The real source of anti-Muslim bigotry

Yet another case of Muslims and their international socialist comrades hijacking a non-muslim related case trying to portray it like an "anti-muslim" case. Sunando Sen was a Hindu not a Muslim, and Hindus are actually persecuted and prosecuted by Muslims.

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/121229/sunando-sen-subway-death-suspect-custody

What did happen was awful no question about it but when things like this happen and people come out with its anti islam i just don't see how that is a good thing.

anyone that follows the news that comes from JW or AS would know the difference between Hindus and Muslims

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/prosecutors-woman-arrested-in-second-nyc-subway-shoving-charged-with-murder-as-a-hate-crime/

However, the New York Times has a number of other details:

A law enforcement official said that Ms. Menendez had “told the cops it was an act against Muslims,” and cited the Sept. 11 attacks. The victim, Sunando Sen, was born in India and, according to a roommate, was raised Hindu. [Emphasis added]

Queens DA Richard Brown related Menendez’s shocking explanation:

“I pushed a Muslim off the train tracks because I hate Hindus and Muslims ever since 2001 when they put down the Twin Towers I’ve been beating them up.”

Yes, the wolves-in-sheep's-clothing are out howling at the moon. They'll exploit this tragic act by this mentally ill, ignorant woman for all it's worth, and the media will lap it up.
Reason number 17 why I don't watch television if I can help it.

Erica Menendez and Naeem Davis, both homeless and both having a psychotic episode.
Sunando Sen and Ki-Suck Han, both from Asia and both men.
Will the media hacks jump to the conclusion that psychotics are violent to asian men with three letter surnames? It's just as logical.

Indeed Robert, anything these scumbags can do to smear critics of Islam they'll do it.

They're actually terrified of people like you because you show them for who they really are-the enemy within, the real threat to our civilization.

This is why fundamentalist muslims will stop at nothing, including using violence to silence criticism of their murderous death cult.

I believe the work you and Pamela are doing is having an impact. It's all about turning on that light-bulb in most people's heads, the moment when they realize Islam is a danger to us, that we'll finally begin the real push back against Islam.

Slander and Defamation.

Nathan Lean names names, and this should be enough for a lawsuit.

The other two seem to be a bit more cunning, but this guy spit the dummy.

I got a C-note that says this loon-bat woman never even heard of Robert or the others named in Lean's tweet.

Greenwald also just tweeted this:

Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald

Here's what a man just convicted of burning a mosque said about where he learned to hate Muslims http://is.gd/xANujk

View summary Reply Retweet Favorite

He says this mosque arsonist (for once it's a real hate crime, and not a Muslim self-inflicted "crime") was influenced by Fox News. And oh yeah, those 45 beers he mentions (I'm guessing he lost count and it was maybe 8-12) might have played into it too....

You are quite right about the cause of Islamophobia being the behaviour of certain Muslims.
Here's another example. and alas, in Indonesia, there are many more!
http://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2012/12/29/blood-thirsty-islamonazi-scorns-ngo-but-his-evils-enshrined-on-video/

"for the act of an insane woman in the New York subways"

...at first glance I thought this story was about Mona Eltahawy.

Ludicrous. As far as I know Spencer abides by the teachings of the one known as “Jesus.” Furthermore, I own every book he’s ever published, and I regularly read his current writings. In short, I’ve never heard him condone violence of any kind, giving great credit to himself and the legendary peacemaker he holds as the most dear to heaven and earth.

To any Muslims reading this I have this message: As a human being, there isn’t a man or woman on this planet that isn’t my brother and sister. I don’t see a “race” other than the human race. Ethnologically speaking, I am mixed. European, Middle Eastern, North African, North & South American, and Polynesian. And I am convinced of a creator, but claim no religion. The only reason I present this ethnological background is because some people take it seriously; it is measured in their calculation of someone’s utterance. In truth, it means nothing. Absolutely NOTHING.

My physical characteristics were not my decision. My mind is, however, and my mind tells me that the world is a theatre of action for the evolution of consciousness. My question to you is this… do you think it assists or inhibits your soul to believe that the creator of this place, this magnificent experiment we are surrounded by called LIFE, has in its calculation greater or lesser beings?

To the Muslims. I love you, dearly, as brothers and sisters on the human level. God knows I don’t want to take life. I want to preserve it! But you must know, abiding by any kind of totalitarian system is doomed to failure. Surely you know this… slaves will always gain their freedom! It may take millennia, but freedom and liberty are the natural state of the human… and the eternal energies that animate these bodies.

So why not choose freedom?

Sunando Sen was from India, but it's unclear if he was Muslim or Hindu.
................................

According to his roommate, Sunando Sen was raised Hindu.

Maybe the news media are bigoted against Hispanics, since Erica Menendez has a Spanish surname. Maybe it has something to do with what her ancestors suffered between the Almoravid invasion and the Reconquista. Or, I wonder, could Ms. Menendez have had a relative who died in the 9/11 attacks? I bet there are lots of New Yorkers of all ethnicities in that boat; and more who've developed health problems or saw relatives develop health problems from all that debris in the air. As for Randolph Linn who burned that Ohio mosque, and is apparently a confessing Christian, maybe he's acting in solidarity with his black and swarthy brethren in a lot of Africa and Western Asia. Really, those MSM types need to learn to understand people...

Oh, I'd better stop trying to imitate the mindset I hear from the Communist and Islamicist apologists. What Menendez and Linn did was completely uncalled for, and to blame Mr. Spencer or Fox News is utterly ludicrous. Both behaved in a criminal manner, and I'd say that of Erica Menendez even if the victim had been named Maulana Omar.

This will be milked for all it's worth.

However - if the subject comes up at the water cooler, or at the New Year's Eve Party - there is a point that could be made.

A jihadwatch 'regular' who saw someone they thought might be a Muslim, in a railway station or other transport hub (such as an airport or bus station) would not be *at all* interested in closely approaching that person, let alone laying hands on him or her.

Knowing altogether too much about what has happened very often in Israel during the suicide-bomber intifada, and what happened in London in 2005, and what happened on the trains in Mumbai, and what happened on the trains in Madrid, a jihadwatch regular espying a possible Muslim - a person of one of the ethnicities, Middle Eastern or South Asian, to which most of the world's Muslims currently belong, especially if wearing one or more items of known Mohammedan gang uniform (such as the female Slave Rag) or a person of Caucasian ethnicity but wearing visibly Mohammedan gang uniform - on a railway platform, etc., is going to stay (if at all possible) well back out of blast range and outside of stabbing distance, and (having taken note of possible bolt holes and/ or items solid enough to provide cover if the possible Mohammedan pulls out a weapon) *observe*, judiciously and narrowly, assessing the person's general demeanour (do they appear nervous? do they have that strange spaced-out dead-eyed look we see in so many jihadi mug shots?), and their costume and accoutrements (e. g. are they wearing unseasonably or unusually bulky clothing or an unusually large backpack or bag?).

The jihadwatcher would not be the least bit interested in pushing a Mohammedan off the platform and running the risk of getting blown up by a bomb on board said Mohammedan; rather, the jihadwatcher would be taking care not to place him or herself in a position to be attacked in any way *by* the Mohammedan, and would be watching in case the possible Mohammedan attacked anybody else,

To repeat: anyone who has done their homework here at jihadwatch is going to steer well clear of anyone they suspect might be a Muslim, merely keeping an eye on them in case they start doing anything funny...such as, say, 'planting' a package under a bench or dropping something onto the tracks...or sneaking up behind someone...

Jihadwatchers like London Jim, Davegreybeard, Undaunted and some others, who have the physical skills and mental attitude/ training to engage in physical fight, would not use violence gratuitously; they would act if and only if they were themselves directly attacked by a Mohammedan or saw the Mohammedan clearly attacking or about to attack someone else.

A few years back, late one Friday evening on a railway platform in Canada, a Muslim male approached a group of non-Muslim teenagers, one of whom was a Jewish girl. He casually asked the Jewish girl if she were Jewish; when she innocently said yes, he simply exploded - he started insulting, hitting and slapping her, shouting 'I'm a Muslim and hate Jews!', and then attacked her Gentile friends (throwing one of them off the platform onto the tracks) when they tried to stop him. I could see someone like our Undaunted or London Jim, should they witness something of that kind, wading in to take out the thug and rescue those he was attacking. But a Mohammedan who refrained from attacking anyone, and kept himself to himself, would have nothing to fear.

Anyone who gets their information from JW or AS knows that the freedom fighters include Hindus as their ally.

Indeed. I think the most enlightened men and women on earth understand that training in the martial arts are for preserving life and peace first and foremost. Ironically, my experience with fighting and warfare has taught me what it has taught so many before… this paradox that martial skills lead to a greater understanding of peace and love, and not hate and homicide.

While not a pacifist, I think the spiritually healthiest of fighters are a hair’s breadth away from being such.

“would not use violence gratuitously,”....

Indeed. The most noble fighters I’ve known exude an amazing sense of fathership, mothership… friendship. Just incredible people.

I’m reminded of these words by the great teacher Morihei Ueshiba: “The Way of a Warrior is based on humanity, love, and sincerity; the heart of martial valor is true bravery, wisdom, love and friendship. Emphasis on the physical aspects of warriorship is futile, for the power of the body is always limited.”

And while the physically ready counter-jihadist must be ready to engage and cancel the threat, we strive to be the most loving beings possible, and a hair’s breadth away from the greatest teachers of morality and peace in history. Is this not the goal?

Your contribution tonight tells me you would agree.

8:43 post a reply to DDA!

I challenge anyone to find negative sentiments about hindus from any counter jihadist. Counter jihadists believe there is common cause with hindus because of the criminally ignored genocide hindus experienced during the muslim invasions of India AND because of all the terrorism India has to contend with from Pakistan.

This homeless woman was turned in by her family. She was obviously mentally incompetant and potentially dangerous long before this incident or she would have been living with her relatives.

Furthermore I think it was the mad act of a moment and her "explanation" is really just post facto rationalization. In a few days she won't be able to even talk about what happened.

Charging this specific woman with a hate crime is ludacris. You have to have coherent thought to actually hate people enough to harm them because of what subset of humanity they might be a part of. From the article this "muttering" woman clearly does not have the ability to control her actions or thoughts.

She was hating in general and externalized that onto whoever was in front of her.

I had a similar experience a few weeks ago. I was standing at a bus stop and a man, who appeared to be having a very interesting conversation with himself, focused on me and told me very angrily that my standing was really bothering him and that I should sit down as if that was of course the only sensible thing anyone with any brain at all would do, he then informed me I had facial hair and described my physique in a tone that epressed utter contempt. He was quite emphatic about it. He as also schizophrenic and was reacting in a stream of conciousness, to whatever was before his eyes. He then ran off.

He was feeling agitated because he was schizophrenic - but externalized the source of that discomfort onto whatever was before his eyes because his disease prevented him from percieving the real source of his discomfort - which was his inability to order his own perceptions and cognitions.

Same deal with this woman. She was agitated, her eyes happened upon someone, in her disordered state she attributed her discomfort to the external stimuli of the man, attacked him, then rationalized it in a muddled way when the subject was brought up to her by police. In a few days she may not be able to talk about it coherently at all - the memory becoming mixed up in the hurricaine of thoughts that composes her internal life.

Do these terrorism supporters really want to bring up the subject of what influenced whom? Really? OK then.

So far it's been a few incoehrent drunks and 2 paranoid schizophrenics, none of which had any connection to anything verses a hundred thousand sane malevolent people indoctrinated and commanded by other sane malevolent people.

Breivik cited a thousand and one sources for his thinking, from Thomas Jefferson to Osama Bin Laden. Whereas all of the thousands of jihad murderers only ever cite Just ONE! Just ONE man and Just ONE book.

That seems like a good retort but it also feels incomplete somehow.

Erica Menendez is Hispanic. As we all know, only whites are capable of hate crimes. Ergo, Ms. Menendez is not guilty of a hate crime.

Next.

If Allah didn't want the man pushed in front of the train, the man would not have been pushed in front of the train...No human is the root cause of these deadly actions...Allah is the culprit...What evil lurks in the heart of Man? Allah knows, he put it there...Look how well he supplies his minions with overflowing hate...

Lean is a poster boy and a conduit for Allah's manifest hate of kufr...Every Mahoundian is obligated to be a conduit for Allah's hate, but Lean appears to be a volunteer...If he is not already a Mahoundian, it is an insult to Allah that he does not convert, or join up...What is holding him back? Has he already claimed shahada, or is that pending?...

Since they have apparently already passed their Sharia Insistent Compliant (SIC) judgment have they also pronounced their SIC punishment?

Yep, 1400 years of blood soaked history, genocide, mass murder, systemic rape, a "holy " book that not only permits violence but asks followers to commit murder....that would have nothing to do with why anyone would have at least reservations about islam.

The people who pointed out that Jihad watch is on the side of the Hindus are 100% correct.Nathan Lean is encouraging hatred toward Mr. Spencer and encouraging crazies to push Mr. Spencer.

Although Mr. Spencer is correct in pointing out that the real source of hostility to Muslims is Muslim behavior he never included the terrorists who the woman herself said motivated her, the ones who committed 9/11.

Lean and others like him, are cowards who are so paranoid of Islam that they really think that it will prevail with it's agenda here in the US.

They're trying to convince their would be conquerers, that they were always on the side of Islam, just in case.

They're the real Islamophobes.

With due credit extended to the good Dr. Samuel Johnson, in our time crying "Islamophobia" is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

I think that when answering people like Nathan Lean, in addition to pointing out that it is the Muslims who create anti-Muslim hate through their violent acts, it is important to point out that Nathan Lean wants people not to know about it. When he criticizes Spencer for telling people the truth what he really is saying is that we should keep people from knowing the truth. That is outrageous. Nathan is indirectly admitting that if people know the truth they will not like Muslims and he is saying that he doesn't want people to know the truth. He wants it to be hidden.

It's amazingly perceptive of Greenwald, Lean and Ayloush to see through the killer's attempt to disguise Pam's anti-savage subway ads as the inspiration for her crime by doing it above ground on the El.(sarc)

Mr sen was clean shaven and working hard by running a print shop. Thats not the muslim lifestyle.
The last name Sen or sena is an old hindu sanskrit name meaning "army". this is used commonly among hindus of bengal. Shiv Sena is a hindu hardline group which translates to army of shiv.
There have and are many popular "sen" people, among them Amartya_Sen, a nobel prize winner in economics. Ashoke sen, a theoretical physicist.
Sushimita and, Raima and Riya sen, three popular film actresses. they are all hindus. muslims don't use the last name sen unless they are trying to pass off as a Hindu.