In PJ Lifestyle I discuss the strange marriage of Carlos Danger and his Muslim Brotherhood wife:
One thing the mainstream media knows about Huma Abedin is that she is elegant. Time reported on how Weiner”s “elegant and accomplished wife”¦ declared her love and support for him, visibly pained at having to speak in public as the sad, sordid details of his repeat behavior were exposed yet again.” The Wall Street Journal lamented:
Watching the elegant Huma Abedin stand next to her man Tuesday as he explained his latest sexually charged online exchanges was painful for a normal human being to watch.
What they”re less sure of is why this elegant woman would stand by the increasingly ridiculous Weiner. Time thinks, rather fancifully, that it”s because “divorce can still be stigmatizing in some social circles where parents are particularly ambitious about providing the absolute best environment for their children” ““ and because, well, Huma just “loves this guy despite it all.”
Most others, however, agree that it is because she is seeking power and influence, and thinks ““ however improbably ““ that Anthony Weiner is still the pathway to them. Even Weiner”s sexting partner Sydney Leathers said of the Weiner-Abedin union: “It almost feels to me like it”s more of an arrangement, or a business relationship, than a marriage.” She said she thought Abedin stuck with Weiner “for the power, for the fame, for the stature.”
Maybe so. And she also may be staying in it because Weiner”s indiscretions just don”t matter to her that much ““ not necessarily because they have a sham marriage, but because Abedin is approaching the marriage from an Islamic perspective.
Huma Abedin comes from a family of devout Muslims with extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. She herself, according to the Washington Post, is “a practicing Muslim.” If this is accurate, and Huma Abedin has never denied it, then it raises a number of questions that have never been answered. Islamic law prohibits a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man. A Muslim man may marry a non-Muslim woman, but not the other way around.
Consequently, when a non-Muslim man begins a relationship with an observant Muslim woman, he is usually pressured to convert to Islam, and such conversion is made a condition of the marriage. This only happens, of course, if the Muslim family is devout and observant enough to make sure it happens. We know that Abedin”s family is devout, and that apparently she herself is also. But in today”s political climate, even to ask the question of whether Weiner converted to Islam to marry her is to invite a cascade of ridicule. Apparently it is inconceivable to the leftist media that a practicing Muslim might want to observe the strictures of Islamic law regarding marriage.
But ridicule, however correct Saul Alinsky may have been in saying that it is a potent weapon to discredit and silence one”s opposition, doesn”t make the questions go away. And the questions regarding how Huma Abedin”s status as a “practicing Muslim” may affect her marriage to Weiner don”t end there. Islamic law also allows a Muslim man to have as many as four wives, and to enjoy also the sexual favors of his “captives of the right hand [milk al-yamin]” (Qur”an 4:24) ““ that is, sex slaves.