Robert Spencer: Grover Must Go

That's right: first Big Bird, now Grover. My piece at Atlas Shrugs this week:

Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) has become the latest Republican politician to see the writing on the wall and break with anti-tax guru Grover Norquist. America has voted for socialism, and socialism is what it is going to get, and the statesmanlike Saxby is not going to be the one who stands athwart history and shouts, “Stop!” And yet, as craven as Chambliss’s capitulation to the forces of unrestrained government power is – and it is craven indeed – there is one thing the august Georgia solon has right: it’s time to break with Grover Norquist.

“I care more about this country than I do about a 20-year-old pledge,” Chambliss thundered piously. “If we do it his way, then we’ll continue in debt, and I just have a disagreement with him about that.” In other words, there is no chance whatsoever to rein in the ever-galloping growth of government spending, and so Americans are just going to have to pony up more to feed the socialist leviathan. After all, we can’t expect that people will perform key services like reading our emails or making sure we aren’t drinking sugary drinks for free. And Saxby Chambliss, part of the ever spineless, gutless, clueless, directionless, visionless Republican establishment, is going to make sure they are duly remunerated for their service to Big Brother.

Norquist’s response was an indication of how utterly the anti-tax idol has failed. “Senator Chambliss,” he huffed, “promised the people of Georgia he would go to Washington and reform government rather than raise taxes to pay for bigger government. He made that commitment in writing to the people of Georgia.” Yet while the good people of Georgia may really want to reform government rather than raise taxes to pay for bigger government, the majority of their countrymen do not. In 1984, Walter Mondale’s promise to raise taxes was the kiss of death for his presidential campaign; in 2012, after over twenty years of Grover Norquist’s anti-tax crusade, Barack Obama made raising taxes the linchpin of his campaign, and was decisively reelected.

Not only has Norquist spectacularly failed to convince the American people that an out-of-control megastate that confiscates the fruit of the labors of the industrious is to be rejected; he has also tied the Republican Party to a disastrously self-defeating posture toward Islamic supremacism. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) called Norquist out for this on the House floor in October 2011, saying of the anti-tax hero: “Documentation shows that he has deep ties to supporters of Hamas and other terrorist organizations that are sworn enemies of the United States and our ally Israel.” He pointed out that “around the years 2000 and 2001, Mr. Norquist’s firm represented Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was convicted two years later for his role in a terrorist plot and who is presently serving a 23-year sentence in federal prison.”

Norquist, reported Wolf, “also associated with terror financier Sami Al-Arian, according to Mary Jacoby’s reporting in March 2003, in the St. Petersburg Times. Al-Arian pled guilty in 2006 ‘to a charge of conspiring to provide services to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a specially designated terrorist organization, in violation of U.S. law,’ and is under house arrest, according to a Department of Justice press release. The Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s ‘paramilitary wing—the al-Quds Brigades—has conducted numerous attacks, including large-scale suicide bombings,’ according to the National Counterterrorism Center.”

These are the kinds of people for whom Norquist opened doors. Norquist, said Wolf, “served as a key facilitator between Al-Arian, Alamoudi and the White House.…In June 2001, Al-Arian was among the members of the American Muslim Council invited to the White House complex.…The next month, the National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom — a civil liberties group headed by Al-Arian — gave Norquist an award for his work to abolish the use of secret intelligence evidence in terrorism cases.”

Wolf also pointed out that Norquist tied his anti-tax work to his agitation for Islamic supremacist causes: he “even used Americans for Tax Reform to circulate a petition in support of the ‘Ground Zero Mosque,’ ” which 70% of Americans opposed. “Why would Americans for Tax Reform,” Wolf asked, “circulate a petition in support of the ‘Ground Zero Mosque?’ For the families of those who lost loved ones on 9/11 or during operations in the War on Terror, concerns about the ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ were neither a ploy nor a distraction, as Norquist described it.”

Meanwhile, for fear of crossing Norquist and losing his favor, Republicans for years have been turning a blind eye to all his ties to shady Muslim individuals and groups. If they signed his tax pledge, they were effectively pledging also not to make trouble about the access and influence he was facilitating for people linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. Thus was removed the only possible effective counterweight to the Democrats’ active collaboration with Islamic supremacists.

But now Norquist has failed. Taxes are going up. Opposing new taxes is not a winning issue in elections. The Republican Party, after being unable or unwilling to offer a genuine choice, rather than an echo, to the Democrats’ socialist pandering, is in well-deserved ruins. But there may be a silver lining. What is left of the American opposition now has a chance to jettison not only Norquist’s failed tax pledge, as Chambliss has done, but also come out against his enabling of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration. Why should this failed tax crusader continue to hold the loyal opposition hostage?

Of course, there may be a few politicians out there who genuinely oppose Big Government, and want to come out publicly against further tax increases. More power to them, I say, and I hope they have solid job prospects in the private sector. But in the meantime, for their convenience I offer, as an alternative to Norquist’s toxic cocktail of No Taxes Plus Collaboration with Islamic Supremacists, a genuinely pro-freedom tax pledge. Call it the Robert Spencer Tax Pledge. Here it is: “I solemnly pledge to oppose new tax increases, to work to cut existing tax rates, and to oppose Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in our government and the concomitant dismantling of our resistance to the jihad and Islamic supremacism.”

There. I invite any and all politicians to take that pledge. So now Republicans (and Democrats) can’t say they have no alternative to Grover Norquist. It’s time for new approaches, and so here is one.

Meanwhile, a toast to Saxby Chambliss. He may be just another self-serving hack feeding at the public trough, but he has managed to do the right thing, even if by accident: he has thrown off the deleterious influence of the thoroughly compromised Norquist. For that alone, even though he did it for the wrong reasons, he may one day deserve to be called a statesman.

| 11 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

11 Comments

| Leave a comment

Now that we all agree that access to our seats of political power has been granted to the historic enemy of human enlightenment, freedom and dignity by ignorant brokers of such access, of varied political persuasion, can we expect, then, the end of petty, partison portraits of The Left as betrayers of Western civilization?

IS THIS THE END OF THE CHEAP SHOT?

Useful Idiots come in all flavors and persuasions; all the same, cowardice, cupidity, and craven dishonor are what they are. The Left is merely more practiced in these anti-virtues in this Present Age, as they practically define uber-Left orthodoxy, so prevalent they are at that end of the spectrum; where the Right also embraces these, political distinctions fade away.

Useful Idiots come in all flavors and persuasions; all the same, cowardice, cupidity, and craven dishonor are what they are. The Left is merely more practiced in these anti-virtues in this Present Age, as they practically define uber-Left orthodoxy, so prevalent they are at that end of the spectrum; where the Right also embraces these, political distinctions fade away.

And here I thought The Server had timed me out!

So one useful idiot for unlimited government throws off the joke of a notoriously useful idiot for Islam. Love the subtle irony of labeling this over-the-counterjihadist a possible future "statesman".

Of course, speaking of abolishing the US Leviathan, a true statesman would pledge to:

- Oppose Islam.
- Oppose the false fight against Islam, the "War on Terror", which, like all of these "War on.."-schemes, is merely about unlimited government.
- Oppose the Federal Reserve corporatist collusion with the US State. Statism and monetary fascism is the rule now. Since its devious inception (1913), it bears major responsibility for bringing about and prolonging economic crises and it has to be abolished.
- Support the people's natural right to peacefully withdraw consent and secede from oppressive government.
- Support measures to drastically downsize the US welfare-warfare state.

Alas, no such statesman in sight..

Kind regs from Amsterdam,
Sag.

Grover Norquist must file as a foreign agent, in my opinion. His client base substantially includes foreign owners of US-based corporations. Saudi Arabia is among the list of foreign owners, making them one of Grover Norquit's supporters.

I would suggest that Congress redraft the legislation that was the subject of the Citizen United case but, critically, isolate on the issue of foreign ownership of US-based companies meddling in US elections. Ban corporations that are not 100 per cent owned by US citizens from meddling in US elections. They cannot be called "citizens." The rationale for allowing corporations to speak in elections is that they are a conduit for real live people -- citizens -- to speak. This rationale is rendered inapplicable for foreign owned corporations.

Mixed ownership companies that want to speak in US elections can be treated analogously to the willing/unwilling payment for political speech discussed in Communication Workers v. Beck.

This would knock out more than half (in my opinion) of Grover Norquist's client base, his foreign clients. Pledging loyalty to foreign agents or entities, for even a second, is unacceptable -- if not a crime for an elected public official.

Hi jake -

"can we expect, then, the end of petty, partison portraits of The Left as betrayers of Western civilization?
IS THIS THE END OF THE CHEAP SHOT?"

Well, I won't hold my breath..

Some people in the US are slowly coming to terms with the sobering fact that this "Left - Right" dialectic is nothing more than a marching order for unlimited government.

I'd reckon the portrait could quite easily be enlarged by including the US political "right" as well, as betrayers of Western civilization ;-)

But again, I won't hold my breath. More likely to see a perpetuation of laments about corrupt and greedy politicians to the effect that it serves to perpetuate the myth of a simple political solution to society's woes: to elect morally virtuous, high-quality bureaucrats into office. Statism is a nasty religion. A cult actually.

The one good thing about the last US elections was that more Americans than ever decided not to participate in this sordid little sacrament of state-worship.

So hope remains while the company is true..

Cheers,
Sag.

Hi Sagunto, here are my two cents on political economy:

The standard or traditional kind of capitalism tends to provoke the growth of the State and of socialism. Why? Traditional capitalism produces great concentrations of economic power. Centers of economic power then merge with and manipulate the State. Traditional capitalism thus leads, somewhat like socialism, to a merging of the economic sphere with the political sphere. And then, in inevitable reaction to that capitalist merging-with-and-domination-of-the-State, groups of course spring up that seek, by enlarging the State, to reverse the direction of control, in the belief that enlarging the State will allow legislators to dominate economic power rather than be dominated by it. And thus there is a back and forth between socialists and standard capitalists, by which the state and economic life become more and more corruptly entangled and merged.

Therefore, if one wants to put the leviathan State on a diet, and increase the separation between State and economic life (so they can check, balance, and correct each other ongoingly), what is needed is a different kind of capitalism. More cooperative, egalitarian kinds of capitalism are in fact emerging, and where they do, the State has fewer excuses for invading the economic sphere, insofar as a communitarian spirit already prevails in cooperative-style capitalism, though without being centralized or coerced. Perhaps the most prominent example today is the Mondragon Industrial Cooperatives based in Spain. They have been enormously successful, have grown tremendously, and are not subsidized, controlled, or owned by the State. Mondragon has developed an innovative, highly functional, extremely humanitarian ownership model.

One needs a growing community of free, loosely associated communities of non-statist, private, voluntary, cooperative capitalism experiments. Granted, moving toward more egalitarian and cooperative forms of capitalism has been happening by small steps for over a century. Granted it will continue to be a very slow process, not an overnight revolutionary one. But it's happening even in the very heart of standard shareholder capitalism, though in small ways, inch by inch. That is the way to put the leviathan State on a diet.

Kind regards from New York

Hi traeh -

Thank you for your diet to downsize the Leviathan State. Very much appreciated!

I beg to differ on some points about capitalism, in two ways.

1) I'd like to call attention to a fundamental difference between two types of entrepreneurs, i.e. genuine free market entrepreneurs on the one side and "political" entrepreneurs on the other. The latter hate competition and love govt regulation, the more the better, if only to keep smaller competitors off the pitch. These are usually the "capitalists" who are hated by many people, and for good reason. They usually grow not because of their entrepreneurial skills and serving the public with their products, but through political deal-making and connections. The capitalism here has very little to do with the free market.

2) It is the state who steals (taxes), manipulates interest rates (through its central bank, thus creating the boom-bust business cycle), and favors only the dependent poor and the very wealthy. The state is the one entity able to create and sustain monopolies and concentrations of power that are to the dislike of the public. A genuine free market is like perfect democracy: people vote every day by buying certain products/services on a voluntary basis. Coercion is the domain of government. The political market merely grants a (symbolic) vote every now and then, truly a poor reflection of a free market. Free market capitalism was once blamed for making possible a phenomenon like "predatory pricing", but many economists today no longer believe this to be the case. See this entertaining clip by Dr. Tom Woods.

There is however a perfect name to describe the economic model of the big business of political entrepreneurship in collusion with the power of the State. It's called corporatism, indeed, the economic model for fascism, and it's too often confused with capitalism. Free markets are nowhere in sight, I'm sorry to say. Not while we still have to cope with centralized banking in cahoots with centralized government and anti-free market, fake crony capitalists.

A welfare state is a welfare state, whether it is "social" welfare, sought for by many misguided client groups, or whether it's corporate welfare sollicited by political entrepreneurs. Its engine is the central bank, able to conjure up "money" at will. Remove that engine (and the power to tax) and the State will shrivel while free markets and sound money will be restored.

My 2 (euro)cts

Kind regs from ye Olde to New Amsterdam ;-)
Sag.

jake-a-runi wrote:

Now that we all agree that access to our seats of political power has been granted to the historic enemy of human enlightenment, freedom and dignity by ignorant brokers of such access, of varied political persuasion, can we expect, then, the end of petty, partison portraits of The Left as betrayers of Western civilization?
IS THIS THE END OF THE CHEAP SHOT?
............................

Jake, you appear not to have noticed that the subject of the above story is a Republican.

Robert Spencer is more than happy to point out fools, tools, and Jihad enablers on *both* sides of the aisle.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter