Norquist and the Republican establishment: the unreality continues

GroverMustGo.jpg

In “The Republicans, the Democrats, and Grover” in the American Spectator, November 29, Republican dinosaur R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., who is still basking in the glow of his cheerful and cheeky takedowns of Bill Clinton in the 1990s, almost immediately after which his publication crashed and burned with astonishing speed and has never fully recovered, demonstrates the ongoing inability of the Stupid Party to learn from its mistakes or to consider lines of thought that lie outside its established boundaries. In his defense of tax crusader/Muslim Brotherhood enabler Grover Norquist, he doesn’t see fit even to mention the mountain of evidence of how Norquist facilitated high-level access for Islamic supremacists who do not have the best interests of our nation at heart:

Now comes upon this happy scene of Republicans holding the line on raising taxes and of Democrats talking gibberish about their preposterous 98 percent of Americans all luxuriating in trillion-dollar budgetary overruns, one Grover Norquist. He is a pleasant barbigerous man of sunny disposition given to homespun truths such as “You can either reform government so that it spends less and works better, or you can raise taxes to keep doing all the things we have been doing that haven’t worked very well.” Conservatives adore him and many independents do too. There are many reasons to adore Grover. He is optimistic, commonsensical, a friend to all Americans who love their freedoms as secured for them in the Constitution. Moreover, he is adamantly opposed to tax increases. He is the author of the tax pledge that, 20 years ago, his organization, Americans for Tax Reform, began asking Capitol Hill politicians to sign. Most Republicans have and by doing so they have distinguished themselves from the Democrats of whom only one has signed the pledge.

Once again — remember attack dog Joe Biden’s assault on him in the vice-presidential debate? — Grover is being made out to be a monster, a tyrant forcing congressional Republicans to stand by their pledge not to raise taxes. Actually he has said in his homespun vernacular, “If you want to go to your voters and say I promised you this, and I’m breaking my promise, you can have that conversation,” but “You’re not having an argument with me. You’ve made a commitment to your voters.” My guess is that most Republicans will stand by their pledge. They know opposition to tax increases is one of the things that makes them Republicans and that in two more years will continue the Republicans’ domination of government.

I can only repeat what I wrote here:

Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) has become the latest Republican politician to see the writing on the wall and break with anti-tax guru Grover Norquist. America has voted for socialism, and socialism is what it is going to get, and the statesmanlike Saxby is not going to be the one who stands athwart history and shouts, “Stop!” And yet, as craven as Chambliss”s capitulation to the forces of unrestrained government power is — and it is craven indeed — there is one thing the august Georgia solon has right: it’s time to break with Grover Norquist.

“I care more about this country than I do about a 20-year-old pledge,” Chambliss thundered piously. “If we do it his way, then we”ll continue in debt, and I just have a disagreement with him about that.” In other words, there is no chance whatsoever to rein in the ever-galloping growth of government spending, and so Americans are just going to have to pony up more to feed the socialist leviathan. After all, we can’t expect that people will perform key services like reading our emails or making sure we aren’t drinking sugary drinks for free. And Saxby Chambliss, part of the ever spineless, gutless, clueless, directionless, visionless Republican establishment, is going to make sure they are duly remunerated for their service to Big Brother.

Norquist’s response was an indication of how utterly the anti-tax idol has failed. “Senator Chambliss,” he huffed, “promised the people of Georgia he would go to Washington and reform government rather than raise taxes to pay for bigger government. He made that commitment in writing to the people of Georgia.” Yet while the good people of Georgia may really want to reform government rather than raise taxes to pay for bigger government, the majority of their countrymen do not. In 1984, Walter Mondale’s promise to raise taxes was the kiss of death for his presidential campaign; in 2012, after over twenty years of Grover Norquist’s anti-tax crusade, Barack Obama made raising taxes the linchpin of his campaign, and was decisively reelected.

Not only has Norquist spectacularly failed to convince the American people that an out-of-control megastate that confiscates the fruit of the labors of the industrious is to be rejected; he has also tied the Republican Party to a disastrously self-defeating posture toward Islamic supremacism. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) called Norquist out for this on the House floor in October 2011, saying of the anti-tax hero: “Documentation shows that he has deep ties to supporters of Hamas and other terrorist organizations that are sworn enemies of the United States and our ally Israel.” He pointed out that “around the years 2000 and 2001, Mr. Norquist’s firm represented Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was convicted two years later for his role in a terrorist plot and who is presently serving a 23-year sentence in federal prison.”

Norquist, reported Wolf, “also associated with terror financier Sami Al-Arian, according to Mary Jacoby”s reporting in March 2003, in the St. Petersburg Times. Al-Arian pled guilty in 2006 “˜to a charge of conspiring to provide services to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a specially designated terrorist organization, in violation of U.S. law,” and is under house arrest, according to a Department of Justice press release. The Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s “˜paramilitary wing””the al-Quds Brigades””has conducted numerous attacks, including large-scale suicide bombings,” according to the National Counterterrorism Center.”

These are the kinds of people for whom Norquist opened doors. Norquist, said Wolf, “served as a key facilitator between Al-Arian, Alamoudi and the White House.”¦In June 2001, Al-Arian was among the members of the American Muslim Council invited to the White House complex.”¦The next month, the National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom “” a civil liberties group headed by Al-Arian “” gave Norquist an award for his work to abolish the use of secret intelligence evidence in terrorism cases.”

Wolf also pointed out that Norquist tied his anti-tax work to his agitation for Islamic supremacist causes: he “even used Americans for Tax Reform to circulate a petition in support of the “˜Ground Zero Mosque,” ” which 70% of Americans opposed. “Why would Americans for Tax Reform,” Wolf asked, “circulate a petition in support of the “˜Ground Zero Mosque?” For the families of those who lost loved ones on 9/11 or during operations in the War on Terror, concerns about the “˜Ground Zero Mosque” were neither a ploy nor a distraction, as Norquist described it.”

Meanwhile, for fear of crossing Norquist and losing his favor, Republicans for years have been turning a blind eye to all his ties to shady Muslim individuals and groups. If they signed his tax pledge, they were effectively pledging also not to make trouble about the access and influence he was facilitating for people linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. Thus was removed the only possible effective counterweight to the Democrats” active collaboration with Islamic supremacists.

But now Norquist has failed. Taxes are going up. Opposing new taxes is not a winning issue in elections. The Republican Party, after being unable or unwilling to offer a genuine choice, rather than an echo, to the Democrats” socialist pandering, is in well-deserved ruins. But there may be a silver lining. What is left of the American opposition now has a chance to jettison not only Norquist’s failed tax pledge, as Chambliss has done, but also come out against his enabling of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration. Why should this failed tax crusader continue to hold the loyal opposition hostage?

Of course, there may be a few politicians out there who genuinely oppose Big Government, and want to come out publicly against further tax increases. More power to them, I say, and I hope they have solid job prospects in the private sector. But in the meantime, for their convenience I offer, as an alternative to Norquist’s toxic cocktail of No Taxes Plus Collaboration with Islamic Supremacists, a genuinely pro-freedom tax pledge. Call it the Robert Spencer Tax Pledge. Here it is: “I solemnly pledge to oppose new tax increases, to work to cut existing tax rates, and to oppose Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in our government and the concomitant dismantling of our resistance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism.”

There. I invite any and all politicians to take that pledge. So now Republicans (and Democrats) can’t say they have no alternative to Grover Norquist. It’s time for new approaches, and so here is one.

Meanwhile, a toast to Saxby Chambliss. He may be just another self-serving hack feeding at the public trough, but he has managed to do the right thing, even if by accident: he has thrown off the deleterious influence of the thoroughly compromised Norquist. For that alone, even though he did it for the wrong reasons, he may one day deserve to be called a statesman.

Palestinian Authority top dog Abbas: Israeli "threats" won't deter us
UN votes to create new jihad base against Israel
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    The wealthy and American corporations bought congress in the 1980s and embarked upon the massive, tax subsidized export of Amercian jobs and manufacturing overseas. Why? Because gutting the industrial base, walking away from worker and environmental protection laws and throwing millions of middle class American workers out into the street to be replaced by 3rd world slave labor was hugely profitable, to a few.

    Well guess what? These people vote. So now the wealthy who made out like bandits destroying the industrial base of this country can pony up to support the millions of once self-supporting taxpayers whose livelihoods thier shrewd economic plans destroyed.

    The alternative to Socialism in 21st century America is people starving, and streets lined with beggars ‘standing on their own two feet’. You have a problem with Socialism under those circumstances? Then you suck.

  2. says

    None of the Mahoundians Grover has planted, in and around government, are in these positions because they have loyalty to America…Not one, no matter what they say or how many pledges they make…The only authentic pledges are those made to Allah…the rest of them are fake…
    Grover is an jihad enabler, somehow I just can’t work up any sympathy for him…

  3. says

    people starving, and streets lined with beggars ‘standing on their own two feet’.

    Don’t worry, taxing the rich will prevent starving and begging…Of course they may flee the country because of it, taking jobs with them so that more people are starving and begging…
    That socialism stuff is great until they run out of other peoples money to finance it, then all can suffer equally…Liberals want equality for all, equal poverty is one way to get it…

  4. says

    My own opinion is, it’s probably a bad idea to merge the philosophy of conservatism with the objective of anti-jihad, anti-sharia.

    In the first place, true liberals, of which many can be found in the Democratic party, can be some of the best allies of the anti-sharia forces. I think the reporter, Eric Allen Bell, is an example. He’s not going to jettison his mildly-redistributionist ideas, but became a leading spokesman for the reality behind the Tennessee mosque and sharia in general.

    I personally think the rugged individualism of the Randians is not a sufficient philosophy for keeping a country coherent. There is a middle ground, where a certain amount of wasteful government presence actually keeps a country and culture together, and maintains strong borders and a sense of identity. That’s an argument for another day. My point is that Norquist’s ideas on absolutely no new taxes are not only debatable, but are logically distinct from his cozy relations with jihadists.

    My opinion is that the anti-jihad fight will really take off once true liberals (in the Lockean sense) become convinced that Islam is an unqualified threat to their countries, and to their philosophy.

  5. says

    Thanks for this. I did not know about Norquist. What contradictory philosopies he holds.

    You are right, America did vote for socialism, I guess those who don’t learn from history are condemned to repeat it!

    Oh well.

  6. says

    Norquist is too much of a challenge to the imagination, to the mind of even many bright conservatives.

    It is just too hard for them to encompass somebody who is VERY GOOD — a force for good — on one subject, and VERY BAD — a force for bad — on another.

    We like to think of people as either mostly good or mostly bad, on the balance, but not strongly both, especially not equally, at the same time.

    Even bright people seem to be unable to wrap their heads around such a thing.

    Grover Norquist: A valued and creative patriot, and a poisonous enemy agent.

    Too bad. As we become more decadent we do not become more sophisticated. Rather we seem to become more simple minded.

  7. says

    Does a Saudi-owned US-based company deserve a break today? Does it deserve to be recognized as a full citizen for purposes of the Citizens United case because Congress refuses to draft a narrowly tailored law to block the political speech of foreigners who launder it through all manner of private corporations, including foreign-owned New York Times?

    The rich foreigners want all of America to be like an enterprise zone for all their ventures within, treated far more favorably than local real-live-people hicks.

    Norquist, in my opinion, is a foreign agent.

  8. says

    The reason Islamist Norquist has waged his campaign against taxes all those decades, is. of course, to starve “The Beast”. To cut the lifeblood to “The Graet Satan”, that is , the US, and to bring it down. He could see that the Americans do not like taxes, and seized upon it. The fact that this one-issue “conservative Republican”, who had never even bothered to run for an office, and never had a vote of even one American, has had such enormous power over the Republican party shows how manipulable the Republicans are. Both the Democratic and the Republican parties are no good.
    We, the Resistance, should launch a new Center Party unafflicted with the 2 parties unmendable defects,one that will at long, long, long last set things in this country right.

    Ruslan Tokhchukov, EnragedSince1999.

  9. says

    I strongly agree with RonaldB. This site is not the appropriate place for Republican and/or anti-tax propaganda.

    We recently had a couple wars we somehow thought we wouldn’t have to pay for. Whatever your feelings on whether those wars were at all worthwhile, we still need to pay for them. The WW2 generation seems to have understood such things, and issued war bonds. The present generation didn’t do diddly. It is juvenile to expect that our resultant fiscal problems can be solved solely by cuts in spending, though it is certainly true that in the long term we need to stop expecting any Government, and in particular the Federal Government, to provide the good life for everyone cradle to grave.

    And now I’m ranting myself on a subject which is irrelevant to Jihad Watch. Apologies.

  10. says

    Road to hell paved with good intentions.

    So it was with NAFTA and other trade agreements. they pushed hard for these agreements, Bush senior, Gore, clinton, and members of both parties. They promised the public that these agreements will provide unlimited oppertunities and job growth for the US manufacturing. But some warned otherwise mostly men like Ross Perot.

    However the 20 year destruction of the manufacturing base will not be solved by taxing the rich and the big corporations. That lib knee jerk reaction may be good for revenge but not for any solution to the problem. What we need to do is reduce taxes on the corporations, VAT tax on all incoming goods, get rid of these frivilous lawsuits, do away with outlandish EPA regulations, get rid of obama care, this is just to name a few. if we don’t do this than we will see the unthinkable, food manufactures close down also, like Hostess.