The Grover's Choice Award: Jihad Watch wins CPAC award, barred from receiving it

Vote.jpg

I was surprised and honored that Jihad Watch was among the nominees for the People's Choice Blog Award, sponsored by Right Wing News and TheTeaParty.net, to be awarded at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) 2013.

As you can see from the vote above, Jihad Watch won decisively, getting over 50% of the vote in a field of fifteen. And I received confirmation of the victory from one of the organizers of the CPAC blog awards when I asked him when voting officially ended:

From: XXXXXXXXX
Subject: Re: You've Been Nominated For A People's Choice Award At the CPAC Blogger Awards
Date: March 2, 2013 2:58:26 AM EST
To: Robert Spencer <director@jihadwatch.org>

Robert

It officially ended at midnight. You won!

But as time went by and no announcement was made of this victory, and the voting continued despite my having been told that it officially ended last Friday night and that I had won, and the promised links and other placement promised to the winning blog didn't materialize, I started to wonder. So I contacted the organizer who had written me telling me I won and asked him what was going on.

He told me that there was a slight problem: the Tea Party group, which co-sponsored this People's Choice Blog Award, didn't want to allow me to receive it at CPAC next week unless I promised not to criticize Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan as I accepted the award.

I told the organizer that I couldn't agree to that. He asked me if I had planned to talk about Grover and Suhail. I said no, I hadn't, but I had to now.

So that's that. The People's Choice Blog Award is now the Grover's Choice Blog Award. I will not be going to CPAC and will not be receiving this award.

And since I will not be allowed to receive this award at CPAC, I will talk about Norquist and Khan here.

As I wrote in this article:

Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) called Norquist out for this on the House floor in October 2011, saying of the anti-tax hero: “Documentation shows that he has deep ties to supporters of Hamas and other terrorist organizations that are sworn enemies of the United States and our ally Israel.” He pointed out that “around the years 2000 and 2001, Mr. Norquist’s firm represented Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was convicted two years later for his role in a terrorist plot and who is presently serving a 23-year sentence in federal prison.”

Norquist, reported Wolf, “also associated with terror financier Sami Al-Arian, according to Mary Jacoby’s reporting in March 2003, in the St. Petersburg Times. Al-Arian pled guilty in 2006 ‘to a charge of conspiring to provide services to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a specially designated terrorist organization, in violation of U.S. law,’ and is under house arrest, according to a Department of Justice press release. The Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s ‘paramilitary wing—the al-Quds Brigades—has conducted numerous attacks, including large-scale suicide bombings,’ according to the National Counterterrorism Center.”

And according to the Investigative Project on Terrorism:

Grover Norquist hoped to…harness votes from the country’s growing Muslim population by creating the Islamic Free Market Institute in 1998. He did so with significant financial help from Abdurahman Alamoudi, then one of America’s most influential Muslim activists and head of the American Muslim Council. Today, Alamoudi is serving a 23-year prison sentence after admitting to illegal transactions with Libya and being part of a plot to assassinate the then-Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia. Alamoudi was also found to be a long time secret financial courier for Al Qaeda while at the same time being routinely invited to the Clinton White House for receptions and meetings.

And as for Suhail Khan, Paul Sperry summarized the evidence in the New York Post in January 2011:

* In June 2001, Khan personally accepted an award from the now-notorious Abdurahman Alamoudi, then head of the American Muslim Council.

* "We have with us a dear brother," Alamoudi said as he prepared to honor Khan with a plaque at the group's annual conference. "I'm really proud to be with Suhail Khan. Some of you saw him today in the White House, but inshallah [Allah willing], you will see him in better places in the White House, inshallah."

Khan thanked his patron, saying "Abdurahman Alamoudi has been very supportive of me. . . . I hope, inshallah, we can keep working together."

Just days earlier, Sen. Arlen Specter of the Judiciary Committee had cited a New York Post report documenting how Alamoudi had supported terrorists and "declared an interest in destroying America." By 2003, Alamoudi had been busted for plotting a terrorist attack; the top al Qaeda fundraiser is now serving 23 years in federal prison.

* In September 2001, four days before the 9/11 attacks, Khan spoke at the Islamic Society of North America's convention. Introducing him was Jamal Barzinji, whose offices and home were raided by federal agents after 9/11. "Barzinji is not only closely associated with PIJ [Palestinian Islamic Jihad], but also with Hamas," according to the search-warrant affidavit. (A lawyer for Barzinji, who has not been charged, says he is the victim of a government "witch hunt.")

At the event, Khan shared his experiences from "inside" the White House, and praised his late father, Mahboob Khan, for helping found ISNA -- which the government now says is a front for the radical Muslim Brotherhood and has raised money for jihad. The founding documents of the Brotherhood's operation in America (recently seized by the FBI) reveal that it is in this country to "destroy" the Constitution and replace it with Islamic law.

Khan's father also helped found the Muslim Community Association in Santa Clara, Calif. This Khan family mosque is listed in the Muslim Brotherhood's own documents as one of "our organizations." In the 1990s, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, it hosted Ayman al-Zawahiri -- now al Qaeda's No. 2 -- as he toured the US raising money.

And Khan also spoke at a September 2012 convention of the Hamas- and Muslim Brotherhood-linked Islamic Society of North America, where Muslims were told not to talk to the FBI.

Norquist and Khan are the controlling forces at CPAC. They have this year finally succeeded in barring AFDI from hosting an event about the Islamic supremacism they enable. And now they have overruled the People's Choice for the winning blog, and made sure that one more voice exposing their unsavory activities will not be heard. This is the conservative movement in 2013.

| 39 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

39 Comments

| Leave a comment

The Grover's Choice Award: Jihad Watch wins CPAC award, barred from receiving it
.................................

*Appalling*. Jihad Watch didn't just win—at 52% it got twice the votes of the next runner up, the popular Politichicks site.

CPAC has become completely corrupted.

Dhimmi Award: CPAC

This is fascinating. Thank-you for the explanation and congratulations! You were the people's choice and that is illuminating and encouraging. And it is incredible how the jihad is using the 'right'. The leftist Islamist alliance and the 'rightist Islamic alliance.

I sent an e-mail of protest to Tea Party. So what are we going to do? Who are we going to elect next time to hope that we can start fighting Islam? Can we learn something from Islamists to fight back? Lies, deceit, intimidation, murder, cruelty all based on a false prophet? This is really an upside down situation in history. God help us.

Interesting! The People's choice or Islam? And Islam is embedded so deep in the US political system, Islam wins.

Clowns!

I wonder how many votes the Republicans lost are directly attributable to norquist locking all the Republican candidates into an absoulte, under no circumstance, uncomprimising "raise zero taxes" plege?
Talk about alienating the masses. norquist has to go, he has mortaly hurt the conservative cause.
On the positive side, the attempt to censor JW
has brought out into the open those inside republican circles who are carring water for the jihadist cause.

Shameful. Suppressing free speech again. Why not let the audience decide if Spencer's remarks are correct and accurate?

Or is it the fear of the 'public perception' that is the issue?

Cowards! We need free debate in a free society. The answer to speech we do not like is more speech to oppose it and conclude the debate through intelligence and FACTS, rather than silencing a point of view that is merely unpleasant or not understood by the listener.

So, if you don't follow their view, then you will be banned, exiled etc. Sounds like fascism to me. Or, Islamism.

Grover Norquist's Jihad, by Pamela Geller ...

Excerpt:

Grover Norquist's ties to Islamic supremacists and jihadists have been known for years. He and his Palestinian wife, Samah Alrayyes -- who was director of communications for his Islamic Free Market Institute until they married in 2005 -- are very active in "Muslim outreach." Just six weeks after 9/11, The New Republic ran an exposé explaining how Norquist arranged for George W. Bush to meet with fifteen Islamic supremacists at the White House on September 26, 2001 -- to show how Muslims rejected terrorism. Wrote TNR author Franklin Foer:

On the afternoon of September 26, George W. Bush gathered 15 prominent Muslim- and Arab-Americans at the White House. With cameras rolling, the president proclaimed that "the teachings of Islam are teachings of peace and good." It was a critically important moment, a statement to the world that America's Muslim leaders unambiguously reject the terror committed in Islam's name.

Unfortunately, many of the leaders present hadn't unambiguously rejected it. To the president's left sat Dr. Yahya Basha, president of the American Muslim Council, an organization whose leaders have repeatedly called Hamas "freedom fighters." Also in attendance was Salam Al-Marayati, executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, who on the afternoon of September 11 told a Los Angeles public radio audience that "we should put the State of Israel on the suspect list." And sitting right next to President Bush was Muzammil Siddiqi, president of the Islamic Society of North America, who last fall told a Washington crowd chanting pro-Hezbollah slogans that "America has to learn if you remain on the side of injustice, the wrath of God will come."

It was Norquist who ushered these silver-tongued jihadists into the Oval Office of an incurious president after the worst attack ever on American soil. Instead of Hamas, Hezb'allah, and the Muslim Brotherhood, Ibn Warraq, Bat Ye'or, and Wafa Sultan should have been advising the president. Instead, at that September 26 meeting, Bush declared that "the teachings of Islam are teachings of peace and good." It was a critically important, historic incident. What should have been the most important teaching moment of the long war became a propaganda tool for Islam. A singular opportunity was squandered, and the resulting harm is incalculable.

More here:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/grover_norquists_jihad.html

"So what are we going to do? Who are we going to elect next time to hope that we can start fighting Islam?"

Allen West

Here's the vile Suhail Khan falsely whitewashing Islam while smearing Robert Spencer:

"'Conservative' Muslim Suhail Khan spreads falsehoods about Muhammad's marriage to 9-year-old Aisha"

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/04/conservative-muslim-suhail-khan-lies-about-muhammads-marriage-to-9-year-old-aisha.html

It may be an award for content. But, no offense, it sure as hell isn't an award for quality. This site needs work. And I'll forego the list since I've griped about it countless times already.

Now it won't even go to comment. I'm being "timed out". Whatever in the f-- that means.

Jihad Watch wins CPAC award, barred from receiving it

You honestly, honestly, honestly, honestly could not make it up.

Honestly.

I already knew in 2009 that the "Tea Party" has its priorities bass-ackward, when their March on Washington then (and subsequent years), drawing thousands of grass-roots conervatives (hardly "Elites" eh, Counter-Jihaders?) had nothing to say about the problem of Islam. It wasn't even on their platform. And it still is not a priority for them.

This, among other things, should put to rest the canard that only "Leftists" and "liberals" are the problem in this regard.

The problem is PC MC -- precisely because it affects the hearts and minds of so many conservatives like these.

Some 'conservatives' are very disappointing...Wishy washy, milk toast amoeba's...If CPAC won't stand up to Grover and Khan, and do what is right, CPAC is worthless, and has gone over to the dark side...

OUTRAGE!

I am seething.

Scorched earth!

Linked at my site and at Infidel Bloggers Alliance.

This is quite revealing. I will be contacting my local TP group to ask why.
Fight the good fight!

I'm contacting my local group also.

Congrats! Beside having a set of... made out of steel, you are also very honorable.
M

Ah, Gover"the Quisling" Norquist tries to pull the puppet strings again on the conservative movement. When will the Tea Party wake up and cut the strings to Norquist. They are being used by this muslim apologist for nefarious reasons.

Copy that, John.

Republicans embrace Grover Norquist and Suhail Kahan, while they shun Congresswoman Bachmann, Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller and other proponents of freedom.

Is it any wonder Republican party leaders champion the Palestinian cause; its jihad against Israel? Our nominee, Mitt Romney turned out to be a strong proponent of a Palestinian state at Israel's throat, even as he said nice things while visiting Jerusalem. Romney (his surrogate Sen. Jim Talent) fought religious conservatives on our national platform writing committee, last August (Tampa), in behalf of the jihadists. Since early October 2001, official Republican party policy supports the establishment of a Muslim-enemy state in Israel's heartland. Republican leaders embrace these jihadists and their sympathizers. CPAC offers an excellent example.

The Republican party (my party) used to be based on morals and ethics, justice, Godly (Judeo-Christian) principles, etc.

No more.

To quote Don Vito Corleone in "Godfather I": "How did we ever let things get this far?"

In the recent news conference given by the Manchurian Candidate for the Mullahs currently occupying the Oval Office, I was chilled to the bone when I heard him say FOUR times: "I am not a dictator." Anybody remember Richard Nixon's famous: "I am not a crook!"?

I feel more and more like Donald Sutherland toward the end of the movie "The Puppet Masters" where he realizes that everyone he knows has been taken over by the pods and that the end for him is now inevitable.

With both the Right and the Left so thoroughly compromised, this can't end well.

Mr. Spencer:
Here's an idea....

Maybe you and Pamela could rent a room at the CPAC hotel or a nearby hotel and hold an event of your own. A little party reasonably priced and a roundtable discussion of some sort.

Or you and Pamela could stand outside the CPAC hotel and speak there -- on the street or something of the like. Get photographers and bloggers to cover the event.

Didn't you do something like this when you were dissed by that diocese a while back?

Only one solution left: Civil War.

CPAC cowers in fear when faced with someone who is presenting the truth about Islam...cowards....

We are in it and they are trying to confiscate our guns.

"Ah, Gover"the Quisling" Norquist tries to pull the puppet strings again on the conservative movement. When will the Tea Party wake up and cut the strings to Norquist. They are being used by this muslim apologist for nefarious reasons."

Nice try to exculpate the rank-and-file conservatives, as though they have no responsibility for letting Grover and Suhail set the agenda. In fact, Grover and Suhail would have little or no influence, were the rank-and-file conservatives not obviously -- by precisely exquisite definition here -- PC MC.

This incident points out the fact that remains strangely elusive to most, it seems, in the Counter-Jihad: namely, that the burden of responsibility for the broader fault of Western myopia (of which this incident is but one important example among thousands one could adduce over the past dozen years) lies sqarely on the shoulders of the ordinary garden-variety non-"Elite" Westerner, including the majority of Christians and the majority of conservatives, who obviously at best are unconcerned with the problem of Islam, and at worst feel positively ethically bound to protect Muslims from "bigotry".

Bravo, Robert Spencer!

Boooo, norquist & khan ...you're such sore losers.

The fact that Robert won *hands down* must be giving you two heartburn.

And when the explanatory pressure valve provided by a proper appreciation of the mainstream phenomenon of PC MC is not operative in a person's mind, they often feel forced down the precipitous and reckless road reflected in Salah's and Sam's comments above.

First things, First ~ CONGRATS, my BRAVE Friend!! Votes speak Volumes ;) I would like to say this is a mixed:bitter sweet thing,as LIFE is...Now, we know with whom, to stand with! OUR Selves ~ form OUR OWN PAC; I will gladly give to a PAC,that supports National Security from tyranny,aboard & from within. I believe that this is the C.P.U.S.A.,(myself) & America had beat them back,before. The Middle East had "beat back",Islamists,before,as well... WE WILL DO THIS, again! There are many BRAVE SOLIDERS, in:Robert, Pamella,Cliff Kincaid, Trevor Loudon,Brigette,Reza Kahlili,Polti Chicks(ALL), Nonie,Glosvow,Allen West,Steve King,Walid Shoebat,...So Many(forgive me for any I missed or mis-spelled)! I DO NOT give $$,to the RNC, to Tea Party or CPAC,anylonger...not since ZERO's 2nd Election. I will gladly give,to a WORTHY PAC ;) Robert, pick out a name & an organizer! God's Speed, Everyone & Blessings

Larry A. Singleton wrote:

Now it won't even go to comment. I'm being "timed out". Whatever in the f-- that means.
.................................

Larry, it really was impossible to comment on Jihad Watch for a couple of hours yesterday. That problem has been fixed.

But generally, if you "time out", hit backspace, return to the site, then hit "refresh". As a rule, you'll find that your comment has already posted.

A lot of us have been frustrated with the balky comments system here at JW—but you seem to be the only one who feels that these technical glitches outweigh the excellence of the content.

Really, if you are so frustrated by something so minor as this, how do you propose to fight a long fight against Islam?

"Votes speak Volumes ;)"

They certainly do; but what's needed from these voters is to stand up and take a stand. Protest. Do a sit-in at the CPAC event. If they really represent a sizeable bloc, threaten to withdraw their $$$$ support.

Or do these rank-and-file conservatives really care more about "Obamacare" and about avoiding the Eligibility Issue (and ostracizing those who want to bring it up, like Diana West), than they do about the global revival of violent, seditious, expansionist, supremacist, evil Islam now in historically unprecedented fashion infiltrating the West? A mere vote will not establish whether they really have their priorities right.

All of which proves that very often being a Republican and being a conservative are two different things.

I think the Tea Party.net is more about earning money for the website operators than advancing true conservativism.

See:
http://www.champaignteaparty.org/25701.html

Maybe that's part of the reason CPAC appears to have become co-opted by RINO's.

Norquist is a mole and as a mole is more dangerous than the porcine looking Suhail Khan because he is the traitor inside the castle gates. It is well to remember what Marcus Tullius Cicero said “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

http://grendelreport.posterous.com/grover-norquist-muslim-mole

Norquist is a mole and as a mole is more dangerous than the porcine looking Suhail Khan because he is the traitor inside the castle gates. It is well to remember what Marcus Tullius Cicero said “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

http://grendelreport.posterous.com/grover-norquist-muslim-mole

"Norquist is a mole and as a mole is more dangerous than the porcine looking Suhail Khan because he is the traitor inside the castle gates. "

Agreed; but again, the bigger problem is why haven't the rank-and-file conservatives seen this, and why haven't they given Norquist the bum's rush and thrown him out on his rear end? A Norquist only has influence and power to the extent that people give it to him.

Leave a comment

NOTE: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter