Sweden: Police watched passively as "provoking" female free speech activists were physically attacked by group of men

These women are close friends of mine and deserve a gold medal and honorable place in our history books for their courage, not fists and eggs in the head. This is where it has come to in Sweden: Police let violent demonstrators get close to defenseless women promoting the right to speak against Islam. People who wanted to get in to Geert Wilders' lecture in infamous Malmø had to go through an "anti-fascist" purgatory:

Aja Fog (Free Speech society, Denmark) surrounded and attacked by Danish far Leftists: "...then I feel a blow to the back of my head"

Aja Fog egg in the head, Geert Wilders Sweden 271012.jpgAia Fog after the meeting with Danish anti-fascists
Katrine Winkel Holm, Kit Louise Strand, her friend Trine and I arrive by taxi to Kockums Fritid. The Swedish police has placed barricades, so we can not drive to the door and have to walk the last 200 meters. We can hear the protesters shouting the usual slogans: "No racists in our streets". There are lots of police, but instead of separating the angry demonstrators from the entrance, they stood in the periphery, so we have to go through the crowd to get in to the meeting. Within no time things go wrong: Some Swedes begin to shouting directly into the face of Katrine: "racist", "Pork Denmark", "Go home, we want to border control for you". To me they cried "Fat fascist pig".

Katrine starts to argue with them, but it's completely futile, and soon I pull her arm and told her that she should cut it, so we can get through the crowd and inside the lecture hall.

Things go very quickly: Katrine and I are suddenly isolated from Kit and Trine, and I'm surrounded by AFA (anti fascists). Or - I think it's AFA: Danish men in their twenties, with black hoodies and small ugly tattoos on their shirts. They are extremely threatening - not just in attitude (which is furious, hateful - and just waiting to be allowed to beat), but also physically: I am completely surrounded by 4-5 men who not only block my way, but one also punches me hard with his shoulder, so I'm getting off balance. Then I feel a blow to the back of my head, and then one more - this time less hard, which turns out to be an egg.

The Swedish police - who could not see the details since I was surrounded - did nothing to help me or let me pass, even though I had egg running down my neck. Finally Katrine managed to convince the police to help me get into Kockums.

Later, when we went out to see whether the police had finally made a corridor, so that people could get in without having to run the purgatory, eggs were thrown at us, and the police asked us to go back because we 'provoked' with our presence.

After the meeting, there was a Swedish journalist who asked me if I had acted provoking before having eggs thrown at me (sic).

Nobody was arrested.

| 33 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

33 Comments

| Leave a comment

And this is the upside-down world we live in today. Young, violent,emotional, black-shirted street thugs, who have as a main target of their hatred "international Zionism" and "Jewish bankers", and who want to violently enforce their political positions through street-level violence---they're now called the ANTI-fascists. Truly unbelievable.

Oh man, Undaunted, I wish you hadn't done that. That's just way, way over the line.
BTW, Champ can't be a tough guy because she's a lady. And a very fine lady, too. I'm sorry you guys got into it--But you don't know how much I wish hadn't seen that from you...

Fair enough. Your choice. And I'm standing by what I think of it. My choice. Good luck...

Question.

Suppose you and 'Champ' were standing in the vestibule of a church you had both just attended (you both, in numerous postings I have read over the past few years, have identified as Christian).

Her grandson is with her.

You have the discussion you recently had.

You disagree, strongly, with something she has said.

Would you, in front of the pastor, and her little grandson, and everyone else there, say to her face what you just said, at the top of this thread, in those *exact* words? 'F- you, dirtbag'?

Remember: she's a woman about your own age, you've both just been in church listening to the sermon, her baby grandson is there, the pastor is listening to you both.

Would you use that kind of language to a woman your own age, part of your church congregation, **to her face** in front of the pastor?

Would you say it to her in the street, outside her home, or yours?

Would you say it if you were both sitting in Mr Spencer's house, at the dinner table?

Those exact words?

'F- you, dirtbag'??

I'm sorry, but that's way over the line.

I wouldn't speak to *any* fellow jihadwatcher here, in that kind of language, no matter how strongly I disagreed with them.

