Muslim cleric at Al-Azhar warns: "The new pope must not attack Islam"

In other words, the new pope must not speak the truth about jihad and Islamic supremacism -- or else. The papacy of Benedict XVI offered numerous illustrations of this. "Muslims Seek Dialogue With Next Pope," by Harvey Morris for the New York Times, March 1:

LONDON — As the Catholic Church’s cardinal electors gather at the Vatican to choose a new pope, Muslim leaders are urging a revival of the often troubled dialogue between the two faiths.

During the papacy of Benedict XVI, relations between the world’s two largest religions were overshadowed by remarks he made in 2006 that were widely condemned as an attack on Islam.

Not by rampant, worldwide Muslim persecution of Christians. No, that didn't hurt relations at all. Only Benedict's remarks were at fault.

In a speech at Regensburg University in his native Germany, Benedict quoted a 14th-century Byzantine emperor as saying, “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

In the face of protests from the Muslim world, the Vatican said the pope’s remarks had been misinterpreted and that he “deeply regretted” that the speech “sounded offensive to the sensibility of Muslim believers.”

For many in the Muslim world, however, the damage was done and the perception persisted that Benedict was hostile to Islam.

Juan Cole, a U.S. commentator on the Middle East, has suggested that although the pope backed down on some of his positions, “Pope Benedict roiled those relationships with needlessly provocative and sometimes offensive statements about Islam and Muslims.”

Juan Cole, who like Reza Aslan is on the Board of the Iranian mullah-linked National Iranian American Council, doesn't say anything about how Muslims may have "roiled those relationships" with "needlessly provocative" and violent attacks on Christians in Pakistan, Egypt, Iraq, Nigeria, and elsewhere. No, for him, as for all Leftist dhimmi analysts, the burden is always on the non-Muslim party to change what it says and does in order to accommodate Islam and Muslims. Muslims have no responsibility whatsoever to change their behavior to improve relationships with Christians.

In this, Cole and others like him betray an unconscious ethnocentrism that contradicts all their multicultural protestations: they view only non-Muslim Westerners as capable of reasoned action and therefore as bearing responsibility for their actions. Muslims, in their view, are helpless, passive reactors to what non-Muslims do, and are unable to control their actions and thus have no responsibility for them or need to change their behavior.

Despite the Vatican’s efforts to renew the interfaith dialogue by hosting a meeting with Muslim scholars, hostilities resumed in 2011 when the pope condemned alleged discrimination against Egypt’s Coptic Christians in the wake of a church bombing in Alexandria.

Al Azhar University in Cairo, the center of Islamic learning, froze relations with the Vatican in protest.

Muslim persecution of the Egyptian Christians is widespread and increasing, but Al Azhar was infuriated not with that persecution, but with the Pope's daring to notice it. He should have heeded the advice Muhammad Atta gave to the passengers on the plane he hijacked on September 11, 2001: "Stay quiet and you'll be OK." Except they weren't.

Following the pope’s decision to step down, Mahmud Azab, an adviser on interfaith dialogue to the head of Al Azhar, said, “The resumption of ties with the Vatican hinges on the new atmosphere created by the new pope. The initiative is now in the Vatican’s hands.”

Mahmoud Ashour, a senior Al Azhar cleric, insisted that “the new pope must not attack Islam,” according to remarks quoted by Agence France-Presse, the French news agency, and said the two religions should “complete one another, rather than compete.”...

Reem Nasr, writing at the policy debate Web site, Policymic, this week offered Benedict’s successor a five-point program to bridge the Catholic and Muslim worlds.

These included mutual respect, more papal contacts with Muslim leaders and a greater focus on what the religions had in common.

“There has been a long history of mistrust that can be overcome,” she wrote. “No one should give up just yet.”

Indeed not.

| 35 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

35 Comments

| Leave a comment

"Mahmoud Ashour, a senior Al Azhar cleric, insisted that “the new pope must not attack Islam,” according to remarks quoted by Agence France-Presse, the French news agency, and said the two religions should “complete one another, rather than compete.”..."

