Tunisia: Muslim cleric calls Jews prophet slayers and apes, prays for Allah to annihilate them

There is nothing really surprising in this. It’s all from the Qur’an:

“Those who disbelieve in the signs of God and slay the Prophets without right, and slay such men as bid to justice — do thou give them the good tidings of a painful chastisement…” — Qur’an 3:19

“And well you know there were those among you that transgressed the Sabbath, and We said to them, ‘Be you apes, miserably slinking!'” — Qur’an 2:65

But of course these are the sort of passages we are not supposed to notice, on pain of charges of “Islamophobia.” The problem is that people like Ahmad Al-Suhayli keep noticing them.

“Tunisian Cleric Ahmad Al-Suhayli Calls the Jews Prophet Slayers and Apes, Prays for Allah to Annihilate Them,” from MEMRI, November 30:

Following are excerpts from a Friday sermon in Rades, Tunisia, which was delivered by Sheik Ahmad Al-Suhayli, which aired on Hannibal TV on November 30, 3012 [sic]:

Sheik Ahmad Al-Suhayli: Ever since the days of the prophets, the Jews have been obstinate. They rebelled against the decrees and laws of Allah. Whenever Allah commanded them to do something, they did the exact opposite.

[“¦]

The Jews continued with their deviations and transgressions. Those accursed Zionist Jews even had the audacity to slay the prophets of Allah. Allah said: “They were struck with humiliation and misery, and they drew upon themselves the wrath of Allah, because they rejected His signs, slayed the prophets without just cause, and rebelled and transgressed.” In the days of Allah’s prophet David, a group of Jews was transformed into apes, because they violated the laws of Allah.

[“¦]

The Koran exposed the evil psyche of the Jews.

[“¦]

When they violated the treaties and agreements that the Prophet Muhammad made with them in Al-Madina, he banished them and drove them out of Al-Madina. In modern times, this accursed gang gathered once again in Palestine, by means of deception and trickery. Then came the Balfour Declaration. It was Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary back then, in 1917, who gathered the Jews in Palestine and Jerusalem. Then he called upon the foreign powers to help [the Jews], providing them with money and weapons.

This Balfour Declaration was a tragedy and a catastrophe for the Palestinians in particular, and for the Arab and Islamic nation in general. He promised a land that he did not own to people who do not deserve it — because it is not the land of the Jews — to pave the way for the racist Zionist movement to rule Palestine and Jerusalem. Indeed, that is what happened.

[“¦]

Look at those Zionists. After a bus in Tel Aviv was blown up by a martyrdom seeker, they hastened to seek a truce, when the Arab and Islamic peoples showed their resolve, and stood as one, defending the violated honor of the Islamic nation.

[“¦]

Brothers, the Arab Spring that the media talks about will not truly be a spring unless we support our brothers in Gaza, and stand united with them, in order to drive those Jews out of Palestine and to liberate Jerusalem.

[…]

Oh Allah, just like you destroyed the people of “˜Aad and Thamud, destroy this gang of Jews. Strike them with a deterring force that will destroy them.

[“¦]

Oh Allah, you know everything that those accursed Jews have done — the corruption they spread on earth, their diverting of people from your path, and their humiliation of your servants. Strike them with a resounding blow, and do not leave a single one of them. Oh Lord, rip them asunder, and disperse them throughout the land, as you did with their followers, because they have invoked the sanctities of Islam. “Soon the unjust will know what vicissitude will befall them.” “Oh Lord, do not leave a single one of them on Earth, for if you do, they will lead your servants astray, and they will beget none but sinners and infidels.” Allah, make the wombs of their women barren, and dry up the loins of their men. Strike them with Your hatred and wrath, oh You who delivers harsh punishment and torment.

Soros-funded Human Rights Watch: Iran's genocidal calls for annihilation of Israel not "incitement," but "advocacy"
New York: Muslim gets ten years for plotting to blow up ten synagogues
FacebookTwitterLinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousEmailPinterestRedditStumbleUponPrint

Comments

  1. says

    1 Min “… because they rejected His (Allah’s) signs,
    they slayed the prophets without justs cause.”

    EVIL Quran 5:33 “… crucifixion who made mischief (trouble,)”
    i.e. 7:103 “… reject Our signs (i.e. Quran). So see what was the end of those who made mischief

    Allah, 4:157 denies the crucifixon of Jesus Christ

    Allah declares war on anybody who reject his Quran (e.g only for Jews & Christians to pay jizyah, protection tax as so-called dhimmis 9:29)

    http://schnellmann.org/kuffar-crucifixion-to-quran.html

  2. says

    O Allah this, and O Allah that…Don’t these fools know Allah is not listening? He’s busy repairing broken and worn virgins…Sometimes it’s just low batteries, but other times some over zealous dead jihadi broke something…
    With new jihadi’s arriving every day, keeping the full fleet of virgins functional, is a high priority…That’s why he doesn’t hear all that O Allah stuff…

  3. says

    In modern times, this accursed gang gathered once again in Palestine, by means of deception and trickery. Then came the Balfour Declaration. It was Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary back then, in 1917, who gathered the Jews in Palestine and Jerusalem. Then he called upon the foreign powers to help [the Jews], providing them with money and weapons.

    ==============================================

    Try as they may, Israel’s supporters can’t deny the core truth — the British gave something they didn’t own to someone who’d been chased out some 1800 years before.

    A basic of our world is that whoever can grab and hold the ground wins. So far it’s been the Israelis — who knows for how long???

  4. says

    Let the genocidal Mohammedan Jew-haters spew out their occult curses, invoking the monstrous allah, drinker of blood, eater of souls.

    It will be to no effect: all their curses will come to nothing and less than nothing.

    Over against their occult black-magic cursing, their hateful screaming, I will light a virtual candle and call upon the life-giving power of the Holy One of Israel, the Lord.

    *I* will bless my Jewish elder brothers and sisters: those within the diaspora and those who now dwell in that teeny-tiny portion of planet earth that is the only place that Jews, the House of Israel, have ever called ‘homeland’.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFxpzgc0B48&NR=1&feature=endscreen

    The Aaronic blessing, from the book of Numbers, 7: 24-26

    YEVAREJEJA ADONAI VE ISHMEREJA
    YAER ADONAI PANAV ELEJA VI JUNEJA
    ISA ADONAI PANAV ELEJA
    VEYASEM LEJA SHALOM.

    ‘The LORD bless thee and keep thee

    The LORD make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee

    the LORD lift up the light of his countenance upon thee,

    and give thee peace.”

    And Psalm 121.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFKemkJIPtI

    And Psalm 122.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoEVLKbyXdA&feature=endscreen

    (Note that although this sequence of Psalm portions begins with Psalm 95, that includes a recognition of past sins, it concludes with the pilgrimage to Jerusalem, and the blessing of the city and the people, in Psalm 122).

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqPh8wHhFb4

    and again, verses from Psalm 122:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66XYGCsBEg8

  5. says

    Read James Parkes, ‘Whose Land’, and get a clue. Look at what he shows of the continual persistent presence of Jews within and steady trickle of Jews into the Land from all parts of the Diaspora – from Christendom, and from Dar al Islam – throughout the years 135-1900.

    The idea that the land of Israel was perfectly and pristinely Judenrein from AD 70 (or AD 135, when the Romans renamed it ‘Palestine’), all the way through to the 1880s when the modern Zionists arrived, is utterly and completely FALSE. Nor was it exactly flourishing and full of people *until* the Zionists got to work restoring it…for more on that, see Walter Clay Lowdermilk, agronomist and historian of world agriculture, in ‘Palestine: Land of Promise’.

    Furthermore: half the Jews of Israel today are descended from Jews who never left the ‘Middle East’ and near east. Jews who endured the seven hells of dhimmitude – as virtual chattel slaves in Yemen and Kurdistan, as despised and downtrodden and periodically mass-murdered and force-‘converted’ dhimmis in the swathe of country that runs from Algeria right around to Afghanistan (did you know there were once Jews in Afghanistan?). Given that *none* of these Jews could ever hope to live as social, political and civil equals with Muslims, why should they not engage in a spot of *decolonisation*, and reinhabit their ancient homeland that *some* Jews had never, ever left? They managed to take back what had been seized and stolen and systematically wrecked; GOOD.

    From a certain point of view, the Land of Israel is precisely equivalent to other lands whose rightful owners after suffering centuries of Muslim oppression liberated themselves (with a bit of outside help): Spain and Portugal, Malta, Sicily, Greece and other Balkan states, Bulgaria, southern Romania, southern Hungary, a great swathe of Russia, most of India, and, today, South Sudan and East Timor.

    In the case of Israel, the remnant indigenes hung on by their teeth and their toenails through 1400 miserable years of Mohammedan misrule (note: the first printing press east of the Bosphorus was set up by Jewish scholars in Safed in northern Israel in 1577)…and then, miraculously reinforced by their returning kinfolk from out of the western diaspora, and *also* then by the Jews from the rest of dar al Islam (and the movement of those Jews, back into Israel, began *before* the reestablishment of the Jewish state, and indeed, even *before* the Balfour Declaration), they shook off *both* the British Empire *and* the clutching talons of the Ummah, the Empire of Islam, and claimed their freedom, their right to live not as cringing unarmed dhimmis, but as free and sovereign people on the land of their forefathers…land that some of them had *never* left (e.g. there was a Jewish community in Hebron in the Byzantine, Arab, Mamluk and Turkish periods, they were only driven out, and Hebron rendered Judenrein, in 1929 after a Mohammedan massacre of that ancient and historic Jewish community…a massacre which the British winked at and did nothing to stop).

  6. says

    Pursuant to my posting above, intended as reply to yahoo UNA above, who claimed sweepingly “the British gave something they didn’t own to someone who’d been chased out some 1800 years before (actually, WRONG: the Jewish community ‘bounced back’ after the devastation caused by pagan Rome in AD 70 and AD 135; Christian Byzantine ‘Palestine’, up until the time of the Muslim invasion in the 6th/ 7th century AD, had a great many lively and prosperous even if sometimes mistreated Jewish communities busily building large, lavishly decorated synagogues with beautiful mosaic floors, whose ruins – they were ruinated at the time of the Muslim invasion – have been found from one end of the country to the other) here is a clear-headed Lebanese Maronite Christian, Ignace Moubarac, writing in 1947, on the subject of ‘the two homelands’, that is, the Lebanon (for Christians) and the land of Israel, ‘Palestine’, for **Jews**.

    http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/28942
    Tuesday, 3 August 2010
    Archbishop Ignace Moubarac Of Beirut, In 1947, On “The Two Homelands”

    “…To include Palestine and the Lebanon within the group of Arab [sic: Arab ISLAMIC – dda] countries is to deny history and to destroy the social balance in the Near East.



    “These two countries, these two homelands [Lebanon and the Jewish National Home as a successor to Mandatory Palestine] have proved up till now that it is both useful and necessary for them to exist as separate and independent entities.
…”.

  7. says

    And more.

    From the jihadwatch archives, ‘Hugh Fitzgerald’, erudite and historically well-informed, on the subject of the Mandate and the rest of it.

    In this thread from May 2010.

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/05/obama-promises-abbas-privately-that-he-will-throw-israel-under-the-bus-at-the-un.html

    Hugh | May 3, 2010 6:55 AM | Reply

    “Let it be repeated here, and a hundred thousand times elsewhere: Israel has every right to “settle” Jews anywhere in that part of the territory assigned, by the League of Nations, to the Mandate for Palestine, for the express and exclusive purpose of establishing the Jewish National Home.

    There were other mandates, for various Arab states, and Jordan itself was an Arab state which — in defiance of the intent of the League of Nations’ Mandates Commission under Professor William Rappard — was carved out by the British, at Cairo, by preventing the application of certain terms of the Mandate (including Article 6 which required the Mandatory to “encourage close Jewish settlement on the land”).

    Neither Hillary Clinton, nor Barack Obama, nor anyone else, is entitled to take away from Israel its legal, historic, and moral rights,

    and those unfamiliar with the Treaty of San Remo, with the League of Nations’ Mandates system, with the requirement that the United Nations accept, without change, those Mandates,

    had better start reading the work of unassailable legal authorities,
    including first of all the book-length treatment by Professor Julius Stone, the celebrated Australian jurist, on the legal status of what the Jordanians renamed, after 1949, as the “West Bank.”

    Attention has been fixed on “building” in Jerusalem. It is idiotic of the Israeli government not to make clear that not only Jerusalem, but those parts of Judea and Samaria referred to so tendentiously as “the West Bank” will remain in Israeli possession.

    Had the Israelis greater sense, and had they understood that the war against them was a Jihad, and therefore a war without end, that could not be assuaged but that could be prevented if Israel remained not only militarily stronger, but understood to be militarily stronger by its Arab and Musliim enemeies,

    they would in June 1967 have announced that whatever they might just possibly do with the Sinai (theirs for the second time, and Egypt’s, remember, only in the 1920s),

    and whatever they might, for practical reasons, do with Gaza,

    they would not surrender, ever, that which is now talked of as if Israel does not have, or somehow surrendered, its claim, and that the invention of the “Palestinian people” after the Six-Day War, out of the local Arabs, somehow has undone.

    It has not.

    And I have not even gotten to the adjustments and changes in borders that occur after almost every conflict.

    Italy’s claim to the Alto Adige, formerly the Sudtirol, rests only on the fact that Austria lost World War I, and so Italy was able to “complete the helmet of Scipio”(see the Italian anthem), and this at a time when the population of the Sudtirol was 98% ethnic German.

    But who in his right mind would support Eva Klotz and those revanchists who want the Alto Adige handed over to Austria? I hope no one.

    The confusion and squandering of American foreign policy, as it tries but fails to grasp properly the meaning and menace of Islam, should not find its fall-guy in little Israel.

    And Israeli leaders should make clear that they are not discussing Jerusalem alone, but the “West Bank.”

    Militarily — ask any honest general — it cannot be given up.

    Morally — ask any honest soul — and as a question of national morale — it cannot be given up.

    But Israel has to give it up “for peace”?

    No, the “peace” that would be achieved by Israel surrendering further territories to which it has a clear and superior claim would not create the conditions for peace but of certain war.

    The “peace” such as it now is is the best that can be hoped for — ever.

    Were Israel to surrender more territory, this would whet, not sate, Arab appetites, and whet, not sate, Muslim appetites everywhere — in the Sudan, in Kashmir, in Thailand, in Sudan, in Nigeria, and of course in the imperilled countries of Western Europe, which if sufficiently islamized will cause incalculable damage to the other parts of the Western world — to the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Latin America — dealing them a moral and cultural blow from which they might not recover.

    Israel’s leaders should indeed be pressured from the outside.

    They should be pressured, that is, to recognize, and to base policy on, a firm understanding of the meaning and menace of Islam.

    And in so doing, they will not only save themselves, but also help to begin a process — not some endless and self-defeating “peace process” but another process, the process of educating those in the Western world who so far have remained wilfully ignorant, or comically confused about how to deal with, Islam.”

  8. says

    And more from Hugh, on the Mandate.

    Hugh | May 3, 2010 7:20 AM | Reply

    ‘Just to remind people of what the Mandate for Palestine was all about, I post below the first part of it, right up to the most important and relevant provision — Article 6.

    ‘Print that out. Send that around. Keep it firmly in mind.

    ‘The fact that the Jordanians managed to seize, and hold onto, part of the territory assigned to the Jewish National Home, and then lost in the Six-Day War, by force of arms, what they had gained and could claim only by force of arms, did not extinguish the terms of the Mandate, nor the rights of Israel as the intended successor state to Mandatory Palestine, at least in that part of historic Palestine (for a good definition, see the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition) that lies west of the river Jordan.

    ‘Note, by the way, that the all-important Article 6 also refers to “state and waste lands.”

    ‘One must clearly understand that 90% of the land, in the two Ottoman vilayets (with a separate sanjak for Jerusalem) that made up what became Mandatory Palestine

    (after all of Eastern Palestine had, in a unilateral act by the British, for reasons of geopolitical calculation having to do with relations with France, at the time the other Great Power with Middle Eastern interests)

    consisted of “state and waste lands” that were never owned by private parties.

    ‘And those “state and waste lands” came under the control first of the Mandatory authority, during the Mandate period, and then were inherited by the Mandate’s intended successor state.

    ‘That handful of people who did own what little was available for private ownership — a small landowning class of mainly Turk and Arab [MUSLIM] absentee landlords, living in Amman, Beirut, and Constantinople, were delighted to sell land to the Zionist pioneers, especially at the high, even exorbitant prices, that those pioneers will so desperately willing to pay.

    ‘To give you some idea of how exorbitant, in 1940 the Jews were paying for practically non-arable land for sale in Mandatory Palestine prices higher than at the time were commanded by the richest farmland – that in Iowa — on earth.

    ‘Here’s the first part of the Mandate for Palestine.

    ‘Note — note above all — Article 6.

    ‘Commit it virtually to memory. Understand what it says. Grasp its meaning.
    ‘It is not enough to be “pro-Israel” — whatever that phrase means. You have to know things. You have to know things in detail.

    
”The Council of the League of Nations:
    July 24, 1922

    “Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations,

    “to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine,

    “which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them;

    “and

    “Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect

    “the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,

    “it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,

    “or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country;
    and

    “Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country; and

    “Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have selected His Britannic Majesty as the Mandatory for Palestine; and

    “Whereas the mandate in respect of Palestine has been formulated in the following terms and submitted to the Council of the League for approval; and

    “Whereas His Britannic Majesty has accepted the mandate in respect of Palestine and undertaken to exercise it on behalf of the League of Nations in conformity with the following provisions; and

    “Whereas by the afore-mentioned Article 22 (paragraph 8), it is provided that the degree of authority, control or administration to be exercised by the Mandatory, not having been previously agreed upon by the Members of the League, shall be explicitly defined by the Council of the League Of Nations; confirming the said Mandate, defines its terms as follows:

    “ARTICLE 1. The Mandatory shall have full powers of legislation and of administration, save as they may be limited by the terms of this mandate.

    “ART. 2. The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion

    “ART. 3. The Mandatory shall, so far as circumstances permit, encourage local autonomy.

    “ART. 4. An appropriate Jewish agency shall be recognised as a public body for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the Administration of Palestine in such economic, social and other matters as may affect the establishment of the Jewish national home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, and, subject always to the control of the Administration to assist and take part in the development of the country.

    “The Zionist organization, so long as its organization and constitution are in the opinion of the Mandatory appropriate, shall be recognised as such agency. It shall take steps in consultation with His Britannic Majesty’s Government to secure the co-operation of all Jews who are willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.

    “ART. 5. The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign Power.

    “ART. 6. The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.”