Obama to nominate virulently anti-Israel Chuck Hagel for Defense secretary

From The Post-American Presidency, by Pamela Geller with Robert Spencer:

Like Brzezinski, [Rosa] Brooks also indulged in the familiar anti-Semite’s complaint: that a few simple criticisms of Israel got one slapped with accusations of…anti-Semitism. (Neither, of course, seemed inclined to own up to how they had prejudged the case and stacked the deck against Israel.) Brooks enunciated this complaint in this way in 2006: “Publish something sharply critical of Israeli government policies and you’ll find out. If you’re lucky, you’ll merely discover that you’ve been uninvited to some dinner parties. If you’re less lucky, you’ll be the subject of an all-out attack by neoconservative pundits and accused of rabid anti-Semitism.”[i]

 Chuck Hagel

Former Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) would probably have agreed with Brooks. According to the Jerusalem Post, he was “one of a handful of senators who frequently didn’t sign AIPAC-backed letters related to Israel and the peace process during his time in the Senate and opposed additional sanctions on Iran.”

Apparently, like Brooks, he has faced criticism for these anti-Israel stances – and has complained that “the Jewish lobby intimidates a lot of people.”[ii]

Yet Hagel himself doesn’t seem to have been particularly intimidated. In the Senate he amassed a significant track record as one of a hardline hater of Israel who would not affix his name even to the most innocuous pro-Israel initiative. When all but four Senators signed a pro-Israel statement in 2000, Hagel was one of the holdouts. The next year, he was again among the few Senators – eleven this time – who refused to add their names to a statement urging George W. Bush not to meet with Yaser Arafat as long as the Palestinian groups under his control continued to pursue violence against Israel. In 2005, Hagel, along with 26 other senators, opposed a call to the Palestinian Authority to disqualify terror groups from participating in elections. And when twelve senators wrote to the European Union in 2006 asking that the EU join the U.S. in classifying Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, Hagel was once again one of the few.[iii]

 Hagel wasn’t intimidated, and Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t either. In late October 2009 he appointed Hagel co-chair of his Intelligence Advisory Board.[iv] And in a particularly piquant symbolic move, the appointment was announced at J Street’s first annual conference – by Steve Clemons of George Soros’s New America Foundation.[v]

And the effect of all this showed in his policies, beginning almost immediately when he took office.

It bodes ill for Jews just how comfortable and at ease Obama obviously is with proud anti-Semites and Israel haters. Obama has appointed all these people, but has concealed their true natures. 


[i] Rosa Brooks, “Criticize Israel? You’re an Anti-Semite!,” Los Angeles Times, September 3, 2006.

[ii] “Obama names Israel critic to intelligence board,” Jerusalem Post, October 29, 2009.

[iii] “Indecisive Senator Hagel has Questionable Israel Record,” National Jewish Democratic Council, March 12, 2007. http://njdc.typepad.com/njdcs_blog/2007/03/indecisive_sena.html

[iv] “Obama names Israel critic to intelligence board,” Jerusalem Post, October 29, 2009.

[v] Sammy Benoit, “Obama Appoints Another Israel-Hating Adviser: Chuck Hagel,” The Lid, October 28, 2009. http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/10/obama-appoints-another-israel-hating.html

"Obama likely to nominate Chuck Hagel for Defense secretary," by David S. Cloud and Brian Bennett for the Los Angeles Times, January 4:
WASHINGTON — President Obama is expected to nominate Chuck Hagel, a former Republican senator and Vietnam veteran, to be Defense secretary, officials said, setting up a confirmation battle with lawmakers and interest groups critical of Hagel's views on Israel and Iran.

White House officials said Friday that the president hadn't formally offered the job to Hagel, but others familiar with the process said that the announcement could come as soon as Monday.

Hagel, who was elected to the Senate from Nebraska in 1996 and retired in 2008, was awarded two Purple Hearts for wounds he received as a soldier in Vietnam. His experience serving in that war made him wary about using force unless other options had been tried, he said in a recent interview with the history magazine Vietnam.

"I'm not a pacifist. I believe in using force but only after a very careful decision-making process. … I will do everything I can to avoid needless, senseless war," he said.

By nominating a Republican to run the Defense Department, Obama would give his second-term national security team a bipartisan cast as the White House is rapidly winding down the war in Afghanistan and planning for even deeper cuts in the defense budget. Hagel's criticism of the Iraq war has made him deeply unpopular with many conservative Republicans, however.

The choice also sets up a possibly contentious confirmation fight with Israel's defenders in Washington, some of whom mounted a public campaign to head off Hagel's nomination. They criticized him for past comments calling on Israel to negotiate with Palestinian groups and for opposing some sanctions aimed at Iran....

Hagel's record on Israel and Iran are likely to be the main focus of the nomination battle. William Kristol, the editor of the conservative Weekly Standard, published a "special editorial" Friday accusing him of having "dangerous views on Iran" and an "unpleasant distaste for Israel and Jews."

Critics have cited a comment Hagel made in 2008 to author and former State Department Middle East peace negotiator Aaron David Miller about why he sometimes opposed pro-Israel groups in the Senate.

"The Jewish lobby intimidates a lot of people up here," Hagel said, but "I'm a United States senator. I'm not an Israeli senator."

They also have cited his calls for direct negotiations with Hamas, the Palestinian militant group that the U.S. and Israel refuse to deal with directly, and his votes against some Iran sanctions.

But defenders and former aides say Hagel showed his support for Israel by voting repeatedly to provide it with military aid and by calling for a comprehensive peace deal with the Palestinians that should not include any compromise regarding Israel's Jewish identity and that would leave Israel "free to live in peace and security."

They note that he also supported three major Iran sanctions bills: the Iran Missile Proliferation Sanctions Act of 1998, the Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000 and the Iran Freedom Support Act of 2006.

In the Senate, Hagel initially voted to give the George W. Bush administration authority to go to war in Afghanistan and Iraq, but he later harshly criticized the conduct of both wars, irritating fellow Republicans and making him popular with Democrats critical of those wars.

Obama and Hagel formed a close relationship in the Senate, and their foreign policy views seem closely aligned. Like Obama, Hagel has called for negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, a position that made some pro-Israel advocates wary about whether Hagel would back using force against Iran if diplomatic efforts to halt the program failed....

Obama will need to deal with opposition from a number of pro-Israel senators from both parties who have already raised questions about their support for Hagel. One example is Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), who has distanced himself from Hagel in comments last month. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, has also raised questions about Hagel's past comments....

| 24 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

24 Comments

| Leave a comment

Anyone who is virulently, and viciously anti-Israel, is actually anti-Jew, which means, Hagel is a racist...I hate to be the one who points that out Chuck, but if the shoe fits...

Well, other lobbies and interest groups intimidate a lot of people with the label "racist", too--especially when the people so labeled have had the temerity to criticize some of the civil rights leaders of yesteryear, or "Tu#d World" countries.

From what you say about Hagel's actual voting record--voting for military aid to Israel and sanctions against Iran--I suspect that the man may actually have a fairly keen appreciation for where America's interests are at a given moment; and may be one of the best picks we can reasonably hope for out of the O.

While I'm very much aware that Iran is an enemy of the USA, I'm also for a diplomatic rapprochement should it become possible. After all, the USA under Nixon decided it needed to live with a hostile China under a lunatic ruler. Further, a better approach to Iraq and Afghanistan would've been to rebuild human intelligence capabilities to the point where we might've been able to pull successful "wet" operations on various terrorist leaders rather than traumatize whole countries and unnecessarily sacrifice our young people with war. Hence, I suppose I'm also a critic of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars at this point.

Alan West for Sec. of Defense.

Hmm!
What is not known until now is whether OIC was taken into confidence before sounding out Hagel for Sec-State, because all other worthies[like CAIR] were consulted, it seems.

This is joke/sarcasm. Pl visit the link below.

Hagel The Horrible

Hamas-Supporting, Islamist Group CAIR Praises and Endorses Obama Defense Candidate


http://www.islamist-watch.org/blog/2012/12/hagel-the-horrible

Error in my previous post;

' Hagel for Sec-State'
it should be
' Hagel for Sec-Defense'

We'll send troops to Turkey to secure their border but Israel will be on its own. Good to know especially where Iran is concerned.

Hmm!
What is not known until now is whether OIC was taken into confidence before sounding out Hagel for Sec-State, because all other worthies[like CAIR] were consulted, it seems.

This is joke/sarcasm. Pl visit the link below.

Hagel The Horrible

Hamas-Supporting, Islamist Group CAIR Praises and Endorses Obama Defense Candidate


http://www.islamist-watch.org/blog/2012/12/hagel-the-horrible

Do a Google search ...

"obama anti semitic"

You'll find enough written on the subject to turn your stomach.

With an almost identical world view seared by a shared Vietnam experience, Kerry and Hagel will assuredly give obama exactly the desired advice he wants to hear. Appease , runaway, select any contingency, so long as for now we don’t get into another Vietnam.

I did as you suggested, and Googled

"obama anti semitic"

Google replied:

About 3,920,000 results

Horrible.

Virulent? Shame on all of you. Every single Day of Atonement that comes and goes I wait to see Israel begging forgiveness for its attack on the USS Liberty. Every person who has served in uniform, and every person who ever serves in uniform in the future, is always going to know that the USS Liberty is the true measure of Zionist leadership....USA is a "shiksa" and does not count...so you say.

Having said that, I will also offer the view that with 41% of all Jews in the world here in the USA, and mindful that Israel is an invented nation (I doubt you have read Shlomo's book, see my review of it at Amazon), I favor a two state solution and not one more penny for Israel until the settlements are rolled back and the Palestinians have clean water, electricity, and a swimming pool in every neighborhood.

USS Liberty. We will never forget.

I don't understand your comment about Obama,anti semitism and google.

If one googles "Obama antichrist"

it's the same,one is presented with a lot of crap.

Do you honestly believe Obama is an anti-semite?

A poster, above, whose moniker I do not seem to have ever seen here before, recites the usual paranoid accusations about the US Liberty military SNAFU: a favourite theme of antisemites in the USA, and always seen as proof! proof! of the monstrous and eternal evil of da Joooooz.

I just can't figure out, though, whether he's for real real or whether he's a parody and forgot to add the SARC mark.


"...until the settlements are rolled back and the Palestinians have clean water, electricity, and a swimming pool in every neighborhood."

Oh, the pooor "Palestinians", those Levantine Arabs, overwhelmingly Muslim, most of whom are pickled in and seething with a murderous Jew-hatred - long pre-dating the resurrection of the Jewish state of Israel - that equals or outdoes that of the Nazis.

People who say and openly publish and broadcast, on their state-controlled media, things like *this*:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/11/hamas-killing-jews-is-worship-that-draws-us-close-to-allah.html

Hamas: "Killing Jews is worship that draws us close to Allah"

Oh, and as for that 'invented nation' thing: purest turnspeak and reversal of reality (that the poster can find a self-hating Jew as a reference, a Jew who has essentially adopted a dhimmi mindset, proves nothing at all): it is the 'poor palestinian people' whose 'plight' we are always alliteratively being reminded of, who were invented out of whole cloth.

http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/3389.htm


March 23, 2012

Hamas Minister of the Interior and of National Security Fathi Hammad Slams Egypt over Fuel Shortage in Gaza Strip, and Says: "Half of the Palestinians Are Egyptians and the Other Half Are Saudis"


http://www.israellycool.com/2012/10/17/azmi-bishara-there-is-no-palestinian-nation/


Azmi Bishara: “There Is No Palestinian Nation


http://www.meforum.org/3262/palestinian-history-nonsense
The Rhetoric of Nonsense
 Fabricating Palestinian History
by Alexander H. Joffe
Summer 2012, pp. 15-22

And just for fun:

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/a-palestinese-lexicon/
A Palestinese Lexicon


RS's pathetic, obsessive attempts to demonize Obama as unpatriotic and anti-Israel would be laughable were they not so damaging to the movement to educate the public about the inherent evils of Islam.

Most leftists (as that word is commonly interpreted) harshly criticize Obama's administration for:
1) continually supporting Israel's positions vis a vis the Palestinians;
2) abandoning US constitutional protections of the rights of US citizens in carrying out the war against terrorists;
3) Abusing executive power by allowing for the use of off shore torture centers, unlawful secret detention, and abusing the use of imprecise deadly drones to target indivduals without legal process.

And for Obama's leftist critics, that's only the tip of the iceberg. Nevermind the falure to pass domestic policies (benefits and tax) without caving in to unjust Republican demands that cater to the haves. It just goes to show how far to the right RS is that he obsessivly rants about Obama's supposed wildly leftist, pro-Muslim, anti-israel bias. No, not even a bias, but a secret agenda to turn the USA into an Islamic haven. More often than not, RS's arguments about the dangers of anything outside his area of expertise lack convincing facts and logic (as is this attempt to paint Hegel as an anti-semite). Tautological argument is common. "Leftist" is simply defined as anyone who does vehemently demonstrate antipathy towards Islam/Muslims. Then such persons are vilifed as leftists because they do not sufficiently oppose Islam/ Muslims. Not very enlightening or persuasive, but typical here.

To many intelligent neutrals, RS lacks credibility precisely because of his misguided, some might argue pathologically obsessive, attacks on anyone or anything to the left of Atilla the Hun. It is why his scholarship and expertise on all things Islam have failed to gain more traction with the general public and mass media. He comes across as the same kind of fanatic that he exposes in the Islamc world. He is his own worst enemy.

When RS abandons his ineffective attempts to analyze politics in general, when he focuses his blog on exposing the human and civil rights deprivations inherent to Islam, he will become a more effective force to defeat the dangerous spread of Islamic totalitarianism and all the evils associated therewith.

Hopefully, if the GOP retains Hagel's seat, his successor will be pro Israel, unlike him.

For an intelligent and well reasoned argument why Hagel would make a great choice as Sec of Defense please read: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/01/07/why-hagel-matters.html
Warning: reading Beinart's piece may require an attention span of up to 12 minutes.

I disagree with most of what Juan Cole says with regard to the mideast, however this piece why Hagel should be confirmed as Sec of Def is persuasive.
Top Ten Reasons Chuck Hagel Should be Secretary of Defense
http://www.juancole.com/2013/01/reasons-secretary-defense.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+juancole%2Fymbn+%28Informed+Comment%29&utm_content=Yahoo%21+Mail

Re Juan Cole

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2006/04/fitzgerald-a-tribute-to-juan-cole.html

And what Hugh Fitzgerald, still going strong over at the New English Review, has to say about this proposed appointment of Chuck Hagel.

http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/45556

Monday, 7 January 2013
Obama's Message To Iran


If Hugh distrusts Hagel, I am going with Hugh.

Furthermore, Iran seems to be delighted by the prospect of Hagel getting the job:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/01/iran-licks-its-chops-over-chuck-hagel-obamas-anti-israel-choice-for-defense-secretary.html

Why would any sane person support a move that pleases the Ayatollahs and other jihad-minded thugs running Islamic Iran?

I read the linked HF piece. I didn't think it was very convincing. In my opinion the Beinart and Cole arguments are much more persuasive in their support of Hagel.
Like RS, HF's point of view seems to be rendered distorted by seeing all world events through the prism of a virulent anti-Islamic mindset.

I don't disagree that religious incompatability is at the heart of the mideast conflict and that a good understanding of Islamic ideology is important to understand and analyze that conflict, but commentators like HF and RS seem to over-emphasize the role of religion and ignor all other considerations.

Another point of view on why Hagel has been chosen and it has little to do directly with Israel or Iran.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/08/opinion/brooks-why-hagel-was-picked.html?ref=todayspaper

Chuck Hagel has been nominated to supervise the beginning of this generation-long process of defense cutbacks. If a Democratic president is going to slash defense, he probably wants a Republican at the Pentagon to give him political cover, and he probably wants a decorated war hero to boot.

All the charges about Hagel’s views on Israel or Iran are secondary. The real question is, how will he begin this long cutting process? How will he balance modernizing the military and paying current personnel? How will he recalibrate American defense strategy with, say, 455,000 fewer service members?

How, in short, will Hagel supervise the beginning of America’s military decline? If members of Congress don’t want America to decline militarily, well, they have no one to blame but the voters and themselves.

What is the difference between a 'virulent' and a 'non-virulent' anti-Islamic mindset?

Look, we've got a 1400 year old death cult-cum-war-cult-cum-organised crime syndicate that has been slashing its way through the human populations on three continents 7th century-21st century and that started in on the fourth continent (New World) with the Barbary Pirates attacking American shipping in the early 19th century and carried out its first known jihad attack on non-Muslims on the fifth continent (Australia) in 1915.

Sooo: what's the appropriate attitude for a sane non-Muslim person to take toward the core - and entirely mainstream - doctrines and practices of this cult? This cult that indulges in regular outbursts of ritual murder? That has always practised slavery - including sex slavery, with the victims frequently being minor children - on the grand scale, still practises slavery in certain of its outposts, and has members who have openly called for the resumption of slave-taking and slave-trading and the use and abuse of (non-Muslim) slaves, by cult-members?

What's the appropriate attitude to take toward persons, groups and whole nations and ethnicities that have been steeped - indeed, pickled - in this particular cult for centuries? Especially given the all-pervasiveness of deception, infiltration and subversion, treachery, treaty-breaking, the sneak attack and ambush, that is manifest in the cult's doctrines and its historic track record?

Just a little distrust?

Mild dislike?

Carefully-calibrated critique?

Islam allows one to *understand* the jihad against the Jews, the jihad against Thai Buddhists, the jihad against India, the jihad against Russia, the jihad against Catholic Filipinos, the Jihad in the Balkans, etc etc. etc.

It *explains* what went on in East Timor and what has happened in the Moluccas and what is still happening in West Papua.

*All* conflicts in which Muslims are involved are eerily similar, irrespective of the ethnicities concerned and the religion of the non-Muslim side of the conflict.

Occam's Razor allows me therefore to conclude that the presence of Islam - the Religion of Blood and War, the world's only extant human sacrifice cult - is what accounts for the peculiar intractability, longevity and ultra-violence of all of these rows. All the other factors are far less important.

You commented in reply to me. I really don't disagree with the condemnation of Islamic ideology set forth in your comment, but what the heck does it have to do with the arguments I posted here all of which concerned RS's spurious attacks on Obama, or RS's ill-considered forays into general political commentary, or the wisdom of the Hagel nomination? What's the connection?

You replied to me. While I don't disagree much with your condemnation of Islam, what does it have to do with what I wrote about e.g. RS's spurious attacks on Obama and RS's ill-considered and poorly reasoned foray into general political commentary? And what does it have to with the subject of this thread, i.e. the wisdom of the Hagel nomination.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter