Jamie Glazov: Female Genital Mutilation: An Islamic Crime

FGMGlazov.jpg


At FrontPage this morning Jamie Glazov tells truths about FGM that the Western Leftist intelligentsia seems determined to ignore or deny:

Asia News recently reported how the misogynist crime of female genital mutilation (FGM) continues to be a “widespread traditional practice” in “rural areas and more remote areas of Indonesia, particularly the island of Java.” The story makes sure to remind us, naturally, that while this crime is being perpetrated in a Muslim country, the crime “is not a rule set in a rigid manner by the precepts of Islam.” It is only widespread, we are consoled, because of the actions of “the more extreme and integral fringe.”

In her coverage of this news report, freedom fighter Pamela Geller shrewdly asks the key question that somehow mysteriously eludes the minds of every breathing human being in our mainstream media: “The fringe made it widespread?”

Indeed, if only the “extreme and integral fringe” supports this sadistic and vicious crime against women, and if it is “not a rule set in a rigid manner by the precepts of Islam,” then where are all the Muslim imams, muftis and clerics in the world, and in Indonesia in particular, vociferously denouncing and repudiating this crime as un-Islamic and coming to the defense of Muslim women?

Why haven’t they shut down this crime against women, since it is, after all, so un-Islamic? Where are all the tens of thousands of Muslims gathering in mass demonstrations around the world shouting in moral indignation and fury about their young little Muslim girls having their clitorises cut out with broken glass and being maimed for life, as they do about Danish cartoons and American movies? Why do cartoons and films mean more to them than the brutal maiming of their women?

Hmmm. What a great mystery this continues to be.

One can’t help from wondering: could it all have something possibly to do with the fact that female genital mutilation is rooted in Islam and integral to its misogynist structures?

Pamela Geller gives us the easy answer – an answer you shouldn’t hold your breath waiting to hear on Anderson Cooper, Geraldo or Pierce Morgan, since uncomfortable answers can’t be given when pertinent questions are never asked in our mainstream media. Geller affirms that this Islam-denial coverage of FGM in Asia News “is just more whitewashing of Islam’s human rights abuses.” She points out that FGM is “fundamentally Islamic” and cites its foundation in Islamic texts such as Umdat al-Salik:

“Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. Bazr) of the clitoris.” Sacred Islamic Reliance: page 59, Umdat al-Salik  (“Reliance of the Traveler”), a manual of the Shafi’i school of Islamic jurisprudence, endorsed by Egypt’s very own Al-Azhar University of Cairo — the oldest and most prestigious university in the Islamic world.

FGM is indeed fundamentally Islamic. Why would it not be when one of Sunni Islam’s “Four Great Imams,” Ahmad ibn Hanbal, quotes Muhammed as saying: “Circumcision is a law for men and a preservation of honour for women?” Perhaps this is why Sheikh Muhammad Sayyed Tantawi of Egypt’s Al-Azhar University has called circumcision “a laudable practice that did honor to women.”

And so perhaps it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out why in Muslim Egypt, like in Indonesia, the crime of FGM is perpetrated on a massive level. Even when the Egyptian government tried to ban FGM back in 1996, an Egyptian court overturned the ban in July 1997 because of the ferocious uprising it sparked among Islamic clerics, who fervently pointed to Islamic teachings to make sure this crime against women remained firm in place.

And it is clear, of course, why FGM is so important and crucial to Islam; crippling women’s sexuality solidifies the misogynist structures of Islamic gender apartheid. Keeping FGM legitimized and institutionalized helps keep women subjugated and caged. By amputating the clitoris, Islam’s mutilators succeed in maiming the woman’s sexual desire and pleasure, which, in the morbid Islamic mindset, reduces the chances that she will ever toy with the horrifying notions (for Islam) of autonomy, equality and self-determination.

But how can we possibly help Muslim girls if our society forbids us to confront this Islamic crime and the theology in which it is rooted? And that’s where we tragically stand: while millions of young Muslim girls suffer the mutilating barbarity of female genital mutilation in the Islamic world every year, our mainstream media and higher literary culture remains completely silent about it – and slanders the truth tellers like Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer who want to come to the aid of Muslim women.

Read it all.

| 4 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

4 Comments

| Leave a comment

It has always baffled me as to why there are no economic sanctions imposed on these countries that oppress, mutilate, deny equal rights and sanction murder and rape of young girls and women. South Africa had the apratheid system which was so abhorent that the UN placed trade sanctions etc. in order to remove this regime that denied equal right to Blacks in their own country. Now, with women, which percentage-wise make up more than one half of the population of Muslim countries, nobody seems to care of the blantant human rights abuses. It is as if women, the female gender of the human species, are not considered to be truly human, but a lower, freaky sub-species - in fact many religions go out of the way to portray the female sex as something outre, evil and strange and to be wary of instead of half of the human species as well as its nurturer and live-giver.

Could it be that business interest trump the rights of half of humanity every time (seeing that many of these country have oil and other resources we covet)? Or could it be that under the guise of religion, anything is permissable (in which case the worshipers of Kali in India and the Aztecs should resume their human sacrifices with inpunity). To be sure, two of the main and most politically influencial world religions today have always regarded two things as supremely evil - Jews and Women. No wonder women's rights are losing ground and anti-semitism is on the increase worldwide.

"To be sure, two of the main and most politically influencial world religions today have always regarded two things as supremely evil - Jews and Women. ".

Way to go with sweeping moral equivalencing of Christianity and Islam...

Never mind that Christianity does NOT teach FGM; it is neither described nor prescribed in any part of Christian scripture, and although I think some Christians in Egypt and Ethiopia (it seems to have originated in pagan Africa) practised it, one has to say that they did it in despite of and not because of their Christian faith, and Christians from other countries have very, very strongly encouraged them to abandon it.

Wife-beating is *commanded* and condoned in Muslim scripture (Quran 4: 34); there is NO text in either the Hebrew Scripture (TaNaKh/ Old Testament) or in the New Testament that either describes or prescribes wife-beating.

'Honor' murders are very prevalent in Islamic societies; there are 'crimes of passion' in historically Christianised societies but Phyllis Chesler has studied 'honor' murders and shows that they differ greatly from the kinds of family murders one encounters in the West. A study of family violence in the UK in the early 1990s discovered that women married to *Muslim* husbands were EIGHT TIMES MORE LIKELY to be murdered by their spouses, than women married to men of any other cultural background. That suggests to me that there is a level of hostility and aggression toward women within the Islamic system, that is simply not matched by any other.

Further: there is another major difference between Christianity and Islam that is very, very relevant to the wellbeing of women and girls.

That is: Christians have always taught and practised and very strongly (once they had political influence) promoted monogamy. (And

Whereas Muslims have always prescribed and practised and promoted polygyny.

Now, just recently, some academics at the University of British Columbia, Canada, did a study:

they looked at the broad social indicators of societies that permitted polygyny and societies that did not, both contemporary and historic, and also at the changes that had taken place in societies that had formerly permitted polygyny but had then banned it and enforced the ban (one can see the transition, for example, in China: just read Jung Chang's Wild Swans; if China had continued to permit polygyny the result of their self-inflicted 'girl drought' would be ten times worse than it already is).

Conclusion: broadly speaking, if you want long-term social stability and wellbeing - especially of women and children - monogamy is the gold standard.

http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/40214

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/9041460/Monogamy-safer-than-polygamy.html

Wednesday, 25 January 2012
 From The Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society
Monogamy reduces major social problems of polygamist cultures
University of British Columbia | January 25, 2012

Summary: "In cultures that permit men to take multiple wives, the intra-sexual competition that occurs causes greater levels of crime, violence, poverty and gender inequality than in societies that institutionalize and practice monogamous marriage."...

"Considered the most comprehensive study of polygamy and the institution of marriage, the study finds significantly higher levels of rape, kidnapping, murder, assault, robbery and fraud in polygynous cultures.

"According to Henrich and his research team, which included Profs. Robert Boyd (UCLA) and Peter Richerson (UC Davis), these crimes are caused primarily by pools of unmarried men, which result when other men take multiple wives.

“The scarcity of marriageable women in polygamous cultures increases competition among men for the remaining unmarried women,” says Henrich, adding that polygamy was outlawed in 1963 in Nepal, 1955 in India (partially), 1953 in China and 1880 in Japan.

T'he greater competition increases the likelihood men in polygamous communities will resort to criminal behavior to gain resources and women, he says...'.

And by way of contrast:

'Monogamous marriage... results in significant improvements in child welfare, including lower rates of child neglect, abuse, accidental death, homicide and intra-household conflict, the study finds.

"These benefits result from greater levels of parental investment, smaller households and increased direct “blood relatedness” in monogamous family households, says Henrich, who served as an expert witness for British Columbia’s Supreme Court case involving the polygamous community of Bountiful, B.C.'

Here's the abstract:

http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1589/657.abstract

But there *is* a way you can read the whole thing.

Go to this link:

http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/2012/01/23/monogamy-reduces-major-social-problems-of-polygamist-cultures/
When it opens, scroll down to the bottom where it says:

"View the study, 'the puzzle of monogamous marriage, at...".
and click on the link there provided

which will allow you to view the *whole* thing in its original scholarly form, footnotes and all.

Anyone who would still want to claim, after reading *that*, that Christianity (promoter of monogamy) was 'just as bad' for women as Islam (promoter of polygyny), has got rocks in their head.


And re treatment of Jews.

I make no excuse for historic persecution of Jews within Christian societies (though, curiously enough, it seems to have gotten much worse after the rise of Islam, and after Christians from western Europe and elsewhere had come under the influence of Islam, than it was prior to that time).

Jew-hatred is not, in fact, however, a *doctrinal* requirement or founding presupposition of Christianity; the three great Creeds (Nicene, Apostolic and Athanasian) do not even mention Jews in the course of their bare-bones summary of what one is required to believe in order to identify as a Christian.

It is perfectly possible to be a completely convinced orthodox Christian, and to feel and practise nothing but love and charity toward Jews, and to do this not in despite of but *because of* one's faith. See, for example, the Reverend James Parkes; or Orde Wingate, whom the Jews of Mandatory Palestine nicknamed 'the Friend'; or the many Righteous Gentiles of Nazi-occupied Europe, whose Christian faith had a lot to do with their willingness to risk their own lives to save Jewish people, Jesus' own earthly kin. (See Corrie Ten Boom, 'The Hiding Place', or look up the Abbe Andre Trocme and the village of Le Chambon, or Jacques Ellul).

There is a further point that may be made.

There were populations of Jews within the 'Christian' world, broadly speaking; there were also populations of Jews within the Muslim world.

In 1930 there were many, many more Jews within the Christian world, than survived within the Muslim world after some 1400 years of dhimmitude.

*Even after the horror of the Shoah, during which around six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis* (pagan revivalist totalitarian Nazis who, one must add, fully intended to start in on the Christians once they had finished with the Jews; they rightly identified Judaism as, so to speak, the fons et origo of Christianity and were aiming to strike at the root before they went for the branches) there were still more Jews within the Christian world - in particular, within Christian America - than within the Muslim world.*

Johann Von Leers, Nazi Islamophile, greatly admired Islam...and one of the main things he admired about it, was the way in which Muslim societies had 'broken' the Jews. (After the war, he fled to dar al Islam and became a Muslim). That is: he thought *Christian* societies, or societies influenced by Christianity, had not done as 'effective', so to speak a job on Jews, as the dar al Islam had done.

Both Christian persecution of Jews and Muslim persecution of Jews were wrong, and evil.

The difference is that had Christians truly thought through the implications of the central tenets of their faith - most notably, 'love your neighbour as yourself ' and 'do unto others as you would they should do unto you' - they could never have engaged in persecution of Jews; because the Jew living next door is the Christians' neighbour just as much as anybody else (and Christianity *also* has that difficult commandment to 'love your enemy and bless those who persecute you', so if Jews *were* perceived as 'enemy', then *that* teaching should have been activated).

Whereas contempt for and abuse (at every level from personal to political) of Jews (as also contempt for and abuse of Christians and anybody else who isn't Muslim) is hardwired into the core program, so to speak, of Islam.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter