Fox is increasingly slipping into the Leftist echo chamber. It is terrified of discussing these issues. A few years ago, Jeanine Pirro contacted me and was going to have me as a featured guest on a special show about Sharia. She was very excited about it, and all the arrangements were made to fly me in and get me set up in the studio. Then at the last minute, everything was canceled — it was clear that Fox executives had told her she was venturing into forbidden territory. They willingly kowtow to the SPLC’s defamation campaign targeting foes of jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women and others. But last night, Pirro ventured off the reservation again, daring to suggest that Ilhan Omar’s hijab showed her to be Sharia-compliant.
There is so much confusion on this issue, even among people who should know better:
https://twitter.com/NolteNC/status/1105103104582782979
No in both cases, because in both cases the headwear in question is not part of a larger system that is incompatible with Constitutional rule. However, the hijab is part of such a system, and that’s all Pirro was saying. She should not have apologized, and Fox should not have rebuked her, but this is the age of pandemic cowardice, so it was likely unrealistic to expect anything else.
“Fox News Strongly Condemns Jeanine Pirro’s Remarks About Ilhan Omar’s Hijab,” by Joshua Caplan, Breitbart, March 11, 2019:
The Fox News Channel on Sunday condemned host Jeanine Pirro’s remarks on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MND) use of a hijab and said the issue has been dealt with directly.
Pirro is under fire after appearing to suggest on her Saturday program — Justice with Judge Jeanine — that Omar, whose repeated antisemitic remarks prompted the House to pass an anti-hate resolution last week, wears a hijab in defiance of the Constitution. “Think about this: She’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine from the Democrat Party. So if it’s not rooted in the party, where is she getting it from?” Pirro said in her opening segment. “Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?”
In a statement Sunday, Fox News denounced Pirro’s remarks, saying: “We strongly condemn Jeanine Pirro’s comments about Rep. Ilhan Omar. They do not reflect those of the network and we have addressed the matter with her directly.[“]
The network also released a statement from Pirro, who said her intent was not to suggests Muslims could not be loyal to the United States. “I’ve seen a lot of comments about my opening statement from Saturday night’s show and I did not call Rep. Omar un-American. My intention was to ask a question and start a debate, but of course because one is Muslim does not mean you don’t support the Constitution,” Pirro said. “I invite Rep. Omar to come on my show any time to discuss all of the important issues facing America today.”
A Fox News online producer, Hufsa Kamal, criticized Pirro’s remarks on social media, writing: “@JudgeJeanine can you stop spreading this false narrative that somehow Muslims hate America or women who wear a hijab aren’t American enough? You have Muslims working at the same network you do, including myself. K thx.”…
Kilfincelt says
When I heard her comments, I gave her a big thumbs up on her Facebook page and added that Omar is an Islamic Trojan Horse. Here is how you can contact Fox: https://help.foxnews.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360000067394
mortimer says
Thanks for that. Fox should realized it is becoming a DHIMMI CLIENT of Islam that VOLUNTARY foregoes its own constitutional rights by showing DEFERENCE TO SHARIA BLASPHEMY LAW.
AT WHAT POINT WILL FOX DECIDE IT CANNOT SUBMIT TO ISLAM?
Sharia law strictly forbids the mere ‘mention’ of ‘something impermissible’ about Islam by a kafir (non-Muslim).
From authoritative manual of Sharia law, ‘Reliance of the Traveller’ Chapter ‘O’ 11.10.05:
“The (DHIMMI) agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
-5- mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.”
The blasphemy punishment for a blasphemer under Sharia law is death.
eduardo odraude says
Yes. I just sent a polite letter to the Judge Pirro show at that link. I say that the question Pirro asked is absolutely legitimate. I hope everyone goes to that link and sends a message to Fox.
Anjuli Pandavar says
K, “Omar is an Islamic Trojan Horse”
—
I beg to differ. Omar is straight up-front, in the open. The way I read it, she is part of an effort to render the US ungovernable. Her part is to turn the House of Representatives against itself, failing that, to paralyse it. So far, grown men are close to tears. She’s right on track.
thebigW says
“I beg to differ. Omar is straight up-front, in the open. ”
Depends on the Muslim and the idiots they fool. Omar is up front to us, but not to Congress, the media, and millions of other Americans. Maajid Nawaz and Zuhdi Jasser etc are up front to ME, but not to most of you guys.
Anjuli Pandavar says
What I mean is that she isn’t concealing what she’s doing or pretending to be doing anything other than what she’s doing. I agree that neither is Zuhdi Jasser, but he isn’t doing anything, whereas Omar is. The odd one out is Maajid Nawaz, who is doing something other than what he pretends to be doing.
Their being up front or not is about them, and not about whether or who can see through them. Just because we can someone practising taqiyya doesn’t mean they’re not practising it. Similarly, just because we misread someone’s open actions doesn’t mean they’re concealing what they do.
thebigW says
“What I mean is that she isn’t concealing what she’s doing or pretending to be doing anything other than what she’s doing. ”
nope, she IS still concealing parts of Islam. She ain’t calling for death of apostates, gays, adulterers, and flogging of fornicators, and war against non-believers because of their non-belief. She can’t do that and be completely honest —- YET, ’cause even the Leftards would wake up if she did.
Anjuli Pandavar says
thebigW, “nope, she IS still concealing parts of Islam.”
—
If anyone has publicly asked her for the Islamic position on “death of apostates, gays, adulterers, and flogging of fornicators, and war against non-believers because of their non-belief,” and she offered anything other than what was asked for, then I stand corrected and thank you.
However, what I get from what you’re saying is that she has never herself offered this information of her own accord. That’d be like expecting a Muslim to be a walking-talking Qur’an, Hadith and Sirra all rolled into one and declaring its entire contents all at the same moment.
What I mean by “she isn’t concealing anything” is that she isn’t concealing her intentions. Her agenda is not hidden. It is you who will not see it. Within a matter of weeks, Omar has turned Representative against Representative in a manner that threatens to paralyse the US Government. Why do you think she repeatedly utters anti-semitic statements, despite every time being made to retract/apologise. It’s no skin off her arse at all. She’ll just keep doing it and every successive utterance, wind up the House a bit more till something snaps. *Already* grown men are close to tears in exasperation.
US commentators don’t seem to understand that for Omar, this is *not* about anti-semitism at all, it’s about what buttons to press that will really rile up her fellow Representatives. SHE IS PLAYING YOU AND YOU’RE ALL FALLING FOR IT! Get rid of her *now* while you still can!
Victoria English says
I don’t think you grasp the concept of the Trojan horse used by Odysseus to gain access to Troy or you would understand the reference to Omar as a Trojan horse. And I might, add, it is a very accurate analogy.
Ashley says
“Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?”
_______________
An absolutely fair question to pose.
I somehow doubt Omar wears a hijab to protect her hair from lice…
somehistory says
Ashley
Not to protect her hair…to protect the lice. She is a nit wit for islam.
James says
I heard her report and I do not know what the commotion is about. I formerly believed that you could trust Fox News to tell the whole truth about anything. Now it seems they are going the way of the other major media into PC behavior. Probably they are afraid to suggest anything that could disturb Muslims. But of course this is another nail in the coffin of free speech. This woman does not just wear this Muslim costume, she also speaks out in ways consistent with sharia anti-Semitism. And she swore her oath on the koran, an anti-Western book that puts sharia above the constitution. She and the other extremists in Congress attack America generally and associate with groups that do, pro-Islamist groups. Is there a Catholic Jihad? Do terrorists repeat Christian slogans while murdering random strangers on the street? Is there a Jewish Jihad where they blow up buildings, attack people at music concerts, fly airplanes into skyscrapers? Does the nun in her Catholic habit perform illegal operations on children? Like the idealists of the women’s movement and their Planned Parenthood? What is happening in America, have we become slaves to this foreign ideology? Second-class citizens with no freedom of speech?
Frank Anderson says
James, I quite frequently find myself in a minority. I watched Glenn Beck when he was on Fox News and learned much that I did not know before. He departed, in my understanding, because he was showing and proving things Fox could not stand. I also write frequently about E.D. Hill’s Fox News special on Terror in its Own Words, that was the Last program in which she appeared.
We get pure MSM from ALL the other networks (6?) and “fair and balanced” (50%) from Fox. So one could argue we get 650% “liberal” deception against 50% more or less truth. Fox does not seem to be able to face the truth, particularly about islam.
gravenimage says
Fox is still better than the other cable news networks, but this is sometimes damning with faint praise.
Frank Anderson says
GI, as with most subjects, we agree. Gotta tell an Uncle Elbert story from my adopted mother’s brother.
A boss gave one of his men a piece of a bottle of liquor at the end of the day. Next morning he asked how was it. Boss, it was just right. If it was any better you wouldn’t have given it to me. If it was any worse I couldn’t drink it. How long must we settle for “just right”?
Wellington says
Agreed, gravenimage. Rather like being forced to opt for people such as Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan over someone like Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer. When all you can choose is either dumb or dumber, you know things are not good.
James Lincoln says
Frank,
You stated, correctly:
“Fox does not seem to be able to face the truth, particularly about islam.”
It appears that, for all broadcast/cable TV news outlets including Fox, Islam officially joins the third rail of politics.
Come to think of it, that’s why websites like Jihad Watch exist.
Frank Anderson says
J.L. for what my recommendation is worth, Spencer’s Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, Mark Gabriel’s The Unfinished Battle and Warner’s Abridged Koran are the best places to start KNOWING instead of Feeling what is happening. Spencer for his concise presentation; Gabriel for his personal knowledge and authority; and Warner for his outstanding work of editing and explanation. From there dozens of other authors can continue to tell the truth MSM is doing its best to hide. I wish I could encourage more people to learn for themselves. I hope we are doing good toward that goal here.
James Lincoln says
Thanks, Frank.
I will take for action.
eduardo odraude says
Frank, to your top list, I’d like to add The Third Choice by Mark Durie.
Frank Anderson says
E.O. my suggestions are based only on the books I have read and do not represent all good, authoritative or helpful books. If I were asked to help someone start the process of self-education in the most direct manner, that is MY starting place; but by no means is it the only one. I speculate there are hundreds of books available that are well worth reading to know the truth and resist the deception being blown in our faces daily. Thank you for adding another recommendation.
“If islam was such a great deal why were 4,000,000 Egyptians murdered bringing it to Egypt?” Mark Gabriel, The Unfinished Battle (paraphrased) Page 52.
Please start somewhere. They have a 1400 year head start to our slavery and death.
carolyne says
I think E D Hill was fired by FOX because on one occasion the Obamas tapped each other’s knuckles and Hill called it “Their little terrorist greeting.” I liked Ms. Hill a lot and was sorry to see her go but that remark was not appropriate. On the other hand Judge Pirro merely stated a fact— wear a hijab and you are following Sharia law. It indicates the lowly status of women in Islam which is antithetical to our culture and our laws. Judge Pirro has led FOX’s weekend ratings for some time and I hope they are not foolish enough to let her go.
eduardo odraude says
I hope she refuses to shut up, and that other people with big ratings at Fox stand up for her.
Frank Anderson says
E.O. I am not sure whether you are hoping about Judge Pirro or E.D. Hill. Certainly we agree about the judge. Hill has never appeared again after her special about 10 years ago, which I have recorded on DVD. It could be time for a new Glenn Beck network effort with all the people excluded and silenced by MSM.
Tom Cheria says
I would have asked the question differently? I would have asked if Mr. Omar considers Muhammad who was a slave owner a perfect man or greatest prophet ever lived.
Hint: A slave owner is NEVER a good moral man let alone PERFECT MAN or GREATEST PROPHET.
I would have forced liberals defend slavery. The moment they defend slavery call them racists and end the debate. PERIOD.
mortimer says
Ilhan Omar’s VERBAL JIHAD is a test sortie against the enemies within the DIRTY KUFAAR. Ilhan Omar has been successful in her test attacks. The Dems have barely responded, so she will CONTINUE HER ATTACKS until they will eventually be forced to kick her out of their party.
NEVERTHELESS, Jeanine Pirro is on the RIGHT TRACK. The Islamic veil is a LEGISLATED PART of discriminatory SHARIA LAW.
The Islamic veil is the ultimate symbol of misogyny and patriarchy. The Dems should know better. If they were even 1% feminist, the Dems would condemn ALL USE of the Islamic veil.
The Dems are not feminist at all, because they are actually neo-Marxists in disguise.
How long will Jewish Americans need to learn they support the Dems to their own peril? The Dems are the anti-Jewish party.
eduardo odraude says
Man, if on Fox you can’t even ask, even at this point in Omar’s trajectory, if Omar supports Sharia, then to hell with Fox. Good grief. Let’s see other Fox contributors stand up to this nonsense from Fox. How about Hannity? How about Levin? I hope Pirro doesn’t give in. Hufsa Kamal has no right to stifle the discussion. The question is absolutely legitimate. The question that was rejected will be at the head of the corner.
eduardo odraude says
Why does Hufsa Kamal get to set the parameters of debate? So is Fox sharia compliant now?
gravenimage says
Good questions.
thebigW says
the fact that there’s a producer of FOX named “Hufsa Kamal” if you can explain THAT, explains everything else.
Lynne Wright says
I’m very disappointed with Fox.
somehistory says
Well, well, well. It’s no wonder she was jumped on for asking the questions no one wants answered.
“including myself. K thx.””
***************************
This moslim idiot…expressing her stupidity on “social media.” While condemning the Judge may be her “job”…is she supposed to do it on “social media” instead of by phone call, in person, or by e-mail? Is it her “job” to condemn the Judge?
In any case, the moslim is an idiot…first of all by being moslim and proud of it. Second….she misused “myself.” She should have written “me.” And, it is unprofessional to us “K” for “okay”…which is very informal..and “thx” for ‘thanks.’
Too bad the Judge couldn’t say, “No thanks.” And then keep on talking and asking questions.
Brian hoff says
What an woman wear have no bearing on her following islamic law. For the last 12 or 14 years I was being than security guard for sunday school I donot tell the woman treacher how to dress . I donot tell muslum woman who are not in sunday school on how to dress. We have than new brother and sister came new muslum. The sister wore than tight bodysuit under than modest outfit the color of the cloth match her skin color very closely I ask some of the sister to talk to her about it. I noticed some brother being uneasy about her outfit.
somehistory says
hoff
What does any of that have to do with the price of wheat in Kansas?
Another question: Do you consider English an infidel language? Is that why you murder it so often? Do us all a favor and look up the definition…in an English language dictionary…of the word “than.” You use it so very often, it doesn’t leave any “than’s” for the rest of us. And quite frankly, you misuse it.
Ashley says
Not sure, but I *think* Brian hoff at one point revealed he suffered some sort of traumatic brain injury or something of the sort.
I don’t excuse his ramblings here…at all. He is clearly not on the same page regarding the counter jihad mission here on JW, handicapped or not.
I simply choose to ignore his posts.
gravenimage says
“Brian hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–wrote:
What an woman wear have no bearing on her following islamic law.
………………………..
*Really*? Why doesn’t “DefenderofIslam” tell that to his coreligionists who beat and murder women who resist wearing the Hijab or Burqa?
More:
For the last 12 or 14 years I was being than security guard for sunday school I donot tell the woman treacher how to dress .
………………………..
Well, that’s big of him. But he has repeatedly said that when Muslims reach enough numbers that they will vote in brutal Shari’ah law, which will surely include barbaric punishments for women who do not adhere to “cover”.
More:
I donot tell muslum woman who are not in sunday school on how to dress.
………………………..
Why would a Muslim woman be in Sunday school? Unless he is actually talking about a Muslim Madrassah?
In this case, there are probably higher-ranking Muslim punks telling these women how to dress.
More:
We have than new brother and sister came new muslum. The sister wore than tight bodysuit under than modest outfit the color of the cloth match her skin color very closely I ask some of the sister to talk to her about it. I noticed some brother being uneasy about her outfit.
………………………..
In other words, “DefenderofIslam* *does* tell women how to dress–he just issues his oppressive demands through a proxy.
And of course “brothers”–Muslim men–are “uneasy” about any woman being allowed to dress freely.
“DefenderofIslam” is just proving Judge Pirro’s points here.
Brian hoff says
When the Rome Empire became christian rome laws change. When rome was pagon rule woman have more right. When christian start to take over woman lost most of they right. When there are more muslum in society then the laws will change. I was born in america with than brain damaged speech center.
Brian hoff says
Most of our woman know how to dress right by either come from other strict religion with than strict dress code or born than muslum. She waanot born than muslum or came from strict religon background.
somehistory says
hoff
Being born with a “damaged speech center” is no excuse for excusing islam and its evil practices. Being born with a “damaged speech center” doesn’t really apply…because you are not “speaking.” This is writing, and writing is different from speaking. Using the dictionary would be a good way to improve your writing so that it makes more sense. Just remember that there is no “sense” in islam…as one prominent moslim said, “There is no logic in islam.” But improving your writing would at least limit your incorrect use of “than.”
And remember what Clint Eastwood said: “A man’s got to know his limitations.”
Victoria English says
So, as a linguist, I think I can state with sufficient confidence that your English language usage is not from brain damage. It is clearly Islamic English with the use of a computer generated translator. Nice try. Would you like try double jeopardy where the stakes are higher? Let’s see how your translator handles idioms.
mortimer says
Many Muslim citizens of the US are practicing Islam-à-la-carte by picking and choosing what they fancy and leaving the rest.
A woman who wears the Islamic veil and says she supports the US constitution is self-contradictory and most likely is not very knowledgeable about Sharia or the constitution. Both systems are now highly codified.
Muslims do not actually have the right to pick and choose which Islamic doctrines they like, because that is ‘BIDA’ (innovation) and all BIDA is ‘forbidden’ and haram (heretical).
Muslims are largely ignoring Sharia law while pretending to themselves and non-Muslims that they are not ignoring Sharia. 60% of Sharia laws (or more) cannot be practiced legally in most countries.
Brian hoff says
This woman need to have the tittle judge remove from her name. She is unfit to be than judge in a court of law.
somehistory says
hoff
There is a game called “Clue.” You should save up your pennies and buy one. Then, at least, you would have a “clue.” In the meantime, as you attempt to save the money, why not watch “The Wizard of Oz.” There is a pertinent plea that applies to you, expressed in song. Just listen to the scarecrow and sing along.
gravenimage says
I think what “Brian hoff”–really, “DefenderofIslam”–means is that Judge Pirro could not be a judge in a Shari’ah court. This is certainly true.
He has said before that as soon as Muslims can they will throw out the Constitution and impose oppressive Shari’ah law.
Again, he is proving Judge Pirro’s points here.
observer says
Strength Jeanine Pirro !!!!
If you have JW’s support what more do you need ?
Of course the ignorant and politically correct will hound you.
It helps them to feel so very much better about themselves, which they will …… until the wolf – knife in hand – comes knocking at their door baying for their blood. By which time it will be too late for them. In their abysmal lack of understanding of reality, they give great support & strength to those currently & yet-to-be-radicalised by this violent ideology.
Tis the way of the world as it currently is.
Hold firm to your convictions.
Michael Copeland says
“I am a traitor to America because my religion requires me to be.”
Samir Khan of New York.
Richard Cole says
The Judge did absolutely nothing wrong. Fox needs to wake up and smell the coffee. Radical Muslims are among us and they will attempt to take control of this country by any means possible. They are a cult of Satan.
somehistory says
Revelation 13 is being fulfilled. So many are losing their means to “buy and sell” because they are refusing the mark.
She should ‘take back’ her apology. If she gets fired, some other company will hire her and she can continue to ask about the lawlessness of islam to which moslims, like omar and tlaib, adhere.
OVV says
“A Fox News online producer, Hufsa Kamal, criticized Pirro’s remarks on social media, writing: ‘@JudgeJeanine can you stop spreading this false narrative that somehow Muslims hate America or women who wear a hijab aren’t American enough? You have Muslims working at the same network you do, including myself. K thx.’ ”
Note the classic straw man fallacy technique used by Kamal in falsely claiming that Pirro is attacking all Muslims when she was in fact rightly questioning the loyalty of Omar and the incompatibility of Islamic Sharia law with the US Constitution. Nowhere did she suggest that Muslims hate America or women wearing a hijab aren’t America enough.”
Kamal owes Pirro an apology for purposely mischaracterizing her remarks to make her look like a bigot, which is simply a ploy to eventually get her off the air if she dares to cross the bogus line one more time no matter how benign or legitimate the crossing may be. Real questions and discussions about Islam must not be allowed so that the false “Islam is a Religion of Peace” narrative can be maintained.
Kamal should also be disciplined by Fox and fired if she pulls such a stunt again, but since Fox continues to get wimpier by the day, Pirro will be the one crucified while Kamal will be praised.
eduardo odraude says
“You have Muslims working at the same network you do, including myself. K thx.”
Can it be that Hufsa Kamal does not realize there is an element of threat in her statement?
Hey Hufsa, do you read your own hadith?
Muhammad says there is to be no punishment for murdering someone who insults him
For example, in Sunan Abu-Dawud, a canonical hadith collection:
Book 38, Number 4348:
https://muflihun.com/abudawood/39/4348
Another canonical hadith:
Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 39, Number 4349:
Michael Copeland says
Alleging that Judge Janine asserted that “Muslims hate America” is, itself, “spreading a false narrative”.
This is a spectacular own goal by Hufsa Kamal.
somehistory says
OVV
Well said.
Ashley says
Robert Spencer writes “However, the hijab is part of such a system, and that’s all Pirro was saying. She should not have apologized…”
____________________
Robert, I can’t find a single citation that Jeanine Pirro issued an apology.
Can someone please post a link that Pirro apologized for her remarks?
Thanks in advance!
gravenimage says
Here’s a link, Ashley:
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/433446-fox-news-condemns-pirros-remarks-about-omar
“I’ve seen a lot of comments about my opening statement from Saturday night’s show and I did not call Rep. Omar un-American,” Pirro said.
“My intention was to ask a question and start a debate, but of course because one is Muslim does not mean you don’t support the Constitution.”
Pirro added that she invites Omar “to come on my show any time to discuss all of the important issues facing America today.”
….
This is, thankfully, not a grovelling apology. Still, Pirro should not have been pressured into making an apology in the first place.
Ashley says
Thanks for that, Graven!
I don’t believe Pirro’s “My intention was to ask a question and start a debate, but of course because one is Muslim does not mean you don’t support the Constitution” written statement an apology…at all. I see Pirro merely clarifying that a Muslim can support the Constitution, and I have to agree with that. Pirro is correct…she never called Omar un-American.
Pirro made no mention of Omar, a political representative in the state of Minnesota, donning the hijab in her statement. Smart gal.
I’m proud of Pirro. No apology, just a statement of clarification.
Making a clarification and issuing an apology are two different matters. The former is assertive, the latter humiliating.
I could be splitting hairs on the matter but it is an extremely important issue to me that no apology has been rendered.
If you simply Google “Pirro Omar apology” you will find that ALL articles will reference that Pirro hasn’t apologized. That has many folks hopping mad.
But not you and me!
Best to you, GI!
eduardo odraude says
Glad to hear this.
CRUSADER says
Fox isn’t Liberal enough for the DNC to okay them to cover Primary Debates for Presidential Campaigns….
But:
…then, there is this:
Muslim Fox News producer calls out Pirro: ‘You have Muslims working here at Fox …
Muslim Fox News producer added her voice to those criticizing Fox News host Jeanine Pirro for her comments on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-Minn.)
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/433453-muslim-fox-news-producer-calls-out-pirro-you-have-muslims-working-at-the-same
gravenimage says
Fox News “strongly” condemns Jeanine Pirro for asking if Rep. Ilhan Omar adheres to Sharia
…………………………..
This is *insane*. Pirro asked a damn good question here. That even Fox News is engaged in this appeasement of Muslims is disgusting.
MaryLetty says
Love Pirro, very disappointed with Fox more and more. I’m surprised no one has mentioned OANN, One America network as an alternative to Fox.
PRCS says
Representative Ilhan Omar (D-UMMA)
Carolyne says
Representative Ilhan Omar. (Dum and Dumma.)
Geoffrey de Brito says
Murdoch the elder has turned over Fox to his liberal sons. They are turning Fox News to the liberal… dark side.
Kilauea says
It’s hard to believe news whether it’s on CNN or FOX. They all have an agenda. Fox softened up when Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bought a minority interest in Fox’s parent company, Twenty First Century Fox.
Gene says
I strongly condemn the Fox News Channel’s ignorant condemnation of host Jeanine Pirro.
gravenimage says
+1
eduardo odraude says
+1.
Ignorant, or very possibly cowardly, or greedy, or some combination of all three.
eduardo odraude says
To be clear, I meant the 10:42 remark as an agreement with Gene and gravenimage.
More Ham Ed says
Vox oops I mean FOX should know better. So I’m heating up a ham sandwich to ease my stress a little over this offensive news lately what they are doing to pirro. The leftist media is going nuts like vampires just “google search” the single word pirro, all leftist propaganda results in the top 50.
Cube says
And more bacon.
Debi Brand says
Max says
Fox news got a choice. Join the competition for the leftist audience and get in competition with CNN, CBS, ABC, The New Yorker and the Washington post, etc. or stick to the centre and keep their existing audience. The choice is theirs.
It is not a coincidence that Judge Janine is the most watched programme in her time slot.
Max says
Fox News denounced Pirro’s remarks, saying: “We strongly condemn Jeanine Pirro’s comments about Rep. Ilhan Omar. They do not reflect those of the network and we have addressed the matter with her directly.
Politically correct cowards.
PRCS says
Pirro’s question demonstrates her ignorance of Islam.
1. It’s ISLAMIC law, not Sharia law. The term she’s looking for is “the shari’ah”–Islam’s yellow brick road.
2. Like all Muslims, of course Omar adheres to Islamic law. Given, however, hat most of the world’s Muslims have not FULLY submitted, do not FULLY comply, the degree to which she adheres cannot be known until she’s asked about that.
Maybe Diane Feinstein can ask her about that.
Raja says
I don’t know if any journo has questioned Omar on her statement of “Obama got away with murder..” These are serious matters and the truth must come out (and for shaming the Muslim apologists)
Pirro, in my opinion is a courageous lady and she has also maintained her decorum by being polite to the rep. (Some journo can be brash or even rude)
The junior Murdoch’s need to know that they need to stand for something, news / views making is not just money making business…
Shame on her colleague Kalam for defending his co-relgionist that is an evil political system under the guise of a faith system. He should be defending the constitution or the free West when 91% of murders take place due to Islam.
somehistory says
Raja
She has since denied saying it, says the media took her words out of context, and said she ‘loves’ her fellow moslim (o).
eduardo odraude says
In a recent video, Robert Spencer said he loves Muslims.
Hating Muslims is ill-advised. The point here is not to hate anyone but to tell the truth about Islam’s core texts and teachings and to come up with humane solutions to the threat Islamic teachings represent to free and open societies. Many Muslims are not aware of what their own core texts teach. But the leadership knows.
Raja says
Thank you Somehistory and Eduardo Odraude for your replies to my comments.
You are right about your comment on 91% Islamic contribution to terror casualites.
God bless…
eduardo odraude says
Raja, I believe you are referring to a recent headline that said something like: 91% of terrorist attacks in Europe are jihadist attacks done in the name of Islam.
Naildriver says
This fake news mob appeal to have even Fox employees (because they are Muslim) give public upbraiding to Pirro is disgusting; as it mimics Islam’s appeal to the mob — not to mention the lies.
Free thinking people should find all Muslims enemy operatives; just in varying degrees of culpability, till Mecca itself invites interfaith visitation with preaching visits by the pope, and suppression and out lawing of its sharia throughout the world.– which isn’t going to happen.
Islam needs to be forbidden in our government, prisons, child care, public education, and military; and treated as communism was during the cold war.
somehistory says
According to a news report, the U.S. is bombing al shabab in somalia. It’s a surprise that omar has not complained about that. Guess she’s too focused on insulting Israel, the Jews, and congratulating herself on causing a big stir in the States, the Congress and FOX News.
Raja says
Somehistory,
She won’t stop these theatrics any time soon as war mongering like hating/killing non-Muslims, grand-standing is after all mainstream Islam. Interesting that a propaganda machine is 1400 years old and not the invention of Marx.
It is lamentable that Left and willfull ignorants of Islam are being swayed in this lady’s nonsense.
Why not call this mental illness? I guess the Left is already burning its midnight llamp on this issue.Celibirities and politicians have this trait and common sickness..
Highsider says
FOX…..dig deeper re: Islam. You make yourself sound foolish by presuming to spank someone over something you have made apparent you know nil about.
eduardo odraude says
“You have Muslims working at the same network you do, including myself. K thx.” – Hufsa Kamal
Can it be that Hufsa Kamal does not realize there is an element of threat in her statement?
Hey Hufsa, do you read your own hadith?
Muhammad affirms that those who do not follow him will be slaughtered
On page 222 (326 in the Arabic) of the earliest Muslim biography of Muhammad:
https://www.goo.gl/G78Rbj
gravenimage says
Oh, I think she understands the threat just fine…
Dennis Pasek says
That is absolutely correct!
The Dems really are neo-Marxist.
They favor the concept of ‘Equality of Outcome’ rather than ‘Equal Opportunity’.
The term that they use for concealment and deception is ‘Post-Modernist’, which is the new term for ‘Marxist Communist’ hoping that the uninformed will not catch on.
They also use the term ‘Progressive’, which sounds really good until you recognize that they are actually better described as the ‘Regressive Left’.
Angel says
So we have a “Hufsa Kamal, Fox News online producer” position himself (or herself) as political/religious police just because Judge Jeanine asked a very legitimate question? Oh, but wait! She was asking a legitimate question about a self-declared Muslim antisemitic Congresswoman named Omar, so that’s a no-no, even for Fox? Are we to conclude that even in right-leaning news outfits anyone with a Muslim name is automatically a Sharia guardian? And to even ask the question would be – what else – “islamophobic”? This Kamal person is not helping the cause of Muslims, on the contrary, it will only encourage more people to look at any Muslim with suspicion. And Fox should sanction him (or her) just as much as they did Judge Pirro, unless of course they did it – ignoramuses that they are – at the urging of Kamal, in which case they should get rid of him (or her) as fast as they can for having manipulated them into making a very bad and very stupid decision.
Judge Pirro is absolutely right to ask if Omar supports Sharia law, which is 100% antithetic to the US Constitution in too many ways to count. It’s a question that is bound to be asked again and again until she gives an answer. If she says yes, she will be honest and will have to be evicted from Congress. If she says no she will be lying, and will have to be evicted from Congress just the same. Do the Fox News executives really want to be watching this story go by under their nose when they could have been the first ones to report?
DumpedFoxLongAgo says
Turn the channel folks. Fox news is lib owned, lib managed and they worship at the PC alter. Fox news is playing you. Remember how they dumped on Trump bigtime during the lead to the 2016 election. They’re libs, with a few non-libs sprinkled on top. Switch to real news OANN for straight news without yappers and ego maniacs.
somehistory says
eduardo odraude
To be clear, I did not say anything about “hating moslims.” What I wrote is what omar said she said about “o” and “murder” being taken out of context and that she said she “loves o”…as opposed to condemning him for murder committed while in office.
i did not say I hated or that she, or anyone, should hate…I didn’t even use that word. So, if you read my comments and wish to reply, please be sure you understand what I have written.
And, I have no intention of following the example of any human as to “what or whom” I hate. My example is Jesus Christ. I hope that is clear.
eduardo odraude says
Good to hear that clarification.
somehistory says
A good rule of thumb is to remember Proverbs 18:13.
somehistory says
Per the Hollywood Reporter, “Fox News host Jeanine Pirro’s Saturday night show has already lost at least three corporate advertisers after she said on her March 9 broadcast that Muslim congresswoman Ilhan Omar is “Sharia-compliant” because she wears a traditional hijab head covering.”
***********************************************
The Judge “asked” a question. It deserves an answer. The three companies are afraid of offending islam. They are the losers here.
emmellkaycee says
FOX has become part of the problem of Islam support in this country. Support for a militaristic, fanatical religious, barbaric tribal political ideology taking advantage of the opportunities that are presently being given it by the Media, social platforms AND individuals in our *own* Government! An ideology that is ANATHEMA to our Constitutionally protected way of INHERENT FREEDOM life!! ???
If you [speaking generally], as a bonafide Citizen of America are *not* PISSED OFF by this, then YOU too, are part of the TREASONOUS problem!!! ???
paul 316 says
Somehistory,
You are right, the three companies are losers and when I find their names I’ll no longer honor their products. American’s better open their eyes and ears fast before oppressive sharia supersedes the Constitution. The idea “that will never happen” is what the muslims are counting on for American’s to think it is not possible. They will never stop their attacks against American law and us infidels. Everywhere islam goes, it brings sorrow and woe. Maybe we could ban muslims from coming to America, it’s not an ethnicity, it’s the sick ideology.
Ashley says
Here you go, paul316:
Personal-finance marketer NerdWallet, pharmaceutical advertiser Novo Nordis and online marketplace Letgo have indicated in press statements they will at stop running ads in Pirro’s program.
paul 316 says
Ashley,
Thanks for the info
CRUSADER says
ACT for America strives to uphold Constitutional override of Shariah
ActforAmerica.org/issues
paul 316 says
Crusader,
Thanks to for the info, went to the site and I’m looking to get involved.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Jeannine Pirro (nee Ferris, daughter of Nasser Ferris and Esther Awad, both Christian Lebanese Arabs) knows her stuff and correctly interpreted the meaning of Sura 33:59.
So of course the leftopathic Murdoch Brothers who, along with a Saudi Prince, own FOX (FAUX Noise?) had to berate and condemn her for hurting the poor widdle cwiminals’ feewings by telling the truth about their crimes!
Ashley says
This sure is becoming soap opera fodder…
https://www.mediaite.com/online/fox-news-producer-calls-michelle-malkin-vile-for-attacking-colleague-who-condemned-jeanine-pirro/
paul 316 says
Ashley,
Fox News had to know that hiring a muslim was going to be a problem sooner or latter especially in a right wing conservative media group. Pirro should never give in with an apology of any kind, she has told the truth. The hajib is more proof that muslims do not plan on assimilating to the American way of life.
Ashley says
Agree, paul316.
Can’t say I’m familiar with Jeanine Pirro (we don’t have a television) but I sense she’s going to stick to her guns and will not be tendering an apology. She had every right to defend herself.
Fox News made a BIG mistake rebuking Pirro’s inquisitive posture in this fiasco. The network should have stepped up to the plate and fully supported Pirro. She said nothing offensive.
Pirro was slammed for wanting to initiate a debate. Omar dons a hijab while representing Michigan…the conflict of interest is glaring.
Proud of Pirro. Disgusted with Fox.
AmyP says
She should not apologize. I love the Judge’s show and watch it every week-end, why? Because she is correct and right on point. FOX grow some not everything needs an apology, if it does, then you need to apologize for Juan Williams daily.
Frank Anderson says
Tonight, Sat 3/16, Pirro is not on the program. This could be a very good time to remember that some “friends” are there only as long as we submit to their control and pay them to be friends. I call those “bought friends” and find I am much better away from them. When a person or a group cannot accept an honest, well-grounded question that is nothing more than the truth, that is the time to move away and find better company.