Canada: Muslim who slit his wife's throat for adopting Western values found guilty of second-degree murder

During the trial, Khairi had claimed that he killed his wife in self-defence, alleging that she had tried to attack him with a knife...

Khairi had not revealed his claim that he was attacked prior to the trial, including when questioned by police.

In court, Khairi said that he had been waiting for his trial to tell the full story....
........................

Uh...right...

More:

We have seen this defense from Muslim honor murderers before.
........................

We have indeed. It was especially ludicrous in the case of Muzzammil Hassan, who was a head taller than his petite wife, and who outweighed her by probably a hundred pounds.

But on some grotesque level I believe pious Muslims *actually believe this*.

Oh, not about being 'attacked with a knife', of course—but that they both regard their murders of their wives as a form of "self-defense".

After all, in both cases she offended him in some way, by being insufficiently obedient, or for becoming "too Westernized"—i.e., insufficiently Islamic.

It is exactly the same with the devout Muslim who threatened to hunt the non-violent Robert Spencer down and cut off his head with an axe in "self-defense":

"I was thinking to CUT your head with AXE.. as Self -defence. defending mY dignity as MUSLIM"

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/11/after-repeatedly-threatening-to-kill-me-muslim-emailer-comes-out-for-obama.html

This hardly sounds like "self defense" to any rational Westerner. For an act to be considered "self defense" in the West, the person must be directly and immediately threatened with grievous physical harm.

But for a Muslim, he only need be confronted with someone who offends his sense of Islamic propriety, or someone whom he considers to present an obstacle to the spread of Islam.

This also makes the Islamic tenet that no Muslim can wage offensive Jihad in the absence of a Caliphate virtually meaningless, since anything and everything can be considered "defensive Jihad"—even an out-of-the-blue sneak attack like 9/11.

"stabbed his wife and slashed her throat" ...

Of course he's guilty; you don't slash someone's throat in self defense ...this violent act demonstrates immense rage towards the victim.

"Peer Khairi, 65, sobbed quietly with his head down"

When surrounded by his enemies, coward Muhammad, 55, sobbed quietly and said: "Who will sell his life for us?"

http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2011/03/muhammad-coward.html

Crazy world we live in. Typically the legal system in America is generally stacked against men, for all matters, for general purposes, when involving women.

But when it comes to muslim murders, hatred, torture, pedo and other sex crimes, and whatever, by men, or women, it is not stacked against muslims, but dials in automatic leniency, even though 1400 years of proof and 3 texts of models of hatred and exhortations should be evidence to make it totally worthy of handing down the maximum sentences. That apparent fact is especially disgusting.

It does tend to make reason for the old saw that "the law is an ass" and at least one other comment that I won't repeat in public.

Thank G-d for justice, that Andrew Mc Carthy got a conviction on the blind sheik, at least.

But a wise and brave judge, with a proper eye to the Amendment 1, would have thrown out the case against the mo movie maker, on the face of it, damned be the probation violation, due to the poisonous manner of the revengeful sick government involvement. That's my opinion....

I suppose the second degree murder charge was sought because it was a much easier conviction to obtain than first degree, and given the killer's age, he will almost surely die in prison anyway. I'd rather hectare executed but we don't have that here. :-(

First, why were they in Canada? Second, why do we think they will tell the truth in court? Third, are libtards beginning to understand why Muslims are undesirable in civilized countries?

In court, Khairi said that he had been waiting for his trial to tell the full story....

He still didn't tell the full story...He left out Quran verses and the examples of Mahound...he had his chance to lay da'wah on the court and he passed it up...I'm sure the prison Imam will point this out to him......

With the information of the above article it's time to inform the reader that Brigitte Gabriel did give the warning years about the dangers of the Islamic ways which includes "honor kills." What she wrote in her book THE MUST BE STOPPED applies very much here, For it reads "Honor killings are exeuted by slitting the victims throat...or by any other means imagainable." Furthermore, "Honor killings have also come to the West thanks to the rise of Islamic immigration."
pages 175,176.

Oh come on be honest. You have a bias against Islam and Muslims.

Mr Khairi, the local FGM operative was sharpening his knife. His dear beloved, greatly loved wife, felt faint and fell on his knife.

The meaning of "first degree" and "second degree" murder varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions, most murders are "second degree" and "first degree" is reserved for the most heinous. That is true in New York state, for example, where murder is first degree only in special cases such as the murder of a police officer. Canada is in this category, though the criteria for murder to be "first degree" are somewhat broader than in New York. The charge of second degree murder in this case looks appropriate to me in that it was not of a police officer, did not occur in the course of a sexual assault or airline hijacking, etc.

Also note that a conviction for "only" second degree murder does not mean that he will get off lightly. In Canada the mandatory sentence for 1st and 2nd degree murder is life in prison. The only difference is that first degree murder the court may not set the time before the criminal may apply for parole at less than 25 years, whereas for second degree murder the court may set the period of parole ineligibility as low as ten years. And to be clear,this is merely eligibility for parole. Parole is by no means automatic.