The Facebook fascists, of course, do their best to conceal what they’re about. This time they have shut down the Jihad Watch page on a technicality that is in reality a catch-22.
Facebook has been giving me notices on the Jihad Watch page saying that the page is unpublished, and will remain unpublished until I confirm what country I’m in. They want to guard against all those Russian bots, doncha know.
Confirming what country I’m in involves entering in a code they send to my phone, and the code never arrives. The Facebook page after they say they sent the code to me tells me to update the Facebook app. It doesn’t say anything more specific, but I’ve repeatedly downloaded the latest Facebook app, so it should be fully updated.
Confirming what country I’m in involves entering in a code they send to my phone, and the code never arrives. The Facebook page after they say they sent the code to me tells me to update the Facebook app. It doesn’t say anything more specific, but I’ve repeatedly downloaded the latest Facebook app, so it should be fully updated.
When I asked Facebook Help what to do, they said to enable Location Services. I enabled Location Services. The same thing happened. Page still unpublished.
I’ve been getting the notice to confirm my country location for awhile, but the Jihad Watch was still updating with new Jihad Watch posts. Today, however, there is a new notice in WordPress, which I use for Jihad Watch, saying that before I publish a post, make sure I’m set up with Facebook. So all morning today I have tried to give Facebook the info it needs, but got the same thing again: they ask for a code that they never send.
Is Facebook closing down my site because it dislikes my political views? That seems to me to be blazingly obvious at this point.
Malcolm Jackson says
Shared to Facebook.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/09/more-censorship-of-dissenters-from-the-leftist-line-facebook-unpublishes-jihad-watch-page
Voytek Gagalka says
Shared it, too. Albeit FB allows me that it hides the title of this article from view or any headline text. Clear censorship. Disgrace.
mortimer says
Muslim stockholders own 20% of 2-Facedbook.
Facebook is now a DHIMMI company.
StellaSaidSo says
The tech giants are all globalists.
Burner Jack says
NOW it makes much more sense.
Thomas Arthur (sultan) says
Don t surprised at all. Facebook banned me for good. Hahaha they think they will shut us!!!
Walter Sieruk says
Facebook is terribly politically correct and well pro-Islamic Islamic. As many of this previous Jihadwatch articles of this site had revealed. Likewise, I’m still under thirty day suspension for Facebook for two posts I put on my Facebook site The first post the PC pro-Islamic F.B. site had put a ban on me for was posting an essay strong condemning that vicious murderous jihad mass murder attacks in Paris France on Bastille day. The second posting the Facebook entity was so offended about an essay greatly condemning the Islamic methods of the insidious stealth jihad and the brutal violent and deadly jihad. Facebook declared both postings as “A violation of community standards ” under the heading of “hate speech” As stated before the real,, actual hate speech is the spiteful , vicious speech of the imams in the mosques and the different cities and countries around the world which incite ,encourages and inspires many young as impressionable young Muslims to go out and engage in violent and murderous jihad attacks. As seen in the malicious and murderous Islamic terror attack in Paris on July 14 2016.
Here is a relating of the first posting, in the month of August , that Facebook labeled as “hate speech.”
Just last month was the second anniversary of those vicious and murderous Islamic terror attacks in the city of Paris, on July 14, 2016, is because of those jihad-minded Muslim males who are so extremely deluded and irrational because they really believed in the nonsensical , strange and far –fetched doctrine contained in the Koran, of sex-filled paradise with black eye- houris, virgins, in it for the male Muslim who dies as a “martyr” for the cause of Islam fighting in the jihad. As, this bizarre Islamic doctrine of a houris -filled place is found in the Koran in, for example, 4:54. 55:56. 78:31. So this odd and outlandish Koranic doctrine inspired many young Muslims males to commit many horrendous, ruthless, heartless and murderous actions of jihad violence. Those vicious jihadists’ massacres that occurred in Paris was most wicked and hideous. That extreme deadly evil caused by those jihadist/Muslims with their firm but blind unquestioning belief in the weird and false doctrine from the Koran of such a houris, filled paradise that had the outcome of mass murder and chaos in the city of Paris. This is a strong reminder of the wise statement written by the French philosopher, Voltaire, who wrote “As long as men continue to believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities.”
In addition, Facebook has a surveillance system that is actually filled with politically correct madness to the extent this PC folly goes way beyond the topic “race.” The Irrational idea keyboarding against Islamic terrorism now classified as “hate speech.” For example, last month I keyboard and essay to remind the reader not to forget about those murderous Islamic attacks on July 14 in the of Paris France which occurred just over two years ago. So for strongly denouncing jihad terrorism I was put on a thirty day suspension for “hate Speech.” By contrast in England a British citizen who converted to Islam posted on his Facebook account a message of encouraging jihad terrorism. Nevertheless, Facebook didn’t ban him with a suspension for hate speech. This is madness. Worse yet this is PC madness. Shame on Facebook.
Malcolm Jackson says
Hi Walter,
Could I have your permission to copy and paste your essays on Facebook. I have got a couple of FB accounts, so if I get 30 day or more suspensions, I will just change accounts.
Best regrds,
Malcolm Jackson.
Walter Sieruk says
To Malcolm Jackson , To answer your question, the answer is Yes, you may
mortimer says
Muslims have a controlling interest in 2-Facedbook. It is now a DHIMMI COMPANY.
Richard says
Facebook’s reactions to this wonderful web site reminds me of a mocking line from an old comedy: “There never were any Nazis in Germany. I don’t know how that terrible story came about!” If the horror stories about Islam published on this site are not true, let the Muslims sue for defamation of character; but they cannot, because, sadly, the stories are true.
Westman says
Isn’t it amazing that Facebook spends so much resources on PC policing and yet can’t stop itself from being hacked? It just lost the information on 50Million accounts to hackers. I’m now getting emails from fake Facebook users filling up my mailbox. Thanks, Two-face-book.
Paddy OConnor says
I would imagine ‘hacking’ to be very easy and almost unpreventable given the number of ‘Believers’ who are positioned in FB.
FB must be broken up to secure all legitimate accounts.
larry larson says
Socialist media ;} is owned by the deep state.
Krishna says
I always get the feeling whether your jihad watch page will be suspended like Alex Jones hope. It never happens
Gary says
What we can eventually expect from Facebook, and the world…
let it be known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead, by Him this man stands here before you whole.
This is the “stone which was rejected by you builders, which has become the chief cornerstone.” Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
Gary says
…meaning Christianity will be rejected by Facebook. (If it already hasn’t!!)
Roland Tours says
@Gary, please spare us your antisemitism, blaming the whole Jewish people for the crucifixion. What is this “let it be known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, ” And so far as we know, Facebook has not yet censored Christianity, and hopefully never does. Get real.
Gary says
Roland,
Allow me to clarify…
Antisemitism. Hardly. My family actually supports Jewish/Christian Missions. Trust me. I am the farthest thing from antisemitic. I was making reference to the fact that Islam seems to be ‘The Protected- “Religion of Peace”‘ which along with Western Media has rejected Christ Jesus our Glorious Savior.
gravenimage says
Gary’s trying to pretend that his ranting about the Jews crucifying Jesus was–somehow–actually a criticism of Islam is just absurd. Try again, creep.
carpediadem says
No, you’re so close that you actually are.
Firstly, the Romans crucified Jesus.
Secondly, Christians go on and on about forgiveness but still lie and bitch about the Jews crucifying their precious Jesus, whom many deny is Jewish because they hate Jews so much but mysteriously never mention the Romans who were and are famous for crucifixions, as in fact are the Muslims.
Then they whine about the Christian massacres in the Middle East, never do anything about it because they’re too busy organising boycotts of Israel, but strangely any anti Christian measure, even if it’s instituted by Christians or Muslims, is somehow the Jews’ fault.
Nothing but sanctimonious bigoted wastes of time and humanity.
Indiana Tom says
Acts 4:10-13 New King James Version (NKJV)
10 let it be known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead, by Him this man stands here before you whole. 11 This is the ‘stone which was rejected by you builders, which has become the chief cornerstone.’ 12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which WE must be saved.”
Quote in context with my emphasis on WE.. I will let the reader figure out if this is anti semitic. If there really is such a thing. Sort of like Islam is a race.
Anti-Old Testament Judaism only, maybe?
carpediadem says
It’s anti Semitism and defamatory.
Much of the planet could not a give a damn about Christianity because they do not believe in your religion. And all you do is whine.
carpediadem says
“If there really is such a thing”?
Way to leave a gigantic clue about your dullard hatred.
Bartholomew Price says
You are quoting out of context.
It’s clear from Acts 4:4-8 (which you failed to quote) that the ones who rejected Jesus Christ are the rulers, elders, scribes and chief priests, and that Peter wants that message broadcast to all of Israel.
And it’s not anti-OT Judaism, as Peter was still offering animals for sacrifice at the temple in Jerusalem in Acts 4. As far as Peter knew at that time he was still under the Mosaic law. It wasn’t until several years later that God revealed to Paul that animal sacrifice and all of the Mosaic laws were fulfilled once and for all at the cross, and even later with the destruction of the temple in AD 70.
2Tim 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Mark Swan says
Bartholomew Price,
Where in Acts 4 or anywhere else in the Bible did you get this Idea—
Peter was filled with the Holy Spirit and had as much understanding
as Paul or any of the other apostles, concerning Christ’s sacrifice.
Don McKellar says
This is no surprise. Really, it only takes one zealous left-fascist at Facebook who has appointed themselves the thought police to simply redirect messages to your cell to some other number or even have it marked sent when it never is.
Meanwhile, the desperate attempts to create Chinese dictatorship friendly versions by Facebook and Google go full steam ahead in the shadows.
Indiana Tom says
Well, they do not call it Fascist Book and Fake Book for nothing.
I do not have an account and really do not wish to support the little Nazi twerps.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
“Facebook hacked: Social media giant admits security breach affecting 50 million accounts”
https://www.rt.com/usa/439861-facebook-admits-security-breach-affected/
R Cole says
It’s more the socialist media these days!!
They want universal guaranteed wages, where they are going to be in charge of us all ~ completely wacky!
Trump is going to have to step in and do something about this. Next thing we’ll hear, since you are banned on Facebook, that you can’t have a credit card, you can’t shop at certain stores or you can’t earn a living.
These tech giant guys are the nouveau-powerful and there are swinging it wildly.
RonaldB says
Yeah. I believe that already happened to Jihad Watch. Their credit card accounts were shut down, at least for awhile. It’s a constant guerrilla warfare against conservative or dissident nationalist points of view.
I myself use Facebook to message with a few friends and to find others. I wouldn’t dream of giving Facebook any discretionary oversight, such as picking out my news feed. I get updates directly from Jihad Watch on their articles, so Facebook could blow up tomorrow and it wouldn’t affect my information or social contacts in the least.
Jay says
Some types of phones do not accept text messages. Ask for the code to be sent to your phone by audio (verbal code read by computer). I hope this resolves it.
Lilith Wept says
We should be posting on some other social media platform………Preferably one that is run by a staunch Constitutionalist or a Co aervative who believes “ I I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it”
That’s not to,say that we shouldn’t fight with all our might againts this blatant attempt at censorship, , discrimination against Christians, Conservatives and critics of Islam and denial of our Freedom of Speech.
But while Facebook continues to censure these posts, we need a platform to communicate , to use to wake people to the threat of Islam…
And who knows, maybe that “ Other “ Social Media platform might become more popular than Facebook!
Vann Boseman says
I hope that Jihad Watch will establish a presence on other platforms. I suggest that everyone be a part of a platform other than FB should they maintain a FB account.
For me, I am on MeWe. I searched for Jihad Watch there just now and it came up that someone in a group I am a member of, Politically Incorrect and Proud, posted articles from Jihad Watch.
It could be that Jihad Watch does not like MeWe or prefers to post on some other social media platform. FB is becoming more and more broken. In posting articles from Jihad Watch, Abbeville Institute, and Mises.org on FB, I can see that I could be seen by them as an undesirable.
When this is considered with the Kavanaugh confirmation, the Lincolnian delusion of the US maintaining a republican form of government becomes more apparent. No greater republic ever existed than the US. Rule of law, self government, and size were easily addressed at its founding. By 1800, size was becoming a question and the division of the country into 3 republics was considered by the most significant author of the Declaration of Independence. As Freedom of speech takes numerous blows, the American concept of the rule of law under a constitution seems to decline. Regardless of who wins the day concerning Kavanaugh, half the country is going to end up viewing rule of law as being in decline as pointed out by Stephan Molyneux:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEzDHUMgeAs
James Lincoln says
I certainly hope that Robert Spencer faithfully backs up all data on Jihad Watch website and Jihad Watch Facebook.
The permanent loss of that information would be devastating to the cause.
gravenimage says
Very true.
Garbut says
“Britain First” a political organisation, today became the first to sue Facebook.
From the leader of Britain First.
“Thankfully, we have one of the most important and experienced QCs in Northern Ireland acting for us.
This QC is an experienced expert in administrative law, Judicial Review, defamation, privacy and human rights law.
He has a long history of winning discrimination and human rights cases – perfect for us.
The combined team of our solicitor, barrister and QC have taken their time and fine-tuned the paperwork that will launch the case against Facebook over the last two weeks.
It has been a frustrating delay, but as leader of Britain First I can finally make the announcement that Britain First has now officially sued Facebook for political discrimination.
Solicitors acting for Britain First lodged the paperwork late today at Belfast County Court to start legal action against Facebook.
This will be the first time that Facebook has ever been sued for discrimination.
We are seeking an injunction demanding that Facebook reinstate our Facebook fan page and also we want damages on several fronts.
Up until now, it has all been ‘demands’ and ‘talk’, but now Facebook are going to know 100% that we are deadly serious.
They will shortly realise – when they receive the summons to court – that they have a serious civil case on their hands that they could easily lose!
For too long now social networks have censored certain political viewpoints and thus interfered with the political process.
Back in March, 2.6 million Britain First supporters were denied their freedom of belief and expression when Facebook abruptly closed our fan pages.
Other pages, like ‘Death to Israel’ and ‘F*** Christianity’ are allowed to post all manner of hateful and abusive content, but Britain First is beyond the pale and must be silenced
Well, Facebook will now have to explain this absurd logic in front of a senior judge
Can you imagine the uproar when Britain First wins this case and Facebook are faced with an injunction instructing them to reinstate our fan pages?
Political discrimination is illegal in Northern Ireland, so Facebook will have to explain to a judge why they have deliberately targeted Britain First and have treated us differently to everyone else.
This is no joke, when the summons to appear in court arrives at Facebook’s offices it is going to cause a meltdown!
Their legal team will be interrogating the lowly moderators as to why they have continually banned all Britain First pages.
Please remember, this is only the start, there is a way to go before Facebook are either defeated in court or settle with us out of court.
This is a massive development that will be watched closely by the entire patriotic, counter-jihad and conservative movement across the entire Western world.
I apologise that it has taken this long and that there have been annoying delays, but we have finally dragged Facebook into court.
This is not just Britain First’s right to freedom of speech on the line, but the entire patriotic, Christian, counter-jihad movement across the Western world
We stand a very good chance of beating Facebook in court.
If we win, the judge will order Facebook to return our former fan pages to us – re-connecting 2.6 million of our supporters worldwide – or face the consequences!
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN
IRELAND
QUEENS BENCH DIVISION
Between
BRITAIN FIRST
Plaintiff
and
Facebook (Ireland) Limited
Defendant
Let us all hope that they win this court battle against left-wing Facebook organisation
gravenimage says
Thanks.
Michael Villano says
Fuckerberg and his band of FB Fascists disabled my 10 year old FB account 5 days before the 2016 election.
Barbara Vandewalle says
I have some sites that cannot link to fb. They are to conservative, pro USA, pro military. So I get them through theit web site.
So please add me to your mailing list.
Yokel says
Barbara, easiest way is to find “Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest” on the home page and enter your email address. Press “subscribe”.
Peter says
2Facedbook shows its true colors yet again.
gravenimage says
More censorship of dissenters from the Leftist line: Facebook unpublishes Jihad Watch page
………………..
This is appalling. And that Facebook is pretending that this is a technical issue is just craven.
JDow says
I hope your facebook page has not been taken over. Apparently FB was successfully attacked losing some 50,000 accounts’ credentials. I hope this can be sorted out.
That said, I am not now an FB member and do not see a future with that status changed.
{^_^}
JDow says
Slipped a decimal point – 50,000,000 accounts hacked.
Sorry.
{^_^}
J.W.K. says
One of the best things I ever did for myself: I cancelled Facebook. Zuckerberg has more than enough money, the creep.
Aunty Podes says
Thank goodness I managed to disengage from Face Crook –
What a rat-shit org it is!
underbed cat says
Unpublishing Jihad Watch, restricting information and reports of Islamic Jihad… that .examines the doctrine of Islam, Sunnah, haddiths, sharia laws and many sura’s calling for killing infidels or non believers may have been done to smooth over the offense some employees may feel, due to the actual sharia law to never say anything to expose Islam, upon penalty of death…just the law itself says alot about the mistaken perception of a glorious doctrine. Since it has global reach it could also reach and expose photos and information you may not want in the hands of those who would be offended.And add to that your location.
In a way it was a warning or caution website with important information for the public since the CVE has been devised to confuse and protect those who would be offended and keep the clueless, less curious clueless which could also be dangerous, because the dawah is never going to give up the goal.
Maran says
I cancelled my Facebook nearly a year ago as I did not agree with some of the policies that had been introduced. Despite numerous attempts to force Facebook to close down my account, apparently it is still open. I know this because I get messages from Facebook to tell me of postings. The problem is if I log on to Facebook again they will presume that it is still ok TO KEEP THE ACCOUNT OPEN.
I have always hated Facebook and their partisan cancellation of serious posts, so intend to research an alternative site.
Jahad Watch needs to be published as far and wide as possible. It is one of the very few ways that we can keep up to date with what the real situation is and what is currently happening especial when so much of the media is totally partisan.
Giacomo Latta says
Just tell Facebook that you are in Somalia or ISIS-controlled territory. That should make you immediately kosher, er, halal.
Lydia Church says
This is called the ‘red-tape run-around’ in plain speak.
Sorry to hear this… like I say, we must be prepared.
What would we do if…. etc.
Bowen G says
Tech Firms Are Not Sovereigns — The Injured Parties Are The Public From Tech Firms Not Following Their Own Contractual Agreements
by Andrew Keane Woods via Aegis Paper Series
It is increasingly common to hear that the sovereigns that reign over the Internet are Internet firms—the companies that set user policies and wield enormous influence over the day-to-day functioning of the Internet. The user base of these firms can be larger than many countries. They have foreign policy teams and have even engaged in experiments with user-driven self-governance. In many ways, they look like states. But firms are not sovereigns. Some public-facing Internet firms may find it expedient to resist some states, some of the time on some issues. But this does not mean that Internet firms are a serious and lasting threat to state sovereignty. Treating them as such is a distraction from the real problem: determining how and with what limits states—sovereign nations—ought to be able to achieve their aims online…
Conclusion
Internet firms are extremely powerful. But they are not states. Treating them as such is a
distraction from the real problem: determining how and within which limits states—real
sovereign nations—ought to be able to achieve their aims online. What is the proper scope
of one state’s authority over the Internet? When that authority extends beyond the state’s
borders, as it often will with Internet regulations, what kind of deference should affected
states grant the extraterritorial regulation? These are the key questions for global governance
of the Internet.25 The fact that technology firms wield considerable power is relevant to any
account of the political economy of Internet regulations—just as the fact that Walmart is
powerful will be relevant to an account of regulation in the retail sector. But little turns on
whether tech firms (or Walmart) are state-like in their power. In fact, that assertion distracts
from the real question: How is the considerable power wielded by tech firms going to frustrate
legitimate policy reform?
https://www.hoover.org/research/tech-firms-are-not-sovereigns