Toronto: Islamic school that taught jihad and Jew-hatred will not face charges

The country that prosecuted Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant for telling the truth about jihad and Islamic supremacism will not do anything about genuine hate. “Toronto Islamic school will not face charges over anti-Jewish curriculum: police,” by Stewart Bell for the National Post, November 8 (thanks to all who sent this in):

TORONTO “” A Toronto Islamic school whose teaching curriculum disparaged Jews and encouraged boys to keep fit for jihad will not face criminal charges but police said they had identified curriculum materials they found concerning.

A Toronto Islamic school whose teaching materials disparaged Jews and encouraged boys to keep fit for jihad will not face criminal charges but police said their investigation had identified passages of syllabus books they found concerning.

A York Regional Police report outlining the hate crimes investigation of the East End Madrassah said a review of 30 school syllabus books found portions that “challenged some of Canada’s core values” and “suggested intolerance,” even if they were not criminal.

The report also confirmed some of the school materials originated from books published by Iranian foundations, one of which is an alleged front for the Islamic regime. The Iranian-origin passages referred to Jews as “crafty” and “treacherous,” and contrasted Islam with “the Jews and the Nazis.”…

The curriculum documents not only referred to Jews in crude terms but also said “good Muslims” could not listen to music, that girls should limit their involvement in sports and that Islam was “the best and most perfect of all religions.”

In addition, the books said boys should exercise to be ready for jihad, which they said “sometimes also involves fighting a war against an unjust ruler” and quoted Muslim scripture that said “fighting (in the cause of Allah) is ordained unto you.”

The Level 3 curriculum asked students to color 10 boxes, each representing a branch of Islam. One of the boxes was labeled: Jihad. Another explained that jihad could be a personal struggle or “the physical defending of Islam in a war.”…

Curriculum excerpts

“Islam has allowed boys to engage in sports for one specific reason and that is to always keep them healthy and strong. But why should a Muslim be healthy and strong? Firstly, it is necessary to take care of the body because it is a gift from Allah. Secondly, so that you may physically be ready for jihad whenever the time comes for it.”…

“End of Jewish Plots and Treacheries: Ever since the Prophet’s entry into Madina, the treacherous Jews had vehemently opposed him and his Islamic call, evoking memories of their hostility to the previous Prophet, Jesus Christ, half a millennium ago. The crafty Jews entered into an alliance with the polytheist Quraish in a bid to stamp out Islam. They conspired to kill Prophet Muhammad despite the fact that he was lenient towards them and had treated them kindly, hoping to convince them of Islam’s truth. But eventually as Jewish plots and aggressions increased, he had no choice other than to take up arms against them, in order to protect Islam and the Muslims. At the battle of Khaiber which is famous for Imam Ali’s heroic exploits, the Prophet defeated them ending Jewish intrigues and conspiracies in Arabia.”…

Canada: Muslim who slit his wife's throat for adopting Western values found guilty of second-degree murder
Sweden: Police watched passively as "provoking" female free speech activists were physically attacked by group of men
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint


  1. says

    Of course, in muslim and non-muslim countries muslims run the show, they can do and say whatever they want… non-muslims? well, they better STFU and submit… or else!.

  2. says

    What ya expect ? It’s Canada ! The next Toronto Police Chief is gonna be a Muslime , so it will be much worse.
    Just wait till all The Liberal dhimmi turds in Canada pick that little asshole Justin Trudeau as leader. Then it will be tenfold worse !

  3. says

    “They conspired to kill Prophet Muhammad despite the fact that he was lenient towards them”

    Actually, they DID kill filthy Muhammad.
    A jewish WOMAN from Khaibar put poison in his meal, three years later he died from the effect of the poison.

    ‘ The apostle of Allah lived after this three years till in consequence of his pain he passed away. During his illness he used to say, “I did not cease to find the effect of the (poisoned) morsel, I took at Khaibar” ‘
    The Major Classes, by Ibn Sa’d, v. 2, p. 202 الطبقات الكبرى لإبن سعد

  4. says

    The value systems seem out of whack, but that happens when Allah shows up…Look what happened to the US gov when Rasool allowed Allah into the WH…We thought the vote was a strong enough Allah wrench to get him out of there, but we were wrong…Allah has now grown roots…Now we need a Roto Rooter to remove him…radical root surgery…Allah could be impeached, he could be arrested, he could go on a very long vacation to Venezuela where Hugo will take his calls…
    We have four years to to evict Allah, a lot less if we play our exorcism cards right…

  5. says

    U.S. needs to remove itself and funding from the United Nations (OIC), then we need to stop funding Egypt, Pakistan, and all those countries that want nothing to do with us. Take the money we save and support Israel our true friends. We need to make an alliance with the West and all those who love freedom (Sharia free). We need to face the fact that China and Russia are not our partners and support our military power the way Regan did. Call to accountability South Korea, Japan, and other countries that have relied on us for so many years and force them to take a stand are you with us or against us? Times are getting dangerous and we need to wake the hell up. Iran does need to have a red line drawn, no question. If we don’t do these things then war is eminent.

  6. says

    FRom the article, the passage from the Muslim hate manual, dripping with Mohammedan blame-the-victim nonsense and lies re. Mohammed’s unprovoked, unjustified and morally unjustifiable attack upon the peaceful Jewish farmers of the Khaybar Oasis:

    “…as Jewish plots and aggressions increased, he had no choice other than to take up arms against them, in order to protect Islam and the Muslims. At the battle of Khaiber which is famous for Imam Ali’s heroic exploits, the Prophet defeated them ending Jewish intrigues and conspiracies in Arabia.”

    Suuuure, pull the other leg you lying thieving Jew-hating b*st*rds, it’s got bells on.

    The Islamic source texts themselves, viewed with a judicious infidel eye, show pretty plainly that the attack on Khaybar was motivated by booty, booty, booty, and set the template for the next 1400 years of unprovoked Muslim supremacist jihad warfare against any target they thought they could grab.

    Here’s the scholar David Margoliouth, writing in 1907, with *his* assessment of the meaning of the jihad raid on Khaybar; an analysis included in Bostom’s encyclopaedic anthology ‘Legacy of Jihad’, and shared with everyone here at jihadwatch by one ‘archimedes’, five years ago.

    Comments on Islam by D. S. Margoliouth (1905):

    “The taking of Khaibar marks the stage at which Islam became a menace to the whole world.

    “True, Mohammad had now for six years lived by robbery and brigandage:

    “but in plundering Meccans he could plead that he had been driven from his home and possessions:

    “and with the Jewish tribes of Medina he had in each case some outrage, real or pretended, to avenge.

    “**But the people of Khaibar, all that distance from Medinah, had certainly done him and his followers no wrong: for their leaving unavenged the murder of one of their number by his emissary was no act of aggression.** {my emphasis – dda}.

    ” Ali, when told to lead the forces against them, had to enquire for what he was fighting:

    “**and was told that he must compel them to adopt the formulae of Islam.** {my emphasis – dda}.

    ” **Khaibar was attacked because there was booty to be acquired there,

    ” and the plea for attacking it was that its inhabitants were not Moslems.** {my emphasis – dda}.

    “That plea could cover attacks on the whole world outside of Medinah and its neighborhood:

    “and on leaving Khaibar the Prophet seemed to see the world already in his grasp….

    “Now the fact that a community was idolatrous, or Jewish, or anything but Mohammadan, warranted murderous attack upon it: the passion for fresh conquests dominated the Prophet.”

    –David S. Margoliouth, (1905) in ‘Mohammad and the Rise of Islam’, pp. 362-363, quoted in Andrew Bostom’s (2005) edited volume ‘The Legacy of Jihad’, p. 250.

    Posted by: Archimedes at January 18, 2007 1:30 PM.

    Canadian jihadwatchers may like to include *that* passage in a letter to Stephen Harper, placing side by side Margoliouth’s scholarly analysis of the Islamic texts themselves – which reveal that the core ‘reason’ for attacking Khaybar was that it was a/ full of tempting booty and b/ not Muslim – and the vicious nonsense and blame-the-victim scapegoating indulged in by the Muslim schoolbook or, rather, hate manual, to *justify* that greedy booty raid and represent it as an act of, forsooth, ‘self defence’ against those eeevil scheming Jooooz.

    Mr Spencer’s discussion of the raid on Khaybar, which may be read in his book ‘The Truth About Muhammad’, pp 139-143, may also be cited.

    And you might also send Mr Harper a copy of the brief article that may be found at this link: Steven Simpson’s classic, ‘Why Islam Will Never Accept the State of Israel’.

    Why Islam Will Never Accept the State of Israel

    By Steven Simpson, THE AMERICAN THINKER June 30 2010

    In fact, it might be worth a try for Canadian jihadwatchers to get together and organise themselves to send a copy of this article from the National Post – with the Jew-hating passages highlighted – together with the David Margoliouth passage, and the Steven Simpson article, and a short, sharp covering letter, to every single Canadian parliamentarian.

    If there is any Canadian MP who is Jewish (be he dhimmified or no), and any Canadian MP who is normally known as a ‘friend of Israel’, make sure that that MP is contacted and given the information.

    Perhaps it’s time for Canadian jihadwatchers to form small groups – say, two or three – and organise to meet their MP face-to-face to discuss this matter of a Muslim school being allowed to peddle pure unadulterated 100 % proof Mohammedan Jew-hatred, scot free.

    Somehow, we have to get it through people’s skulls that Islam – classical, mainstream, orthodox Islam – inculcates venomous and hysterical hatred toward Jews qua Jews. That the hate (and the vicious abuse of and aggression toward Jews that it produces and has produced historically) isn’t a new thing – that it isn ‘t a response to the rebirth of Israel, it isn’t an import from the West; it is hardwired into the core Islamic texts and has been part of the theory and daily practice of Islam for 14 centuries.

    For those regulars here who remember regular poster and essayist Hugh Fitzgerald, here’s what *Hugh* had to say to this story, over at New English Review:

    Thursday, 8 November 2012
    Toronto Islamic school will not face charges over anti-Jewish curriculum: police


    8 Nov 2012
    Hugh Fitzgerald

    “No charges?
    No closing of the school?
    No deportation of the staff, including being stripped of citizenship if they had managed to obtain it under obviously false pretenses?

  7. says

    The film is wrong

    Ironically the Islamists tried to stop he film, but they finally got the producer Moustapha Akkad in the November 9, 2005 Amman bombings in Amman, Jordan. he was in the lobby at the Grand Hyatt when a suicide bomber sent by al-Qaeda detonated his device; his daughter died instantly, and Akkad died of his injuries two days later in a hospital

  8. says

    Double standards? It’s much worse than that, because this school really did teach hatred. But Mark Steyn’s crime, in the end, the reason he will never be forgiven, has been his delicious mocking of the Leftis enablers of this growing avalanche of hatred. To mock AND be SO funny is simply not fair, as people love a joke and the Left-Liberal types just aren’t funny.

  9. says

    I understand your point and it’s well taken but I meant a double standard whereby Muslims and leftists fault others for what is often times not a fault at all while blithely overlooking their own egregious faults. The hypocrisy of it all is rank.

  10. says

    “We have four years to to evict Allah, a lot less if we play our exorcism cards right…”

    Minor quibble: it isn’t just person who is the problem, but rather thousands in government at all levels and branches, tens of thousands in academia and the bureaucracy and media, and millions in the electorate. So if you want to believe in exorcism the target would not be Allah but rather Legion. Good luck.

  11. says


    If ‘The Message’ portrayed Kinana of Khaybar as a *Muslim* being tortured to death by *Jews*, then ‘The Message’ got it exactly the wrong way around.


    Do *you* think that Kinana of Khaybar was a Muslim tortured by Jews, or do you think that – as is stated in books such as Mr Spencer’s ‘The Truth About Muhammad’, which are based on reading of the Sira and the sahih Hadith – Kinana of Khaybar was a Jewish man tortured to death by *Muslims*, on Mohammed’s orders?