Fascists with pathological psychological projection, accusing people, who do not think like them, of being fascist.

Oh, the buffoonery!. Will it ever end?.

The journalist suggested that the women might have "provoked" the egg-throwing.
Provoked? So young thugs get around with eggs in their pockets in case they are "provoked"?
Huh??

dumbledoresarmy,

Well said. Internet anonymity makes many people -- sometimes I make this mistake myself -- makes many people think that we can say all kinds of things we'd never say in person.

Often, internet anonymity fosters a scurrilous irresponsibility and lack of accountability in what people say. Kierkegaard spoke of the horrible behavior of crowds where people are anonymous, i.e., mobs. The absence of the "I", of the individual, allows monstrosities to emerge. I'm not criticizing "undaunted" in particular, since, as I said, I myself have sometimes been guilty of this.

At the same time, internet anonymity allows many people to criticize Islam without having to look over their shoulders all the time for fear violent retribution. That anonymity is a mixed blessing. Perhaps many more people would be speaking out publicly, if they didn't have the anonymous internet outlet.

I asked Robert to delete my crass comment and he has consented.

Sincere apology to Champ and all. Won't happen again.

undaunted, admirable of you to admit the mistake.

Nicely done, Undaunted. You just pegged the applause-meter here!

I can be a real jerk sometimes. No need, though, to inflict it on others.

Reminded of Red Green's "Man's Prayer"...

I'm a man
But I can change
If I have to
I guess

This sort of thing is exactly why, as a young man, I turned against the American New Deal tradition in which I was raised. American Dems or European SD's, they are less and less likely to penalize downright criminal actions and more and more suspicious of free speech. They are less the protectors of the innocent as the enablers of the wicked. I suppose for me the last straw was when my eldest brother adopted a child because he and my sister-in-law thought they couldn't have one naturally (they had another later), and I considered how "progressive" opinion was pushing for abortion on demand while at the same time condemning the death penalty for those clearly convicted of very heinous crimes.

I fear we're heading for a situation in which the Western social contract is completely broken; when governments no longer protect life, liberty, and property (to use Locke's view even if he was an Englishman rather than an American--but I've never been a chauvinistic hater of furriners, anyway). We'll have to end up back in a Hobbesian state of nature, in which life is solitary, nasty, brutish, and short.May God not enter into judgment with us in such a way!

I've never been a particularly chivalrous man, but this report in which supposedly armed police will not protect women peacefully presenting their opinions strikes me as shocking.

And I'm utterly disgusted by people calling themselves "anti-fascist" abetting one of the most violent and tyrannous ideologies on the planet. Then again, back in the Sillier 'Seventies, I figured out that today, "Fascist" simply means anyone whom a Marxist-Leninist doesn't like.

Hey no worries, Undaunted ...of course I accept your apology and all is forgiven. And I apologize for being so hard on you yesterday. Please accept my apology, as well.

Dear Jihad Watch readers:

I am trying to understand the Scandinavian nations and their suicidal fanaticism in protecting and fostering Islamadoodles at all costs, above all else and beyond any scope of reason. Why are Norway, Sweden and Denmark intent on self-destruction?

The open door immigration policies that have let in a toxic flood of West hating, sharia implementing thugs who parasitically live off the work and prosperity of the Scandinavians.

Why? What guilt trip is causing this? With my various personal and professional experiences; I look a this multi-national mess and just don't get it.

Scandinavia NEVER had a "colonial history" in the middle-east or even in the regions of Asia dominationed by Islam. It was the Dutch in Indonesia and the British in great India (ie what would one day become Bangladesh and Pakistan).

North Africa? The Spanish, Italians and French were present in muslim North Africa. The British and French were in the mid-East; and Russia in central Asia.

Oh, let me add that the colonization of North Africa by the Europeans; was an act of self defense. For generations the Islamadoodle menace had raped, pillaged and robbed its way across the Meditteranean. Coastal communities of France, Italy, Greece... even as far away as Ireland were being decimated by Islamists.

The colonization by the Europeans stopped the reign of murder and terror. However, the Europeans DID NOT react in a vengeful manner. North African societies were transformed by the Europeans- education, healthcare, culture, infrastructure, agriculture; etc- all were improved by Europe. When some of nations in Europe took an evil turn (Germany and Italy forming the Axis Powers)... the rest of Europe stood up and died in large numbers to protect North Africa during WWII.

Then post-WWII; millions of North African muslims are allowed into Europe and live in prosperity. The muslims return this favor by turning France, Italy, Spain and Britain into hellholes.

Oh yea, once again- this deals with France and Italy... not Sweden or Denmark. So once again why are Scandinavian states involved in this nonsense?

Colonialism? Well, the Scandinavian state's worst acts of colonialism had been taking over OTHER Scandinavian terriroty... Norway and Sweden the part of the same kingdom.... Denmark owning Iceland. When you look beyond the nordic mutual take overs... you have Sweden flexing against Russia of yesteryear and Denmark owning the Virgin Islands BEFORE the USA purchasing them in 1917.

Denmark WAS NOT BRUTAL in its tenure with the Virgin Islands. Which WERE NOT INHABITED BY ISLAMISTS.

In North America... "New Sweden" left its mark in North Dakota, Minnesota, etc. Once again let me point out this Swedish colonial "legacy" DID NOT DEAL WITH MUSLIMS. The peoples being encountered were American Indians.

So once again- why the muslims? Why didn't Denmark invite tens of thousands of Black Afro Carribean people to live in Denark? After all Denmark used to own the Virgin Islands?

Why didn't Sweden try to relocate poverty stricken American Indians into well-to-do neighborhoods of Stockholm or Malmo? After all the Swedes colonized North Dakota and Minnesota in droves.

Yet it is Islam that Scandinavia embraced and brought into their borders by the thousands. Why the guilt Scandinavia? What "travesty" do you feel you have to make amends for? Heck, post WWII Scandinavia poured millions in currency, medicine, and supplies into muslim states. Scandinavians provided teachers, doctors, agriculturalists, science techs, etc-to the muslim nations.

What? Did some Norwegian doctor or Danish teacher eat a bacon sandwich in front of some muslim fool in the 1950s while serving in some sort of UN program overseas... and now the entire Scandinavian region should lay themselves out as a sacrifice?

I am a Native American Indian. I know very well that interaction between European and non European can be brutal. I know too well, that colonialism can have negative situations.

However, this Native American Indian is in absolute SHOCK... why are the Europeans known as Scandinavians having this "guilt trip." Europe HAS NO REASON TO FEEL GUILTY about North Africa muslims. Why.. then are they allowing this culture of murder take over their continent.

This Native American Indian is saying at the top of his lungs... EUROPE WHY ARE YOU LETTING THIS HAPPEN, EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION SHOULD NOT FACE EXTINCTION FROM ISLAMISTS. EUROPE... PLEASE STOP THIS SUICIDAL EMBRACE OF ISLAM.

The result? Those same North African muslims

Thank you, dear sister and friend! :)

Hi George! ...thank you, dear friend :)

Kepha, "fascist" can mean anyone even a garden-variety social democrat (never mind Marxist-Leninist) doesn't like. I sometimes got the impression that my beloved aunt considered all Republicans fascists. But to certain people on the right, all Dems are commies. Caricatures seem to go both ways.

Yes, Arjay.

I guess that Scandinavia wants to be a multi-racial society, and the nearest way to do that is to take in North African Muslims? They also need a growing population to support their social welfare system.

But I agree with you. Why can't Scandinavia take in immigrants from non-Muslim places? Bring in Christian Africans. Bring in Buddhists from Asia. Bring in American Indians, and anyone who wants to go, provided they are non-Muslim.

Dear Jihad Watch readers:

Thank you "Traeh" for you input and view as to why Scandinavia wants more and yet more muslims inside her borders.

If the Scandinavians DID WANT MORE IMMIGRANTS to thus work and add to an economy and thus support the tax generated social welfare programs that Scandinavians enjoy.

The problem is the demography. The MUSLIMS ARE NOT WORKING OR ADDING TO THE "money pot." They are greedily sucking up the prosperity of the Scandinavian systems... without contributing to the system. Then there is the destrucion of Scandinavian rights and quality of life being caused by the muslim immigrants.

Want to be multi-racial Scandinavia? Fine... but STOP THE INFLUX OF A PEOPLE THAT WANT TO DESTROY YOU! Especially, when they cause sky rocketing crime and try to enforce their unjust and evil SHARIA LAW everywhere.

I also agree with Traeh, that if Scandinavia wants to be "multi-racial" then I am sure there are plenty of ethnic, cultural or religious groups that would love to live in Scandinavia... AND unlike Muslims... actually contribute to Scandinavian society and culture and NOT TRY TO DESTROY IT.

When I read about muslims and muslim supporters in Scandinavia seeking to destroy this wonderful part of the world- it is so very sad.

It's pretty easy to tell why the Swedish police did nothing to protect the women from the crowd intimidation, and why no arrests were made. The police were scared of the thugs and Muslims.

Before judging them too harshly, however, remember that police have a rough job, and that they depend very much on their hierarchy and on the support of the legal system. Policing can be very dangerous, with the added risk that if a policeman misjudges his (or her) response to an attack, they can also find themselves brought up on criminal charges.

In the United States, most police feel that if they exercise reasonable restraint, they have community support when they respond to force with deadly force. Also, attacking a police official draws a very heavy sentence upon conviction.

My guess is, in Sweden, the police do not have the background of experiencing community support when they have to be violent. Furthermore, the police are aware that in any violent confrontation, it is as likely they will be charged as their attackers. If their attackers are actually convicted, they will receive light sentences.

The community itself must give the police the groundwork of support to put themselves in harms way to protect the rights of law-abiding citizens.

"I fear we're heading for a situation in which the Western social contract is completely broken; when governments no longer protect life, liberty, and property"

Yes, very possibly. Are you familiar with the term 'anarcho-tyranny'? It's another possibility.

"Scandinavia NEVER had a "colonial history" in the middle-east or even in the regions of Asia dominationed by Islam."

No need to be baffled. Scandinavia need not have actively participated in Western colonialism. The condemnation of the white West and its colonialism is not rational; so why should it follow rational rules? Scandinavia simply by being white and Western is, in the eyes of Leftism and its decaffeinated cousin PC MC, guilty, and should be eternally ashamed (with that eternal shame reflected in interminable policies of one sort or another -- among which are the latest ones benefiting and enabling Islamic invasion of the West).

This is Reverse Racism; and just like classic racism, it's not rational. All white Westerners are guilty and should atone, and show their atonement in various concrete ways. Until the PC MC paradigm collapses under its own irrational weight, that's our White Man's Burden. Unfortunately, it is also bringing in its train not merely low-level sociopolitical problems, like affirmative action and immigration (of non-Muslims); but now a problem of deadly proportions that cannot be ignored forever: Islam Redivivus.

Arjay: the bringing in of dangerous, destructive Muslims might have had its origins in "white guilt" but it gained momentum because of democracy, which seems to be in self-destruct mode with the ethnic vote-chasing scenario. The more we bring in, the more politicians will pander to them. There is another point too, that I think the first country which makes the decision to cease or even limit Islamic immigration will suffer especially savage terrorist attacks as retribution. Appeasement has thereby become the order of the day; our governments are now tending to security by committing their populations to slow rather than fast destruction.
It is nowadays normal to believe that "war is futile". Our governments seem to be making all the sacifices our forefathers and their brothers made exactly that: utterly futile. It is up to us to work out how to not make it so, as our governments might as well be our enemies, the way they are betraying us.
"Vote for revenge" said Obama. I presume he meant that America's precious new immigrants,or blacks, or anyone not white, can do what they like to the Guilty Whites. As for native Indian Americans, you are apparently in the sights of Turkey and expected to happily and gratefully convert to Islam.

WARNING: "no matter what color you are, you are the 'wrong color' in some neighborhood."

natural, real blonds, are the fastest disappearing "minority" in the world. in the '80's they were only 10% of the world's population. don't know how much further down that has gone now.

Mate: there's a reason why you don't get many blondes (the really-fair-hair + light blue eyes) variety.

Because light hair and light eyes are Mendelian recessive and because dark hair and dark eyes are Mendelian dominant.

And because even in countries where there are quite a few classic blondes, like Scotland, England and Scandinavia - and this was *before* large-scale immigration from anywhere - there are also dark-haired and dark-eyed people who are ancestrally natives of those countries. I have relatives whose ethnic ancestry is entirely native Scots/ Irish/ English who look like they stepped right out of the Middle East or Northern India or Spain.

And whenever the light-hair/ light-eyes person marries a dark-hair/ dark eyes person, the children will be dark hair/ dark eyes.

(The children of the marriage will carry the recessive genes, but these won't manifest in *their* offspring unless *they* marry a 'blonde' or unless they marry a dark-haired person like themselves who happens to be carrying the 'light colour' recessive. And even if they do, it's possible that if they have two or three children, none of those children will get the 'light-light' recessive; they may get 'dark from mum, dark from dad' or 'dark from mum, light from dad' or 'light from mum, dark from dad' and in the latter two cases, the child will be 'dark hair, dark eyes' even though carrying the recessive.)

It *is* possible, too, to get someone with light hair and brown eyes (I have a niece who looks like that) or with dark hair and blue eyes (a very common combination in people of Irish ancestry; and again, I have a niece and a nephew with exactly that combination).

Thanks. I accept your apology as well. Happy to be in the fight with you.

Americans are not going to lay down for the elimination of their rights the way the Europeans have.

If things get as bad as they are in EU, there will be civil war here.

By refusing to provide police duties such as maintaining law and order, the police have encouraged more civil disobedience and more chaos...it will only get more ugly...

Today the thugs are slinging eggs and with no police intervention they soon will be slinging lead...bet on it...

"Americans are not going to lay down for the elimination of their rights the way the Europeans have."

If there is going to be a civil war, it's not going to have anything to do with Islam, since most conservatives don't seem to care about the problem of Islam. The Tea Party organized a mass weekend of hundreds of thousands of supporters in D.C. a couple of years ago, and was Islam even on the agenda at all? Nope.

Great! sounds good ...take care :)

Regarding the human behavior described in this and many other similar news stories ...

If you have not recently read the complete story of the global flood as presented in Genesis chapters 6 through 9, I recommend it to you.

It begins this way:

Genesis 6:5 (ESV)
"The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually."

Sometimes I am forced to re-ponder the subject of human depravity, because I observe it in myself and in societies.

How did the people in the time of Noah become so utterly depraved on such a huge scale?

Why did the people not take heed to the noble, observable life of Noah and his verbal warnings to them?

Why were the people unable to recognize and deal with their own moral failings?

How could the people have become so deceived on such a huge scale?

How is it that a person today -- with truth abundantly available -- can become unable to recognize and admit personal and societal depravity?

How can truth be successfully infused into the midst of error, so that truth conquers, overcomes, obliterates error?

I have, over many decades, arrived at some personal answers for these questions based upon the good news, the gospel of Jesus the Messiah, the Christ, the Savior of the world, the good Shepherd, the Way, the Truth, the Life.

All of us must be willing to turn around and change direction in conformity to the truth, leaving error behind. This is called repentance. It is a absolutely necessary for individuals and for societies.

We must continue to ponder questions like these and deal with them using wisdom and strength that are far beyond our own.

When people become deceived and when logic -- good sense -- does not prevail, then we must wage spiritual warfare. We must fearlessly proclaim the entire Truth and we must pray.

@ lemon lime I think you are beening to hasty in your " generalization" of civil war and the tea party vs. Islam , it is an undercurrent that is well hide but is needless to say " active! , in europe the populace is not armed here they are ! so Islam treads lightly ! , europe is full of pussies who do not stand up here , we have had our fill and we don't back down like the europeans !!!!!!! , so do not mistake silence for weakness or that we are not aware of this " plague " in our country !!!! ( barry included !!! )

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter