications.

  19. says

    Yes, the media were all over Nixon, crying “What did he know, and when did he know it?”
    So where are they now, with Obama?
    It seems the media these days are better at covering things up than at exposing them.

  20. says

    What Wellington means to say is that none of the allegations thath would be sufficient to use to impeach Obama are currently able to be substantiated with sufficient evidence. It’s a very frustrating situation to be in, when you know someon’e guilty, but you can’t yet quite do anything through legal channels. If only Trump hadn’t wimped out (perhaps he was bribed or threatened), and Breitbart hadn’t conveniently died. So now we’re banking the future of the entire free world on a healthy, chipper politically correct Mormon. Great. We deserve what we get, frankly.

  21. says

    @kepha,

    ‘ That’s part of the whole trouble with our American system of government, courts, a free press that has gone voluntarily slavish, and perhaps even our American people who have been dumbed-down, made entertainment-drunk, sports-crazy, and media-sedated. Take that as an agonized crie de couer.’

    Golden Words.exactly true with India too.
    Thanks,Your Excellency!

  22. says

    Thanks for the encouragement. As a Christian, I am grateful to God that we now have internet and so many other ways to get information, rather than the self-appointed information gatekeepers of the major media.