Sharia-adherent nations have long “sought a determination from the United Nations that any criticism of Islam or Muslims is ‘Islamophobia’ and banned globally.’”
But somehow Westerners still generally refuse to acknowledge the real meaning and intent of the concept of “Islamophobia.” In short, it’s intended to promote the supremacy of the Sharia by discrediting and silencing critics of Islam. The UN declared its intention to become closer with the OIC years ago, and it has happened. Now:
Nations belonging to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and other governments adhering to Shariah law across the world are ramping up their new campaign with the United Nations to prohibit all speech that Muslims consider offensive.
This aggressive campaign is the logical next step following years of appeasement, thanks to politically correct Western leaders. There have been enough warnings. Now, the final stage for Western subjugation has arrived, and the more Westerners fight for their own right to the freedom of speech, the more aggressive the “Islamophobia” brigade will become, particularly in light of the fact that they have come this far through bullying, intimidation, deceit and manipulation. They’re not about to surrender now, as they have been encouraged by too many Western dhimmis surrendering to them.
Pakistan Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi incited more support to silence any opposition to Islam and its adherents – including speech condemning Islam for its scriptural inciting of terrorists to conduct jihad (holy war) on “infidels.”
Mainstream Muslim groups in the West share the message of Lodhi and routinely persecute those who call out the truth about Islam. Lodhi stated a common message which is now embraced across the West in describing the so-called consequences of those who offend Islam:
“An inevitable consequence is to fan the flames of bigotry, intolerance, anti-Muslim hatred and xenophobia”
An “inclusive political process for durable peace” by rejecting “Islamophobia” is what Lodhi — and other stealth jihadists who are promoting the Sharia — have duped Westerners into believing as they promote Islamic anti-blasphemy laws.
“UN poised to launch global ban on all criticism of Islam,” by Michael F. Haverluck, One News Now, June 23, 2019:
Nations belonging to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and other governments adhering to Shariah law across the world are ramping up their new campaign with the United Nations to prohibit all speech that Muslims consider offensive.
“Islamist nations … long have sought a determination from the United Nations that any criticism of Islam or Muslims is ‘Islamophobia’ and banned globally,’” WND reported, noting that with 57 members, the OIC represents the largest voting bloc in the U.N. “But each time it has come up for a vote, more realistic arguments prevailed and the campaign never was legitimized.”
Pakistan putting on the pressure
After U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres unveiled the new “U.N. Strategy and Plan of Action” to fight so-called “hate speech” at a special meeting in the packed Economic and Social (ECOSOC) chamber, Pakistan Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi incited more support to silence any opposition to Islam and its adherents – including speech condemning Islam for its scriptural inciting of terrorists to conduct jihad (holy war) on “infidels.”An inevitable consequence is to fan the flames of bigotry, intolerance, anti-Muslim hatred and xenophobia,” Lodhi proclaimed before ambassadors, senior diplomats and high-ranking U.N. officials, as quoted in a press release, according to MSN. “My Prime Minister Imran Khan has recently again called for urgent action to counter Islamophobia, which is today the most prevalent expression of racism and hatred against ‘the other.'”
Cathryn Paradise says
Doesn’t surprise me since the UN is controlled by moslems. Moslems hate it when the truth gets out about their demonic religion.
Don McKellar says
Does Trump shut down the UN’s US digs on the first day of his second term? It would make a very productive pro-freedom, pro-America, pro-nationalist addition to his first day check list. A lot of good would be done.
mortimer says
Muslims want to silence ALL news reports about jihadic terrorism.
Murad says
And surprisingly and puzzlingly the western kuffar help them (muslims ) do that.
Betty says
Trump need to be informed about this. pray he gets the un,eu out of America all together. both are run by moslems period both need destroyed in every country they are the reason for our invasion.
Jim says
The U.N. has no rule over me and the Muslim do not as well.
Sandy says
Absolutely!!!
Nancy Slovik says
Firstly, many people get it wrong, Islam IS NOT a religion, by it’s very dictionary definition it meets all the criteria for a CULT….. period!! It is nothing more the a demonic CULT, they literally inadvertently worship the devil/paganism…
Frank Anderson says
Ms. Slovik, the number of people writing here who cannot get past the religion question is amazing. The label religion usually invokes the US Constitution’s First Amendment “freedom of religion” clause to immunize religious practices from further examination. I suggest, with few agreeing, that is error. I have written a number of times a detailed legal explanation that a conspiracy is 1) an agreement, if you will a contract, 2) between 2 or more people, humans or legal entities, 3) for an illegal purpose or to use illegal means for an otherwise legal purpose, and 4) ANY overt act by ANY of its members in furtherance of the goals. Islam is in fact a written agreement widely published and practiced for 1400 years that by its terms is “final, perfect, complete and unchangeable” to conquer, enslave or kill the entire world. It has killed over that time an estimated 250 million to 1 Billion people. There is a lower limit of the number of parties in a conspiracy, TWO. There is no upper limit. There is no time limit on a conspiracy. “The knowledge of one is the knowledge of all; The acts of one are the acts of all.” It is not necessary for any member to know all the details to be criminally responsible for any act: Only that the accused and prosecuted party understands the goals and makes them his own. Allowing yourself to be fog-bound in the religion/cult question means you will go around in circles and never reach a conclusion. US law on conspiracy is quite clear and long established. I urge you to do some reading and talk with a currently licensed and practicing attorney in your jurisdiction who is familiar with the law and cases for the best understanding. It would help you more forward instead of wasting your time trying to convince those who refuse to see. I have learned from experience that some people are willfully and deliberately blind. Hopefully you are not.
Jaladhi says
So telling the truth about Islam/Muslims is insulting them! If they are so insulted by learning truths about their religion then they should leave that religion – no more problems of being insulted. UN is proposing to curb our free speech to protect these cry babies won’t be offended. I say grow up/wake up and smell the coffee.
mortimer says
Yes, jaladhi is correct. Muslims want to silence ‘SLANDERS’ against Islam, Mohammed, jihadism, and TAQIYYA. This campaign is the JIHAD OF THE PEN. The OIC wants all opposition to JIHAD to be quelled so that the worldwide JIHAD can go forward without being stopped even by public opinion.
They want to control public opinion about Islam.
Mark says
If they don’t like it they can leave! Oh wait….. why leave when you everything free and the government covers up your crimes to avoid being labeled racist
Connie wood says
You are spot on it seams any adverse comments are deleted or banned
Angemon says
If I wanted to live under blasphemy laws, I’d move to Russia…
gravenimage says
You aren’t wrong, Angemon:
https://end-blasphemy-laws.org/countries/europe/russia/
Wellington says
No, Angemon certainly isn’t wrong, gravenimage, and the link you provided only proves for the upteenth time that Russia remains to this day a retard on liberty.
Yes, liberty can be abused, and God knows many in the West over the past half century have abused it, but Russia has failed in the opposite direction from its inception, whether under Czars, First Secretaries or now Putin, by nixing liberty in toto.
The Aristotelian means, the “middle of the road,” is necessary where freedom (and most everything else in life) is concerned. Russia continues to fail in one extreme direction and many, i.e., Leftists, in the West respecting the opposite extreme.
Pathetic. Troubling. Painfully instructive. Good for Islam though since Mo’s creed functions as the ultimate parasite over the longest period of time in man’s history. What a cockroach the Islamic religion is. Like no other. And note to lebel: This is not about ethnic cleansing, liar. Rather this is about how awful the ideology Islam truly is, divorced ENTIRELY from ethnicity, race or gender.
gravenimage says
+1
Paul J says
Welcome to Russia watch, the site where sanctimonious Americans try to assauge their own guilt for their role in numerous atrocities in world history and their ongoing role in the decay of the West by constantly denigrating Russia and her people. Conveniently forgetting or at least minimizing the mess in their own backyard, they have to keep disparaging Russia to make themselves feel good. Where they get highly agitated if anyone dare criticize the good ole US of A but are quite happy to throw mud at all and sundry as they see fit; despite the fact that all nations have committed evil at some stage in their history including the USA.
PS. All this carry on over who has the biggest skid marks in their jocks, Russia or the US is a distraction from who is the enemy to both nations ISLAM. Trump and Putin are on a First name basis with each other ( I’ve heard Putin call Trump Donald, how often does that happen between world leaders in public) yet cold war fossils still want to point score with each other. I repeat; ISLAM is the the enemy, both to the US and the land my Grandmother was born in; Russia.
God Bless the Bear and the Bald Eagle. United we have a chance, divided we fall.
##News Flash## Mad Mo was actually Russian.## Boom Boom.
Wellington says
Bullshit. Russia denigrates itself. Doubt me? Well then, ask Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Finns, Georgians, Ukrainians, et al. Forget about Americans at present and concentrate on these other peoples and their take on Russia.
Why the hell do you think nations like Poland, Estonia and Czechia wanted into NATO ABOVE ALL OTHER REASONS? Yeah, ponder this one. It ain’t hard.
Russia remains a retard on liberty to this day and sees its neighbors as vassals or enemies. One knows this or should know it. Quit it with the “kick-America-first garbage.”
Paul J says
If you actually read what I wrote you intellectual dipshit I’m not bagging America first at all. What part of ALL NATIONS don’t you understand. Your reply just proves my point.
Paul J says
We in Australia have plenty to be ashamed about too. You just haven’t got the backbone to admit to your own faults so you have to make yourself feel better by pointing out others.
Paul J says
BTW who gave half of Eastern Europe to Stalin in the first place? What happened to Gen. Patton (RIP) ?
Wellington says
Paul J: Sanctimonious Americans? Committing numerous atrocities in world history? Americans are responsible for the decay of the West? Blah, blah, blah. And you’re not “bagging America first at all?” Hey, maybe fools like Merkel, Macron, May, Trudeau, the present Pope, Blair, Brown, Cameron, the pathetic EU, et al. have had something to do with the decay of the West. Take your “kick-America-first” crap and stick it where the sun never shines.
As for not admitting faults, I and plenty of other Americans regularly admit the wrongs America has committed. Probably no country on earth has tried to make up for its wrongs more than America has. I taught American history for a third of a century and conveyed to my students what America got right, which has been a great deal, and what it got wrong. So, you set up a straw man and knocked it down. More bullshit, courtesy of you
And I notice you didn’t bother to address my point about so many peoples like the Poles and Czechs who have no affection for Russia at all and indeed their animosity to, and suspicion of, Russia was the number one reason such peoples wanted to be in NATO, the greatest military alliance in history for the promotion and protection of freedom (and yes, by now Turkey should have been kicked out of NATO). When the hell has Russia ever been involved in promoting freedom? When has Russia ever apologized for its wrongdoings? My God, just this past March the Russian polling agency, Levada, released its latest polling on Russians’ view of Stalin. 70% of Russians have a positive view of one of the greatest mass murderers in history. 70%! Stunning. The harm that has been done to Russia is overwhelmingly self-inflicted or don’t you get even this. Blaming America here is pathetic.
Paul J says
Once again you refuse to actually read what I said. But then what can you expect from an intellectual know it all. God Bless the Bald Eagle is a reference to the USA smart arse. Hardly shit canning it. Never trust an intellectual, I don’t care how long you “taught” your version of history. Your pompous long winded lectures are nothing more than an attempt to show us all how clever you are. If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. Even Dr Bill Warner from CSPI has said you professores are full of it. Your own importance that is.
Angemon says
“God Bless the Bald Eagle is a reference to the USA smart arse. Hardly shit canning it. ”
Right – because “sanctimonious Americans try to assauge their own guilt for their role in numerous atrocities in world history and their ongoing role in the decay of the West” is not shit-canning at all… Oh, no – you blame the US for the decaying of the West but you you wish God to bless them (cognitive dissonance much?) so all is fine and dandy…
Paul J says
I can’t stick anything where the sun doesn’t shine, your head is already there taking up all the space.
gravenimage says
Wait–Paul J is blaming the US for Russia taking over Eastern Europe?
We had to do it because the Americans didn’t stop us! How absurd is this?
Paul J says
GI, that’s according to Churchill. He was there at the time, you weren’t, or me. He was not very happy with the carve up of Europe post WW11. Duckduckgo it, it was a surprise to me too.
Paul J says
Churchill at the Yalta conference in 1945 “All of the Balkans except Greece will Bolshevisied and there is nothing I can do to prevent it. There is nothing I can do for poor Poland, either” FDR over ruled him.
Angemon says
“Churchill at the Yalta conference in 1945 “All of the Balkans except Greece will Bolshevisied and there is nothing I can do to prevent it. There is nothing I can do for poor Poland, either””
LOL!!! Are you real? Seriously? Are you really arguing that saying “X is going to happen and there’s nothing I can do to prevent it” equals to causing X? And all this after a self-righteous ramble about people who, according to you, “have to keep disparaging Russia to make themselves feel good“? Do you not have mirror at home or are you a vampire?
gravenimage says
No, of course Churchill was not happy about Stalin’s repulsive totalitarian land grab at the end of WWII. This does *not* mean that he was blaming FDR America and pretending that Russia had nothing to do with it. What absolute claptrap.
One can argue about whether the war-weary West should have challenged the Soviets–I can certainly make an argument that they should have done so. But this is *not* the same as it being the fault of the US for the Communists’ actions.
Paul J says
And so here we are on JIHAD WATCH arguing over who was the biggest a/hole at the end of WW11. Why do the French say more women were raped by “liberating” GI’s than “occupying” Nazis. How many German POW’s were deliberately starved to death in former concentration camps? (as per the Geneva Convention, hmm). Truth is I am more concerned with what is going to happen in the future than what has happened in the past. My Grand parents told me all that ( they were there) GrandPa was a German who fought in the Red Army. As I said in my first post on this thread ALL NATIONS have done evil deeds to be ashamed off. The dinosaurs that want to point score here shouldn’t stir up a hornets nest, you will assuredly get stung yourselves. The more you want to argue about the past and carry on with confected outrage the greater the likelihood that the future will belong to Islam. They know their “enemy”, while we squabble amongst ourselves. Keep your eye on the ball, lest you fumble it and islam scores. Also actually read what people write instead of inventing narratives and opinions.
Angemon says
“And so here we are on JIHAD WATCH arguing over who was the biggest a/hole at the end of WW11. ”
“We”?
“Why do the French say more women were raped by “liberating” GI’s than “occupying” Nazis. ”
Citation needed. In any case, since you brought WWII and rape, shall we ask the German women what they went through at the hands of the Red Army?
“As I said in my first post on this thread ALL NATIONS have done evil deeds to be ashamed off. ”
And yet, you only seemingly find examples of Western nations…
“The more you want to argue about the past and carry on with confected outrage the greater the likelihood that the future will belong to Islam.”
Perhaps you could convince Putin that islam, not Western nations, are the enemy to fear? Oh, right – how much % of the Russian population is muslim? Common enemy, etc.
“ Also actually read what people write instead of inventing narratives and opinions.”
Seeing how your replies make little to no sense, I’ll assume your level of projection is more than enough to run an IMAX theatre…
gravenimage says
Paul J wrote:
And so here we are on JIHAD WATCH arguing over who was the biggest a/hole at the end of WW11 (sic).
…………………………
Actually, it only seems to be Paul J doing this.
More:
Why do the French say more women were raped by “liberating” GI’s than “occupying” Nazis.
…………………………
The French knew that they could complain to Allied leaders over any presumed misconduct by Allied troops–the implication that any conquered people could do the same with the Nazis is, of course, grotesquely absurd.
And look at his sneer quotes on “liberating”–clearly he would have preferred that Europe had never been freed from the Nazis. *Ugh*.
More:
How many German POW’s were deliberately starved to death in former concentration camps? (as per the Geneva Convention, hmm).
…………………………
The only confirmations of mistreatment of German POWs was by the Soviets (the very people Paul J is exonerating),
The only claim against the Americans that I have ever seen is by Canadian fiction writer James Bacque, In his book “Other Losses” he accuses Dwight Eisenhower of running death camps deliberately killing three quarters of a million German POWs.
He makes such bizarre claims as there being no food shortages in post war Europe, and makes no note of many soldiers being wounded or sick.
Most scholars consider his work to be “worse than worthless”.
More:
Truth is I am more concerned with what is going to happen in the future than what has happened in the past.
…………………………
As are we all–but the implication that it made no difference that we have bravely faced down evil before is just absurd. That many of our parents or grandparents courageously defeated Fascism makes no difference is just plain wrong.
In fact, many apologists for Islam falsely do this–claim that Infidels are no better than are Jihadists, and so we have no right to defend against their depredations.
More:
My Grand parents told me all that ( they were there) GrandPa was a German who fought in the Red Army. As I said in my first post on this thread ALL NATIONS have done evil deeds to be ashamed off. The dinosaurs that want to point score here shouldn’t stir up a hornets nest, you will assuredly get stung yourselves. The more you want to argue about the past and carry on with confected outrage the greater the likelihood that the future will belong to Islam. They know their “enemy”, while we squabble amongst ourselves. Keep your eye on the ball, lest you fumble it and islam scores. Also actually read what people write instead of inventing narratives and opinions.
…………………………
The implication that if we dare say that defeating Fascism was a *good* thing that this will enable Islam to conquer us makes no sense whatsoever. The fact that we faced evil before and were able to prevail should *hearten* us.
Wellington says
Paul J: I did read what you wrote and you think at the end of your post where you say “God bless the Bald Eagle” after all the denigrating crap you pointed out about America makes up for this? Right.
As for WWII, you know or should know that all kinds of people, including German civilians, did everything they could as the war was coming to an end to get away from Russian soldiers and get to the Americans or the Brits. As John Toland detailed in his work, The Last Hundred Days, and as many other historians have, Russian soldiers raped every female in sight, whether 8 or 80. As Toland narrates matters, American and British military observers stationed with the Russians wanted to shoot Russian soldiers for the atrocities they were committing but were told by Allied Command they cold do nothing because the Russians were our allies. Eisenhower in his memoirs of WWII, Crusade in Europe, recalled having a conversation with Marshall Zhukov right after the war about land mine detectors and was astonished when Zhukov told him they didn’t use them. They just sent in the first wave of soldiers who got blown up and then sent in additional waves thereafter. Eisenhower went on to note that any American officer who did that would be court martialed .
Respecting Yalta, yes, I and many other Americans have long criticized FDR for what he arguably gave away there and he certainly didn’t listen to Churchill about having independent advisers in the upcoming Polish elections (my grandparents came from Poland and they detested the Russians—just about the worst thing I could be called when a boy and did something bad was to be told by my Polish relatives, including my mother, that I was “as bad as a Russian”), but as many nonetheless have pointed out, the Russians were already all over Eastern Europe with their troops and there wasn’t much anyone could have done about this. Moreover, why blame the Americans for the Hell that descended over Eastern Europe after WWII? That was Russia’s fault FIRST AND FOREMOST. As for what you averred by French women, I would like to see the sources. I do know that Americans were welcomed en masse by the French in 1944-1945 and many French to this day, especially older French men and women, retain great respect for the sacrifices Americans and their British, Canadian and Polish allies suffered in liberating France.
As for people here at JW wanting “to score points,” I detect projection from you big time. Wise up.
Paul J says
The people who suffered the most in Russia were Russians themselves at the hands of COMMUNISTS. Do you conveniently forget that. 10’s of millions killed by Stalin and the bolshies.
Angemon says
Paul J posted:
“The people who suffered the most in Russia were Russians themselves at the hands of COMMUNISTS.”
And many victims of islamic terror attacks are muslims who belong to a different sect. It means jack s*** to non-muslims killed by islamic terror attacks. This is standard Soviet-era whataboutism.
gravenimage says
This is like spouting apologia for Islam by noting that Muslims suffer most at the hands of Jihadists.
Communism, like Islam, is a totalitarian creed that both abuses others and eats it own. This doesn’t make totalitarianism–of any stripe–somehow less destructive.
Wellington says
Paul J: I remember when I taught a young Czech woman and, for argument’s sake, having heard what you touted here, i.e., that the Russians suffered too under Communism and thus they were victims just like Poles, Estonians, Latvians, Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, et al., I couldn’t even complete my sentence when the young Czech cut me off and said she wasn’t buying it and it was Russia that inflicted itself on her people and many others. She also praised America for the Marshall Plan, Truman Doctrine, Berlin Airlift, et al. and drew a huge contrast between the areas America liberated in WWII that became free nations and the nations the Russians took over in the waning days of the war and which became totalitarian states with lackies kowtowing to Russians.
She knew her history. I wonder if you do. You seem like a rank apologist for a people who have not comprehended the importance of liberty, have treated their neighbors like vassals or enemies whether under Czars or First Secretaries and this is still going on under Putin who is a killer, a liar and a massive meddler in other nations’ affairs (e.g. the cyber attack on Estonia he authorized and threatening the Czechs and Poles with massive retaliation if they should accept an extremely limited missile shield from America designed to knock out a rogue missile or two even though Russia could inundate Poland and Czechia with literally hundreds of missiles). And don’t forget what I already brought up to you on this thread, i.e., in a poll taken just this past March 70% of Russians had a positive view of Stalin. Any people, 70% of whom have a positive view of Stalin, is a people who are pathetic and whom I never would want to trust. Indeed, such a people are possessed of a HUGE character flaw.
Right now, a nation like Poland has its greatest ally in its thousand year history, the USA, because an attack on one NATO nation is an attack on all NATO nations. Putin and the Russians don’t like this at all and I don’t give a damn they don’t like this at all because it is Russia here that is grievously at fault for not grasping the importance of liberty. If Russia had been really smart since the fall of the USSR, it would be in NATO by now (as both Bush 41 and Clinton suggested was possible) but instead Russia continues to function in retarded mode on the matter of freedom. What a waste.
Angemon says
Paul J posted:
“Welcome to Russia watch, the site where sanctimonious Americans try to assauge their own guilt for their role in numerous atrocities in world history and their ongoing role in the decay of the West by constantly denigrating Russia and her people.”
If that was aimed at me, well, I, for one, am not American. And I certainly have done nothing that might be accurately described as “denigrating Russia”. Which is more than I can say about the Russian government doing to me, as an individual bred, born and raised in a Western nation.
“Conveniently forgetting or at least minimizing the mess in their own backyard,”
Exactly what mess are you talking about? My backyard is squeaky clean.
“they have to keep disparaging Russia to make themselves feel good.”
Again, if that was aimed at me, nothing could be further from the truth. And I’ll notice that your little dime-store psychology wannabe rant does nothing to prove that blasphemy laws exist in Russia.
“Where they get highly agitated if anyone dare criticize the good ole US of A”
If by “criticizing” you mean “blatantly lying about”, you might be on to something…
And isn’t it funny that you’ve never taken to task the people who, on a daily basis, lie and lie and lie about the US and the West? Why, just today I’ve read several posts about “the US giving taxpayer money to Saudi Arabia” when what really happened was thet the US sold weapons to the Saudis. Where was your indignation then? For all your talk about “uniting” against the “common enemy”, you only preach to the people who actually take it on themselves to defend their nation/culture from a barrage of lies and slander …
Paul J says
Not denying any of that, again ALL NATIONS have things to be ashamed of. Now go and take a salt water bath all you pompous windbags and toughen your very thin skins up a bit. I’ve got better things to do than banter with you self worshiping clowns.
Angemon says
Paul J posted:
“Not denying any of that, again ALL NATIONS have things to be ashamed of. ”
And yet, like I said, isn’t it funny that you’ve never taken to task the people who, on a daily basis, lie and lie and lie about the US and the West?
“Now go and take a salt water bath all you pompous windbags and toughen your very thin skins up a bit. I’ve got better things to do than banter with you self worshiping clowns.”
Oh, the projection levels here are off the charts – Paul J, who is clearly angry and rambling senselessly, is telling me to “toughen my skin” – even though he was the one who started this altercation because I said something that’s demonstrably true: Russia has blasphemy laws.
Paul J says
Just one little thing more, your upset about people saying the US is giving money to the Saudi’s when they actually SOLD them weapons. WTF are you selling weapons to the Saudi’s in the first place for? That’s what you should be indignant about.
Angemon says
Paul J posted:
“Just one little thing more”
So you lied when you said you had better things to do?
“your upset about people saying the US is giving money to the Saudi’s when they actually SOLD them weapons.”
Yes, how dare I criticize someone who repeatedly stated a blatant lie?
“WTF are you selling weapons to the Saudi’s in the first place for?”
When, exactly, have I sold any weapons to SA? This rambling idiocy only makes sense in a context where i’m an American-. Which I stated I’m not – apparently, Paul J missed that bit…
“That’s what you should be indignant about.”
Oh, look, the Saudis have less billions to spend funding terrorism. Why should I be indignant about that, hmmmmm? BTW, I don’t see you decrying Russia or China for selling weapons to the genocidal, Christian persecuting Iran. Plank in your eye, double standards, rules for thee but not for me, etc.
Paul J says
Typo, you’re
Jaladhi says
>“An inevitable consequence is to fan the flames of bigotry, intolerance, anti-Muslim hatred and xenophobia”<
Irony of ironies – only Muslims are guilty of practicing the above in the name of protecting Islam!! Of course Maleeha Lodhi doesn't see that!!
Besides, these crybabies are always offended – they will be offended if you call Islam Islam!!
gravenimage says
Crybullies.
Savvy Kafir says
That does sum them up nicely, graven!
carolyne says
The US needs to expel the UN from New York and send it and its anti-American members to a place more to their liking such as Mecca. We need to immediately stop financing this hotbed of violent and uncivilized people and withdraw from membership. The property should then be converted to tax-paying entities i.e. apartments and shops. These people who are in NY are immune from our laws and they and their spouses and children can flout the law and even murder with no consequences. And BTW, they cannot hold us to any law they pass which abrogates our Constitution. Nor can Congress pass such a law. in fact they cannot hold us to any of their barbaric laws no matter what they pass.
Wellington says
A beautiful sentiment, carolyne, which I enthusiastically support. The day the UN is expelled from NYC and America such a day will be a great day for the species, Homo sapiens, even though multitudes of this species would miss this completely.
Well, some dogs are smarter than others. Some apes (Pongids) are smarter than others. Some fish are smarter than others. Diito for humans.
gravenimage says
Agreed, carolyne and Wellington.
Frank Anderson says
carolyne, I agree with you and hope you are correct. Remember Article 6 Clause 2 includes treaties as Federal Law, which is the supreme law of the land. I don’t recall too many issues where a Constitutional provision contradicted a treaty. One I think involves the Small Arms Treaty which I think clearly offends the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Obama signed it but never presented it for ratification. But he treated it as binding, calling on every licensed gunsmith to obtain a UN license for 1500 dollars per year, an amount that would put most gunsmiths out of business. DJT, I believe, has withdrawn Obama’s signature and killed that treaty for the time being. I think we in the US should always pay attention to any effort to take away or limit our rights by the back door through the UN instead of the amendment process in the Constitution.
Barb says
I totally agree
alex says
Carolyne: people should write to top U.S. officials (including President Trump) and firmly but politely demand this (what you have suggested).
revereridesagain says
I have never obeyed any edict forbidding “blasphemy” and have no intention of starting in obedience to the commands of these savages.
James says
Perhaps the West needs to propose UN laws forbidding speech offensive to Christians as Christophobia, or against Hindus as Hinduphobia or against Buddhists as Buddhistophobia, etc. Why should Muslims be privileged?
katherine says
Oh no ! You conveniently forgot the most vulnerable of them all – the Jews, you anti-Jude.
Herbert says
How can anyone blaspheme a god that doesn’t exist? How can Moslims say that drawing a picture of Muhammad is Blasphemy, when they never seen him or his likeness? How can Moslims prove that their god Allah is, was, and always a god. Up to 1600 years ago, Islam had never even mentioned any prophet named Muhammad. They just don’t like being wrong and looking like the savage animals they are. They kill, cheat, lie, and rape all in the name of a made up entity named Muhammad the perfect animal. No proof. And besides, I can’t blaspheme a got that I don’t believe exists, and if they are so supreme, why do they kill for Allah when they claim he is all knowing? If Allah was so knowing, then he would have destroyed all of us already, so after 1600 years we still are here, they lost so many wars, and still don’t have full supremacy? Because We Infidels know of the true God of the True Moses, not some borrowed story that was spun into so many lies that the only people who believe any of it, are imbasiles.
Frank Anderson says
Herbert, I started challenging the existence of any god when I was a teenager. My entire family went totally ballistic when I asked such daring questions, except my uncle. After 7 years of really harsh, direct questions, I BELIEVE I received an answer that causes me to believe in the existence of something that I am incapable of proving. This belief gives me hope for a better day and comfort when things get extremely rough. It has kept me going a number of times when I was ready to quit. But I cannot prove what I believe to you or any other person, because that is your right and challenge to find your connection. Muslims have no choice it they want to survive in a totally intolerant, unforgiving misery in preparation for a “glorious” afterlife. Any effort to change any teaching, to reform, to moderate, is apostasy punishable by death. Helping anyone escape what is literally to me Hell on Earth is an honorable calling. The teaching “Blessed are the merciful for they shall obtain mercy” has many applications.
ploome says
from 1999, David Littman
https://myislam.dk/articles/en/littman%20islamism-grows-stronger-at-the-united-nations.php
https://www.meforum.org/campus-watch/8028/damned-if-you-do
https://www.dhimmitude.org/littman-biography.html
Wellington says
The last good thing the UN did was back in 1950 when it authorized standing up to the invasion by North Korea of South Korea. Since then it has been all downhill. During the Cold War the Communist Bloc dominated the UN and since the fall of the totalitarianism which is Marxism the UN has become dominated by another totalitarian ideology, i.e., Islam in the form of the OIC.
The UN (Useless Nations) is rooted in apologies for totalitarianism of whatever breed. Most everything it touches it makes worse. Time is way overdue for the UN to go the way of the League of Nations, yet another attempt at world governance that failed, though for different reasons.
City-states are too small to protect themselves. Any attempt at world governance invites the worst of mankind to engage in control-freak behavior. The best of the lot is the nation state which, if it has four things: 1) democracy, 2) capitalism, 3) a decent legal system. and 4) a proper moral system to guide, is really the best mankind can do. Stunning that so many have not figured this out by now but so many haven’t.
N.B., Islam fails in ALL four matters I mentioned above. It makes a farce of democracy whenever it tries it. It engages in crony capitalism, not real capitalism, and which difference many, especially those opposed to capitalism, cannot distinguish and thus so many times when rubes like Lefties are criticizing capitalism what they are really in insouciant ignorant mode criticizing is crony capitalism. And Islam has both a wretched legal system and a putrid moral system. So, Islam fails in all four areas and failure in even in one of these areas is enough to insure far less than optimal results. Conclusion: Islam is a total loser all around.
gravenimage says
There are more unfree than free nations, so they will always dominate a body like the UN.
Wellington says
And free nations are getting fewer. For instance, the UK, France and Sweden.
Not looking good for liberty.
James Lincoln says
Yes, Wellington – the world as a whole is getting less free – and more dangerous.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Wellington and James.
Herbert says
The UN was conceived by all the weak and failing Nations, because they had nothing so started ganging up and banding together so they could try to take over the United States. We were too big for them so now they find a barbaric Ideology to be the masters of the universe. They figured if they can just shut down our freedoms, and pushed America into Socialism, by dumbing down the children since 1950, they would eventually make themselves supreme. It won’t work the way they have played their hand gave away their folded hand. America get your kids smart again and teach them the morals that your grandparents learned and was proud of. You can’t be proud of being a bully so don’t even try, Socialism and Islam are nothing but weak bullies that can’t do anything without bloodshed, so let’s take things to the next step and just ignore these Barbarians like they don’t exist. We don’t owe anyone anything. And Moslims and Islam is not a race or religion, they are an Ideology.
gravenimage says
Actually, the UN was conceived in the US–but it was an unrealistic utopian scheme from the beginning, since unfree nations outnumbered free nations from the very beginning. The UN was dominated by Communist nations for years, and now largely by Muslim polities allying with other unfree countries.
Westman says
Agreed. Islam is a flop that is based on punishment and control. It even killed its own, “Golden Age”, with bid’a. The scientific and industrial revolution left it in the sand to soak up more blood.
Wellington says
Yep, Westman, the more Islam you have the more repression and stupidity you have. Any advances in the Early and High Middle Ages for the Islamic world were due to ignoring the worst aspects of Islam (of which there are many) as well as much borrowing from others for which, no surprise, Muzzies took credit.
Have Islam? Well then, the more you do the more your society will be retarded. A guarantee.
Anyone doubting me just look at the over fifty majority Muslim nations in our time for confirmation of my “hypothesis.” And just ponder how much the Saudis and other Buttlims would have extracted and refined petroleum products found on their real estate minus Western technology. And so on and so on. Ah, must be Western colonialism (Islamic imperialism of course never existed) which is the culprit here. Surely. Who but an Islamophobe could doubt it?
owensgate says
If it had been MY decision when the search for oil started in the 1920’s, I’d have gotten the subsoil rights first, and sucked them dry of oil.
Barb says
We have got to DEFEND our RIGHT to criticize Islam the ECLJ had two Petitions out earlier this year!
Here are the links:
https://eclj.org/religious-autonomy/coe/la-charia-est-incompatible-avec-les-droits-de-lhomme
https://eclj.org/free-speech/coe/defend-the-right-to-criticise-islam-in-europe
Can some one stop this wickedness of the OIC – the UN Secretary General must resign if he let’s this pass and all western countries should pull the plug on the UN if they do not stand up for FREE SPEECH!
mortimer says
Sign the PETITION against SHARIA BLASPHEMY LAWS !
European Center for Law and Justice is fighting for our rights. SUPPORT IT!
KWJ says
Saudi Arabia doesn’t have a marriage age. Ayatollah Khomeini wrote perverse things about having sex with infants. Child marriage and pregnancies happen, for sure in Iran, with as young as 10-12 year olds. If someone says, Well, Muhammad did it,” then how can you say anything positive? If you say times have changed then Muhammad’s behavior is no longer exemplar and a model to imitate. Per the Sira not even all his followers agreed with such young marriages. Also, all Muslims don’t agree Aisha was 6 though there’s more evidence she was. Also on Paradise they get young boys “fresh as pearls” which is also Arabian culture.
The European Council on Human Rights doesn’t seem to care much about childrens’ rights just as the feckless British people who knew the Pakistani rape gangs were going on.
Pakistan has some audacity to talk about blasphemy laws considering all the unproven accusations of blasphemy that got people murdered and a bunch sit in prisons. Don’t like your neighbor? Accuse him of blasphemy and the vigilantes kill them. The ECHR should be forced to watch a video of a mob of ordinary Muslim men in Kabul, Afghanistan kill a Muslim woman before she could even get to court. It is really sick.
Given centuries of people accusing people of being witches, of heresy and blasphemy, the ECHR is NOT about human rights. They’ve sold their souls to the devil, so to speak. They think not blasphemizing would be “religious peace” and “mutual tolerance”? No, they’re just making it worse, of course. A very shameful display of dhimmification on the ECHR’s part.
Think about “religious peace” and “mutual tolerance” in Islamspeak.
Anjuli Pandavar says
After such a takeover of the UN by an intrinsically discriminating, intrinsically violent, intrinsically genocidal, intrinsically divisive, intrinsically punitive and intrinsically inert ideology, one might legitimately ask, “wherefore art thou, UNO?”
Rufluc says
Simply put, a phobia is an irrational fear of something. So is a fear of Islam irrational? Absolutely not! 1400 years of barbaric history of this murderous cult is well documented, and still is up to the present day!
It has incited and carried out millions of murders against anyone who chooses not to believe or follow its satanic teachings, and is written in a way as to deceive Western fools who haven’t the intelligence or the balls to stand up and confront it for what it really is. The religion of Satan!
Savvy Kafir says
“Islamohostilis” is more accurate than “Islamophobic”.
Salome says
No surprise that Pakistan’s behind the push.
gravenimage says
So true, Salome. You get messages on social media–here in the West!–saying that your comments violate the laws of Pakistan. As if we should care–we should be proud.
owensgate says
It’s so pleasing and comfortable to me that I have violated the laws of “Pahkistan” (barry’s pronunciation), and they can do NOTHING about it. To my way of thinking, a platoon of Blue Helmets on U.S. soil is a “Target Rich Environment”. Absolutely no concern to me what a rancid Pakistani thinks.
Paul J says
To receive a notice that you have violated Pakistan’s laws is confirmation that you have spoken the truth.
gravenimage says
UN poised to launch global ban on speech that insults Muslims
…………………
This is Shari’ah law, where the Infidels cannot even name what is threatening them.
The only proper response to this is resistance–and mockery and criticism of the foul creed of Islam.
CRUSADER says
North American — Britain Alliance (post-BrExit)
will have to blaze an alternative path for future policy making….
sans U.N.
Perhaps future US President Nikki Haley can utilize her experience with the U.N.
to carve a pathway?
In the meantime, the flag of Islam continues to unfurl….
Speaking of flags, the Islamic Republic of Iran’s supremacy flag has interesting design
— for those who don’t know much about its meaning:
———————————————————————–
Tricolour comprising equal horizontal bands of green, white and red with the national emblem (“Allah”) in red centred on the white band and the takbir written 11 times in the Kufic script in white, at the bottom of the green and the top of the red band.
This flag was adopted on 29 July 1980, as a reflection of the changes brought about by the Iranian Revolution of 1979, which resulted in the replacement of 2,500 years of continuous Persian monarchy with an Islamic Republic under the Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution, supported by a wide range of Islamist organizations and student movements. In opposition to the current regime in Iran, a number of Iranian exiles (particularly in Los Angeles) continue to use the Iranian tricolor with the Lion and Sun at the center.
The Tawhid is an emblem of Iran —
The parliament of Iran, per the 1980 constitution, changed the flag and seal of state insofar as the Lion and Sun were replaced by the red emblem in the centre of the flag. Designed by Hamid Nadimi, and officially approved by Parliament and the Leader Grand Ayatollah Khomeini on 9 May 1980, this emblem is a highly stylised composite of various Islamic elements: a geometrically symmetric form of the word Allah (“God”) and overlapping parts of the phrase lā ʾilāha ʾillā l-Lāh, (There is no God Except Allah), forming a monogram in the form of a tulip it consists of four crescents and a line. The four crescents read from right to left; the first crescent is the letter aleph, the second crescent is the first laam; the vertical line is the second laam, and the third and fourth crescents together form the heh. Above the central stroke is a tashdid (a diacritical mark indicating gemination) resembling “W”. The tulip shape of the emblem as a whole memorialises those who have died for Iran and symbolises the values of patriotism and self-sacrifice, building on a legend that red tulips grow from the shed blood of martyrs. This emblem is somewhat similar to the Khanda but has no relation to Sikhism and its meaning to that religious community.
Kufic script:
Written in white and repeated eleven times on the inner edges of each the green and the red band is the phrase Allahu Akbar (Allah is the greatest) in a stylised version of the kufic script. This symbolises the calls of Allahu Akbar on the night of 22 Bahman (11 February 1979) when the national radio of Iran broadcast: “From Tehran, the voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran” and marked the unofficial beginning of the Islamic Republic (with the official day being 2 May). This writing renders the flag non-reversible.
Colors:
Green.
In the Iranian culture, it symbolises growth, happiness, unity, nature, vitality and the Iranian languages. Historically, a green and white flag in a triangular form used to be the flag of the Persians (Pars).
White.
The traditional colour of white symbolizes freedom, because white represents blankness and it is free to carry anything on it.
Red.
It stands for martyrdom. In the Iranian culture, it symbolises bravery, fire, life, love, warmth, and sophistication. Historically, a red and white flag in a triangular form used to be the flag of the Medes (Mada).
Cyrus the Great, a Persian, defeated his grandfather Astyages, the High Judge (King) of the Medes, and founded Iran by uniting the Persians and the Medes. The Iranian flag (which was later designed under Darius I the Great) symbolised this unity and victory (green above white and red) as the flag of the people of Iran.
—————
Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Iran
Below reference mentions how the rise of Muslims coincided with an unprecedented political, social, economic, and military weakness in Persia. Once a major world power, the Sasanian Empire had exhausted its human and material resources after decades of warfare against the Byzantine Empire. With civil war erupting between different factions, the empire was no longer centralized. Arab Muslims first attacked the Sassanid territory in 633… Islam would become the dominant religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquest_of_Persia
CRUSADER says
What of the supposed origin of the crescent moon symbol
seen throughout Islamic cultural history ?
===============================
ISLAM emerged in Arabia where travel along the desert trade routes was largely by night, and navigation depended upon the position of the moon and stars. The moon thus represents the guidance of God on the path through life. The new moon also represents the Muslim calendar, which has 12 months each of 29 or 30 days. So in Islam the lunar month and the calendar month coincide, and the new moon is eagerly awaited, especially at the end of the month of Ramadan when its sighting means that the celebrations of ‘Id al-Fitr can begin.
The usage of the so-called crescent moon in many Islamic symbols cannot be related to the importance attached to the new moon in Islam. The moon depicted on, e.g. many Islamic flags is the old moon, the reverse shape of the new moon, which is like a letter C backwards.
Again ‘crescent,’ implying ‘increasing,’ is properly applicable only to the young moon: the old moon is diminishing in phase. Presumably the moon is depicted as a crescent in Islamic, and many other, contexts as that shape is unambiguously lunar.
Although the crescent is indeed a very widespread motif in Islamic iconography, it is not Islamic in origin nor exclusive to that religion. The emblem has been used in Christian art for many centuries in depictions of the Virgin Mary, for example. It is in fact one of the oldest icons in human history, having been known in graphic depictions since at least as early as the Babylonian period in Mesopotamia.
The stele of Ur Namu, for example, dating from 2100 BC, includes the crescent moon to symbolise the god Sin, along with a star representing Shamash, the sun god. Later the moon became a female deity, typified by the goddess Artemis and her many counterparts, including Diana, who was celebrated as the moon-goddess in Roman times and depicted with a crescent on her brow.
The device seems to have entered Islam via the Seljuk Turks who dominated Anatolia in the 12th century, and was widely used by their successors, the Ottoman Turks, who eventually became the principal Islamic nation, and whose Sultan held the title of Caliph until 1922. The story that the Ottomans designed the crescent upon their conquest of Constantinople must be dismissed as mere legend, since the device considerably predates 1453.
It wasn’t until the Ottoman Empire that the symbolism of the crescent moon and star became affiliated with the Muslim world. When the Turks conquered Constantinople (Istanbul) in 1453 CE, they adopted the city’s existing flag and symbol. Legend holds that the founder of the Ottoman Empire, Osman, had a dream in which the crescent moon stretched from one end of the earth to the other. Taking this as a good omen, he chose to keep the crescent and make it the symbol of his dynasty. There is speculation that the five points on the star represent the five pillars of Islam, but this is pure conjecture. The five points were not standard on the Ottoman flags, and are still not standard on flags used in the Muslim world today.
In the late 19th century the Pan-Islamic movement sponsored by the Sultan Abdul Hamid II used the crescent and star on a green flag as part of its propaganda, and from this were derived the flags of Egypt and Pakistan and many other Islamic states.
The crescent moon (hilal) motif is featured with a five or six pointed star (the latter known as Solomon’s shield in the Islamic world ) on early Islamic coins circa 695 AD, but it carried no distinct Islamic connotation. Some 500 years later, it appears in association with various astrological/astronomical symbols on 12th century Islamic metal-work, but when depicted in manuscript painting, held by a seated man, it is thought to represent the authority of a high court official: ‘the sun [is] to the king and the moon [is] to the vizier … ‘
———–
Source:
https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-1411,00.html
KWJ says
Not sure why you didn’t mention this: The crescent moon was venerated in Arabia for centuries. In the Book of Judges in the Old Testament the Hebrews mention how the Arabians adorned their camels and hung moons from the camels’ necks. I was reading in the Smithsonian about Wendell Phillips who went with a team to Yemen to look for ancient objects. Southern Arabia (now Yemen) Sana, Timna, Marib was a prosperous area due to the frankincense trade and passing camel caravans. They called it then “Happy Arabia.”
He unearthed a alabaster bust of a woman and a gold necklace with a crescent moon on it dated around 100 A.D. In Marib (mentioned by the OT in regards to the Queen of Sheba) is a moon temple dedicated to the moon god Ilumquh. Inside it is decorated with alabaster bulls’ heads and such motifs since Ilumquh often took the shape of a bull with crescent shaped horns. “Phillips has already noticed the crescent moon-now Islamic-but previously an ancient pagan symbol-everywhere in South Arabia, painted on women’s foreheads and stamped on incense burners. “I could really see how a godless people, seeking something visible to worship, would choose the moon,” he mused. “It’s light was kindlier than the brilliant sun’s, and it’s effect on…alabaster cities and green fields turned dark velvet at night must have been inspirational.” [They weren’t godless, lol, that’s monotheism supremacy.]
The moon temple main enclosure is rounded like the moon and may have at one point circled a sacred water source for camel caravans. When the frankincense trade dried up so did their irrigation systems and dam, not unlike the wealthy Nabateans who had a water piping system and pools with water. Bedouins probably took off looking for greener pastures, that is water.
What the Ottomans did has nothing to do with the Arabians’ moon affinity. With Yemen’s proximity to Egypt, they also unearthed some Greek style earthenware and they also had imports. It was a major trade route.
I think Muhammad’s mother was connected to the Yemen area and buried there per Ishaq’s biography. Either way, there are many references to the Yemen area in Islam.
If a coin had a moon on it…well, Arabians believed in the supernatural jinn troublemakers long before Islam too. Islam kept them too. The Greeks also use a lunar calendar for their Easter which can’t begin until the last quarter of the moon or after it (and also after Passover.)
The Saudi flag is the Saud clan’s victory, I believe.
In the Qur’an Dhul Qarnayn is thought to be Alexander the Great who was also called the two horned one and depicted that way. He wasn’t the only one called that besides Ilumquh the moon god. All Muslims don’t agree it’s Alexander. Makes one wonder.
somehistory says
Jesus said, “When you catch sight of the disgusting thing causing desolation, as spoken of through Daniel the Prophet (let the reader use discernment), standing in a holy place (Luke 21)”…
as a warning that destruction was near. One of those times of destruction was when the Romans under Titus attacked and destroyed Jerusalem. The Romans brought in their government ‘standard’…their flag… and set it up in what was a “holy place” dedicated to the God Who sent Jesus.
Christ’s reference to Daniel was regarding the verse in chapter 11 where we are told that the “king of the North” sets up this entity that is destructive, disgusting, and will be made to stand “in a holy place.” Daniel said this would happen in the “time of the end.”
moslims have long salivated for their evil to be protected by the laws of non moslim nations. They regularly speak of their hatred and desire to rape and murder, but it is so offensive to them to hear non moslims tell about these aspects of islam…because it is said with disapproval and condemnation.
With this “ban”…they are advancing the idea that islam is too “holy” to b spoken about by non moslims, unless those ones are willing to lie and say it’s a good thing, or they must only tell the truth if it is done in a manner to praise the “disgusting thing,” thereby making it stand as “holy.’
I, personally, refuse to lie for the evil that is islam, and will, as long as possible, tell the Truth about islam…that it is from God’s enemy, satan the devil and is full of disgusting things.
CRUSADER says
The Days of Ezekiel – speech by IDF Major Amir Tsarfati
Prophesy of End of Times….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWfK7T3PrHo
somehistory says
Thanks for the link. he makes a lot of sense, and I agree with most of what he says.
Interesting about the word the Chinese have for their wall. I had never heard that.
somehistory says
The words of Jesus, the verses in Ezekiel, Daniel, Revelation…all go together to inform those who wish to know, and to warn all of what is coming “upon the inhabited earth.” Like a puzzle picture that can only be completely discerned when all of the pieces are put together, each Scripture adds to our knowledge and understanding of what is taking place and soon to happen.
Lydia Church says
Bingo!
tgusa says
“to prohibit all speech that Muslims consider offensive.”
“Islamophobia, which is today the most prevalent expression of racism and hatred against ‘the other.’”
Target group = western leftist allies.
Prohibit all speech that leftists consider offensive. Sound familiar?
Muslims know the fools they can easily dupe and those they can’t.
Been there, seen that.
Where’d you dummies get your talking points, Harvard or Berkeley?
Dear UN, when I break the rules feel free to stop by anytime. I’ll be waiting.
CRUSADER says
Ha! Get your “A K 15” and your “A R 47” locked at the ready (LOL)
They’ll be coming for those, as well….
😉
tgusa says
Roflmao!
Lydia Church says
Shhh! Don’t say that around here!
Mortimer thinks that we have to check in with him first before we can defend ourselves! Probably didn’t give Trump the green light either the other day…
; )
(This refers to how he attacked me after I made a bold joke about Europe launching another crusade instead of taking the pope’s advice in an article from yesterday…)
Lydia Church says
And of course I mean to defend itself, which they have every right to do over there as does anyone else!
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Muslim leaders and their obsequious leftist defenders can’t offer any intellectual rebuttal to our legitimate concerns about islamic violence and hate, so they must intimidate the world into submission. Any uncomfortable truth about islam is “hate speech” while any rational immigration policies that might serve to maintain a healthy society are dismissed as race hatred or xenophobia. We live in a day and age where the hopes and dreams and religion of muslims takes precedence over everyone else’s. We aren’t supposed to care about the rape epidemic against our people or the loss of our neighborhoods to overbearing enclaves, we aren’t supposed to care about the destruction of our peace and freedoms for a 3rd rate religion that advocates murder and slavery of unbelievers. And never mind the tremendous strides the West has made in the area of human rights and equality, let’s just welcome in the throwback ideas of a depraved and violent religion, a religion that makes political violence and intellectual slavery a spiritual quest. NUTS!
My opinion, we “infidels” and “kafirs” (filthy, bigoted terms that muslims bestow upon us) must realize that muslims as a global enterprise will never have the courage to look within and admit the moral and intellectual deficiencies of their phony religion. And as long as the left encourages their jihad intentions with self-destructive concession then muslims who might have had the courage won’t dare challenge the traditions that keeps them enslaved. Now more than ever–as islam is challenged in the modern age like never before–we must rally behind good folks like Spencer and Geller and Wilders, who truly care about the human condition and want to live free of religious slavery. We as a species have already witnessed in our history the dramatic “play” of religious tyranny, where religion runs amok and wreaks havoc on the lives of good people and intellectual progress. And no religion more than islam proves my point, millions have died and suffered for that overgrown cult of superstitious hate. It would be the greatest betrayed to ourselves and god (if god even exists) if we don’t stop this fast-moving islamic train to hell. Islam is not just another “religion,” in fact, it’s not really best described as a religion. It’s an ideology that is a religion in name only, and whose founders (allegedly allah and muhammad) were murderers, bigots, and terrorist promoters. In the face of such evil we must have free speech, we must have the right to dissent. It is the only means of mitigating the inbuilt violence of islam. Without it , hate, murder, and war, is inevitable. We must never give into the bully tactics of muslims. Our human rights improvements are born of the blood and suffering of millions, we should feel duty bound unto death for our heritage. It is far better to fight for what we believe in now than to give in out of weakness and die for all the wrong reasons later.
Muslims who want to destroy our free speech for their sick “religion” can go to hell. Without free speech we become their b*tch and a slave to their demon god. No thanks.
KWJ says
The globalists’ one-world economy one-world government cult like war however it benefits them. Who do they yell about ad nauseam? Those who don’t think climate change is an “emergency,” right-wingers, Islamophobes and racists in general. They say people against immigration are xenophobic (fear of strangers) even if an Iraqi expatriate ex-Muslim doesn’t like it. They see anything and anyone as a wrench in their agenda fan. I really don’t think they care if you die even if it’s their fault. They are use to blood on their hands, what’s a little more even if it’s their own citizens? They are building powder kegs and blasphemy laws NEVER stopped even Muslims from fighting each other.
We are not bound to UN laws…Hillary already told the UN that some years ago and said “We can’t do that…we’ll just use good ol shaming and peer pressure.” Hillary is not for free speech or else she would have replied, “We can’t do that…we have free speech” and that’s that. It’s the Puritans all over again. It will be so hard to undo that we can’t let it happen…all of this…in the first place. These folks are nuts.
Frank Anderson says
KWJ, I think it is important to remember that as a general rule when a country ratifies a treaty, that treaty instantly becomes part of that country’s laws and may override other laws, such as the Constitution, which contradict the treaty. In the US, which actually has a written Constitution that is supposed to be really hard to change by amendment, Article 6 Clause 2, The Supremacy Clause, makes ratified treaties part of the supreme law of the land.
Now this is where it gets interesting: When John Kerry signed the UN Small Arms Treaty that destroys Second Amendment rights under the Obama Administration, the treaty was not presented for ratification, but instead was treated as binding and controlling law without ratification until the Trump administration withdrew signature of the US and stopped pretending this violation of the Constitution was law.
You can be as sure as daylight follows dawn that if another Democrat gets in the White House that treaty will be signed again and the Second Amendment will be challenged like it never has before. “Elections have Consequences.” Arrogance in person. Recipient for Nobel Peace Prize for nothing. BHO.
Frank Anderson says
KWJ, another important fact to remember that a treaty is an agreement or promise. Muslims are taught by their Perfect Man/Perfect Example that promises do not limit or control them. Treaties are binding only so long as they are convenient to the goals of the “final, perfect, complete and unchangeable” teachings. “What’s mine is MINE. What’s Yours is Negotiable.” The Soviets may have popularized this negotiating style; but muslims invented it.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
You summed it up well, KWJ, you understand perfectly the games played by the left. They don’t care about freedom or their country, only the increase in power and control islam will bring. To me this is a war, a war that pits intellectual and religious freedom against the barbarism of islam. I think the Middles Ages is an interesting time to know about, but I don’t think it’s a good idea for humanity to revert to it for islam. That was then, this is now; the challenges of today cannot be met using the primitive and immoral doctrines of a superannuated creed (never thought I’d use “superannuated” in my life time, lol). We should learn from the mistakes of the past, and islam is a mistake–probably the biggest mistake in human history.
I’ll save everyone the trouble of having to look it up.;
Superannuated: obsolete through age or new technological or intellectual developments.
If you disagree with my usage please leave a note in the suggestion box. 🙂
mortimer says
WHO APPOINTED THE UN as the POLICE or the CREATORS OF PUBLIC OPINION.
Renate says
It’s another one of those self-appointments. No wonder. Look at how many Islamic countries dominate at the UN. The world is going to become a lot quieter place suddenly if people can’t criticize Islam. People need to dispense with the UN.
Ray A says
Islam is a political construct controlling all aspects of Muslim lives – religion is just a component of that construct and is used a means to subvert laws of western societies.
Muslims are 7th Century Barbarians with general IQ’s of 70. They have memorized the false religious doctrines but can’t count to three.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Time to cancel this expensive farce. It fails at all of its important tasks like preventing and stopping genocides and famines, but it still deems itself critical to world peace. Time to shut it down. It’s gone well past being useless and expensive – it’s become a laughingstock.
Example: “Saudi Arabia elected to UN women’s rights commission / Watchdog director likens move to ‘making an arsonist the town fire chief'”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-un-womens-right-commission-un-watch-middle-east-muslim-driving-clothes-a7698536.html
Stephen Silverstein says
What about their disgusting attacks, verbal and otherwise, on Jews Christian’s, you name it?
The UN is nothing but a talking shop for these savages and it’s time Trump defended it and kicked it out of the USA.
Stephen Silverstein says
Defunded
gravenimage says
+1
FYI says
“speech that insults muslims”?
“I’m sorry Tristram but i don’t think the “prophet” muhammed would know how to appreciate Rachmaninov.The man was a philistine…I’m sorry Tristram.You see this?watch my foot Tristram..it’s going down Tristram{thump} ..it is down”
“How is Sahih Bukhari # 2442 insulting ?just because muhammed liked to wear Aisha’s dress whilst channeling “Al Lah”,his one legged pagan Arab god with two right hands:why should I care muhammed was a cross dresser?so what if the dude looked like a lady?we must be tolerant like islam is.haha”
“Here Buraq,here girl.!.has anyone seen Buraq?Muhammed’s magic horse with the head of a woman,wings and a peacock tail?Can we draw pictures of Buraq or does that ridicule islam?”
“What’s that?muhammed FAILED the poison test thus proving himself a FALSE prophet?”
“haha this is funny.
muhammed said women have “a DEFICIENCY of the mind” which is why k2:282 the koran insists a woman’s testimony is HALF that of a man.But answer me this?
Who was it that took out the great warrior of islam?
Who was it that cunningly used the poisoned meat trick to expose muhammed the misogynistic chauvinist bigot as a false prophet?
A woman
….and to add insult to injury a Jewish woman who had been enslaved by muhammed and whose husband she had murdered.
What poetic Justice too:muhammed,a mass murderer of Jews Abu dawud 4390,mighty warrior of islam
felled by…. a woman….and such a small woman too.
“Woman have a deficiency of the mind”:oh I don’t think so..that woman was a genius..”
“yo islam!Why yo mama soooo fat…”
“But why khalid,should anyone take the koran seriously given that it gets the religion of Moses wrong,contradicts itself,has talking ants and gets Astronomy and Biology wrong”:seriously,”the Sun sets in a muddy pool”?
abad says
The best reason ever to get the USA out of the UN.
If the UN wants to promote special rights for Islam and Ishnaq along with Moslems, fine, but leave the USA out of it. Maybe more UN countries will follow us.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
The UN is a malignant thing, a quasi-governmental world power, especially when it comes to information. Like so much of the governance business nowadays, the UN operates disconnected from reality wherever feasible. Accurately mocked as a Islam front organization, it has used the quasi-government setting of the UN to make fantastic assertions against Israel and its Jews.
Perhaps an even bigger and more historically profound reality-disconnection is its Climate Warming… whoops meant to type Climate Change… reports, and the bureaucracy that writes them. Just as most Infidels mistakenly think Islam is ok, they think that the world’s climate is on the edge of a disaster. That would mean the modern economy’s technology for reliable and cheap energy is untenable and must be changed. That puts the UN in the middle of it all, and it would go from a quasi-government to a real one, necessary because air and water are fluid and cross national borders. This in the absence of a single scientific proof that carbon dioxides causes global warming, even though it’s only about 0.003% of all greenhouse gases. Most of greenhouse gases are variants of dust, water and other natural elements.
And oh, the globe hasn’t warmed in 21 years. Computer models are tools, and are no form of proof for a scientific hypothesis. They’ve been wrong over 95% of the time, sucking in tens of billions of research dollars, much of it from the UN, little of it spent on proving the predicates input into the models. Why is carbon the key to it all given that it’s a minute physical factor the field of greenhouse gases? Could it be that hydrocarbon fuels as a group drive economic advancement.
All this is untenable, ridiculous, idiotic, and dangerous.
The UN needs to start its scientific work, and shut up until they’ve got something to show. The Infidel World needs to start its evaluation work, and shut up until they’ve got proof of Islam’s quality that is arrived at with full sourcing and traceability.
The probable outcomes? I predict the planet, which is tipping at the inflection point of starting an historic cooling cycle, will expose the climate practitioners who will gradually be eased into irrelevance. I predict a decades long terror war with countries reduced by significant disruption to the economic system that generates wealth. The Global Jihad has already started of course but hasn’t been dialed up to full volume yet,
PRCS says
I liked this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2NaiX-hvVQ
Old Fat Bald Socially Inept Ron says
Today it’s speech,…
tomorrow it’ll be church bells, beer, and bacon…
by next week they’ll be tossing homos from the rooftops and cutting camel throats in Times Square.
John Allan says
The UN is, is it? Well, as far as I – and no doubt more than a few others – am concerned, they can shove their ban up their collective arse.
b.a. freeman says
according to Lodhi, “Islamophobia … is today the most prevalent expression of racism and hatred against ‘the other’ …
—
isn’t it amazing that when one is a buddhist, a jain, an atheist, a christian, or *anything* but a muslim, one’s gender, eye color, hair texture, and skin color are of little or no consequence, but when one is a muslim, one suddenly becomes a member of a “race?”
these supremacist islamic bigots have learned well which guilt buttons to push to dhimmify the west. they are repulsive in their own special way, but the lying traitors (or profoundly unthinking obliviots, or downright stupid incompetents) of the left are a cancer that is destroying freedom across the planet. it is truly sad that civilization is rotting from within. let all who love freedom prepare now for the troubles to come!
Linde Barrera says
I hate no Muslims. I do not wish harm or death to any Muslim who obeys the laws of civilized Western nations. But I do hate Islam and I am proud to be ISLAMOPHOBIC.
OLD GUY says
Muslims are insecure, I think many may have doubts about Islam and Muhammads offensive teachings. There is nothing like the fear of being wrong and not wanting to hear about it. Muslim leadership can’t overcome the truth about their interpretation of Islam and fear their followers will convert to a peaceful version or another religion.
Ginger Snap says
This is an insidious move! Will the U.N. also protect Christians and Jews from hateful speech? It is time to pull the curtain back and show the world that the wizard behind the curtain is just a weak old person. Weak people often use fear to intimidate. Stand strong against a religion of an unloving false deity! There is only one true God who is loving. Let the Muslims believe in false idols. Just don’t let them change our lives or intimidate us!!
Rose Keeling says
Wake the hell up people, wake up! This is a take-over of our countries, our cultures, our laws, our lives, period…. WAKE THE HELL UP AND FIGHT BACK 100%…. STAND UP FOR OUR COUNTRIES AND U’RSELVES!
Westerners need to vote out ALL coward politicians that refuse to open their eyes and acknowledge the real truth and intent of this made-up word called “Islamophobia.”…. uggg…. Wake up and fight back people, fight back, make u’r voices heard loud and clear.
Frank Anderson says
Rose, please consider a question that I offer with polite courtesy; one that I ask myself every day: What can I do today to help ONE person wake up to the truth? I try to learn from every source, both good and bad, what to do and what to avoid. I learned when television first came to my home in the early 1950’s from a Catholic Sunday morning program, “It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness.” There is around us darkness that is threatening and growing upon us and all we value. The same kind of darkness circled Jews before WWII. Some saw it and did what they could while others did not. Some lived and many didn’t. Can we learn from their sacrifice?
gravenimage says
Frank, we can speak up.
I just received cartoonist Bosch Fawstin’s “My Mohammad Cartoons vol. 2” today–very brave stuff.
Frank Anderson says
GI, yes we can; and we can actually tell the truth instead of trying to conceal it and follow the muslim example of deception. There is nothing as cleansing and redeeming as the plain, simple, clear truth, even if it hurts a little. The truth hurts less than lies.
Bacherbazistan says
I hope Trump will slap the UN down firmly on this.
Jeremiah says
Revelation 13 starting with verse 11 explains what is happening.
Barb says
There is a way to fight back against the OIC and Pakistan and the UN! The OIC represents 57 Islamic Countries!
Get the other 136 countries in the UN to join the Organization Of Non-Islamic Countries – ONIC that will vote as a block to stop the ban and to vote as a block in support of Israel!
Ada Taiber says
Sadly, many of the nonislamic countries leaders are stupid corrupt leftists who get a lot of money from Muslim countries and organisations and depend on Muslims votes….
Frank Anderson says
Ada, you make a very helpful point. Non-muslim countries have little or no principles that they will not trade on one question for a favorable vote on another. Most blow in the diplomatic wind “horse trading” basic rights for their political goals, usually contrary to the rights and dreams of the people they pretend to represent.
NotALib_NoMo says
What about just “pointing out”? Suppose I’m not saying anything bad about islam, muslims, or their pedophile prophet, the pig-faced dog mohammed, but just “pointing out” that islam is a gutter cult, and it’s adherents gutter-cultists? What if I point out that mohammed, the pig-faced dog, is a pedophile and a madman? Would that be banned too?
Frank Anderson says
NOT, for what my opinion is worth, YES; and in the right place soon to be followed by a miserable session of torture and a horrible death. It might be worth reading the book or watching any of the movies of 1984 to be reminded of what is happening now. “He LOVED Big Brother!”
Ada Taiber says
Hi, Sadly I think that in the EU you can be nowadays banned, brought to court and fired from you Job! A man in UK was now fired from his job for putting in his Facebook a satiric video against all religions! He was fired only because Islam was one of the religions mentioned there…. I was banned for short periods from Facebook and twitter for writing that Muhammad was illiterate, pedophile, polygamist, sadistic murderer. sex maniac, and a liar ( every word is true and based on Islamic history and books). Islam is irreformable as it is based on the cruel unchangeable Koran and the life of MUHAMMAD! Sadly they succeed with their lies, terror and money!!!!
terry says
When we lose our Freedom of speech, they will rule.
terry says
When they take away our Freedom of speech, they rule.
Linda Goudsmit says
If the United Nations passes a global ban on speech that insults Muslims, it is time for the United States to withdraw from this corrupt organization and kick them out of New York.
Janice Capling says
Fake news
ismat Souheil safar says
Terrorism and Violence are not from Qura’an. Qura’an never promotes violence and killings against innocent people and you know it. Islam is the best religion in the world because Jews do not believe in Jesus. Christians do not believe in Mohammad. Islam Believes in Mohammad, Jesus, and Moses. So who is the most universal and fair religion? On the subject on hand: Jews have succeeded in making Anti-Holocaust rhetoric as wrong or illegal, so why can’t Muslims make “terrorism and violence related to Islam” as illegal and prohibited as well? In fact, this will promote peace and dialogue among nations. Terrorism and violence are being committed by White, blacks, Asians individuals(who do not represent their respected communities) across the world. With all due respect to all ethnic and religious backgrounds. It is so racist to relate terrorism and violence to Islam only as your Platform wants us to believe. BE FAIR AND JUST LIKE JESUS peace be upon him. Stop your racism against Islam. In fact, your anti-Islam rhetoric is a form of intellectual terrorism.
Angemon says
“Terrorism and Violence are not from Qura’an. ”
Terrorism and violence in general? Nope. Islamic terrorism and violence? Yes, they are. Quran, sunnah and ahadith – the unholy trilogy.
“Qura’an never promotes violence and killings against innocent people and you know it.2
Is someone who refuses to convert to islam “innocent”?
“Islam is the best religion in the world because Jews do not believe in Jesus. Christians do not believe in Mohammad.”
And rightfully so. Without divinity, Jesus – the biblical version, not the jihadi wannabe Issa – would be someone striving for social justice and personal responsibility. Without divinity, muhammad would still be a barbaric warlord.
“ Islam Believes in Mohammad, Jesus, and Moses. So who is the most universal and fair religion?”
Does islam believe that Jesus is the son of God, that he died in the cross and resuscitated? Also, don’t Bahai also believe in Moses, Jesus and muhammad? They also believe in the Báb, so, by your logic, Bahaism is the most universal and fair religion. If you’re being honest, you should convert to bahaism.
“On the subject on hand: Jews have succeeded in making Anti-Holocaust rhetoric as wrong or illegal, so why can’t Muslims make “terrorism and violence related to Islam” as illegal and prohibited as well?”
“Anti-holocaust”? You mean Holocaust denying, right? It is true that in some countries that is against the law, but are you sure it was the Jews that made it so? In any case, what does that have to do with making ““terrorism and violence related to Islam” as illegal and prohibited as well“? Why shouldn’t one be able to point out the islamic roots of islamic terrorism?
“In fact, this will promote peace and dialogue among nations.”
Does making Holocaust denial illegal promotes “peace and dialogue among nations”? Did Stalin’s denial of German invasion of Russia stopped the tanks dead in their tracks? Would making it illegal to say “Germany is invading us” put an end to the shellings?
“Terrorism and violence are being committed by White, blacks, Asians individuals(who do not represent their respected communities) across the world.”
There’s nothing inherent to skin colour that makes one more or less susceptible to turning into a terrorist – that is overwhelmingly the result of ideology. You have white muslims waging jihad in the Caucasus, black and brown muslims waging jihad in Africa and asian muslims waging jihad in asia. They’re doing so not because of the colour of their skin but because of the ideology they believe in.
“ It is so racist to relate terrorism and violence to Islam”
Islam is not a race. Even if it were, there’s nothing racist in pointing out facts.
“Stop your racism against Islam. In fact, your anti-Islam rhetoric is a form of intellectual terrorism.”
First of all, islam is an ideology. An ideology is a set of ideas, beliefs and ideals and, by definition, is not a race. Therefore, you can not be racist against islam any more that you can be racist against Christianity, Judaism, communism, capitalism, pastafarianism, nationalism, etc. Second, if believing in an ideology equates being a race, then, by definition, believing an opposite ideology also equates being a race. Therefore, your accusations of racism and intellectual terrorism on our part, based on our ideology, are racist and intellectual terrorism against us. Third, you does your holy book, which claims to be free of errors, claims that the Christian Trinity is God, Jesus and Mary, and that the Jews hold Ezra was on equal footing with God?