Fewer than one in four people think Islam is compatible with British life, UK's Muslim "faith minister" blames "Islamophobia"

Baroness Warsi is working from the same playbook that Hamas-linked CAIR and other Islamic supremacist groups in the U.S., along with compromised academics like Haroon Moghul and a host of other rogues and hacks, use regularly: deflect attention from jihad terror and Islamic supremacism by claiming that the whole thing is a public relations problem trumped up by vicious, bigoted, racist, hateful "Islamophobes."

The whole thing is nonsense, of course. If anyone in Britain thinks Islam is incompatible with British life, it is because so many Muslims there behave as if it is. It is because of the rape gangs, the hate preachers, the thuggery on the streets, the jeering at returning military personnel, and all the rest. This kind of thing isn't caused by "Islamophobia." "Islamophobia," such as any actually exists, comes from it.

Journalist Enza Ferreri noted last September: "And former co-chairman of the Conservative Party Baroness Warsi, unelected, appointed to the House of Lords, amidst public expenses frauds scandals, breachings of both the Ministerial Code and rules on financial declarations, found time to run a business her partner in which, Abid Hussain, has been a leading member of Hizb ut Tahrir, a radical Islamic group the Conservatives promised to ban when they were in opposition."

Any attack on an innocent person is reprehensible. That bit about Hizb ut Tahrir makes it clear that Baroness Warsi may have a vested interest in exaggerating their frequency.

"Fewer than one in four people think Islam is compatible with British life, faith minister warns," by Tim Shipman for the Daily Mail, January 24 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Fewer than one in four British voters believes Islam is compatible with the British way of life, the UK's first Muslim woman Cabinet Minister reveals today.

Baroness Warsi will quote private police figures which show that more than half of race hate attacks in Britain are against Muslims as she condemns critics of Islam for peddling 'hate'.

Lady Warsi sparked huge controversy two years ago when she said Britain's approach to Muslims has made Islamophobia acceptable at middle class dinner parties.

But in a new speech today she accuses critics of Islam of being 'un-British' themselves by grouping ordinary Muslims with extremists.

The Minister for Faith and Communities reveals stark polling conducted by YouGov which found that just 24 per cent of voters think Islam is compatible with being British, while more than half disagree. Only 23 per cent say Islam is not a threat to Western civilisation.

An unrepentant Lady Warsi, whose parents emigrated from Pakistan, said that she was right to speak out before and will use the new evidence to warn that the 'underlying, unfounded mistrust' of Muslims is fuelling extremism.

In her speech to a group called Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks, which monitors violence against Muslims, Lady Warsi condemned politicians and the media for failing to do enough to combat negative views of Muslims.

'When I said that Islamophobia had "passed the dinner table test", I meant anti-Muslim sentiment had become so socially acceptable, it could be found even in the most civilised of settings.

'I got a fair amount of stick for making that statement. There were those who denied the problem existed. There were those who said talking about it was dangerous.

'But let me tell you what's really dangerous. It's when people are treated differently because they hold a different religious belief. It's when a country turns a blind eye towards that discrimination....

| 36 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

36 Comments

| Leave a comment

'But let me tell you what's really dangerous. It's when people are treated differently because they hold a different religious belief.'

Describing Islam to bash its detractors. Rich.

Fewer than one in four people think Islam is compatible with British life, UK's Muslim "faith minister" blames "Islamophobia"
.................................

Um...Might that be because Islam *is* incompatible with British life?

Unless, of course, Muslims are even successful in turning the Sceptered Isle into just another Islamic hell-hole.

Certainly, having a Muslim "Minister for Faith" is moving in that grim direction...

More:

Baroness Warsi is working from the same playbook that Hamas-linked CAIR and other Islamic supremacist groups in the U.S., along with compromised academics like Haroon Moghul and a host of other rogues and hacks, use regularly: deflect attention from jihad terror and Islamic supremacism by claiming that the whole thing is a public relations problem trumped up by vicious, bigoted, racist, hateful "Islamophobes."
.................................

Yep. So much easier to take over if you can render your victims prostrate with unearned guilt...

More:

"Fewer than one in four people think Islam is compatible with British life, faith minister warns"
.................................

And what will the not-so-good baroness do to convince the British that Islam is compatible with British values? Why, nothing at all—instead, she will just castigate them for being such terrible "Islamophobes".

Actually, I am quite heartened by these figures—this means that many Brits are waking up to the Jihad threat.

More:

Baroness Warsi will quote private police figures which show that more than half of race hate attacks in Britain are against Muslims as she condemns critics of Islam for peddling 'hate'.
.................................

What crap. Will she address the under-aged girls groomed and raped by Muslim men, and the victims of "street Jihad", and the victims of the attacks of 7/7? Of course not.

More:

But in a new speech today she accuses critics of Islam of being 'un-British' themselves by grouping ordinary Muslims with extremists.
.................................

Grimly hilarious—as so many of those "ordinary Muslims" also support waging violent Jihad against the "filthy Kuffar" and imposing brutal Shari'ah law.

More:

Only 23 per cent say Islam is not a threat to Western civilisation.
.................................

Again, what will "Baroness" Warsi do to convince the British that Islam *isn't* a threat to Western Civilization? My guess is nothing...

But I am also heartened by this statistic—bravo!

More:

An unrepentant Lady Warsi, whose parents emigrated from Pakistan, said that she was right to speak out before and will use the new evidence to warn that the 'underlying, unfounded mistrust' of Muslims is fuelling extremism.
.................................

What "extremism" is that? "Islamophobia"? Or is Warsi making the claim that violent Jihad is the fault of filthy Infidels for not "respecting" Islam enough?

More:

In her speech to a group called Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks, which monitors violence against Muslims, Lady Warsi condemned politicians and the media for failing to do enough to combat negative views of Muslims.
.................................

She wants dhimmi leaders and the free press to do their part for Muslim supremacy...

“In her speech to a group called Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks, which monitors violence against Muslims…”

The Jihadis got an outfit called MAMA lookin’ out for ‘em?

Mrs Arsi is barking up the wrong tree.

'But let me tell you what's really dangerous. It's when people are treated differently because they hold a different religious belief. It's when a country turns a blind eye towards that discrimination...."

Truer words were never spoken. It reflects the situation in Pakistan, where the curry princess comes from, perfectly.
Not so in once great Britain, where left and right are constantly engaged in mental acrobatics to accommodate the religion of peace, which is disgraceful to the point of surrender.

Projection as usual; BS with a cherry on top. Warsi had a good run; its time to give her the shoe.

David Cameron needs to pull the plug on this fraud.

"It's when people are treated differently because they hold a different religious belief." (Warsi)

And what if that so-called 'religious belief' tells me I'm the 'vilest of creatures' because I'm not a Muslim? And what if it calls for the genocide of an entire race, the Jews? And what if it says beating women and treating them as commodities is OK, too?

Warsi is a crooked, lying clown!

Baroness Warsi blames the media. But she is not fooling the British public. An amazing 90% of Huffington Post UK, (yes, that’s right Huff Post!) readers think she is wrong. They think Muslims have only themselves to blame.

And, you should see the comments they make. See summary here: http://islamsurveyed.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/baroness-warsi-is-anybody-paying.html

One only has to read the Quran and a few biographies of Mohammed to know that Islam is not compatible with free thought and the importance of the individual.

Look at the football riots in Egypt and the aftermath of the death sentences!!!

Oh the 'beauty of islam' and the 'holiness' of muslims!!!

Their savage behaviour, shows they worship Satan in disguise, and are 'demon possessed'!!!

'underlying, unfounded mistrust' of Muslims is fuelling extremism.

'Unfounded' huh? Exactly who's responsibility is it to generate trust of Islam and individual Mahoundians? Trust cannot be imposed, only earned...Has Islam or individual Mahoundians 'earned' the trust of kuffar? Exactly how?

”'But let me tell you what's really dangerous. It's when people are treated differently because they hold a different religious belief. It's when a country turns a blind eye towards that discrimination....”

Now let me tell you what's really dangerous. It is when people who hold and act upon belief, religious or otherwise, based on moral principles completely contrary and openly hostile to our own, the principles that command that those who hold a different religious beliefs *must* be treated differently are *not* treated differently.
It's when a country turns a blind eye towards that *lack* of discrimination - a discrimination between friend and foe - that it finds itself in a mortal danger.

”'But let me tell you what's really dangerous. It's when people are treated differently because they hold a different religious belief. It's when a country turns a blind eye towards that discrimination....”

Now let me tell you what's really dangerous. It is when people who hold and act upon belief, religious or otherwise, based on moral principles completely contrary and openly hostile to our own, the principles that command that those who hold a different religious beliefs *must* be treated differently, are *not* treated differently.
It's when a country turns a blind eye towards that *lack* of discrimination - a discrimination between friend and foe - that it finds itself in a mortal danger.

An ancient Hindu text called, Viveka Chudamani (sp unsure), which is also called the 'Crest Jewel of Discrimination'...Or, how to tell the real from the unreal...Mahoundians have not read this book, and the Quran, in fact, presents the unreal as real...That's why Mahoundians believe in fairy tale fantasy...Islam is the unreal on steroids...

How can the queen look at herself on the mirror after signing off on this odious Muslima becoming a peer of the realm?

That woman is no lady, and she's simply making a fool of herself, like our Obama in a sense, with a chip on her shoulder thinking out loud, "Now! Yes ! I! Can!" just like Michelle jetting off to Spain with a taxpayer supported transport load of her claque, in unseemly haste right after the elevation to the White House, no real difference in those arriviste performances.

A couple of unanswered questions pop up like carnival monkeys on a shooting gallery shelf.

1.] Why would any woman promote such a cultic line of thought reducing her gender to mere incubators and sucklers of children through centuries of brutal suppression? Required to being literally invisible inside a black shroud outside of her house.

2.] Presumably her father emigrated out of Pakistan for hirsute, virile economic betterment, dragging her mother with him, but following a few footsteps behind, having had no choice.

3.] What dramatic "road to Damascus" event changed the daughter's activist direction? [She logically would be the last to suggest such a blasphemous comparison.]

4.] Isn't she just like Hillary in her muddled female defensive thought process of simply flicking aside any evidence contradicting her thesis? What difference do these historical, blatant pieces of cultural difference make?

5.] Isn't this baron-"ess" using her new social position [absolutely unattainable inside Pakistan] as a soapbox in Hyde Park to bark out her hypocrisies?

Absolute Muslim chutzpah....I love that rude oxymoron.

Well said.

It's driven by the idea of 'supremacism' and the 'supremacy' of islam and muslims!!!

While the good Baroness is wailing out loud over the perceived lack of preferential treatment accorded to Muslims in UK, did she ever bother to find out how non-Muslims are treated in Muslim-majority countries such as Pakistan, Egypt, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc, etc?

Graven, you slightly misquoted the article, which noted "new figures ... showing that between 50 to 60 per cent of all religious hate crimes REPORTED TO POLICE are now against Muslims". I wrote to the Daily Mail pointing out that this did not equate to actual hate crimes; that Muslims were notoriously trigger happy when it comes to seeing "Islamophobia" everywhere; and that figures in the US show that hate crimes against Jews are 6 - 8 times those against Muslims, even though they are a much smaller population, and I doubted that the UK would be very different. You won't be surprised to learn that my letter was not published.

Muslims are full of contempt for every religion on this planet. They are "Jewphobia, Christainphobia, Hindophobia, Sikhphobia, Buddphobia, ..atheistphobia,...". The list goes on and on. Mrs Warsi has the gall to call us Islamophobia.

Muslims are victims of Kuran and Mullahs. They should bury that book deep in the ground and learn to live and let live. They should bury their evil practices deep under the sand instead they practice them in the Western countries.

I don't believe the figure is less than 25% agreeing with her. The figure is concocted to make it look more acceptable.

Anyone I talk to, they think Islam and Muslims practicing it are dangerous to every society (that includes Islamic societies).

Only 23 per cent say Islam is not a threat to Western civilisation.

And what percent of 23% are Muslims? I'd bet a hefty many, so the actual number of Brits are far smaller than 23% reported. Yes, Islam is incompatible with egalitarian democratic society. It violates virtually every principle of human rights. Thus Islam is severely incompatible with all modern civized society. Glad the people of UK are getting it, that Islam, the Koran, and Sharia are the danger. Time to start shutting down their dens of inequity, starting with the mosques.

Evidence of intelligent life in Britain.

I should add that the bizarre utterances of "Lady" Warsi are testament to the respectability of taquiya, and the weirdly warped sense of what's normal, among those brought up under Islam.

You can develop, from simply a social behavior perspective, a perfectly normal looking personality and a perfectly normal point of view on many aspects of life, while holding absolutely bizarre and utterly alien moral standards.

It is the great puzzle of Mohammedans in the western world.

There is something in the Islamic approach to life that produces truly and deeply weird psychologies and personalities.

I don't think it's the same as, but it is faintly reminiscent of split-personality syndrome.

This is not completely surprising when you consider that Mohammedan ethics have double standards for pretty much everything. There has to be SOME psychological cost attached to living with such rules. I don't think that the human brain is set up to maintain a state of internal contradiction -- not comfortably at least.

In fact, entertaining contradictory ideas is notoriously uncomfortable, as everybody knows from introspection. So one imagines that the Mohammedan must do SOMETHING to dispel or avoid that discomfort.

I rather suspect it requires powerful internal walls of denial, complicated rationalizations and at least some degree of what the psychologists call dissociation (a sort of cutting yourself off from aspects of reality, turning off part of consciousness).

This is not a moral excuse. Quite the contrary. It is highly immoral to do that to yourself. But I suspect it is quite common when most of the people around you are doing the same lousy thing.

=========

Just bear in mind, that feeling you get sometimes when seeing something that doesn't make sense, that feeling of "wow, that's really weird", is often nature's way of telling you that you are in the presence of evil.

Well said oh instrument of destruction of Tank! Well said. Has it ever been more evident and obvious that the Monarchy needs to cease, desist and disappear? Max.

...the UK's first Muslim woman Cabinet Minister...
Baroness Warsi...

The name "Baroness Warsi" conjures up images like this one:

http://www.tribal-bellydance.be/tribal-dancers/banjara-tribe.jpg

"... it is faintly reminiscent of split-personality syndrome.

This is not completely surprising when you consider that Mohammedan ethics have double standards for pretty much everything. There has to be SOME psychological cost attached to living with such rules. I don't think that the human brain is set up to maintain a state of internal contradiction -- not comfortably at least.

In fact, entertaining contradictory ideas is notoriously uncomfortable, as everybody knows from introspection. So one imagines that the Mohammedan must do SOMETHING to dispel or avoid that discomfort."

This is precisely why Muslims must practice their psychological jihad (the "inner struggle" against the Nafs) -- in order to maintain that schizophrenia that enables their demon possession.

Just as everything in the Bizarro world of Islam has double meaning (is, indeed, duplicitous), so too the Nafs is putatively the "lower self" on the one hand, and the human conscience on the other. And what do we know about people who fight against their conscience (or who have succeeded in suppressing their conscience)?

A man of insight, well said. We elect our leaders far too young. Our current leaders are paid and bought professional political hacks. We need experienced, qualified, (in the sense of understanding the vectors and dimensions of life that integrate to form a civilized functioning whole) as leaders. In the days of ancient Rome the Senate was comprised of accomplished, philosophical, wise and experienced elders who acted as buffers between the younger, ambitious, bent-on empire, Caesars and the general populace.
America missed a tremendous and unique opportunity, in the lead-up to the 2008 Presidential campaign, to market the RIGHT first black President. Colin Powell, as America’s first black President, would have been an acceptable option to all Americans. A seasoned, reasoned, palatable, accomplished, intelligent, rational, experienced Patriot and gentleman with long military service to his country. I wish he had stayed and defended his ground after being setup by Cheney, Rumsfeld and the CIA over WMD’s in Iraq in front of Congress. The topography of America would be radically different today if Powell was America’s first black President. America would be safe. Instead it is facing the gravest challenge to its very existence under the not-so gentle avarice of a muslim interloper. Max.
Disclaimer: Max Modine is not an American and consequently his opinions are driven by his perspective that America is all that stands between Freedom and Tyranny. He believes that if we lose America, we lose everything. Forgive him any perceived Peccadillos.

Beautiful. Max.

Islam is incompatible with human beings.

Charlie

you wrote - "...Isn't she just like Hillary in her muddled female defensive thought process...?"

"Female"?

So you agree with the Mohammedans, at least to some extent, that wimmens is 'deficient in intellect'? And perhaps, qua wimmens, in morality, also?

You could just have written 'muddled defensive thought process' (scroll back up and read joeblough's **excellent** posting about the sorts of scramblings that must go on in a Mohammedan's brain, e.g.

"There is something in the Islamic approach to life that produces truly and deeply weird psychologies and personalities.
I don't think it's the same as, but it is faintly reminiscent of split-personality syndrome...").

What's wrong with Hillary is not that she is female but that she is a person of bad character, period. Her femaleness as such - those two X chromosomes - are surely not the sole sufficient cause of her wilful folly or of her bad character.

And what's wrong with Baroness Warsi is, basically, Islam: she's been pickled in Islam from birth, and is therefore just one more demonstration of what Islam - the ideology - does to the human mind and character...be that human female or male.

Her 'muddled defensive thinking' isn't a 'female' thing; it's a **Mohammedan** thing, because although similar types of muddled thinking are manifested by evil people belonging to other cultural groups, Islam is so appalling that *most* Mohammedans seem to manifest these patterns to some degree.

....Heh heh heh .....

You're saying that if I simply omitted that politically incorrect word "female" in the context of The Hillary being on the defensive and permitting her anger and frustration to trump her, or derail ....shall we say....uncoupled train of thought....that I'd be politically more correct?

It's got to the point where the...gasp!...mere mention of..."Male" and "Female" and "man" and "woman" conjures up images of leering, feral tomcats howling in grinning anticipation over fragile little helpless flowers being ...gasp!....de-flowered.

Why is it so difficult for us to openly admit that there are in fact real, actual differences in men and women?.....why does the mere mention of sex have to be always so Victorian?....always instantly, defensively, infer some sort of inferiority on male or female brain chemistry? depending entirely on just who is so haplessly making a statement?

Why is is it such a strange, eyebrow raising searching for misogyny whenever a Secretary of State gets so pissed off and frustrated that she/he/it flings arms in the air and blurts out, "What! difference! does! it! make!".

Frankly, I sit here leering at my computer screen barely containing myself over that character Kerry doing exactly the same thing?

He's just as mercurial as The Hillary.

The world seems to be divided between those who are intent on persuading themselves and others that Islam is a peaceful and civilised life stance, and those who recognise it as having violent, totalitarian and imperialist motivations. It is a battle of ideas.


You said: "You're saying that if I simply omitted that politically incorrect word "female" in the context of The Hillary being on the defensive and permitting her anger and frustration to trump her, or derail ....shall we say....uncoupled train of thought....that I'd be politically more correct?"

No, I think you'd simply be avoiding causing confusion.

Are either of these two unpleasant women, Warsi and Hillary Clinton, foolish and muddled and morally deficient because they are women, or because they are *people* who seem to have wilfully chosen folly and, indeed, evil*?

Have they chosen evil *because* they are women? Are their intellects 'muddled' - clouded, confused - *because* they are women, or because they are...evil, and that is what evil does to the human mind?

Remember the words of Virgil to Dante at the gates of hell: 'here you will see the miserable people/ who have lost the intellectual good' (il ben dell'intelletto').

*Evil*, not female hormones (nor, for that matter, male hormones) rots the brain and corrupts the thinking processes (just read M Scott Peck , 'People of the Lie', to see a discussion of that).

*I* always thought that thinking was... thinking.

There's truth and lies. There's reason and unreason, logic and illogic. Do any of those things have gender labels?

How do you define 'female' thinking, precisely?

The only examples you have given are entirely negative - Hilary Clinton, and Baroness Warsi; and now Kerry ( a man) who you say 'just as mercurial as The Hillary.' (and you are not being complimentary toward him). Presumably you mean that he is 'thinking female' or 'thinking [or reacting?] like a woman'?? Your claim that someone is engaging in 'female' thinking does not seem to involve a neutral description of a simply different mode or style of thought; it seems to be derogatory.

Your only usages of the term 'female' thinking have been negative.

So: would it be possible for you to give three *positive* examples?

And, for completeness, how do you define *male* thinking, precisely?

And let's have three negative and three positive examples of people - whether women or men - engaging in 'male' thinking.

Alternatively, why don't we just use *really* old-fashioned language, leave aside vague terms like 'male thinking' and 'female thinking' (which have to be extensively defined, before they are of any use at all), and, if we truly think something to be the case, say it: namely, that so-and-so (whether male or female) is being rational or irrational, logical or illogical, or that they are lying, or telling the truth, or...peddling BS (which Harry Frankfurt in his book 'On Bullshit' argued was something different from either truth-telling *or* lying, in that he thought the BS artist simply didn't *care* whether what s/he said was true or false). And be prepared to explain why we think that is so.


It worth noting that any female that rises to world power is a crypto-male since she is de facto forced to function and excel in a male dominated world and has to conform to the male paradigm. This has been so for millennia, every since humanity neglected the Mother Earth goddess and became a patriarchal project that favours force, violence and absolute control of the earth, its people and resources, and sees kindness, peace, concensus and generosity as femminine attributes and therefore weaknesses.

Charlie Griffith wrote, as cited by Dumbledore's Army:

"...Isn't she just like Hillary in her muddled female defensive thought process...?"
.......................

Dumbledore's Army was right to point this out.

More:

You're saying that if I simply omitted that politically incorrect word "female" in the context of The Hillary being on the defensive and permitting her anger and frustration to trump her, or derail ....shall we say....uncoupled train of thought....that I'd be politically more correct?
.......................

This has nothing to do with "political correctness". Do you believe—as Muslims do—that women are "deficient in intellect"?

Do you believe that erudite, cogent, and rational women such as Dumbledor's Army, Marisol Seibold, Diana West, and Pamela Geller exhibit a "muddled female defensive thought process"?

More:

Why is it so difficult for us to openly admit that there are in fact real, actual differences in men and women?.....why does the mere mention of sex have to be always so Victorian?....always instantly, defensively, infer some sort of inferiority on male or female brain chemistry?
.......................

Actually, your positing a "muddled female defensive thought process" doesn't require any inference on the part of the reader—it is quite blatant.

There are indeed some differences between men and women—but they *do not* include deficient thought processes on the part of the female gender.

More:

Why is is it such a strange, eyebrow raising searching for misogyny whenever a Secretary of State gets so pissed off and frustrated that she/he/it flings arms in the air and blurts out, "What! difference! does! it! make!".

Frankly, I sit here leering at my computer screen barely containing myself over that character Kerry doing exactly the same thing?

He's just as mercurial as The Hillary.
.......................

You've just contradicted yourself. You are the one who initially characterized Hillary Clinton's foolish and meretricious thought processes as specifically female—whereas, as you later concede, they are just as likely to be found in men like the equally foolish and dishonest John Kerry.

And "Baroness" Warsi is very much the same as any number of vicious male Taqiyya artists, including Imam Rauf, Ahmed Rehab, and Reza Aslan.

As Dumbledore's Army notes, what has muddled her thought processes is not the presence of female hormones, but her embracing of Islam.

I'm still ducking and crouched over double under my now creaky table to avoid all of those dozens of stiletto-steel heeled shoes being tossed in my hapless direction, so permit me to come up and put my nose above the edge of the dented and scarred table as my friend Kilroy used to do, and say merely that in regards to...

"Do you believe that erudite, cogent, and rational women such as Dumbledor's Army, Marisol Seibold, Diana West, and Pamela Geller exhibit a "muddled female defensive thought process"?

Absolutely not.

[..saying that, even though not having met any of them. Mentioned in the implied context you cite, we need many more women just like them. Besides, it's a safe bet that none of them has ever testified before our august[!] Congress and lost their "cool" and blurted out, "What difference does it make!" in the context of the details leading up to the rape/murder of an Ambassador she herself had assigned. That mind-set is simply unfit to be our Secretary of State.]

Charlie Griffith wrote:

I'm still ducking and crouched over double under my now creaky table to avoid all of those dozens of stiletto-steel heeled shoes being tossed in my hapless direction, so permit me to come up and put my nose above the edge of the dented and scarred table as my friend Kilroy used to do...
.............................

Oh, pfffft. I didn't regard your initial crack as some sort of metaphorical size-13 hobnail boot to the head, so this is just silly.

More:

"Do you believe that erudite, cogent, and rational women such as Dumbledor's Army, Marisol Seibold, Diana West, and Pamela Geller exhibit a "muddled female defensive thought process"?

Absolutely not.

[..saying that, even though not having met any of them. Mentioned in the implied context you cite, we need many more women just like them.
.............................

Yes, but not because so many women fall short of their stature—it's because so many clueless people do, in general.

In just the same manner, very few men or women—live up to the stature of figures such as Robert Spenser, David Wood, and Mark Steyn.

With respect, I don't believe that this is about gender at all.

More:

Besides, it's a safe bet that none of them has ever testified before our august[!] Congress and lost their "cool" and blurted out, "What difference does it make!" in the context of the details leading up to the rape/murder of an Ambassador she herself had assigned. That mind-set is simply unfit to be our Secretary of State.]
.............................

Well, I couldn't agree more. Hillary Clinton is absolutely incompetent—and worse than incompetent.

Lots of women probably would have folded under the pressure if in Hillary's position, since they clearly would have no excuses and no ready answers. Likely lots of men would have given a similarly poor account of themselves, as well.

The fact is, we have a real paucity of able leaders at this point—and those who *are* able often face a great deal of flak from mediocrities.

In any case, buck up! I certainly take issue with that one comment of yours, but in general I consider you a good, solid Anti-Jihadist.

It's hard to fight Jihad from under your desk—I might suggest taking a more dignified position...

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter