Here in microcosm is how the Politics of Offense works. Sara el-Yafi is deeply offended, even outraged by the Israeli buffet menu, and Harvard rushes to accommodate her. Islamic supremacists such as Hamas-linked CAIR play the outrage card again and again in the U.S. because they know that when they do, frightened dhimmi officials will hasten to give them everything they want.
"Harvard 'deeply troubled' by row over Israeli buffet," by Charles Bybelezer for the Jerusalem Post, November 9 (thanks to Benedict):
Harvard Business School is “deeply troubled” for having offended Arab sensibilities due to the mischaracterization of various foods appearing on the menu of the dining room’s Israeli Mezze Station, Brian Kenny, chief marketing and communications officer of the school, was quoted by Al-Arabiya as saying Friday.The controversy over the Israeli food station arose after Lebanese Harvard graduate Sara el-Yafi on October 28 posted to her Facebook page a letter of protest to the university describing the Israeli buffet’s menu as an affront to Arabs, as such foods as humous and couscous are not of Israeli origin.
“That ‘Israeli Mezze Station” is the ultimate multicultural, multireligious ‘f*** you’ in the face of ALL Arabs at once from North Africa to the Levant,” el- Yafi wrote.
“Israel already has a hard time keeping face in the Arab world for the way it has ‘appropriated’ its lands since 1948, don’t make it worse for them by having them appropriate other peoples’ foods as well,” she added.
El-Yafi also pointed out that haloumi cheese is in fact “Cypriot,” and therefore “until Cyprus becomes another conquered Israeli territory, haloumi is considered NOT Israeli.”
She concluded that at the very least the buffet should be renamed “Mediterranean Mezze Station.”
In response to el-Yafi’s Facebook protest, which as of Friday had garnered more than 4,500 “likes,” Kenny reportedly said that “we are deeply troubled that we offended anybody by doing this buffet item, particularly considering that our reason for doing the international buffet each day is to celebrate cultural diversity.”
“We’ve been following the comments and the [Facebook] posts,” Kenny continued, which have “prompted us to have some extensive conversations here internally... to understand how this happened and to make sure that it doesn’t happen again.”
I'm quite sure it won't.


























“That ‘Israeli Mezze Station” is the ultimate multicultural, multireligious ‘f*** you’ in the face of ALL Arabs at once from North Africa to the Levant,” el- Yafi wrote.
...........................
Ludicrous. If a buffet had had a "Syrian Food Station", say, and also featured humous and couscous and that infamous Cypriot cheese, no one would have batted an eye.
And the fact is, no one knows where many of these foods originated—many of them are centuries old.
An Israeli food journalist set out a few years ago—rather whimsically—to settle the question of whether falafel was an Arab or a Jewish invention. It turned out, from her research, that falafel had almost certainly been developed by Coptic Christians as a dish for meatless Fridays.
Are the Copts demanding their dish back? I think not...
Also, note how Sara el-Yafi hammers away on these foods "not being Israeli"—even though many of them have been enjoyed by Jews in the Levant for hundreds of years.
The fact is, that foods are some of the most mobile of all cultural artifacts.
For instance, several of the foods we think of as being most iconically Italian are new world foods like the tomato and peppers. The same is true of potatoes in northern European cuisines.
And this isn't some "colonial" thing—it works both ways. That famous Hawaiian bread certainly wasn't originally indigenous to the islands.
But—of course—this is *not* about food.
This is merely yet another attempt to label the Jews of Israel as "foreign" invaders—despite the fact that they predate the existence of Muslims in the region by *milllenia*, and that all Muslims in the region were originally Arabian invaders.