Pakistan: Parliament condemns India's hanging of jihad mass murder plotter

They are all Fzal, eh?

Some might say that is exactly the problem.

If they are all Afzal, shouldn't they be hanged alongside him?

"We are all Afzal".
Well then you all deserve to be hanged!

From the article - 'India reacted strongly to the resolution with Minister for External Affairs Salman Khurshid saying, "This shows Pakistan's unhealthy interest in matters of our country."

"Pakistan should restrict themselves to their issues," Mr Khurshid added.'

Excellent.

Oddly enough, this Salman Khurshid appears to be Muslim at least in name, but I can't fault the statement in and of itself;it is exactly what India *should* say.

There should be neither apologies nor explanations.

Afzal did bad, very bad.

Afzal, he belong dead.

End of.

One hopes that India has burned his body to ashes and scattered them to the four winds.

Muslims have no right whatsoever to complain of anything that Infidels may choose to do with the bodies of terrorist Muslim jihad raiders and plotters whom Infidels have killed in self-defence (after being attacked by same) or else arrested, tried and lawfully executed.

Muslims are notorious for grossly desecrating Infidel graves and the bodies of dead Infidels (as well as the tombs and bodies of other Muslims, if those Muslims are deemed insufficiently Islamic or the wrong sect), always and everywhere, since Islam first got going.

For example, even today the local Muslims regularly vandalise the ancient and contemporary Jewish tombs in the Mount of Olives cemetery, in Israel, and violently attack those who come to mourn or to attend funerals:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/163972#.UUBfI668seU

Who Controls Vandalized Mount of Olives?
Jerusalem Arabs destroyed a dozen graves at the Mount of Olives cemetery, supposedly under Israeli sovereignty.

[click on the link; there are photographs].

http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=306081

Hoenlein appeals to PM: Save Mount of Olives

“continuous violence against visitors, rampant grave desecrations, dumping of refuse and gross defilement of the cemetery by local Arab youths.”“

By all accounts,” he wrote, “tourists, mourners and others are frequent victims of rocks being hurled as they approach, or leave, Har Hazeitim.”

The Hindu practice of cremation of the dead at least ensures that there is nothing for Muslims to mutilate and defile, no grave for them to smash and rob or defecate and urinate upon; but I am sure that, from the long and terrible annals of Muslim invasion and occupation in India, and from the violence at Partition, our Indian friends could provide us with myriad examples of gross Muslim desecration of the bodies of Hindus that Muslims had captured and killed.

As an example of the atrocious Mohammedan mindset, here is John Roy Carlson, writing about something that happened during the 1948 jihad against the newborn Jewish state of Israel:

It is a passage from chapter 9 'the holy city', of Carlson's "From Cairo to Damascus", describing what happened immediately after the 'Battle of the Roads' between a Haganah force and an Arab Muslim force, as the Haganah force were returning from supplying Gush Etzion. In that battle twelve Jews and 138 Muslims were killed.

Here is Carlson's account of the aftermath.

"The next day on sale everywhere in the Holy City were gruesome photographs of the battle: the burnt and mutilated bodies of Haganah men, *which for some perverse Arab reason, had been stripped of clothing and photographed in the nude* {my emphasis added - dda}.

"These naked shots hit 'Holy' City markets afresh *after every battle* {my emphasis added - dda}, and sold rapidly.

"Arabs carried them in their wallets and displayed them frequently, getting the same weird subnormal 'kick' that our perverts derive from nude photographs of women." END QUOTE.

The 1948 equivalent of the beheading videos of today.

Throw his carcass into the ocean and let the sharks have it.

So much for the myth that there is no global Islam, and that all Muslims are just detached local communities.

Sure there's a global Islam, and their philosophy is that if you fight with one of them, you're fighting with all of them. No different than communism.

Shariah law claims worldwide jurisdiction, so when the (Muslim Brotherhood's) global jihad's leaders think it is strong enough, they will do more than issue fatwas for whoever of the umma will do their bidding. Pakistan is flexing its global jihad muscle more and more vocally because they hold the nukes. If India did not also have nukes, there would probably be no India.

I hear some people say that Pakistan has suitcase atomic bombs hidden in some US and European cities. Could there be any truth in this? Can anyone know for sure!
Concerned.