British Muslim behind attack on CIA base in Afghanistan

Britain’s new export: jihad. “British extremist ‘behind attack on CIA base in Afghanistan,'” by Rob Crilly in the Telegraph, November 11 (thanks to Anne Crockett):

A video released by the Pakistan Taliban claims that a British extremist was one of the masterminds behind a devastating suicide attack on a CIA base in Afghanistan.

“Umar the British martyr” is identified in the 30-minute propaganda film, which pays tribute to extremists who have given their lives in attacks on Western or Pakistani forces.

It claims the Briton was a co-conspirator in an attack carried out by a Jordanian triple agent, Abu Dujana, on a US base in Khost, Afghanistan, three years ago.

He had been sent by the CIA and the Jordanian intelligence service to infiltrate al-Qaeda in Pakistan’s tribal region but detonated a vest crammed with explosives when he arrived at Camp Chapman for a debriefing, killing the station chief, Jennifer Matthews, six other American personnel and his Jordanian handler.

The video, obtained by The Sunday Times(£), is the first time a Briton has been named in connection with the attack.

“Umar, with his accomplice Amir Hakimullah, entirely planned the suicide attack which Dr Abu Dujana undertook against the American CIA station in Khost,” says an Urdu voice-over set to images of Umar’s face.

Umar, whose full name is not given, is filmed sitting with Abu Dujana.

Speaking in English, with a London accent, he describes American forces as “dogs running with their tails in between their legs”.

“By the grace of Allah, my brother Abu Dujana will attack them,” he says.

The video claims he was arrested in the UK for “Jihadist” activities before heading to Afghanistan but was killed in a drone strike in 2010.

The attack on Camp Chapman was the CIA’s bloodiest day in more than 25 years.

Abu Dujana, a doctor and Islamist blogger, had been recruited by Jordanian intelligence who believed he had been turned and would operate as a double agent, providing intelligence on the whereabouts of al-Qaeda’s then deputy leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Officials later said he was not searched as he entered the base for fear of offending a trusted agent.

Rabbi: Islamization of Europe a good thing
Yet again: British soldier murdered by jihadist in Afghan army uniform
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    This scum was *not* British. He merely carried a British passport.

    ”Officials later said he was not searched as he entered the base for fear of offending a trusted agent”.

    Dear God. Our suicidal insanity is *unbelievable.*

  2. says

    Agreed.

    The term, “American” is similarly loosely applied to anyone carrying a United States Passport.

    This old airline employee learned years ago working in Hong Kong that the papers one presents to show “nationality” say, at an airline check-in counter, often have little or no relationship to the mind-set or even the genuine national loyalty of the document holder.

    Passports, even more so today with our universal problem of Muslim penetration and subversion, are literally traveling papers of convenience.

    No more. No less. It’s offensive to have this Muslim butchery “attached” to one of our passports.

    What to do? It’ll be cumbersome to say something like, “..the Muslim murderer and throat slitter was in possession of and had been using a [……] passport”.

    “Native born” is also losing “national” meaning. Here in America the term, “anchor baby” has been coined to define a category of child born of an illegal-entry mother (never mind the biological father) in order to gain American citizenship for a child born shortly after that illegal arrival….born deliberately on our soil for the nativity-citizenship.

    Twenty-first century “nationality” has taken on new meanings forced upon us by these infiltrating Muslims.

    This proud infidel here likens it to a variation of elastic taqiyya.

    There will be shrieks and howls of protest at this perceived elasticity of “truth”, perhaps….but so be it. It’s literally true. Undeniable.

  3. says

    Jan wrote:

    This scum was *not* British. He merely carried a British passport.
    …………………..

    Very, very true, Jan.

    And the same is true of “Dutch”, or “Australian”, or “French”, or “American” Muslims on Jihad back in Dar-al-Islam.

    This is increasingly a matter of Jihadists using the civilized countries of the West as a base from which to wage violent Jihad. It is, perhaps, even worse in countries with generous welfare programs, where Jihadists are often using their victims’ own hard-earned money to fund their murders.

  4. says

    ”This is increasingly a matter of Jihadists using the civilized countries of the West as a base from which to wage violent Jihad. It is, perhaps, even worse in countries with generous welfare programs, where Jihadists are often using their victims’ own hard-earned money to fund their murders”

    Exactly. This enrages me so much I sometimes wonder if I’ll have a stroke.