Of course that's what he believes---and by "complete" he means that Christians fit into Islam under dhimmi status, and when they follow those dhimmi rules laid out by sharia law, then the two religions "complete" each other.

Mr. Spencer, when the new pope is announced, please send him copies of all of your books.

When things look down, remember you are changing the world and especially changing Muslims for the Better. Look at Secular Muslims in Egypt they are fighting against Sharia Law.

Incidentally, on a related subject there's a great take on how the crime of treason is relevant again in the wake of the Birmingham terror plot in: "Humpty and his Numpties" at:

http://john-moloney.blogspot.com/

The mullahs claim to possess more infallibility than the papacy!

Even popes don't believe it's right to 'murder, crucify, amputate, imprison or exile' their critics.

While criticizing the pope might...at worst...be considered rude or unjustified...criticizing Mohammed is 'a crime against humanity'.

The call for the new pope to avoid criticizing Islam is threat.

As for things in common, the Koran is a cocktail of contradictions of an evolving, opportunism. Mohammed began by being conciliatory to Christians, until they denounced him as a fraud. Then the Koran turns on Christians and calls for their deaths. The war Mohammed declared on Christians cannot be abrogated by any 'dialogue'.

I miss the old pope's in a way, if you fucked with the church they'd launch a Crusade against you-we could use one of those now more than ever against the Shitlamic world.

All we have now are cowards and bovines pretending to be our leaders while they cower in silence or throw away our rights, freedom and culture because the savages demand it.

There's nothing more liberating to know that you have an enemy that can be defeated-but also nothing more frustrating to know that no action is being taken against them as they continue to gain strength and power.

All this reminds me of:

"800 Italian Men Beheaded in Otranto in 1480 for Refusing Islam,by the Turks, with the Approval of Sultan Mehmet II"

http://www.antisharia.com/2011/07/26/800-italian-men-beheaded-in-otranto-in-1480-for-refusing-islamby-the-turks-with-the-approval-of-sultan-mehmet-ii/

AND ALSO

"Sober and True Video Documentary about Muslim Enslavement of Africans"

http://www.antisharia.com/2013/03/02/sober-and-true-video-documentary-about-muslim-enslavement-of-africans/

Muslim cleric at Al-Azhar warns: "The new pope must not attack Islam"
In other words, the new pope must not speak the truth about jihad and Islamic supremacism -- or else.
.................................

That's *exactly* what it means. More and more, pious Muslims are warning Infidels not to dare speak the truth about Islam. And why not? Under Shari'ah, no Infidel is allowed to say *anything* critical of Islam or Muslims. And all pious Muslims believe that Infidels everywhere in the world should be under these strictures.

More:

The papacy of Benedict XVI offered numerous illustrations of this. "Muslims Seek Dialogue With Next Pope" by Harvey Morris for the New York Times...
.................................

"Dialog"—what crap. They want him to mouth platitudes about Islam—not speak honestly as Benedict at least did once or twice.

More:

LONDON — As the Catholic Church’s cardinal electors gather at the Vatican to choose a new pope, Muslim leaders are urging a revival of the often troubled dialogue between the two faiths.
.................................

"Troubled dialog"—the dialog is only considered troubled if Catholics have the temerity to notice how violent Islam is, and how violent it has *always* been.

More:

During the papacy of Benedict XVI, relations between the world’s two largest religions were overshadowed by remarks he made in 2006 that were widely condemned as an attack on Islam.
.................................

Were his words inaccurate? Of course not. But good little dhimmis are not supposed to notice this. After all, look what happened to the original speaker at the hands of Islam—Constantinople herself would fall to the bloody Mohammedan hordes just a few decades after he spoke those words.

More:

Not by rampant, worldwide Muslim persecution of Christians. No, that didn't hurt relations at all. Only Benedict's remarks were at fault.
.................................

Exactly. Christians—including Catholics—are being persecuted, oppressed, and slaughtered outright by Muslims. This, of course, is not an issue...

More:

IIn the face of protests from the Muslim world, the Vatican said the pope’s remarks had been misinterpreted and that he “deeply regretted” that the speech “sounded offensive to the sensibility of Muslim believers.”

For many in the Muslim world, however, the damage was done and the perception persisted that Benedict was hostile to Islam.
.................................

Even this craven dhimmitude wasn't enough for Muslims.

More:

Juan Cole, a U.S. commentator on the Middle East, has suggested that although the pope backed down on some of his positions, “Pope Benedict roiled those relationships with needlessly provocative and sometimes offensive statements about Islam and Muslims.”
.................................

So much better to let Muslims slaughter Christians and other Infidels without a peep from us...sarc/off

More:

Despite the Vatican’s efforts to renew the interfaith dialogue by hosting a meeting with Muslim scholars, hostilities resumed in 2011 when the pope condemned alleged discrimination against Egypt’s Coptic Christians in the wake of a church bombing in Alexandria.
Al Azhar University in Cairo, the center of Islamic learning, froze relations with the Vatican in protest.
.................................

"Alleged discrimination"? Copts have been discriminated against—and worse—in Egypt for *centuries*. And, bad as it was under Mubarak, it is much, much worse now, in the wake of the increased Islamization of the "Arab Spring".

More:

Following the pope’s decision to step down, Mahmud Azab, an adviser on interfaith dialogue to the head of Al Azhar, said, “The resumption of ties with the Vatican hinges on the new atmosphere created by the new pope. The initiative is now in the Vatican’s hands.”

Mahmoud Ashour, a senior Al Azhar cleric, insisted that “the new pope must not attack Islam,” according to remarks quoted by Agence France-Presse, the French news agency, and said the two religions should “complete one another, rather than compete.”...
.................................

Christians "complete" Islam when Muslims live off their Jizya and tribute and use them as whipping boys for Muslim rage. And, as the Pact of Omar makes clear, Christians and other Infidels are *never* allowed to compete with Muslims, but always to serve as despised second-class citizens, surviving at all only on the whim of Muslims.

Speaking of both the New York Times adn the "Arab Spring", there is an *insane* op-ed piece in last Thursday's issue, "A Vatican Spring?", where author Hans Küng compares the bloody "Arab Spring" *favorably* with the state of the papacy:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/28/opinion/a-vatican-spring.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

It has such jaw-dropping passages as this one:

"THE Arab Spring has shaken a whole series of autocratic regimes. With the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, might not something like that be possible in the Roman Catholic Church as well — a Vatican Spring?

Of course, the system of the Catholic Church doesn’t resemble Tunisia or Egypt so much as an absolute monarchy like Saudi Arabia. In both places there are no genuine reforms, just minor concessions. In both, tradition is invoked to oppose reform. In Saudi Arabia tradition goes back only two centuries; in the case of the papacy, 20 centuries...
.................................

In other words, Vatican City is worse than "chop-chop square", where Saudi Arabia beheads its victims every Friday. The piece goes on in this vein.

Madness.

These included.....a greater focus on what the religions had in common.

Like what?!! Christianity teaches peace and forgiveness whereas Islam teaches world domination by the sword!

They have nothing in common; even if you do think of Islam as a 'religion'and not a military doctrine dressed up as one.

Clowns!

Virtually the last official action of the Pope was the order, by the consistory that sat immediately after his resignation announcement, to go ahead with the canonisation of the martyrs of Otranto later this year. For some reason the BBC has not even bothered to report that 813 new saints are to be created who were all the victims of Muslim persecution of Christians.

They want "mutual respect"!Yeah - when start behaving like human beings we will consider giving them respect. Until then - NO!!

Secular Muslim, is an oxymoron...

''Reem Nasr, writing at the policy debate Web site, Policymic, this week offered Benedict’s successor a five-point program to bridge the Catholic and Muslim worlds''

If you click on the link to this web site, you will see that this Reem Nasr (muslim, I'm sure) believes that it will be the responsibility of the new **Pope** to travel all over the world, 'dialoguing' (stupid word) with all the various sects of mohammedans and their various shrieks and imams etc.

*They* (mohammedans) of course, have no obligation to get off their backsides and speak to the Pope; no, it's his job to speak to them.

The sheer arrogance and unearned sense of entitlement of these specks of faecal matter infuriates me, but what infuriates me more is the unquestioning dhimmitude and cowardice of Western 'leaders', who no doubt will put pressure on the new Pope to do *exactly that*.

When, in the name of **God**, are we ever going to get any leaders who will have the moral courage to stand up to the vilest cult known to man, and **take them on** !!

"These included mutual respect, more papal contacts with Muslim leaders and a greater focus on what the religions had in common."

Christianity and islam have NOTHING in common. In fact, they couldn't be more opposite, so what is this liar talking about?

2 Corinthians 6:14 ...

"Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?"

Christ is a Christians righteous risen LORD and Savior who is the light of the world, and muhammad was wicked who represents evil and darkness--so these two men share nothing in common.

And Benedict had every right to quote that emperor who said, "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." ...hear, hear!

This imam is just another lost cause defending an evil cause: islam.

If the new pope will not stand up for our martyred brothers and sisters in Christ, who are being oppressed and slaughtered by genocidal muslims, I do not know that I can remain a Catholic, and if I leave over the Church's failure to defend the faithful, I do not think I'll be able to go quietly.

Damn fine suggestion, IND.

It should come as no surprise to civilized rational people that this Muslim barrow is exactly wrong. The Pope must speak out against the barbarians, these worshipers of Satan, aka Allah.

Oh dear, I hope I didn't offend too many followers of the lying looting raping murdering psychopath pedophile, Mohamed!

I'm praying.

I'm praying for a Pope who will stand up to the Mohammedthugs.

I'm praying for a Pope who will invite to the Vatican, for private audiences, the following people, *at least*: born-Catholic now-agnostic Geert Wilders; reared-Muslim now-Catholic-Christian Magdi Cristiano Allam; Lebanese Maronite Catholic Brigitte Gabriel; Nonie Darwish; ex-Muslim now-atheist Ayaan Hirsi Ali; Bat Yeor; and a certain Greek Melkite Catholic, one Robert Spencer. A Pope who will, before inviting Bat Yeor to a tete a tete in the Vatican, will have *read her books* - including 'Eurabia' and 'The Dhimmi' - and who will also have read Mark Durie's three books which build upon and extend Bat Yeor's pioneering labour.

I'm praying for a Pope who will publicly speak up on behalf of the many non-Muslims - Christian and also not Christian - who are being viciously attacked, oppressed, and often murdered by Muslims in Muslim-dominated countries (and in other places dominated by Muslims) all over the world.

Oh for a Pope who will publicly identify the Arab/ Muslim war against the Jewish state of Israel, as a genocidal Jihad against the Jews; and who will condemn that Jihad, and refuse to push the barrow of the Poooor "Palestinians" (TM) and who will, instead, insist firmly that 'Palestinian' Christians must repent of their antisemitism. A Pope who will be prepared to publicly recognize *all* of Jerusalem as rightfully belonging to Israel.

I'm praying for miracles...

Wally, you wrote, above:

"Virtually the last official action of the Pope was the order, by the consistory that sat immediately after his resignation announcement, to go ahead with the canonisation of the martyrs of Otranto later this year.

"For some reason the BBC has not even bothered to report that 813 new saints are to be created who were all the victims of Muslim persecution of Christians..".

Canonising the Martyrs of Otranto, 1480 (only 12 years before Columbus' famous voyage): Benedict XVI's parting shot at the Ummah as he walks off the stage.

Re. those Martyrs:

http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/161401?eng=y

Summer Reading: How the Eight Hundred Men of Otranto Saved Rome

Sandro Magister


"They were martyred five centuries ago in the easternmost region of Italy, the spot most exposed to attack from the Muslims.

'The objective of the caliph Mohammed II was to conquer Rome, after having already taken Constantinople (only 27 years previously - dda).

'But he was stopped by Christians who were ready to defend the faith with their blood.

'But who were the eight hundred men of Otranto? And why were they killed? Their story is of extraordinary relevance – just like the conflict between Islam and Christianity, in the midst of which they sacrificed their lives.

'This is presented in the account that follows – it appeared last July 14 in “il Foglio” – written by Alfredo Mantovano, a Catholic jurist, senator, and a son of the same land that produced those martyrs, born in southern Puglia, the region of Otranto.

'Ready to die a thousand times for Him...”

by Alfredo Mantovano...

Excerpt, describing the fall of the city, besieged by Ottoman Muslim troops:

"After fourteen days, at dawn on August 12, the Ottomans focused their fire on one of the weakest points along the walls: they opened a breach and poured into the streets, massacring anyone in their path, and came to the cathedral, where many had taken refuge.

"They broke down the doors and flooded into the temple, where they found the archbishop, Stefano, who was there in his pontifical vestments and with the crucifix in his hand.

"To the order that he no longer speak the name of Christ, because from that moment Mohammed was in command, the archbishop responded by exhorting the assailants to conversion, and at this his head was cut off with a scimitar..."

{And that, in the end, is the Mohammedan idea of interfaith 'dialogue': the Muslim says to the non-Muslim - 'shut up!' - and if the unarmed non-Muslim refuses, and insists that, 'No, it is you who are in error', the Muslim chops his head off. - dda}.

And then the Muslims went on to kill every adult male in the city; every man over the age of 15. Not one renounced their faith even though they were told that they could save their lives by becoming Muslims.

The article points out that:

"...The sacrifice of the eight hundred men of Otranto was not important solely on the level of faith.

"The city’s two-week resistance [prior to its being taken by the Muslims - dda] permitted the army of the king of Naples to organize and to approach that area, blocking the eighteen thousand Ottomans from invading the entire region of Puglia...".

If the link still works, I encourage people to click on it and - as the man so often says - 'read it all'.


I just checked the link I gave above.

Six years old, it still works, or at least it does today (March 3 2013, where I am).

Click on it and read it. It's a great piece.

Italian and other European jihadwatchers, posters and lurkers here, whether Catholic or not, should if at all possible arrange to be present (in Rome? or in Otranto? not sure where it would be happening) as and when the canonisation ceremony takes place.

Today's counter-jihadists should be out in force to honor people - perfectly ordinary citizens of a 15th century Italian town - who preferred to die rather than convert to Islam (and who before being overwhelmed and captured had put up a HUGE fight against the invading, besieging Mohammedans who attacked their town).

If 'Secular Muslim, is an oxymoron...', and it is, would that mean the "Muslim" portion is a reference to a generic moron.....

The Martyrs of Otranto, 1480, puts me in mind of other threads in the wonderful tapestry of Islam's perennial jihad against Rome -- the literal Rome, and the larger figurative Rome of the translatio imperii: i.e., the modern West with America at its vanguard.

Nearly 1,000 years earlier, in the year 848, Pope Leo IV undertook an expensive and laborious walling of the city of Rome to protect it from Guess Whom. The "Saracens" -- aka Muslims, who had been attacking Rome, and various spots along the entire south Mediterranean coast, for over 100 years, and would continue into the 17th century, until finally the West was powerful enough to put a stop to them (save for the piracy), and also Islamic weakness was catching up with it after centuries of the blood of dhimmis having run dry for Muslims to suck parasitically from their talents and labors. For that Pope's great project, Rome was nicknamed the Civitas Leonina.

For a good millennium, the Western problem with the scourge of Mohammedans was of an external peril assailing our outer periphery, and occasionally breaching it here or there (sometimes spectacularly, as with Gibraltar in the 7th century, or Constantinople in the 15th, or the terrible reversal of Lepanto only a few years later at La Goutte in the 16th).

Now we have entered a new phase of the perennial jihad, where in unprecedented numbers, and with an unprecedented gullbility besotting their perennial enemy, Muslims are within the gates, and increasingly aggrandazing and machinating among us, laying their eggs of jihad like so many minions of army ants or termites.


I'm sorry to say mate I don't think our prayers will be answered this time around the Church has shown itself time and time again to be nothing more than an institution of spineless cowards and outright idiots there will be no miracle pope just the same spineless coward only this time with a different name and age that's all I personally have lost all faith in the Church.

WallyUK wrote:

Virtually the last official action of the Pope was the order, by the consistory that sat immediately after his resignation announcement, to go ahead with the canonisation of the martyrs of Otranto later this year. For some reason the BBC has not even bothered to report that 813 new saints are to be created who were all the victims of Muslim persecution of Christians.
....................................

Thank you for this information, Wally—I hadn't heard about this. Kudos to Pope Benedict!

Thanks to Dumbledore's Army and LemonLime for further information.

DDA, I hadn't read the description of the breaching of O)tranto's walls and the massacre at her cathedral for some time—note that it is almost identical to accounts of the fall of Constantinople from six centuries later.

And the terrible massacre of the men of Otranto sounds very similar to the beheading of 900 Jewish men of the Banu Qurayza carried out by the appalling "Prophet" Muhammed himself in the 7th century.

Islam doesn't change—it has been a vile, bloodstained creed for almost 1400 years now.

Here is a painting of the massacre, which I believe is by Italian Baroque master Silvestro Chiesa:

http://data.kataweb.it/kpmimages/kpm3/misc/chiesa/2007/07/31/70981.jpeg

You wrote DDA:

"I'm sorry to say mate I don't think our prayers will be answered this time around the Church has shown itself time and time again to be nothing more than an institution of spineless cowards and outright idiots there will be no miracle pope just the same spineless coward only this time with a different name and age that's all I personally have lost all faith in the Church."

Hey are you here to expose evil islam or to hate on Christianity and Christians for expressing their intention to pray? I've noticed a trend towards the latter over the past week or so.

Great comment and call to prayer, DDA, so thank you for sharing, dear sister; and I'm praying for these things, as well.

Praying to Jesus Christ is never a waste of time for the believer, since Jesus is our risen LORD and Savior--our atoning sacrifice, and our prayer advocate to the Father who hears and answers our prayers:

1 John 2:1-2 ...

"My dear children, I write this to you so that you will not sin. But if anybody does sin, we have an advocate with the Father—Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world."

Although I am not Catholic, I come alongside you in prayer for the things that you ask of God through Jesus Christ--our prayer advocate, since you and I are both believers and sister's in Christ. Also, praying for miracles is a good thing and shows that you are abiding in Christ; since Jesus, God in the flesh, performed many miracles during His time here on earth (and malevolent muhammad never performed any miracles, but practiced murder instead).

Take care, my friend :)


My own affiliation is Anglican (though I was baptised in a Presbyterian church and brought up as a child within that strand of the Christian faith).

After seeing report after report of Muslim mobs attacking Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant churches quite indiscriminately - if it's got a cross on it, it's Christian - and in places like Nigeria the Catholics, the Anglicans and the Churches of Christ/ Assemblies of God/ other 'independent Protestant' have sometimes had their churches in the same town attacked all in a row, one after another, by the Mohammedan Mob on the same day or night, I have an entirely ecumenical concern for my brethren who are under attack from Muslims.

And in the case of the Catholics, since they make up a large chunk of the world's Christians, it would make a great difference to them and to everybody else as well if they got a leader willing to stand up to the Mohammedthugs and tell them what's what.

As it would if we Anglicans got somebody with backbone, as well...pray for that, too, please, a successor to Rowan Williams the (sadly dhimmified) current Archbishop has recently been identified.

In both cases it is among the laity (.e.g. Mr Robert Spencer, for the Catholics) and among the lesser clergy (e.g. Rev Dr Mark Durie, for the Anglicans) that, so far, the most clearly Islamosavvy and bravest voices are to be found. The problem is how to get that knowledge and awareness spread not only horizontally but vertically...up to the top of various churches' governing bodies.

Hopefully whoever is selected, will be sufficiently offended by this lout, to begin to set in place a proper response to jihad: A crusade, but this one to be successful, and the last needed.

Dumbledore's Army wrote:

After seeing report after report of Muslim mobs attacking Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant churches quite indiscriminately - if it's got a cross on it, it's Christian...
.....................................

Quite right, DDA—vicious Muslims could not care less whether someone is Orthodox, Methodist, Catholic, Presbyterian, Baptist, Anglican, or Evangelical—or, for that matter, Mormon, Jehovah's Witness, Seventh Day Adventist, or Unitarian—they consider them a "cross worshipper", and fair game for the oppression and slaughter.

And I completely agree that the more Christian leaders get a clue about Islam, the better—while hardly perfect, Benedict clearly had some idea of the threat of Islam, despite his later backpedalling.

I would *love* to see a new Pope who is willing to stand up for threatened Christians in the Muslim world—and the more he understands that such threat is all on the tenets of Islam itself, the better.

Does this mean that the incoming Pontiff should not canonize or beatify those Catholics like Father Mychal Judge, the Italian nun murdered in Somalia after Benedict's Regensburg speech or the Pakistani Catholic Minister - all murdered by Islamists- lest it "offend" Muslims?

Terry

Now that would be a great idea: One of the first things the new Pope should do is put up the name of Sister Leonella Sgorbati for beatification, then canonization.

Saint Leonella could become the patron saint for all Christians persecuted by Muslims.

"Saint Leonella could become the patron saint for all Christians persecuted by Muslims."

Unfortunately, such a patron saint will be needed for the decades ahead, because Western governments and media, neglecting their primary job of defending their societies and their citizens and compatriots abroad from a murderous supremacist organization called Islam, will continue to allow Christians to be slaughtered by Muslims -- likely into the tens, if not hundreds, of thousands in the decades ahead.

And the majority of Western Christians -- besotted with starry-eyed PC MC -- are also to blame for this scandalous, appalling, inexcusable moral negligence.

Australia's reliably Islamophile and rapidly-dhimmifying ABC *published a truly creepy hit-piece on Benedict, written by the sinister Tariq Ramadan, Frere Tariq himself. the Ikhwan's front man and chief infiltrator in Western Europe.


http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2013/03/05/3703533.htm

Pope was tone-deaf when it came to interfaith dialogue
Tariq Ramadan


Australia's reliably Islamophile and rapidly-dhimmifying ABC *published a truly creepy hit-piece on Benedict, written by the sinister Tariq Ramadan, Frere Tariq himself. the Ikhwan's front man and chief infiltrator in Western Europe.


http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2013/03/05/3703533.htm

Pope was tone-deaf when it came to interfaith dialogue
Tariq Ramadan


Incidentally:


Australia's reliably Islamophile and rapidly-dhimmifying ABC *published a truly creepy hit-piece on Benedict, written by the sinister Tariq Ramadan, Frere Tariq himself. the Ikhwan's front man and chief infiltrator in Western Europe.


http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2013/03/05/3703533.htm

Pope was tone-deaf when it came to interfaith dialogue
Tariq Ramadan


Note: this is my second attempt to post this.

This evening, every single time I try to post, I get a Gateway Timeout message.

Methinks the site is under attack again.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter