Robert Spencer to appear at CPAC after all -- as part of "Uninvited" panel

Bravo! Let the debate begin.

The plot thickens.

Honoring the wonderful memory of the late Mr. Breitbart. Like him, I believe strongly that the answer to speech with which you disagree is more speech - speech of cogent, articulate reasoning. Bravo Mr. Spencer! With Ms. Nina Shea there you are in good company to speak about the ongoing oppression and martyrdom of our Christian brothers and sisters.
God Bless.

"The Willful Blindness of America's Elites"

"Freedom or Submission – The War On Free Speech"

"The Global Persecution of Christians" (by Islam...we must emphasize)

...a hot time in the old town...tonight!

excellent!!
M

Ha! Take that, dhimwit Repubs. Try to keep Spencer out of the picture? Some of us will stay away when you want our votes.

WOOT!

Bravo, Robert! It's excellent company, you will be in, thankfully, and all the topics should be central to a conservative party, along with economics, always, every speaker's topics. They must be considered, as each topic will continue to become more ugly, with time, if not dealt with strongly and bravely, now, before each becomes that much larger a problem. Just like the prelude to WW2, the longer we wait to handle intelligently and firmly the dangers in the speeches, so too will be our greater price paid, by the West and the Free, and even the guilty. Always the opponent becomes emboldened and stronger, the longer action is delayed. These principles must be reminded, before we relive WW2.

It is the wussy, loose, and misdirected attitudes of the current CPAC and GOP, that had for the first time, in recent years forced me to become an independent, though pragmatically I voted pure GOP, this time. To me, though, they are fiddling, while the Rome, she is a burnin', and I'm not pleased with their cowardice, in the face of fire.

It's fortunate that one among them has already broken the ice on the "controversial topic" of the day, and millenium. See a short piece and video of the tenor of his commentary, in the mainline speech. Maybe they ought to hear more from him in your sessions, as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xuvgz6zMMwU
http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/342982

Tom Cotton pulled his punch only slightly using "radical", far as I'm concerned, but at least he punched, stating we are at war with "radical" islamic jihad. As so many know, it is islamic jihad, supported by various mild, moderate, and fundamental islamic operators, playing many and diverse roles, of nefarious evil jihad, ordered originally, eternally by a crazy wandering madman of the pagan desert.

As a GOP vet, former Army officer, Cotton stated facts straight up, straight out, and did not waiver, against the likes of grover and suhail.

Like Alan West, and Tom Cotton, these are the brave souls the conservatives, and American Freedom need.

Oh, this is good! A really positive development and a most canny move by the Breitbart Media people. Those rooms will be filled--everyone wants to hear the "forbidden" people--finally a place where they can get the truth--not just more of the same shopworn, PC RINO bromides. I think Grover and Suhail ought to show up, too. Their presentation could be titled, "How Enemy Sympathizers Usurp Control Over Conservative PAC's." I'd like to hear the Q and A session after that one...

5. Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch – Why I Am Not a Conservative....

I wrote Gary Bauer -- American Values. I sent him a link to Spencer's piece and I asked Gary, "Are you still a conservative? I think he was offended by my question.

We "the controversials" who speak the truth should start our own new Center Party totally independent from both Republican and Democratic parties. No Norquists. No Insane McCain. No neoliberals. No neocons.

Ruslan Tokhchukov, EnragedSince1999.

They need a special session for controversial speakers? Then they are the Cowardly Political Action Committee.
I'm just glad they weren't around in 1776 or we'd have been dragged into the Boer War.

Yay! ...sock it to 'em, Robert!

Good news. I am still cautious of politicians liberals or conservatives. We can not be politically correct anymore. We have few like Robert and Pam who tell the truth without mincing words. Yet we still need many, many more heros like them. Still good news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Y1W4DNTGP8

It is such a shame that you did not get a prime spot at this conference because no message or topic is more crucial than yours. If today's 'conservatives' cannot bear to hear controversial opinions and unpleasant truths, what good are they?

I don't know how Norquist and his sidekick Khan managed to appropriate CPAC but if they are running the show, the Republican Party is indeed doomed. McCain and Graham continue to collude with the communist democrats and CPAC is owned by islamic supremacists/infiltrators. Apparently Norquist's tax activism is merely a cover to advance the islamic agenda.

I'm so ashamed of the so-called Conservatives who sponsored this conference and made the rules. They deprived many attendees the opportunity to learn about the biggest threat this country faces next to Obama's intentional destruction---islamic jihad. But at least you'll have your say and it will be profound and memorable, as always.

PRAISE THE LORD! SPENCER is marching in!

maybe the dust up is good for free advertizing. i hope someone brings up the BLOG prize!

and LemonLime, "thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy GOD in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain." ~ big TOP TEN from the Bible.

"Robert Spencer - Why I Am Not a Conservative"

Awesome topic for a CPAC meeting! LOL!

Food 4 Thought ...

"Unforgiveness is choosing to stay trapped in a jail cell of bitterness, serving time for someone else's crime..."

Saturday is the last day of CPAC 2013. The CPAC program that day looks to be composed of a lot of heavy hitters. The hotel/convention center will be packed!

So there's going to be a 'hot time in the ole town tonight', after all...I would be tempted to use all my time talking about Grover, just for spite...

We ex-Muslims living with Islam's formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that cruel, terroristic cult of Mohammadanism is a fraud.

Forget the inauguration of the new pope! This special two-hour session hosted by Breitbart News Network at CPAC is far more important. But seriously folks, there is arguably nothing more important than informing our fellow non-Muslims about Islam. And Spencer and Geller and Gaffney excel at it. Getting out the terrible truth about Islam not only saves lives - in the end it may well turn out to be the one thing that preserves human freedom and civilization.

>>>>>

Introduction to Islamic Apostasy

In Islam, the rejection in part (of any of the pillars, or individual principles of Islam), or discarding the faith as a whole, amounts to apostasy. It is not a quick or easy affair for an apostate or heterodox believer of Islam, as the punishment for apostasy in the Islamic faith is death. Though it may be argued that this is not clear through the Qur'an alone, scholars have found justification for the penalty from within its pages, and there are also numerous Sahih (authentic) hadiths confirming this punishment as attested by Prophet Muhammad. In Sahih Bukhari we find:

Hadith, Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 9, Book 84, No. 57:

Narrated Ikrima
Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn Abbas who said, “If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Apostle forbade it, saying, ‘Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire)’. I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostle, ‘Whoever changes his Islamic religion, then kill him.’”

Apostatizing from Islam was also one of the only three reasons given by Muhammad where killing a Muslim is permitted...

More at:
http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Apostasy

Islam is no “religion of peace.” Islam is primarily a religion of “injustice, intolerance, hatred, and violence.” The fact is, if we non-Muslims were to say about Muslims what the Qur'an says about us, we would be arrested for hate speech. The Qur'an largely preaches discrimination, death, and imposition of its dogma on everyone. Certainly some Muslims will be offended by such statements, but frankly, so what? Judaism and Christianity, the world’s two other major monotheistic religions, have had to face the harshest of scrutiny and criticism for several hundred years which continues to this day. Islam must not be granted any special privileges or be exempt from such treatment – the implications are of tremendous importance.

Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:

"One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur'an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way...

The statement continues,

Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified."

Wonderful!! Please post videos!

5. Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch – Why I Am Not a Conservative.....

I think it is important to add the following. Conservatism means adhering to "fundamental" conservative principles; uppermost of which is properly identifying the enemy, especially when the enemy is actively waging war against his enemy, in this case "unbeleivers."

If a self-professed conservative cannot or will not identify the enemy (or even come close to identifying the enemy) I question his or her conservatism.

The problem is neither liberalism (classical or otherwise) nor conservatism; nor is the problem the Democratic party nor the Republican party. All of the aforementioned are perfectly capable of integrating a rational appraisal of the appallingly grotesque enmity against all non-Muslims by Muslims following their Islam.

The problem is any one of the aforementioned when compromised by PC MC.

While not easily detachable from the pleasantly self-righteous starry-eyed individual afflicted with it, PC MC nevertheless is not intrinsically fundamental to any Western individual, save for the minority of radical Leftists. But since that latter category is indeed a small minority, they should not be a problem for modern society as it deals with the problem of Muslims. But alas, they are extraordinarily influential, way beyond their real numbers, by virtue of Leftism Lite -- PC MC, which is precisely a virus of Leftism candy-coated to go down easy, giving a pleaant high to boot, and most importantly, making the patient feel like he's on the side of the angels in his ethical concern for those masses of Ethnic Muslims who, defined (even if only unofficially or semi-consciously) as "Ethnic", are under the psychological & cultural mechanism of PC MC, to be axiomatically accorded respect and protection even in the face of mountains of data indicating that such respect and protection is not only not warranted, but grotesquely misplaced.

And so, the main problem of PC MC is that it has affected, and infected, the hearts and minds of the majority of non-Leftists. That's what endows PC MC with the mainstream dominance it enjoys, without which the entire West would not be behaving so idiotically with regard to the flaming problem of Muslims that is so clear to the few of us whose eyesight has not been so occluded. But it is silly to demonize those around us who do not see as we do. For the most part, it's not because they are evil, nor because they are greedy (isn't that the same thing as evil? who would betray their society to an enemy they know is deadly for money except an evil person?), it's not because they are "Leftist" or "liberal" (sure Leftists and liberals indulge this, but since they are a minority in the West, they can't possibly be directing this colossally mistaken course the West is on), and it's not some Dastardly Cabal pulling all the strings of our helplessly peon lives (for that doesn't explain why, to pick one example of many, the Tea Party minions don't seem to care about the problem of Islam as the #1 priority it should be); etc.

Why is it that whenever I explain this, I can't help getting so verbose? I'll tell you why; it's because too many in my audience in the Counter-Jihad are dense or simple-minded about the nuanced package of the Problem of the Problem.