![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Amir Taheri writes in the Jerusalem Post (thanks to Joel) about a forthcoming meeting in Tehran that he says is drawing Islamic radicals from 40 countries, including members of top Shi'ite and Sunni jihad groups. Taheri adds some important considerations about the nature of the Iranian regime today:
Militants from some 40 countries across the globe are trekking to Teheran for a 10-day "revolutionary jamboree" in which "a new strategy to confront the American Great Satan" will be hammered out.The event is scheduled to start on February 1 to mark the 25th anniversary of the return to Iran from exile of the late Ayatollah Ruhallah Khomeini, father of the Islamic Revolution. It is not clear how many foreign militants will attend, but the official media promise a massive turnout to underline the Islamic Republic's position as the "throbbing heart of world resistance to American arrogance."
The guest list reads like a who's who of global terrorism.
In fact, most of the organizations attending the event, labeled "Ten-Days of Dawn," are branded by the United States and some European Union members as terrorist outfits. These include 17 branches of the Hizbullah, a worldwide militant Shi'ite movement created by Teheran in 1983.
Today, Teheran is a magnet for militant groups from many different national and ideological backgrounds. The Islamic Republic's hospitality cuts across even religious divides. Thus militant Sunni organizations, including two linked to al-Qaida - Ansar al-Islam (Companions of Islam) and Hizb Islami (The Islamic Party) - enjoy Iranian hospitality. They are joined by Latin American guerrilla outfits, clandestine Irish organizations, Basque and Corsican separatists, and a variety of leftist groups from Trotskyites to Guevarists. Teheran today is also the only capital where all the Palestinian militant movements have offices and, in some cases, training and financial facilities.
Iranian officials claim that the presence of these terror organizations in Iran is limited to "cultural and information activities." The militants' offices are known as daftar ertebat, which means "contact bureau," while the training offered by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards is presented as "courses in self-defense."
The war in Iraq and the capture of Saddam Hussein, however, have shaken the traditional Khomeinist assumption that the US will never risk a direct confrontation with the Iranian regime.
THAT VIEW is expressed in a celebrated dictum of Khomeini that is painted on the walls of the conference center where the militants will meet. It reads: "America Cannot Do A Damn Thing!"
Now, however, many in Teheran believe that unless the Iranian regime modifies aspects of its behavior, notably in its relations with terrorist organizations, it might find itself in military conflict with the US.
"Anyone who ignores the presence of the American war machine all around us suffers from deadly illusions," says Imadeddin Baqi, a member of the outgoing Islamic Majlis (parliament).
Until at least last December, one idea was to either cancel the event or curtail it to a one-day prayer session in Khomeini's mausoleum in Teheran. That idea was vetoed by the "Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenei, who believes that any show of weakness by the regime could encourage its numerous opponents inside and outside the country.
Thus Khamenei plans to use the global jamboree to show that Iran is still a revolutionary force and that he alone, and not the ineffective President Muhammad Khatami, calls the shots in Teheran.
Khamenei also hopes that the next elections, to be held 10 days after the revolutionary jamboree ends, will produce a new parliamentary majority that shares his strategy. His game plan is to unify the regime by cutting the so-called "reformists" down to size and adopting a wait-and-see tactic until after the American presidential election.
The militants who are going to Teheran this week are likely to be told that they must lie as low as possible for the next few months without abandoning any of their radical goals. The Teheran gathering is also expected to deepen the recent informal alliances made between Islamist militant groups and a variety of communist, anarchist and environmentalist militant groups against the "American common enemy."
The Khomeinist regime is prepared to change aspects of its behavior and even concede some tactical retreats to weather what many in Teheran call "the Bush storm." But the regime's strategy, which is aimed at driving the US out of the Middle East, destroying Israel, and replacing all Arab regimes with "truly Islamic" ones, remains unchanged.
It is no accident that two words are popular in Teheran these days. One is "detente," often used by Khatami and the so-called "reformists." The other is "hudhabiah," which is the name of a truce signed by the Prophet Muhammad with a Jewish tribe in Medina at a time Muslims found themselves in a weak position. At the end of the truce period, the prophet's army, having rebuilt its strength, attacked the Jews and massacred all the adult males, seizing women and children as war booty.
It is against that background that the question "What to do with Iran?" must be debated. Today, Iran is ready to offer all the behavioral changes required of it by Washington and the EU. But it cannot change its nature. And there is no guarantee that this particular beast will not bite again - and hard - as soon as it feels that it is no longer threatened. A scorpion does not sting because it is naughty; that is dictated by its nature.
Posted by Robert at January 25, 2004 6:28 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
So many high value targets in one place. I say release the hounds and allow SOF to do their thing.
Posted by: Mark at January 25, 2004 11:48 AMResponse from D.C. Watson (Ohio USA)
I agree, Mark. With the troublemaking cavemen all gathering on one area of land, now would be the time to blow their sorry asses off the planet. If the terrorists are so hell bent on meeting Allah, let's oblige them.
Iran's President recently stated that he wanted to open up talks with the U.S., yet they're allowing this summit to occur on their sand. This is simply nothing more than another perfect example of these hypocritical bigots talking out of both sides of their mouths.
If the Iranian Government wants to befriend us, they would simply let us in to capture/or terminate all of these slugs in one swoop. But as we all know, that's a gigantic IF...
Posted by: D.C. WATSON at January 25, 2004 3:27 PMI wonder why we haven't just sent in a B-2 to take care of these terrorist summits. We could probably take out a boat load of terrorists and maybe even that A-Bomb factory in Busheur with a single plane.
Posted by: asdf at January 25, 2004 7:40 PMBlowing up the evidence of large scale Iranian support for global terrorism would be a waste. If America had been able to enter Iraq prior to the war and got their hands on some WMDs, they wouldn't be having all the problems they are having now with David Kay quitting.
This conference would be a great time to put the screws on Iran in a big way. If America was willing to send in ground forces to seize the conference and capture all the terrorists, Iran would be caught with their hand in the cookie jar. This terrorist conference could be the pretext for disbanding the theocracy and destroying all nuclear facilities.
I'm very worried that with all the time wasting since October 2003, Iran is only months away from a bomb. The North Koreas recent processing of fuel rods, Libyas 'more advanced than suspected' program, unknown to the IAEA, and Pakistans nuclear scientist debacle only proves how much of a threat Iran will be in 2004.
Posted by: Zan at January 25, 2004 10:06 PMSend in a delta force team and take all of them out,point blank.
Posted by: adela at January 26, 2004 12:33 AMThis is one of the most important and chilling stories you have passed along to us on "Jihad Watch." Where can one get names and pictures of these characters to post on the web…to get them any way we can!
Who is orchestrating all of this: Iranian mullahs or the oil monies of Saudi Wahabbism?
Posted by: epg at January 26, 2004 3:29 PM

(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)