Editor-in-chief of "moderate" Aslan Media endorses cyber terrorism

LeanTakeHimDown.jpg


Jihad Watch is under continued cyber attack -- it's easier for the jihadists and Islamic supremacists than refuting what we say, and accords better with their authoritarian mindset. I am working to get the site fully operational again -- but in the meantime, ask for your patience.

The above tweet comes from Nathan Lean, editor-in-chief of the "moderate" spokesman Reza Aslan's Aslan Media. It is part of a consistent pattern: Aslan is one of the most prominent, popular and respected Muslim spokesmen on the scene, but he has recently been unmasked as a Board member of a front group for Iran's bloody Islamic regime. Aslan is also a Left-fascist who has called for obstruction of our freedom of speech by means of vandalism of our pro-freedom ads.

Aslan employs Lean, a dull-witted thug who has threatened me repeatedly, repeats what he knows to be falsehoods about my record, and has been arrested for shouting obscenities at a city council meeting.

In a sane world, people like Reza Aslan and Nathan Lean would be regarded with contempt and disdain by all free people. In ours, Lean gets space in the Los Angeles Times and New York Daily News to defame me and my colleagues, and to call for restriction of our freedom of speech. And now he openly endorses cyber terrorism, knowing that in doing so he will get only applause from his fellow Left-fascists.

| 31 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

31 Comments

| Leave a comment

What can we do to help, Robert?

Keep up the fight Robert!
We are with you.

I have not been able to post for three days.
Looks like it's working now!

To all who lurk here, imagine a world where this type of free speech supression was sucessful.

We are truly in a war and we should treat it as such.

looks like its working now, and a lot faster.

The guy is a fool and a thug,the evidence is in.Those types never change even when there is blood because of their actions.Check out this:

"More than 100,000 Christians killed in 2012,for their Faith,according to Italian Scholar Massimo Introvigne"

http://www.antisharia.com/2013/01/14/more-than-100000-christians-killed-in-2012for-their-faithaccording-to-italian-scholar-massimo-introvigne/

AND ALSO

"Al-Hussaini,Grand Mufti of the Palestinians and Ally of Hitler"

http://www.antisharia.com/2011/04/24/al-hussainigrand-mufti-of-the-palestinians-and-ally-of-hitler/

How DARE ANYONE criticise Mohammed and his band of followers. How could anyone possibly find fault with a man like Mohammed? He was such a nice caring man. Just ask Asma bint Marwan or al-Rabi of Khaybar. Robert Spencer you should be ashamed of yourself! If he still lived today, Mohammed would shower you with rose petals, he would NOT deliberately try to silence you and your website. You can feel the sweetness and light streaming from Mohammed in his book the Quran. If flows out to people who disagreed with him, like a shower of pure love. Especially to the polytheists who lived around him. (sarcasm)

He just dumped another steaming pile on the "Islamophobes" @ the PuffHo:

Wall Street Journal Denies Existence of Islamophobia

Google it if you're interested.

No comments allowed!

If you look at his twitter photo close up enough, his eyes look cold and dead and hard -- like marbles.

In a core Islamic text, Muhammad says there is to be no punishment for murdering someone who insults him

From Sunan Abu-Dawud, a canonical hadith collection:
Book 38, Number 4348:

Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas:

A blind man had a slave-mother [a slave who bore children for him] who used to abuse the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and disparage him. He [the blind man] forbade her but she did not stop. He rebuked her but she did not give up her habit. One night she began to slander the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and abuse him. So he [the blind man] took a dagger, placed it on her belly, pressed it, and killed her. A child who came between her legs was smeared with the blood that was there. When the morning came, the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) was informed about it.

He assembled the people and said: I adjure by Allah the man who has done this action and I adjure him by my right to him that he should stand up. Jumping over the necks of the people and trembling the man stood up.

He sat before the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and said: Apostle of Allah! I am her master; she used to abuse you and disparage you. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not abandon her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was my companion. Last night she began to abuse and disparage you. So I took a dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it till I killed her.

Thereupon the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Oh be witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood.



It can't be easy being Nathan Lean. Imagine having to wake up in the morning and see THAT face staring you back in the mirror? And then it only gets worse you realize that you've sold out to an even more ridiculous dweeb--the ludicrous Reza Aslan signs your paychecks. How desperate, how second-string would you have to get...to be a flunky--to sell yourself and your country down river for Reza Aslan? Maybe it's easy when know that you're not strong enough to be "muscle," not smart enough to be "mouthpiece," not worthy of the air you breathe. But really, Reza Aslan? Wouldn't death itself be preferable?

Nathan Lean. The very definition of bottom-feeder...



In line with their repressive Islamic ideology, jihadists and their supporters, attempt to impose cyber-jihad against infidels, including 'Jihadwatch'.

Let this stimulate our resistance.

"dull-witted thug"--

And another typical product of an uncritical, unthinking "liberal" education.

I think Nathan Lean is a great guy...So great, I would like to meet him and shake his hand...vigorously for three to five minutes, then give him 20/50 hardy pats on the back, just for being so swell...Credit should be given where credit is due...and Nathan deserves a lot of credit...If I was Allah, I would see that Nathan got everything he has coming to him...

Posts like that above always remind me of the scene from the King and I where she learns that no one's head is ever supposed to higher than the king's.

Islam is like that. No one can do anything, make anything, enjoy anything unless it somehow glorifies Islam or was made by someone who practiced the faith. And, that they revel in things not going well (as well as promote trying to destruction of anything they disagree with) means they will miss much of the good things in life because so much of the world is not associated with Islam in any way.

sad

Nathan Lean and Mona Altahawy (sp?) would make great bedfellows.

Oh,wait!

They're already in bed, having a FOURSOME with Reza and The Moon God.

Lean's conduct demonstrates what an ignorant jerk, if not, criminal he is, however what concerns me more when I read this piece is RS's continuing error of defining "left" soley by reference to Islam.
This is an incorrect definition of the term and only serves to undermine the effectiveness of RS's scholarly work exposing the civil and human rights abuses inherent in Islamic ideology. It alienates many people, in and out of the media, who would otherwise lend RS a much more attentive ear.

Spencer seems to be getting on just fine without your amateurish criticism, which, BTW, has become more than tiresome...

What is "amateurish" about my criticism?
How do you define leftist?
p.s. If reading my comments is tiresome for you , why not just skip over them?


What's amateurish about your criticism?

1. This is Mr. Spencer's enterprise and hence his choice to put forward whatever views he wishes. Has it occurred to your self-described "superior" intellect that perhaps he doesn't care if "many people...in an out of media" lend him a "supportive ear?" Please consider it! Spencer has this forum to put his views forward without coddling or compromise. Isn't it clear that that's exactly what he intneds to do? Deal with it, already!

2. There's more than enough evidence out there that islam is a favorite among the Left. Not that that's exclusive--there are notable exceptions--just that it's pervasive.
Yet for some reason (pray tell?), you want that linkage ignored or denied. Islam is a political system, but you want Spencer to ignore its political strategies, allies and implications? Come on, you must know that that's absurd? Don't you?

3. Tiresome? Well, unbidden, you continue to harp on Spencer in the same fashion, time after time, insisting that you know better than he what's good for the anti-jihad. Start your own website, then! Perhaps you can attract these purported (unidentified) "supportive ears" that vapidly claim Spencer is spurning. Hmmmm?

4. I don't need to define "leftist" for you. In any case, I know it when I see it.

Skip over your posts? Sorry, but I have this ghoulish side that enjoys seeing arrogant fools embarrass themselves in public. And, you're doing a bang-up job--thanks for the laughs!


What's amateurish about your criticism?

1. This is Mr. Spencer's enterprise and hence his choice to put forward whatever views he wishes. Has it occurred to your self-described "superior" intellect that perhaps he doesn't care if "many people...in an out of media" lend him a "supportive ear?" Please consider it! Spencer has this forum to put his views forward without coddling or compromise. Isn't it clear that that's exactly what he intneds to do? Deal with it, already!

2. There's more than enough evidence out there that islam is a favorite among the Left. Not that that's exclusive--there are notable exceptions--just that it's pervasive.
Yet for some reason (pray tell?), you want that linkage ignored or denied. Islam is a political system, but you want Spencer to ignore its political strategies, allies and implications? Come on, you must know that that's absurd? Don't you?

3. Tiresome? Well, unbidden, you continue to harp on Spencer in the same fashion, time after time, insisting that you know better than he what's good for the anti-jihad. Start your own website, then! Perhaps you can attract these purported (unidentified) "supportive ears" that vapidly claim Spencer is spurning. Hmmmm?

4. I don't need to define "leftist" for you. In any case, I know it when I see it.

Skip over your posts? Sorry, but I have this ghoulish side that enjoys seeing arrogant fools embarrass themselves in public. And, you're doing a bang-up job--thanks for the laughs!


What's amateurish about your criticism?

1. This is Mr. Spencer's enterprise and hence his choice to put forward whatever views he wishes. Has it occurred to your self-described "superior" intellect that perhaps he doesn't care if "many people...in an out of media" lend him a "supportive ear?" Please consider it! Spencer has this forum to put his views forward without coddling or compromise. Isn't it clear that that's exactly what he intneds to do? Deal with it, already!

2. There's more than enough evidence out there that islam is a favorite among the Left. Not that that's exclusive--there are notable exceptions--just that it's pervasive.
Yet for some reason (pray tell?), you want that linkage ignored or denied. Islam is a political system, but you want Spencer to ignore its political strategies, allies and implications? Come on, you must know that that's absurd? Don't you?

3. Tiresome? Well, unbidden, you continue to harp on Spencer in the same fashion, time after time, insisting that you know better than he what's good for the anti-jihad. Start your own website, then! Perhaps you can attract these purported (unidentified) "supportive ears" that vapidly claim Spencer is spurning. Hmmmm?

4. I don't need to define "leftist" for you. In any case, I know it when I see it.

Skip over your posts? Sorry, but I have this ghoulish side that enjoys seeing arrogant fools embarrass themselves in public. And, you're doing a bang-up job--thanks for the laughs!

are comments still working?

You ask "Has it occurred to your self-described "superior" intellect that perhaps he doesn't care if "many people...in an out of media" lend him a "supportive ear?" Contrary to what you assert, I believe that RS cares to influence as wide an audience as possible among all segments of society, e.g. media, politicians, voters, both domestic and foreign. And I hope he achieves enormous success in doing so.

I am not, and don't purport to be, smarter than RS, however, I would like to think that RS is sufficiently open-minded that he considers well-intentioned criticism from his readers. He may not accept any advice I offer, but until such time as he personally asks me to refrain from offering it, I will continue to voice my opinion on how he could better achieve his goals.
You say "islam is a favorite among the Left." What do you mean? Are more Democrats soft on Islam than Republicans? More Notherners than Southerners? More Protestants than Jews or Hindus? You can't even define "leftist." You crap out on so doing even though the definition of that term is central to the very criticism I made and your reply to it. Your silly riff on Potter Stewart's opinion in the pornography case, Jacobellis v Ohio, i.e., "I know when I see it" is laughably evasive. By the way, Potter later recanted his definition as untenable. Hopefully, you will too. The definition of the term "leftist" that emerges from JW is strictly limited to how one relates to Islamic ideology. If you are soft on what are here regarded (correctly) as Islamic abuses then you are, ipso facto, a leftist. That is not accurate or helpful.

I don't mind bearing the brunt of the blowback from the likes of you. You call me an arrogant fool, but make no real intellible counter argument to my observation on the misuse of the term "left" other than to lambast me for, god forbid, having the chutzpah to criticize Robert Spencer. I doubt RS will read this exchange, but if he did, I suspect he would not mind my remarks nearly as much you seem to.

You ask "Has it occurred to your self-described "superior" intellect that perhaps he doesn't care if "many people...in an out of media" lend him a "supportive ear?"

Contrary to what you assert, I believe that RS cares to influence as wide an audience as possible among all segments of society, e.g. media, politicians, voters, both domestic and foreign. And I hope he achieves enormous success in doing so.
I am not, and don't purport to be, smarter than RS, however, I would like to think that RS is sufficiently open-minded that he will consider well-intentioned criticism from his readers. He may not accept any advice I offer, but until such time as he personally asks me to refrain from offering it, I will continue to voice my opinion on how he could better achieve his JW goals.
You say "islam is a favorite among the Left." What do you mean? Are more Democrats soft on Islam than Republicans? More Notherners than Southerners? More Protestants than Jews or Hindus? White collar vs blue? You can't even define "leftist." You crap out on so doing even though the definition of that term is central to the very criticism I made and your reply to it. Your silly riff on Potter Stewart's opinion in the pornography case, Jacobellis v Ohio, i.e., "I know it when I see it" is laughably evasive. By the way, Stewart later recanted his definition as untenable. Hopefully, you will too.

The definition of the term "leftist" that emerges from JW is strictly limited to how one relates to Islamic ideology. If you are soft on what are here regarded (correctly) as Islamic abuses then you are, ipso facto, a leftist. That is not accurate or helpful.

I don't mind bearing the brunt of the blowback from the likes of you. You call me an arrogant fool, but make no real intelligible counter argument to my observation on the misuse of the term "left" other than to lambast me for, god forbid, having the chutzpah to criticize Robert Spencer. I doubt RS will read this exchange, but if he did, I suspect he would not mind my remarks nearly as much you seem to.

You ask "Has it occurred to your self-described "superior" intellect that perhaps he doesn't care if "many people...in an out of media" lend him a "supportive ear?"

Contrary to what you assert, I believe that RS cares to influence as wide an audience as possible among all segments of society, e.g. media, politicians, voters, both domestic and foreign. And I hope he achieves enormous success in doing so.
I am not, and don't purport to be, smarter than RS, however, I would like to think that RS is sufficiently open-minded that he will consider well-intentioned criticism from his readers. He may not accept any advice I offer, but until such time as he personally asks me to refrain from offering it, I will continue to voice my opinion on how he could better achieve his goals.

You say "islam is a favorite among the Left." What do you mean? Are more Democrats soft on Islam than Republicans? More Notherners than Southerners? More Protestants than Jews or Hindus? Does one group favor Islam over all other religions or does it simply shy away from harsh criticism of Islam?
You can't even define "leftist." You crap out on so doing even though the definition of that term is central to the very criticism I made and your reply to it. Your silly riff on Potter Stewart's opinion in the pornography case, Jacobellis v Ohio, i.e., "I know it when I see it" is laughably evasive. By the way, Stewart later recanted his definition as untenable. Hopefully, you will too.

The definition of the term "leftist" that emerges from JW is strictly limited to how one relates to Islamic ideology. If you are soft on what are here regarded (correctly) as Islamic abuses then you are, ipso facto, a leftist. That is not accurate or helpful.

I don't mind bearing the brunt of the blowback from the likes of you. You call me an arrogant fool, but make no real intellible counter argument to my observation on the misuse of the term "left" other than to lambast me for, god forbid, having the chutzpah to criticize Robert Spencer. I doubt RS will read this exchange, but if he did, I suspect he would not mind my remarks nearly as much you seem to.

What a blow-hard you are! First, you come in here a few days ago, telling us that we represent the intellectual ghetto--vs. your "intelligent, progressive" friends, that is. Then you start on Spencer, wanting him to leave his politics at the door--where politics is clearly part of islamic issues--for fear of alienating some undefined, unidentified people which you insist without substance are out there. Now, you want ME to identify the terms in YOUR complaint about Spencer? How about making your own case, fool? How about writing to Spencer directly, if you think it's so important?
Who are these "people" Spencer is alienating? Who (beisdes you) says they'd feel any differently toward him or his cause if he made no political references? Perhaps you could make a case--so we have something to discuss--but you want ME--one of those inferior intellects you accused of dwelling here, to make it for you? BTW, by the frequency of your posts, you must like it here in the intellectual gutter anyway, no?

Go ahead, waste all the bandwidth you want with your transparently agenda-driven attempts to silence Spencer! Even we dummies can see that's going nowhere! And, the "likes of me" will continue to call you out for the arrogant fool that you are. It's an easy call, after all...

What a blow-hard you are! First, you come in here a few days ago, telling us that we represent the intellectual ghetto--vs. your "intelligent, progressive" friends, that is. Then you start on Spencer, wanting him to leave his politics at the door--where politics is clearly part of islamic issues--for fear of alienating some undefined, unidentified people which you insist without substance are out there. Now, you want ME to identify the terms in YOUR complaint about Spencer? How about making your own case, fool? How about writing to Spencer directly, if you think it's so important?
Who are these "people" Spencer is alienating? Who (beisdes you) says they'd feel any differently toward him or his cause if he made no political references? Perhaps you could make a case--so we have something to discuss--but you want ME--one of those inferior intellects you accused of dwelling here, to make it for you? BTW, by the frequency of your posts, you must like it here in the intellectual gutter anyway, no?

Go ahead, waste all the bandwidth you want with your transparently agenda-driven attempts to silence Spencer! Even we dummies can see that's going nowhere! And, the "likes of me" will continue to call you out for the arrogant fool that you are. It's an easy call, after all...


What a blow-hard you are! First, you come in here a few days ago, telling us that we represent the intellectual ghetto--vs. your "intelligent, progressive" friends, that is. Then you start on Spencer, wanting him to leave his politics at the door--where politics is clearly part of islamic issues--for fear of alienating some undefined, unidentified people which you insist without substance are out there. Now, you want ME to identify the terms in YOUR complaint about Spencer? How about making your own case, fool? How about writing to Spencer directly, if you think it's so important?
Who are these "people" Spencer is alienating? Who (beisdes you) says they'd feel any differently toward him or his cause if he made no political references? Perhaps you could make a case--so we have something to discuss--but you want ME--one of those inferior intellects you accused of dwelling here, to make it for you? BTW, by the frequency of your posts, you must like it here in the intellectual gutter, no?

Go ahead, waste all the bandwidth you want with your transparently agenda-driven attempts to silence Spencer! Even we dummies can see that's going nowhere! And, the "likes of me" will continue to call you out for the arrogant fool that you are. It's an easy call, after all...

Time to step outside the 'left/ right' box.

Something for all of us, wherever on the political spectrum we might be, and whether we identify ourselves as adherents of this or that non-Muslim faith, or as nonreligious, to print out and stick to the fridge door, or next to our computer screens.

It's a list of twelve bad ideas that are stymying the ability of what might loosely be called 'the west' (and a good deal of 'the rest', probably India most of all) in its self-defence against the Jihad, against Islam, against the aggression - hot war *and* 'cold' war - waged by the Ummah, or Mohammedan Mob.


http://markdurie.blogspot.com/2011/02/twelve-bad-ideas-for-21st-century.html

"Here is a list of false beliefs and modes of thought which make it hard for people in the West to come to terms with the challenge of Islam today.

" If you are deeply attached to any of these ideas or ways of thinking, you will have difficulty accepting the truth about Islam's teachings and their impact.

{Here are the first six, with a little of what Durie has to say by way of riposte to them; just to encourage people to click on the link and see the rest - dda)

1/ 'The belief that all religions are the same.

- They are not. {Note: this belief can be held by people who think 'religion' is a good thing; it can also be held by people who think that all religion is false and that religion as such is a *bad* thing; in both cases, people who think this way have difficulty recognising the nature and scale of the *specific* menace presented by Islam- dda}.

'2/ The belief that religion is irrelevant as a cause of anything...

'The belief that we all worship the same God.

- We do not...

3/ 'The belief that one can justify anything from any sacred text.

- This is not true.
It is a postmodern fallacy that all meaning is in the eye of the beholder.
Certain texts lends themselves to supporting particular beliefs and practices much more than others.

4/ The belief that the Christian Reformation was a progressive movement.

- This is not true.
In fact the Christian Reformers aimed to go back to the example and teaching of Christ and the apostles.

Throughout the whole medieval period reformatio always meant renewing the foundations by going back to one’s origins.

Understanding ‘reformation’ in this way, Al Qa'ida is a product of an Islamic reformation, i.e. it is an attempt to go back to the example and teaching of Muhammad.

5/ 'The belief that dispelling ignorance will increase positive regard for the other.

-[but] ...accurately dispelling ignorance sometimes rightly increases the likelihood of rejecting the beliefs or practices of another.

'It is illogical to assume that those opposed to a belief are the ones who are most ignorant about it.

Ignorance can breed positive regard for what is wrong just as easily as it can breed prejudice against what is good.

6/ The belief that everyone is good and decent, and if you just make a sincere effort to get to know another person, you will always come to respect them.

- This is not universally true. Holding this view is a luxury...'...

Now, I have no idea how many people on the so-called 'right' would hold all or some of these positions, nor how many people on the so-called 'left' would hold all or some of these positions.

Perhaps we need to assess our acquaintance and our politicians according to whether and how strongly they appear to hold to *these* Twelve Bad Ideas.

That raging leftist commie John McCain is up to his old tricks....
http://news.yahoo.com/egyptsU.S.

Sen. John McCain said a congressional
delegation he led that met with Morsi expressed to him their "strong disapproval" about his 2010 comments. The delegation and Morsi had a "constructive discussion" about the remarks, he told reporters.
Still, despite calls by some in Washington to rein in aid to Egypt's Islamist-led government, McCain said the delegation will press in Congress for approval of some $480 million in new assistance to Cairo.-morsi-tries-defuse-flap-over-jews-slur-214424497.html

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter