“Radical Islam, Islamic extremism – you know, I’m not sure an awful lot is gained by saying that. It doesn’t have an impact on our military posture, an impact on what we call it, on the policies we put in place.” And that’s why the Obama policies are failing. A refusal to define the enemy properly, and a prohibition on understanding his motives and goals, is a recipe for defeat and disaster. “The terminology has, seems to me, little or no impact on what ultimately we have to do.” There’s your problem right there, Holder. You cannot prescribe the proper remedy without the proper diagnosis.
“Holder: Little to Be Gained in Calling Islamic Terrorism ‘Islamic Terrorism,'” by Patrick Goodenough, CNS News, February 18, 2015:
Outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder took a swipe Tuesday at critics of the Obama administration’s reluctance to call Islamic terrorism Islamic terrorism, reserving a particular dig for Fox News.
“You know, we spend more time, more time, talking about what do you call it as opposed to what do you do about it,” he said at the National Press Club in Washington. “You know, really, you know, if Fox didn’t talk about this, they’d have nothing else to talk about, it would seem to me.”
“Radical Islam, Islamic extremism – you know, I’m not sure an awful lot is gained by saying that. It doesn’t have an impact on our military posture, an impact on what we call it, on the policies we put in place.”
“I don’t worry an awful lot about what the appropriate terminology, you know, ought to be,” Holder continued. “I think that people need to actually think about that and think about, really, we’re having this conversation about words as opposed to what our actions ought to be?”
Holder said the problem was a difficult and ongoing one.
“The terminology has, seems to me, little or no impact on what ultimately we have to do.”…