Mainstream media downplays, ignores jihad threat

The mainstream media's complicity with the jihad and Islamic supremacism is nothing new. I have frequently noted how hopelessly compromised pro-jihad pseudo-journalists in the U.S., such as Christiane Amanpour, Manya Brachear, Bob Smietana, Kari Huus, Dave Weigel, Michael Kruse, Eli Clifton, Alex Kane, Adam Serwer, Max Blumenthal, etc., are cutting their own throats by propagandizing for Sharia and defaming freedom fighters. This piece shows the other side: they ignore jihad activity and even crimes committed by Muslims, out of an immovable conviction that Muslims are and can only be victims, not perpetrators of violence. "Jihad? What Jihad? Media Shrug At Islamic Threat," from Investor's Business Daily, March 1:

Homeland Insecurity: The attorney general says the threat from local jihadists is now worse than terrorist plots hatched overseas. He warned Americans not to grow "complacent." Tell it to the media.

The major news gatekeepers have ignored the jihadist element in no fewer than four recent cases of sensational killings of non-Muslims by mostly young Muslim men inside the U.S., including:

• Yusuf Ibrahim, a 27-year-old Egyptian immigrant who on Feb. 5 allegedly beheaded two Coptic Christians living in New Jersey.

• Ali Syed, a 20-year-old Muslim who allegedly randomly killed three people in Southern California on Feb. 18 before killing himself.

• Ammar Asim Faruq Harris, a 26-year-old reported black Muslim convert who on Feb. 21 is said to have killed three people in Las Vegas.

• Ali Salim, a 44-year-old Pakistan-born doctor who is accused of raping and killing a pregnant woman and her 9-month-old fetus last year in his Ohio office.

This rash of homicides by Muslims has triggered a giant media yawn, despite telltale signs of jihadist motive. Jihad? What jihad? Reporters seemed to be collectively shrugging in another fit of extreme PC.

Here's another key piece of information denied the average American watching the evening news: the majority of convicted terrorists in the U.S. are American citizens. A study found the terrorist threat is increasingly in our backyard.

Equally stunning, more than half of the 171 terror convicts analyzed by the London-based Henry Jackson Society are college-educated. Many are black converts. Nearly half were born and raised here, according to the report prefaced by former CIA director Mike Hayden.

Yet they want to kill fellow Americans simply because they believe that's what their creed tells them to do. But instead of confronting this homegrown threat, our society is fig-leafing it, even glorifying it.

Even in red-state Texas, educators are indoctrinating kids into the Islamic faith. At Lumberton High School, a geography class was recently told to dress up in Islamic garb — including burqas — and refer to the 9/11 hijackers not as terrorists but as "freedom fighters."

This isn't an isolated event. There's a coordinated effort by leftist do-gooders and multiculturalists to de-link Islam from violence and terror and rewrite history.

When educators, journalists and politicians hear no Islamic violence, see no Islamic violence and report no Islamic violence, beware, it's Sept. 10, 2001, again.

| 42 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

42 Comments

| Leave a comment

When these jihad deniers stand first in line for getting their neck slit by the jihadis, they will be still asking "jihad, what juhad", we see no jihad!! One can't imagine how utterly stupid they are!!

The article lists recent crimes by muslims against non-muslim Americans.

It then says there were telltale signs of jihadist motive involved with these crimes, but doesn't give one example of one of these signs.

And I haven't been able to see the signs when I read about the Las Vegas killings.

Does anyone know which telltale signs of jihadist motive go with these crimes?

Did someone shout "allahu akbar" or "islam will destroy America"? What were the signs?

Obviously, multiculturalism and moral relativism serve the powers that be. And that is why the corporate Media is in favor of Islam.

whatever the sign, there will always be blood, or, at least diminished life (sometimes called justice, like amputation, acid scars, wounds of many kinds)

But what were the signs?

not only they ignore it, they purify and white wash it.
M


I think your question is fair; the article suggests "telltale signs of Jihadist motive" without citing any evidence of same. I'm not familiar with the details of the subject cases, so I can't give you a fair answer. The closest I can get is to render one American's opinion.

At this point, I feel strongly that unless you can provide evidence that islam was NOT a factor in any crime involving muslims, then I'm going to believe that it WAS. I think the "jihadist" mindset cannot be separated from islam (and its practictioners) in general and that this islamic mindset is present, even if there was no "allahuing" involved at the moment. It doesn't have to be "Jihadist" to be islamic--though the latter is the vehicle to the former, and the former is exclusive to the latter. So, I'm going to turn it around; you provide the evidence--prove to me that islam (granted, not necessarily "Jihadism") WASN'T a factor in these crimes. I know, sounds like "guilty until proven innocent," doesn't it? But that's where I am on it, and muslims--whose only significant contributions to my country have been terror and crime--while falsely claiming minority-status victimhood-- are wholly responsible for that perception.

Sorry, that doesn't answer your fair question. Or does it??

No, that doesn't answer my question.

Either there are signs or there aren't.

These crimes appear no different than any similar crimes by anyone unless there really is a sign showing they were probably motivated by a desire to do jihad.

Journalist shouldn't make allegations without evidence.

Having said that, I can believe that muslim criminals have a special contempt for Americans. And their culture dehumanizes us, so the doctor probably found it easy to justify his actions to himself. But I don't see any reason to think he was motivated by anything other than lust.

But I still don't see a sign of jihad.

here is the way I am looking at it. There are two types of Jihad and jihadists. the first kind/type are the jihadists who strap bombs, assassinate, shoot, car bombs, roadside bombings etc... for most part main stream media does recognize this albeit most of them call it militants, radicals etc.. and few call it terrorism but never Islamic terrorists... so you have to give them a little credit there... the second and the most dangerous kind of jihad, is stealth jihad and jihadists like CAIR. These are the ones we need to be most concerned with and main stream Media recognizes them as legit, thus making it much harder to fight. I think this article is referring to stealth jihad. My opinion as a patriotic American who came here not speaking English and made it big. hope this explains it.

I think you just answered your own question:

"I can believe that muslim criminals have a special contempt for Americans. And their culture dehumanizes us, so the doctor probably found it easy to justify his actions to himself."

I think the problem is with the term "Jihadist" to ascribe motives. If we substitute the word "islamic" we may have a more accurate (if less PC) description. As I said above, it doesn't have to be "jihadist" to represent islamic beliefs and practices. The fact is that muslims are particularly vulnerable to suggestions about their motives--rightfully so, I think. Call it inuendo if you like, but it remains that they are wholly responsible for the suspicion and negativity with which they're viewed.

Guess you'll have to get your answer from the article's author. My suggestion would be that he stop pulling his punches and say the "I" word rather than pulling his punches with the "J" word...

Hi instlam! Just out for a bit of trolling, are you? Well, listen up for the 'telltale signs of jihad'.

1 A Muslim beheads two Coptic Christians. (Slay the infidel ..etc)

2 A Muslim randomly kills three people. (Slay the infidel ..etc)

3 A Muslim convert kills three people in Vegas. (Slay the infidel ..etc)

4 A Muslim doc rapes and kills a woman. (Slay the infidel ..etc)

Are you beginning to get the picture .... you clown!

Whaddya mean, where's the telltale signs? The telltale signs are written as big as the Twin Towers.

Sheesh, some people!

Signs? What signs? You don't need any signs. They are simply applying their religion. These are not nominal Muslims, they are TRUE Muslims.
A TRUE Muslim reads the Quran and applies its teachings. Period.
READ!
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2012/10/infidel.html

And the MSM makes things more *dangerous* by downplaying the very real threat of jihad.

Not just downplaying, the media doesn't even think there is any danger from Islam and Muslims and their jihad. All Muslims are jihadis and all are dangerous. It's only a matter of time when sudden jihad syndrome takes over them and they play out their religious duty. Jihad-the sleeper cell in them all lives on!!

Got to give you George, you kept the logic in tact, except you may have pointed out the beheading is not a regular crime in my country unless you are a f..faced Muslim. A recent convert killing three people in Vegas in my opinion is also a Jihad. A Muslim randomly killing people is most probably Jihad - mathematics tells me that. I will never ever forget Nidal Hasan in Fort Hood shooting, killed 14 people. That was a Mullah-pumped Jihad not a random shooting. The Pakistani doctor raped and killed a woman may be a cocktail of lust and Jihad.


Hi Miriam,

I was in a hurry there earlier (had to run to a haircut) and see that I even got redundant in my last sentence.

Can you imagine how pissed the "hip, fast lane" muslims must get after every new attack or well-publicized aborted terror plot? I mean the Aslans and the Raufs (and others like them) have made their careers lying to us about islam--and what happens? Another day, another muslim attack or foiled plot--and all they have are the same old shopworn lies about "tiny minorities," the "hijack" of islam by "extremists," blah, blah, blah. They're in 24/7 damage control--and there's so much damage! You're right, though; the slick muslims are the dangerous ones...they're right here among us, they lie easily and often, and worst of all...they have lots of folks here who desperately want to believe them--even with the ugly truth staring them right in the face!

