Al-Qaeda calls for assassination of top U.S., British, French heads of state and politicians

I have to admit to a sneaking sympathy with you on that one, especially when I think how **their** policies have been so instrumental in bringing us to the position we are now faced with.

And I've always thought, and said, that no politician in the West will do anything about muslim immigration, islamisation of Europe, and jihad murder plots, until their **own precious hides** are in danger.

Al-Qaeda calls for assassination of top U.S., British, French heads of state and politicians
....................................

Lovely. Damn barbarians.

Guy Macher wrote:

I am strangely ambivalent at the prospect of the present world leaders being offed.
....................................

With all due respect to you and Jan, Guy—and realizing that you both may have been speaking at least somewhat tongue-in-cheek—I can think of few things more horrifying for the free West than a slew of assassinations of heads of state by homicidal Muslims in emboldening Islam and demoralizing Infidels.

And this would be true no matter what sort of dhimmi tools these "leaders" might be on an individual basis. This is a case where the office really is often bigger than the person filling it.

Also, I don't want to see *anyone* fall victim to Muslim savagery—not even those who may have intentionally or unintentionally enabled its spread.

More:

Question: "I Want To Carry Out A Big Jihad Operation To Support The Religion. Guide Me."

In its answer, Inspire congratulates the inquirer on his great determination, and reiterates that jihad is a form of 'ibadah (worship), like any other type of worship.
....................................

**Ugh**. Assassination as a form of "worship". Grotesque.

More:

Answering a similar query from "an active journalist," Inspire says that journalism is a "useful profession to the mujahideen," as journalists' wide knowledge of current affairs, along with their "access to many areas as a media personnel," can provide AQAP with valuable intelligence about the enemy, adding that journalists themselves can exploit their positions to execute attacks themselves.
....................................

Oh, boy—that's really having a journalist "making themselves part of the story". Would we be leery of Muslim "journalists" even then? Likely not—it would be too "politically incorrect"...

You're quite right, graven.

What I said was, perhaps, not so much tongue in cheek, as sheer frustration and rage at the fact our so-called 'leaders' seem to do nothing but either enable islam, or abjectly bow to it.

No, I don't want to see a slew of assassinations of Western 'leaders', no matter how much I despise them for their pusillanimity.

However, I really do believe that nothing will be done unless they themselves are personally affected, in some way, by the Islamic blight.

When, in the UK, I see Somalian muslims housed in million pound mansions in Mayfair, and then young amputee soldiers refused disability allowance, and being housed in a miserable flat 10 storeys off the ground, I feel sick with rage.

When I hear that consummate piece of slime, camoron, intone that muslims don't need to integrate with us, we need to integrate with them, I feel sick with rage.

When I hear clegg tell us that people who don't want a mosque with its caterwauling built in their neighbourhood are bigots, I spit with rage. And these things are just the tip of the iceberg. I could write a book cataloguing such things.

Well, you know it all as well as I. Obama, and most of your own politicians are no better.

There are politicians here and there, who **seem** prepared to stand up for what's right, so the only thing to do is to throw support behind them; the fight isn't over yet.

Forgive the rant. I must be in a despondent mood today.

Thanks so much for the reply, Jan.

And believe me, I *very much* share your frustration—especially in the wake of the reelection of a major enabler of Jihad and Muslim supremacy to the presidency in my own country..