Robert Spencer at PJ Lifestyle: Improvisation vs. Islam

It's Friday night, and I am back in sunburnt California for the David Horowitz Freedom Center's West Coast Retreat, and life is beautiful, and so it is a good time for something completely different. Here is the second in my new series on Islam and Jazz, or Islam or Jazz, for PJ Lifestyle: 5 Exhilarating Jazz Improvisations To Unshackle Your Spirit. Part 1, in case you missed it, is here.

“Islam,” said Muslim Brotherhood founder Hasan al-Banna, “does have a policy embracing the happiness of this world….We believe that Islam is an all-embracing concept which regulates every aspect of life, adjudicating on every one of its concerns and prescribing for it a solid and rigorous order.”

Al-Banna was enunciating a commonplace. One of the chief elements of Islamic apologists’ polemic against the West is that Islam, unlike Christianity and other rivals, is a complete way of life, one that governs every aspect of the believer’s life, down to the smallest detail. But one detail remains unproven: that having every aspect of one’s life “regulated” is really a recipe for “the happiness of this world.” This is the key question at issue between the proponents of Sharia and the defenders of free societies: whether the human being can and should be entrusted with the right and power to make decisions of his own, or whether it is preferable for him to submit to a total system of control – one so all-encompassing that it tells him how to wear his hair, how to brush his teeth, what clothes to wear, and even how to evacuate his bowels.

Contrasting to this is the philosophy of life that assumes that the human spirit best flowers when it is not subject to such all-invasive control, but is allowed to find its own rhythm and choose its own direction. And that’s why jazz is a foremost expression of the American spirit. Every aspect of the music is not controlled; rather, the players compose it right on the bandstand. The blazing and tragic reedman Eric Dolphy once said, “When you hear music, after it’s over, it’s gone, in the air. You can never capture it again.” That is true of all music to a certain extent, even the most carefully scored and coordinated, for every performance is subject to human vicissitudes, particularly when different musicians interpret the same written notation – just compare recordings by two different orchestras of the same orchestral piece to see this. But it is true above all of improvised music, in which each performance comes from the soul (or lack thereof) of every performer, and every aspect of the music is most gloriously and emphatically not regulated.

All composition begins in improvisation, but the composer who is writing a score takes the time to reflect, sharpen, polish and shape his musical thoughts; the improviser, on the other hand, is walking the tightrope without a net, trying to create something compelling in the moment. If he fails, the music will be dull and uninteresting; if he succeeds, it will be spectacular – as spectacular as the flowering of America and the West when individual rights were respected, and when so many fewer aspects of life were controlled.

Every great improvisation is, therefore, a monument to freedom – one to savor, and to celebrate. It would take a book, or more precisely a library, to catalogue them all and to give each its due, but within the confines of the space we have, here are a few choice monuments to the free and unfettered human spirit:

1. Louis Armstrong, “Dinah,” 1933

Louis Armstrong’s importance cannot be overstated; he practically originated this music himself. Ensemble jazz with short improvised patches arose in the early part of the twentieth century, with Armstrong’s great precursor Jelly Roll Morton laying claim to being its sole “inventor.” But it was Armstrong who had the imagination, the audacity, and the chops, to extend his improvisations and make them the centerpiece of his music, making them into much more than the brief elaborations on the melody they had been before his arrival on the scene. This example comes from slightly later than the period of Armstrong’s first flush of inspiration and innovation, but all of his wit, exuberance and musical inventiveness are on abundant display.

2. Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie, “Hot House,” 1952

Parker (alto sax) and Gillespie (trumpet) took improvisation on the chord structure of a melody to its outer limits. “Hot House” is based on the chords of Cole Porter’s “What Is This Thing Called Love?,” used as a pretext for high-speed, breakneck melodic inventiveness (which this YouTube clip only fleetingly and inadequately captures). No one could match Parker for harmonically sophisticated improvisations elaborated at high speed – for that matter, no one could match Parker’s speed in any other aspect of life, either.

3. Miles Davis and John Coltrane, “So What,” 1959

Miles Davis and John Coltrane together best illustrate how jazz is an expression of the individual soul. “So What,” one of the first pieces featuring musicians improvising on a single scale or mode, rather than a series of chords and all the different scales that emanate from those chords, has Davis (on trumpet) and Coltrane (on tenor sax) taking exactly the same material and going in radically different directions with it: Davis spare, taciturn, and reserved, and Coltrane searching, effusive and loquacious. (Watch closely at 3:42 to see – for just a split second — the ever-cool Miles Davis’ mouth drop open in awe at Coltrane’s astonishing invention. And with good reason: it is astonishing.)

There is more -- and there will be more still, next week.

| 26 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

26 Comments

| Leave a comment

Now here is story about one of my favourite artists.

In the late fifties the jazz musician Yusef Lateef received a portrait of himself from a painter named Abdul Mati. Lateef was portrayed as almost buried in a pile of exotic flowers, apparently enjoying himself with whatever he was doing. The artist waited for some time for any kind of response - but none came. Finally he decided to call the big man himself and as it turned out Mr. Lateef had liked the painting very much and asked Abdul Mati to come down to the Village Vanguard, where he was performing at the time. And so Mati did.

- Across the top of the painting I'd written Original Portrait of the Great Yusef Lateef Hand Painted by Abdul Mati. After the gig we were supposed to discuss the future use of the painting as a record cover. So when the concert was over I went over to his table. I addressed him, he looked at me, but continued his discussion with the others at the table. So I addressed him again and introduced myself as the artist who'd sent him the portrait. Once again I was ignored and this time he didn't even bother to look up...

Mati Klarwein was born in Hamburg, Germany, in 1932. Two years later, following Hitler's coming into power, he fled with his parents to Palestine, now Israel.

Islam is a complete way of life? Absolutely. Of course it is.

And anything that offers itself as a complete way of life should be disregarded pronto like. Marxism did this. Nazism did it too. And Islam has been putting forward this crappy nonsense for some 1400 years now.

Totalitarian systems ALWAYS, no exceptions, portray themselves as a "complete way of life." They are replete with such a deficient system of thought and they ALWAYS come with the demonizaton of the OTHER for second-class status or death in this world. For Nazism it was ethnic groups (e.g., Jews and Slavs). For Marxism it was socio-economic groups (e.g., the upper and middle classes). And for Islam it is non-believers, who are assigned second-class status or death wherever Islam is in control (or even when it isn't). Well, any belief system or institution which styles one or more groups of human beings as worthy of second-class status or death is ipso facto evil. And that's why Nazism, Marxism and Islam, in a nutshell, are evil. Ditto for any slavery institution which must, by default, consider the free man superior to the slave, otherwise the free man could no longer enslave the slave.

It's one thing to have a belief system, e.g., Christianity, that says that it is keenly important in guiding one's life and may even have repercussions, if not followed, in a world to come. But such belief systems still allow for an enormous amount of respect, support and independence in this world for such things as nation, family and football (invoking Vince Lombardi here, folks).

Such belief systems, and this is key, also allow for disagreement with them without threat of death or harm. What totalitarian ideology allows this? I'm 'athinkin Islam is coming first and foremost to mind here.

Of course, in all of this, one is led to ask: what of the great names in Western music? How do they relate to this theory about improvisation?

So (being a devoted fan of, for example, J S Bach, and having a bit of an idea that he was known, in his day, as a master improvisateur, I googled 'Bach' 'improvisation' and here is what came up:

http://ericbarnhill.wordpress.com/facts-about-improvisation/

Excerpt:

"J.S. Bach, while he was alive, was little known as a composer, and his works were criticized for being dense and old-fashioned — but he was renowned as the greatest improviser on the organ in Europe.

" A famous French organist once came to town to compete against him, and, hearing him improvise while warming up, promptly left town.

" Bach put improvisation skills at the center of his teaching.

"Most of his instructional manuals are how-to books in improvisation. He often wrote out several different versions of his most popular pieces, such as the inventions, to show how a student might improvise on the structure..."

(And then the author goes on to talk about some of the other 'big names' in baroque and Romantic music, and we find out some very interesting stuff about what they were capable of).