Miriam, you came here for a better life and you've made that happen. To me, that makes you a REAL patriot!

G

as you know I have said it before that I am in 1950's technology. But this past three month I have learned how to use twitter. I am having a blast with the jihadists!! it is a lot of fun!! Check it out. go to twitter and type miriam rove and you will laugh your....!!!!!
M

Good points BlueRaven, especially about the beheading aspect. My point (I think!) is that Jihad is uniquely and exclusively islamic. The same goes for Sharia. It may be politically correct and acceptable to say, "We don't want jihadists here," or "We don't sharia here." I think, though, that what we're really saying is, "We don't want islam here." And since jihad and sharia (among a host of other things we consider abhorrent)are what islam brings, then we finally have to arrive at, "We don't want muslims here." That may make for an unpleasant truth, but its unpleasantness makes it no less true. So, if the author of that article had cited "islamic influences" rather than "jihadist motives," I think that would have mooted Isntlam's question, and been a more honest description of the problem, too.

Regards, BlueRaven, I always enjoy your posts here!

G

"Ali Syed, a 20-year-old Muslim who allegedly randomly killed three people in Southern California on Feb. 18 before killing himself."

A kid went into an elementary school a few weeks ago and killed a number of people. Was that Jihad?

Just killing people, even randomly, is no sign of jihad.

Muslim culture is big on cutting off heads, but they do that to their own familiy members when they're unhappy about something. Not a sign of jihad.

The guy in Vegas was a common criminal. No sign of jihad there.

Muslim doctor rapes woman. Kills her. Other non-muslim doctors commit crimes, too. Where is the sign of jihad????

Hey, buddy, can you post a link to those comments? The page I find shows no tweets.

Buraq says

1 A Muslim beheads two Coptic Christians. (Slay the infidel ..etc)

Yusuf Ibrahim” can be a Muslim or Christian name in the Arab world.

If you look at Yusuf Ibrahim’s photo, he has gang-style tattoos on his chest. He looks like he’s probably involved in some nasty stuff and gang stuff. It can’t be a coincidence that he came into contact with two fellow Egyptians and beheaded them. There’s something more to the story, and perhaps they were involved together in some sort of illegal activity like drugs or something. The victims’ hands were cut off, not just their heads, a hallmark of a gangland style killing.

I have never heard of a Muslim severing someone's hands as part of a religious execution. Severing one hand, perhaps, as punishment for thievery. Cutting off someone's head, yes, common practice for religious executions. But severing someone's head AND both of their hands? No. That is an underworld hit, and the head and hands are all buried separately so that the body, the largest part and therefore the part most likely to be found, is harder to identify.

This has all the signs of gangland killing, not to many signs of jihad and islam here

Buraq says

2 A Muslim randomly kills three people. (Slay the infidel ..etc)

There is no definitive proof that Ali Syed, the shooter was a practicing Muslim or a Muslim of any sort at all. That’s only speculation until it can be proven.

This has all the signs of the kid cracking up, not to many signs of jihad and islam here

Buraq says

3 A Muslim convert kills three people in Vegas. (Slay the infidel ..etc)

A self-described pimp Ammar Asim Faruq Harris with previous convictions in South Carolina felony possession with intent to sell a stolen pistol and convicted that same year in Atlanta of a misdemeanor marijuana possession charge.

Harris, whose Internet posts show him with fists full of money boasting of a high-rolling lifestyle with prostitutes, was driving his black Range Rover SUV when he fired into a Maserati sports car, killing self-promoted rapper Kenneth Wayne Cherry Jr. The two men had argued minutes earlier in the valet area of a Las Vegas Strip resort.

This has all the signs of a "Gansta Killing, not to many signs of jihad and islam here

Buraq says

4 A Muslim doc rapes and kills a woman. (Slay the infidel ..etc)

Just because this sick pervert happens to come from Pakistan and have a muslim name does not indicate he was a practising muslim.

This has all the signs of a pervert, not to many signs of jihad and islam here.

Buraq said

Are you beginning to get the picture .... you clown!

And where in the picture do you see the signs, There is no element of islam or jihad involved in the above four cases, only speculation.

You are seeing things, fool

Hi instlam and Gunung!

Boy, I must be right over the target to get so much flak!

Any murder of any non-Muslim by a Muslim is jihad, simple as that. Why? Because Al Qur'an commands Muslims to 'Slay the unbeliever....'

You said that Yusuf Ibrahim was involved in some gangsta type behaviour. That's Sunna! Mohammed was the leader of a gang that robbed caravans. Jesus wasn't!

Then you say that the Muslim doc from Pakistan who raped and murdered a woman might not have been a 'practising Muslim'. What better way to show you *are* a practising Muslim than by treating a woman as a commodity to do with what you will!

No! You'll have to come up with better than that to persuade me that violent, gangster behaviour and murder and rape of women does not lead straight back to Al Qur'an.

Clowns, both of you!!


Buraq retorts

No! You'll have to come up with better than that to persuade me that violent, gangster behaviour and murder and rape of women does not lead straight back to Al Qur'an.

And just where in the koran can we find that rape and murder of women is permitted.

Any murder of any non-Muslim by a Muslim is jihad, simple as that. Why? Because Al Qur'an commands Muslims to 'Slay the unbeliever….'

Firstly, you have no proof that this people where practising muslims.

If Yusuf Ibrahim was a muslim and not a copt, how do you know that he killed his victims in the cause of allah, and not a drug deal gone sour, if it is the crime was because of the latter, then it is a criminal offence, not jihad.

What proof do you have that Ali Ali Syed went on a killing spree in the cause of allah, Is there any record that he attended mosques, or even knew what is written in the koran.

Was he yelling allah akbar, or was his body completely shaven.

How do you know that Ammar Asim Faruq Harris shot Kenneth Wayne Cherry Jr in the cause of allah, when all reports he killed Cherry in a fit of rage

The same for the perverted Doctor, how do you know he killed the woman in the cause of allah, and not to satisfy his perverted desires,

Good thinking, Gunung. Unfortunately you can never enlighten the ignorant and small-minded people.

Good thinking, Gunung. Unfortunately you can never enlighten the ignorant and small-minded people.

Good thinking, Gunung. Unfortunately, the ignorant and small-minded person never learns.

Careful there, Gunung. You can score a few cheap debating points on this questionably-written article...but that doesn't address the larger issue of the barbarism that islam packs with it wherever it goes, whether you call it "jihadist" or whatever you prefer. The more you may harp on this the more you may further compromise what I think is your already shaky credibility here...

You're twisting my words. I didn't say that rape and murder is written in the Qur'an. I said rape and murder lead back to Al Qur'an.

Al Qur'an says that women are of little or no value. Their evidence is worth only half of a man's, she must obey her husband's orders or she will be beaten, she inherits far less than a male relative, and her husband can 'go upon her like his field (tilth)' whenever he wants.

That creates the image that women are not deserving of respect or basic human rights.

Also, Al Qur'an states that non-Muslims are 'the vilest of creatures' whereas Muslims are 'the best of people'. So, unsurprisingly, Muslims don't feel there is a problem murdering non-Muslims.

You repeat, 'How do you know that X is Muslim?' Well, I could ask you the same question in the negative. You, of course, don't know.

Clown!

Careful there, Gunung. You can score some cheap debating points harping on this questionably-written article...but that doesn't address the larger issue of the barbarism that muslims pack wherever they appear, whether you call it "jihad" or whatever you prefer. You may actually find that your opportunism on this one may only further compromise what I already think is your rather shaky credibilty here...

isntlam claims.

Muslim culture is big on cutting off heads, but they do that to their own familiy members when they're unhappy about something

Yes cutting of heads is quite popular in islam, but in is not reserved for family members.

=== When Isfahan surrendered to Timur in 1387, he treated it with relative mercy as he normally did with cities that surrendered. However, after the city revolted against Timur's taxes by killing the tax collectors and some of Timur's soldiers Timur ordered the massacre of the city's citizens with the death toll reckoned at between 100,000 and 200,000.[50] An eye-witness counted more than 28 towers constructed of about 1,500 heads each.[51] This has been described as a "systematic use of terror against towns...an integral element of Tamerlane's strategic element" which he viewed as preventing bloodshed by discouraging resistance. ===

===When Timur sacked Delhi in 1398, he slaughtered a hundred thousand people, and built a tower with their skulls. Later Mongol kings in India (Mughal kings) built skull towers too. In 1556, the Mughal emperor Akbar defeated Hemu at Panipat, slaughtered his army, and built a victory tower with the heads.===

http://4freedoms.ning.com/xn/detail/3766518:Comment:117812

Buraq says

"You repeat, 'How do you know that X is Muslim?' Well, I could ask you the same question in the negative. You, of course, don't know."

Quite right I do not know, so as not to make a fool of myself I am not making any claims either way.

This is not stupidity or ignorance. The left has so embedded themselves in this mindset that they cannot now bring themselves to admit their own ignorance and gullibility. It would and should end their careers if there is any justice left. This is called "self justification" at its worst. These people have totally convinced themselves of their own intellectual superiority and interpret all criticism as unworthy of consideration. The only solution to this is their removal from the scene. What are the chances? Critics of this bunch, who've gained control of the dissemination of what passes for "impartial journalism," have been effectively silenced by their purposefully denied access to the so called "main stream" and vitriolic attacks on their character and veracity. No matter the motives behind this blatant display of ignorance, they are using their artificially created and carefully nurtured stature and their unholy alliance with the present administration to put this country in its most precarious position since WWII. And America "sleeps."

This is not stupidity or ignorance. The left has so embedded themselves in this mindset that they cannot now bring themselves to admit their own ignorance and gullibility. It would and should end their careers if there is any justice left. This is called "self justification" at its worst. These people have totally convinced themselves of their own intellectual superiority and interpret all criticism as unworthy of consideration. The only solution to this is their removal from the scene. What are the chances? Critics of this bunch, who've gained control of the dissemination of what passes for "impartial journalism," have been effectively silenced by their purposefully denied access to the so called "main stream" and vitriolic attacks on their character and veracity. No matter the motives behind this blatant display of ignorance, they are using their artificially created and carefully nurtured stature and their unholy alliance with the present administration to put this country in its most precarious position since WWII. And America "sleeps."

This is not stupidity or ignorance. The left has so embedded themselves in this mindset that they cannot now bring themselves to admit their own ignorance and gullibility. It would and should end their careers if there is any justice left. This is called "self justification" at its worst. These people have totally convinced themselves of their own intellectual superiority and interpret all criticism as unworthy of consideration. The only solution to this is their removal from the scene. What are the chances? Critics of this bunch, who've gained control of the dissemination of what passes for "impartial journalism," have been effectively silenced by their purposefully denied access to the so called "main stream" and vitriolic attacks on their character and veracity. No matter the motives behind this blatant display of ignorance, they are using their artificially created and carefully nurtured stature and their unholy alliance with the present administration to put this country in its most precarious position since WWII. And America "sleeps."

You're just another mindless lost cause defending an evil cause: islam. Grow a brain, why dontcha.

Hey Dave,

That's OK, I enjoyed all three of 'em!

Hope all is well with you, DD...

G

I'm telling you, Dave, it's confusing over here. The Democrats in our state legislature are passing all these laws, seemingly intent on disarming our legal firearm owners. But these same Democrats are all Obama supporters--so they seem to approve of arming the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt with Abrams tanks and F-16 Fighters. Disarming Americans? Arming the Muslim Brotherhood? I'm telling you, Dave, it's confusing over here!

Take care, pal!

Not surprisingly, the apologists for Islam are out in force on this thread.

I'm not familiar with "isntlam"—this is the first time I've seen his comments.

His TypePad profile read, in part:

"...isntlam eschews all western religion and philosophies and regards them with suspicion. he prefers loving lifestyles like islam to the polytheistic, warlike ways of christianity."

Now, his entire "profile" is clearly tongue-in-cheek—and yet, one wonders if he isn't coming fairly close to his real views here nonetheless...

That's clear thinking, Gunung. But ignorant people will never learn.

>>Not surprisingly, the apologists for Islam are out in force on this thread.

I'm an apologist for islam because I point out the article's problem?

Show me where the tell-tale signs of jihad are given in the article or any news-service article about the crimes.

Do you even have an idea what such a sign might be? Clue: ordinary crimes committed by every sector and level of society - homicide, rape, even mass shootings nowadays - are not done in the name of jihad.

They COULD be. Like Nidal Hassan shouting "allahu akbar" during his shooting. But Ali Syed who killed some people at random didn't do that. Now, if it comes out that his internet use shows he was a fan of jihad websites, that would be a sign.

Otherwise you've got nothing. I would say "learn to use your brains", but you never will.

Your posts are a form of jihad. They are an attack on a site that stands for the defense of freedom of expression, human rights, including, of course, women's rights, and freedom of conscience.

You are a jihadist, and a clown!

LOL!! What circus did you escape from?

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter