Philadelphia: The kidnapper wore a niqab

Around here if an adult want's to take a child out of school, you have to endure something like a TSA airport examination...They don't demand you drop em and bend over, but it's almost like that...So far, they have made no mistakes...

Was that niqab registered? Can an executive order banning all niqabs be far behind? After all if "only one child would be saved" from a kidnapping, shouldn't Obama take action?

Another article shows a picture of the girl's aunt, also covered in black. It makes one wonder whether there have been ID problems before this, problems best avoided again?

At Pearson International Airport in Toronto people wearing Omar's black tents walk through security being herded by a pissed-off looking Muslim barrow. No one says anything.

One day that will result in the same kind of disaster that befell this little girl and her family.

But, at least we didn't upset any barbarians.

1. The good news--the girl has been found:
http://www.myfoxphilly.com/story/20595645/man-who-found-missing-5-year-old-says-he-hopes-someone-would-the-same-for-his

2. The bad news:

She will most likely be returned to her Muslim "family".

3. Possible good news:

The news reports to come about this "family".

Muslims kidnapping Muslims. Shocker.

I wonder if her husband Red Beard the Pirate is going to "Chastise" her for not guarding the secret for G_d's guarding. In other words beatin' her senseless for letting her face hang out.

The Trash Bag Mafia strikes again. Taking out the trash(returning breeding stock to Dar-al-Islam) was temporarily foiled by heartless infidel meddlers disrespecting the One True Faith.

The Trash Bag Mafia strikes again. Taking out the trash(returning breeding stock to Dar-al-Islam) was temporarily foiled by heartless infidel meddlers disrespecting the One True Faith.

Are we sure the kidnapper was a woman?
Muhammad used to wear women's clothing so...

http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/03/transvestite-muhammad-mahomet-le.html

one of the purposes of distinctive Muslim garb is to instill fear into the hearts of Infidels...the school official did not question the abductor for fear of offending a Muslim...just the way Islam intended it to be...

Judging by the Islamic names of the girl's mother and aunt - the aunt was named 'Shahadah Rashid' and was wearing a niqab, that is, a Slave Mask - this looks like the fallout from some intra-ummah feud.

Nevertheless, it is a sharp reminder of the fact that the Slave Mask permits people to evade identification by, for example, CCTV, when engaged in criminal activity. (It is also, of course, if imposed against a victim's will, a good way of concealing a *non-Muslim* kidnap victim or hostage; if the Authorities are not prepared to check under *every* Slave Mask that enters or leaves the country, how can they know whether a/ it *is* a woman under there and/ or b/ whether the ID documents proffered - a passport, or a driver's licence - actually match the person hiding or hidden behind the mask?

One should note that the really, really fanatical Muslimahs often wear..**gloves** as well. Which means that someone in *that* costume will also avoid leaving any pesky fingerprints in their wake...

(Besides of course the fact that a man's hands are hard to pass off as a woman's hands; so if the Muslimahs in a particular part of the Ummah usually wear black gloves, and the infidels get used to seeing them do it, a Muslim male who wishes for whatever reason to 'pass' as a female, will then be able to conceal the hairy backs of his hands, by wearing gloves).

In any official-type situation (a transaction in a bank or a large transaction in a shop, or something like this case - an adult 'collecting a child' from school):

Make them take the mask off.

Make them take the gloves off.

Demand a visual and a signature...made whilst holding the pen in an *ungloved* hand.

If they refuse, or kick up a stink, they're Up To No Good.

(Frankly, any Mohammedan female in the Slave Sack with her face hidden - whether by niqab/ yashmak, or by the burqa - should not be admitted into a large department store or a shopping centre, without being first intercepted and frisked and made to reveal her face so the CCTV can get a nice long look at her).

Right now, our Authorities all over the Lands of the Infidels are not anywhere near the point of slapping a ban on Muslim immigration.

But in the meantime, until we reach that point, there are still lesser measures that can be taken, to reduce the threat to the general Infidel public somewhat.

Given that some nations such as France have already, for very good and sufficient security and public safety reasons of all kinds, at least got a burqa ban *on paper*, even if they're not consistently enforcing it, an excellent case can be made for all non-Muslim citizens in countries like Australia and the USA and Canada and the UK to demand a **burqa / niqab ban**: that is, a ban on the wearing in public (and that includes, in malls/ shopping centres, on school and university campuses, in lecture halls and examination rooms, in the street and in the square and in the park and in the public toilets, and on buses, trains, and planes, and when driving a car - of any form of the Mohammedan female slave rag that involves concealment of the face.

This is about public health and safety.

There is, of course, a further angle.

*Every* form of the Mohammedan Female Slave Rag, even the most faux-innocent wisp of headscarf, is the functional equivalent of the Black Flag of Jihad. It's like the Hell's Angel jacket and patch, or the KKK hood and robe, or the Nazi swastika armband of Gestapo/ SS death's head badge. It signifies the Sharia order that Muslims intend to impose world-wide; it is a badge of allegiance to the sharia; it declares the intention of the Ummah to demand that all humans everywhere shall submit to the sharia, that is, to Muslim male despotism.

It is, as some here have pointed out, "the rape-someone-else rag"; the article of clothing that not only identifies the wearer as a Mohammedan Gang Moll, but also identifies all females in the neighbourhood who are *not* wearing it, as Dirty Kuffar Sluts, Un-Owned Females, Rape Fodder for any Mohammedan Male who feels like exercising what he regards as his allah-awarded right to the persons and property of all kuffar.

There is a lucid exposition of just this point, in a classic article by N Maruani, from 2009, discussing and summarising the work of a Persian writer - either ex-Muslim, or MINO - one Chahdortt Djavann, which helped lay the groundwork for the French burqa ban.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=148041

Outlaw the hijab
N. Maruani
07/08/2009 20:54

...'She [Djavann] writes that the veil cannot be presented as a personal choice, disregarding centuries of Islamic history...

'Djavann explains further: "The veil has never been innocent or innocuous.

"**It has always signified the submission of women to men and the denial of legal rights to women in Islamic countries."** {my emphasis - dda}...

'ADDRESSING THE growing phenomenon of veiled women in Europe, Djavann points out its centrality to Islamist propaganda:

"The political, ideological and psychological impact of the veil goes far beyond its appearance... If this weren't the case, why would the Islamists make it their main focus?...

"**It constitutes a constant call to order by Islamic law."** {my emphasis - dda}.

'...Djavann stresses that Islam can exist without the veil, but the Islamist system cannot, because "the veil is the symbol, the flag and the keystone of the Islamic system."

{Let's cut to the chase and, for 'the Islamist system' and 'the Islamic system', read 'Sharia' - dda}.

Djavann, to go by Maruani's summary and citation of her writing, is not as forthright as she could be; nevertheless, she still makes some useful points. And the observation that the hijab, or Slave Rag, on a Muslim female 'constitutes a constant call to order by Islamic law', is spot-on. 'Islamic law' - that is, the sharia.

And as Nonie Darwish, ex-Muslim, has pointed out, in the end, Islam is sharia and sharia is Islam; that is the point that Djavann either evades or obscures, or has not yet grasped.

Here are the 'money quotes' from Djavann's work, that are worth learning by heart, as regards the Slave Rag, the Islamic 'veil', hijab:

"It [and she doesn't just mean burqa or niqab, she means every form of the Islamic veil, including the headscarf - dda] has always signified the submission of women to men and the denial of legal rights to women in Islamic countries".

"It [the Islamic female slave rag - dda] constitutes a constant call to order by Islamic law.

"the veil is the symbol, the flag and the keystone of the Islamic system."

Now to see if I get a 'hung posting' with *this* attempt.

(Apologies in advance if this creates a double posting).

Judging by the Islamic names of the girl's mother and aunt - the aunt was named 'Shahadah Rashid' and was wearing a niqab, that is, a Slave Mask - this looks like the fallout from some intra-ummah feud.

Nevertheless, it is a sharp reminder of the fact that the Slave Mask permits people to evade identification by, for example, CCTV, when engaged in criminal activity. (It is also, of course, if imposed against a victim's will, a good way of concealing a *non-Muslim* kidnap victim or hostage; if the Authorities are not prepared to check under *every* Slave Mask that enters or leaves the country, how can they know whether a/ it *is* a woman under there and/ or b/ whether the ID documents proffered - a passport, or a driver's licence - actually match the person hiding or hidden behind the mask?

One should note that the really, really fanatical Muslimahs often wear..**gloves** as well. Which means that someone in *that* costume will also avoid leaving any pesky fingerprints in their wake...

(Besides of course the fact that a man's hands are hard to pass off as a woman's hands; so if the Muslimahs in a particular part of the Ummah usually wear black gloves, and the infidels get used to seeing them do it, a Muslim male who wishes for whatever reason to 'pass' as a female, will then be able to conceal the hairy backs of his hands, by wearing gloves).

In any official-type situation (a transaction in a bank or a large transaction in a shop, or something like this case - an adult 'collecting a child' from school):

Make them take the mask off.

Make them take the gloves off.

Demand a visual and a signature...made whilst holding the pen in an *ungloved* hand.

If they refuse, or kick up a stink, they're Up To No Good.

(Frankly, any Mohammedan female in the Slave Sack with her face hidden - whether by niqab/ yashmak, or by the burqa - should not be admitted into a large department store or a shopping centre, without being first intercepted and frisked and made to reveal her face so the CCTV can get a nice long look at her).

Right now, our Authorities all over the Lands of the Infidels are not anywhere near the point of slapping a ban on Muslim immigration.

But in the meantime, until we reach that point, there are still lesser measures that can be taken, to reduce the threat to the general Infidel public somewhat.

Given that some nations such as France have already, for very good and sufficient security and public safety reasons of all kinds, at least got a burqa ban *on paper*, even if they're not consistently enforcing it, an excellent case can be made for all non-Muslim citizens in countries like Australia and the USA and Canada and the UK to demand a **burqa / niqab ban**: that is, a ban on the wearing in public (and that includes, in malls/ shopping centres, on school and university campuses, in lecture halls and examination rooms, in the street and in the square and in the park and in the public toilets, and on buses, trains, and planes, and when driving a car - of any form of the Mohammedan female slave rag that involves concealment of the face.

This is about public health and safety.

There is, of course, a further angle.

*Every* form of the Mohammedan Female Slave Rag, even the most faux-innocent wisp of headscarf, is the functional equivalent of the Black Flag of Jihad. It's like the Hell's Angel jacket and patch, or the KKK hood and robe, or the Nazi swastika armband of Gestapo/ SS death's head badge. It signifies the Sharia order that Muslims intend to impose world-wide; it is a badge of allegiance to the sharia; it declares the intention of the Ummah to demand that all humans everywhere shall submit to the sharia, that is, to Muslim male despotism.

It is, as some here have pointed out, "the rape-someone-else rag"; the article of clothing that not only identifies the wearer as a Mohammedan Gang Moll, but also identifies all females in the neighbourhood who are *not* wearing it, as Dirty Kuffar Sluts, Un-Owned Females, Rape Fodder for any Mohammedan Male who feels like exercising what he regards as his allah-awarded right to the persons and property of all kuffar.

There is a lucid exposition of just this point, in a classic article by N Maruani, from 2009, discussing and summarising the work of a Persian writer - either ex-Muslim, or MINO - one Chahdortt Djavann, which helped lay the groundwork for the French burqa ban.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=148041

Outlaw the hijab
N. Maruani
07/08/2009 20:54

...'She [Djavann] writes that the veil cannot be presented as a personal choice, disregarding centuries of Islamic history...

'Djavann explains further: "The veil has never been innocent or innocuous.

"**It has always signified the submission of women to men and the denial of legal rights to women in Islamic countries."** {my emphasis - dda}...

'ADDRESSING THE growing phenomenon of veiled women in Europe, Djavann points out its centrality to Islamist propaganda:

"The political, ideological and psychological impact of the veil goes far beyond its appearance... If this weren't the case, why would the Islamists make it their main focus?...

"**It constitutes a constant call to order by Islamic law."** {my emphasis - dda}.

'...Djavann stresses that Islam can exist without the veil, but the Islamist system cannot, because "the veil is the symbol, the flag and the keystone of the Islamic system."

{Let's cut to the chase and, for 'the Islamist system' and 'the Islamic system', read 'Sharia' - dda}.

Djavann, to go by Maruani's summary and citation of her writing, is not as forthright as she could be; nevertheless, she still makes some useful points. And the observation that the hijab, or Slave Rag, on a Muslim female 'constitutes a constant call to order by Islamic law', is spot-on. 'Islamic law' - that is, the sharia.

And as Nonie Darwish, ex-Muslim, has pointed out, in the end, Islam is sharia and sharia is Islam; that is the point that Djavann either evades or obscures, or has not yet grasped.

Here are the 'money quotes' from Djavann's work, that are worth learning by heart, as regards the Slave Rag, the Islamic 'veil', hijab:

"It [and she doesn't just mean burqa or niqab, she means every form of the Islamic veil, including the headscarf - dda] has always signified the submission of women to men and the denial of legal rights to women in Islamic countries".

"It [the Islamic female slave rag - dda] constitutes a constant call to order by Islamic law.

"the veil is the symbol, the flag and the keystone of the Islamic system."

As I said: if this is a double posting, sorry.

The cyber attack on jihadwatch is clearly continuing at some level, or at least, for me, right now, late morning on January 17 Aussie time, the jihadwatch comments is simply ..cray-cray.