While we're on music, I'm always inspired by the guitar playing in a certain 30 second section of a song called "Yours Is No Disgrace." Below is a video clip of the thirty seconds as performed on one occasion. The clip has the camera way too much on the bass player, who is not doing much at that point in the song, but you can hear the guitarist in the background and then see the guitarist appearing sort of from behind the bass player in the last 15 seconds. Steve Howe is the guitarist:

http://www.splicd.com/f4eoTsdTk9U/46/83

Here's the same band (Yes), showing the same guitarist playing the same 30 second section. The clip below is poor quality, but if you put it on "full screen" it perhaps allows you to see a wee bit more what the guitarist's fingers are doing:

http://www.splicd.com/mHyd_0V_3Bg/58/92

The simple fact that a Sharia shackled world would ban the Jaques Loussier Trio is good enough reason to fight Islam tooth and nail!

I can imagine how it was back in the early 1930's, in Copenhagen:

"Louis Armstrong is in town, he is all the rage. Let's get a live performancet of his into that film we're making!"
"?"
"The negro? Funny faces? The kids love him. Tickets!"
"Oh him. Humm, yeah ...I suppose we can squeeze him in somehow. Sure it's worth it?"

I doubt any people remember the name of the film.

"Dinah" is the clip on Youtube, a tremendous exuberance I have enjoyed many times.

Travelling by bus around Khartoum last year, I noticed something: no longer the loud, rousing Sudanese music I had enjoyed other times, only Koran recitations. Sudanese music had developed marvellously since the "drum-only" days, with Western and other influences, and the Comprehensive Peace Agreement time of 2005-2011 had seen much freedom: I heard of an emigre jazz musician who had decided to return to this newly freed-up Sudan to entertain the Sudanese people - the CPA was "a gift from the south to the north" said a northerner 9hardly voluntary, but there you are).
And now? Well, now the north has Islam, purer and purer, and non-Muslims are in trouble. I wonder if the jazz musician has run back to the West?

If Sharia law were to rule the world, you can bet that musicians, along with a whole lot of other folks, would hang for being not Islamic enough.

We ex-Muslims living with Islam's formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that the cruel cult of Mohammedanism is an obvious fraud.

>>>>>

Music in Islam Examined

Is music forbidden in Islam? This article will consider this question.

It is often said that music is prohibited in Islam. Upon hearing this statement most people doubt that such an absurd claim could possibly be true.

If the religion of Islam actually does forbid music, even the majority of devout Muslims would probably find this to be very strange and a cause for concern. Why in the world would a religion prohibit Music? Do any other minor or major religions prohibit music? What did Muhammad have to say about this matter? This article will also consider the many benefits of music.

Let’s examine what the Islamic texts and traditions have to say about this subject. The first two hadith that we will be considering have been selected from what are believed by Muslims to be the canonical texts of Islam. Hence, Muslims must believe them to be the authentic utterances of the Islamic prophet Muhammad and should therefore be obeyed.

Hadith: Sahih Bukhari: Volume 7, Book 69, Number 494v:

Narrated Abu 'Amir or Abu Malik Al-Ash'ari:
Reported that he heard the Prophet saying, "From among my followers there will be some people who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk, the drinking of alcoholic drinks and the use of musical instruments, as lawful. And there will be some people who will stay near the side of a mountain and in the evening their shepherd will come to them with their sheep and ask them for something, but they will say to him, 'Return to us tomorrow.' Allah will destroy them during the night and will let the mountain fall on them, and He will transform the rest of them into monkeys and pigs and they will remain so till the Day of Resurrection."

Hadith: Sunan Abu-Dawud: Book 41, Number 4909:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Mas'ud:
Salam ibn Miskin, quoting an old man who witnessed AbuWa'il in a wedding feast, said: They began to play, amuse and sing. He united the support of his hand round his knees that were drawn up, and said: I heard Abdullah (ibn Mas'ud) say: I heard the apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) say: Singing produces hypocrisy in the heart.

Hadith Qudsi 19:5:

"The Prophet said that Allah commanded him to destroy all the musical instruments, idols, crosses and all the trappings of ignorance."

Muhammad also said:

(1) “Allah Mighty and Majestic sent me as a guidance and mercy to believers and commanded me to do away with musical instruments, flutes, strings, crucifixes, and the affair of the pre-Islamic period of ignorance.”

(2) “On the Day of Resurrection, Allah will pour molten lead into the ears of whoever sits listening to a songstress.”

(3) “Song makes hypocrisy grow in the heart as water does herbage.”

(4) “This community will experience the swallowing up of some people by the earth, metamorphosis of some into animals, and being rained upon with stones.” Someone asked, “When will this be, O Messenger of Allah?” and he said, “When songstresses and musical instruments appear and wine is held to be lawful.”

(5) “There will be peoples of my Community who will hold fornication, silk, wine, and musical instruments to be lawful ….” -- 'Umdat al-Salik r40.0

What puritanical nonsense! If a person were to dig deep enough into the dung heap of Muhammad’s wacky utterances and bizarre behaviour nearly everything could be banned! (except of course warfare, and the all those nauseating and useless Islamic rituals that are part and parcel of the cult of Muhammadanism). The above passages are indeed bizarre and quite an insight into the strange world of Islam. Keep folks in the dark, and keep them afraid, frustrated and obedient, that was the tune that Muhammad sang. The more ignorant and primitive the Muslim, the better Muhammad could readily use them for his own ends -- as foot soldiers to acquire “booty of all types.” Not only was Muhammad a mass murdering brazen thief and a slave trading pedophile, he was also some kind of strange puritanical nut-case opposed even to music! Why all the abnormal behaviour?! How sick was this guy?!

Muhammad preferred not to be asked difficult questions and often ended such inquiries abruptly. From the above hadiths and Islamic traditions we can see that Muhammad’s priority was to keep his followers focused solely on the details of his religion and then use them to kill and die for it when the time called for more booty. One of the reasons that Muslims are so obsessed with Islam and busy trying to promulgate it is because Muhammad has denied or restricted their abilty to enjoy so many of the healthy and common activities of life -- such as music. This is plainly obvious when one studies the reality of how Islam plays out in the real world. When Muhammad was forced to address some of the challenging questions posed to him by his followers, his answers, or verdicts, were often patently ridiculous. Even folks who call themselves Muslims must get a real chuckle out of the some of the absurdity contained within Muhammad’s Islam.

Tragically, the condemnation of music in Muhammad’s Islam has many profoundly negative consequences. Muhammad was truly disturbed and his prohibition of music is just more proof of this. Pastimes such as music and many other social customs that are known to be good for human health are not to be partaken of or enjoyed by Muslims. Many ex-Muslims, such as myself, leave Islam upon learning the truth about this man Muhammad and his incredulous religion. We see Muhammad not as an honest man telling the truth but a deranged warlord and criminal gang leader. The fact that he claimed to be the messenger of God, delivering the one and only perfect religion is just that, a claim. One only needs to look at how Muhammad lived his life and the error-ridden and inhumane documents that he left behind to understand that he was merely a very sick liar and a fraud. Any honest person can plainly see that the founder of Islam, Muhammad ibn Abdullah, was through and through crooked and crazy. A mad criminal who attempted to fool his followers with threats and promises.

In truth, to express one’s self openly and honestly is fundamental to the human experience. For centuries music has been a healthy outlet for such expression. In fact music has played a very beneficial role in human development and the civilizing of mankind. With every passing year scientists are discovering more evidence that music enhances intelligence and that it has many positive effects on human health. It is a fact that humanity in general has derived many benefits from music throughout the ages. Throughout history music has been a rich and profound cultural element to nearly all of man’s diverse cultures and billions of individuals can attest to the fact that great enjoyment and rewards can found in both the creating and listening to music. In reality, due to Muhammad’s illness(es), basically he really only cared about himself and fulfilling his selfish desires, so all of this was lost on the pathetic little fool. As we can plainly see, if one is to submit to Muhammad’s Islam they must also submit their common sense and much of their basic self-honesty.

In conclusion, Muhammad’s ludicrous attitude towards music is very revealing. More obvious nonsense contained within his erroneous theology. No doubt some Muslims and Islamic apologists would be quick to point out that other passages from the Islamic texts and traditions make music Halal. Due to the fact that Islam is full of contradictions and inaccuracies this is no surprise. This proves that Muhammad was not the perfect man and that his Islam is over-flowing with utter nonsense and lies. From the above texts we see that music is actually Haram in Islam. Nonsense such as this should awaken any Muslim of sound mind to the fact that Islam in totality is a ridiculous and harmful fraud, and that its creator was simply a clever a con man and a very, very sick liar. Islam’s aversion to and taboos regarding music are just more proof of this.

I fail to see the point of your anecdote, unless it is to highlight the abominable rudeness of the **muslim** Lateef towards the **Jewish** Marwi.

I have been enjoying this series very much. The old clips are just amazing. I suppose I might not be the only one who has this little nagging thought NOT to argue with the premise of the article that Islam is totalitarian in thorough rigorous minute detail!! I agree with that. Any fool can see it. It's just that I have always dearly believed that life in Christ is also a complete way of life. I in him Him in me, baptised DEAD to sin, rejoicing in The Lord ALWAYS, pray not several times a day but WITHOUT CEASING. If anyone even says to his brother 'you fool' is in danger of hell fire. And so on. I think it is no less all encompassing but that Christianity is just fundamentally such a completely different***way of life. One that insists on freedom as a necessary gift from God to the individuals and the Church. I could go on but I bet you get what I mean already.
By the way, I just had to stop listening to anything eric Allen bell says because his worldview is toxic toward the Church. He never misses a chance to take pot shots at the Faith.

is a complete way of life, one that governs every aspect of the believer’s life, down to the smallest detail.

That is unnatural...it binds the human spirit which yearns to be free...Music represents freedom, which may be the reason Islam hates it...Music has a habit of freeing the listener, and especially the musician who knows what 'being in the groove' really means...
The movie 'Crossroads' 1986, was more about blues than jazz, but improvisational music is jazz, and the south produced a lot of both and hybrids...
In Islam, it is haram to be, 'in the groove'...
Music is a gift from the universe, a common language, even animals can relate to...ever sing to a horse? They don't like rock and roll, but they enjoy the sounds of soft melodic music...and they don't care if you are a great singer or not...


@ PCPCP -

"By the way, I just had to stop listening to anything eric Allen bell says because his worldview is toxic toward the Church. He never misses a chance to take pot shots at the Faith."

I had the same experience. I have no idea what happened to him! One minute he's fighting against jihad and sharia, the next minute he's ranting about Christianity. The strange part is that his web site is now full of New Age/Eastern religion type of information. The first time I saw it, I thought his site had been hacked!

I wish I knew what happened. I heard he had some sort of trouble with Christians maybe on Facebook? But I'm not sure. Even that doesn't seem to be enough to turn him so quickly. It's sad. He was a good ally and was doing important work in the fight. I haven't kept up with him lately.

"Any fool can see it. It's just that I have always dearly believed that life in Christ is also a complete way of life."

This highlights an important nuance that may get lost in the transmission. The problem is not so much the ideal held by some individuals for a complete way of life they feel deserves to be such: The problem, rather, is to what extent those individuals translate their ideal into a goal of violently imposing that complete way of life on others who don't agree.

And when that violently supremacist goal becomes ratcheted up to actual plots and plans to kill people -- many of which have already successfully resulted in mass-murders, sometimes into the thousands -- furthermore in tandem with elaborate plots of seemingly non-violent subversion necessarily linked to that continuing violence, in the context of a widespread organization mobilizing these individuals, it moves beyond merely a repellant idea which our Western laws must grudgingly permit, to a clear and present danger tantamount to a declaration of war against which our Western laws give us full leverage to try to stop in any way we find it reasonable, unconstrained by laws that apply under ordinary circumstances, in order to save lives and prevent widespread destruction and dislocations to our infrastructure.

There is a lot you don't see.

Oh well, as this thread deals with music and islam, here is a video that marks the end of Tower Hamlets and begins Bangla Town, notice at the beginning is an rather nasty thug who you should know.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqJziLpnkEU

BTW, your comment about me taking out against the Downes family and getting banned by EDL, well seems I was not so wrong.

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2013/01/28/13674/

And more important is this

http://thenorthernmonkeymedia.wordpress.com/2013/01/01/search-for-the-truth-charlene-downes/

Pay attention to the comment by Vicky Clementine.

Oooops wrong video

Same event

Here is the correct one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9eLeZS9OeY

PCPCP,

As to both Christianity and Islam being "complete ways of life."

The difference would seem to be between a complete way of life based fundamentally on love (which in the end means freedom, since love comes from the innermost core of a person and cannot be compelled), vs. a complete way of life that is not based on freedom or love, but on detailed rules -- even for one's innermost being and for the State. Muhammad said the penalty for changing one's religion from Islam is death. Christ never said anything of the sort about Christianity. In Islam one sees the power of the State directing the innermost core of one's being. Muhammad set up a theocratic, expansionist, totalitarian government. Christ said, "my kingdom is not of this world," and "give to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, to God the things that are God's." He said that those among his disciples who would be greatest would not lord over others but would serve them and wash their feet, as Jesus washed the disciples' feet. Islam's "way" is submission to Allah's "prophet" Muhammad and to all the commandments of Islamic law, which are based on the life of Muhammad -- what he forbade and permitted and commanded. Christianity is based ultimately on only two commandments: love God with all your heart and soul and mind, and love your neighbor as yourself. One does not "submit" to love, properly so called, except in a paradoxical sense, since to love is to become more fully who one is. But one does submit to Islam, which conceives of human beings only as servants or slaves, not as sons and daughters of God.

No doubt you already know all the above, PCPCP, but I've said it anyway.

Spencer's first part published over at PJMedia has an interesting excursion into the fact of multiple jazz musicians who have been, or who are, Muslims. Spencer mentions a few names in this regard, to which I'd add a couple that always amused me, from Herbie Mann's At the Village Gate and Returns to the Village Gate (1962 and 1963, respectively): on upright bass, Ahmed Abdul-Malik; and on congas, some dude from north Africa named "Chief Bey".

Other than noting that the Islamosaxophonist Pharaoh Sanders saw his jazz music as "Dawa", Spencer doesn't really conjecture how these Muslims reconciled their Islam with their jazz. I think, if they are not deeply confused to the point of some form of mental illness, they are doing what Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam seems to have come around to doing, what with his recording with Dolly Parton and sharing the stage with James Taylor (after spending a few years stolidly maintaining an Islamic "purity" about his absention from music): using music as a medium for the stealth jihad -- helping to make Muslims look "normal" and thus easing their broader assimilation into the enemy territory of the Dar-al-Harb.

As for why Islam is anti-music, Spencer notes in that same part:

They [early Muslims] knew that music would not serve the purposes of their martial, expansionist society, for it would blunt the fighting edge of the mujahedin. They knew, as Lenin would come to know centuries later, that the just society on this earth could only be established by means of a reign of terror: “One must break heads, pitilessly break heads.”

As Muhammad himself put it, “I have been made victorious through terror” (Bukhari 4.52.220). That’s the core reason why Islamic law is hostile to music. Music brings joy, and joy is the opposite of terror. It’s no wonder, then, that the Ayatollah Khomeini said: “There is no fun in Islam. There can be no fun and joy in whatever is serious.”

I'm sure this is an important part of it, but I think it runs more deeply: I think Muslims recognized that music seduces a person into loving this world too much, and that was seen to be inimical to the hatred of this world, the Gnostic hatred of the cosmos, the Satanic hatred of Creation, which underpins the Islamic psyche.

I'm not sure why a couple of readers here are surprised that Eric Allen Bell is thoroughly New Agey and disdains Christianity (though he spent an inordinate amount of time in various comments fields here a while back trying to shrug off those impressions one otherwise reasonably gets from him). Perhaps his Learning Curve about the problem of Islam never quite made it out of the gates (or the box) of his deeply ingrained Equivalencism.

Louis Armstrong, “Dinah,” 1933 first video.
so hilarious, at the end of the video all those shoes bouncing in such quick time and at the very last note, STOP in a split second! i had to watch it a few times, so hilarious! those guys really had TIMING!

Nice screed on a passion of mine.

Any jazz musician who wants to, should open a club in downtown Kabul......I'm sure it will be packed (with explosives)......

Todays Truth: Happiness and Islam, two words that should never appear in the same sentence.

"Happiness and Islam, two words that should never appear in the same sentence."

Except this sentence:

Though it won't solve many nagging, and some terrible, problems, nevertheless, the world will have a great deal more happiness if -- and/or when -- Islam is put out of our misery.

(Some may have opted to have constructed a far simpler sentence; but I was trying to be realistic.)

I wonder if some Muslims feel drawn to jazz because it often has a sort of "abstract" non-pictorial feel and reminds somewhat of arabesques and plant-like patterns. Islam I gather permits images of plants and things below plants, but not of animate beings, beings with souls. There is relatively little soul melodrama in jazz. Compare that with, say, Wagner, or Mozart, or pop music. Jazz might be the sort of music that is least "about" some content other than itself.

Robert Spencer at PJ Lifestyle: Improvisation vs. Islam
...............................

Wonderful stuff, Robert.

My husband especially is a huge jazz fan, and is going to Jazz Fest in New Orleans next month.

Louis Armstrong's "Dinah" clip is from the beginning of his career, and this performance of "It's a Wonderful World" is from near the end. This is a vibrant, powerful, supremely life-affirming piece of music. Could anyone imagine Islam creating such a song?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2RbFVRRtqI

PCPCP wrote:

I have been enjoying this series very much. The old clips are just amazing. I suppose I might not be the only one who has this little nagging thought NOT to argue with the premise of the article that Islam is totalitarian in thorough rigorous minute detail!! I agree with that. Any fool can see it. It's just that I have always dearly believed that life in Christ is also a complete way of life...
...............................

It's not that Christianity is not "complete", PCPCP—it's that Christianity doesn't dictate how a Christian wears his hair, brushes his teeth, or goes to the rest room.

I've heard Christian music ranging from Classical to Gospel to Jazz to Country to Hip Hop to Christian Rock to New Age. In addition, a Christian may listen to pretty much any secular music he likes. There may be a few artists and songs that contain un-Christian themes, but other than that there are no limits—and even here, it is up to individual believers to decide what works with their faith and what does not.

What's important for a Christian is that he live his life in accordance with the ethics of Christianity—not that he constricts his life over inconsequential matters. And certainly not that he oppress and restrict others for their own expression.

All over the world, we find pious Muslims crushing musical freedom. Northern Mali was known for its Saharan music festival—now its known for amputations and stonings.

From the Hadith:

Hadhrat Abu Hurairah narrates that Rasulullah [the "Prophet" Muhammed—GI] said: "Listening to music and singing is sinful. Sitting at such gatherings is fisq (immoral transgression). Deriving pleasure from it is kufr."

Well, that pretty much sums it up. What a killjoy!

Here are some more ugly Hadith condemning music and any anyone who listens to it to hell:

http://themajlis.net/Article146.html

"It's not that Christianity is not "complete", PCPCP—it's that Christianity doesn't dictate how a Christian wears his hair, brushes his teeth, or goes to the rest room. "

That's what I basically wrote in response to PCPCP (what is that, Evangelical angel dust...:)?).

Perhaps I was too verbose. In a nutshell, the distinction lies not in the ideal of a "total way of life" -- but rather in whether one believes in a theocracy by which to enforce it upon others using, among other means, violence.

The long explanation:

All laws require at least the implicit threat of violence, and the clearly communicated willingness to use violence, in order to maintain an orderly society in a world where humans are imperfect and many may reasonably be assumed to be anti-social, even criminally so (i.e., I'm describing the real world). This becomes even more true the larger and more complex a society is. While it helps to have a relatively healthy culture and tradition (as most of the West has), this is not, as we know, enough to deliver a nicely ordered utopian society where no police have to maintain order and protect people from other people in society.

When this realistic situation would become translated into a religious ideal to transform society, it can take either of two forms:

1) an idealistic naive assumption that society can organically evolve into a utopia through change, or education, or persuasion, or "higher consciousness", etc. (Sometimes a variant of this is Communalism, where a group of utopian-minded people think they can create their own world in the middle of the world that resists their utopia -- rarely realizing that they are perpetuating their parasitical dependence upon the non-utopian society (unless they can manage to find a wilderness so utterly remote it has no ties at all to the rest of the interconnected world).)

2) the more robust kind of theocracy that wants to force other people in line with their total way of life. Islam would be the gold standard of this form.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter