FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Dhimmi Watch Robert Spencer Islam 101 Qur'an Blog
 
« Pakistani Forces Arrest 100 Terror Suspects | Main | What on earth does this mean? »

March 20, 2004

Jihad at the US Insitute of Peace?

siddiqi.gif
Siddiqi

From WND:

The congressionally funded United States Institute of Peace hosted an event yesterday in Washington on reforming Islam, with a guest panelist who has threatened the United States and openly supported terrorist groups, Insight has learned.

Among the guests in the panel discussion was Muzammil Siddiqi, who until November 2001 was president of the Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA, a leading Wahhabi front organization in the United States. Wahhabism is a radical form of Islam practiced in Saudi Arabia and advocated by al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and his terrorist leaders.

Siddiqi has accompanied visiting Saudi officials from the Muslim World League on fund-raising tours across America, and is listed on its website as the organization's official representative in the United States. Offices of the Muslim World League in Herndon, Va., were raided by a federal antiterrorism task force in March 2002 because of suspected ties to al-Qaida.

During an anti-Israel rally outside the White House Oct. 28, 2000, Siddiqi openly threatened the United States with violence if it continued its support of Israel.

"America has to learn ... if you remain on the side of injustice, the wrath of God will come. Please, all Americans. Do you remember that? ... If you continue doing injustice, and tolerate injustice, the wrath of God will come."

By "injustice," he meant U.S. support for Israel.

Siddiqi also has called for a wider application of Sharia law in the United States, and in a 1995 speech praised suicide bombers.

"Those who die on the part of justice are alive, and their place is with the Lord, and they receive the highest position, because this is the highest honor," he was quoted as saying by the Kansas City Star on Jan. 28, 1995.

A Bush appointee to the U.S. Institute of Peace said he had to distance himself from yesterday's event because it associated the USIP with groups "on the wrong side in the war on terrorism."

USIP board member Daniel Pipes tells Insight that, in addition to his objection to Siddiqi, he has warned the USIP about the presence of the U.S. spokesman of al-Muhajiroun, a London-based group that claims to be recruiting jihadis for a worldwide "Mohammed's army" faithful to bin Laden.

Pipes tells Insight: "I believe that President Bush appointed me to the USIP board in part to serve as a watchdog against militant Islamic groups. Unfortunately the management of USIP is not listening to my advice. I cannot be associated with the event today which associates USIP with some of the very worst militant Islamic groups."

Kay King, a spokesperson for USIP Chairman Richard Solomon, said USIP was "not aware of the allegations about Siddiqi, and we will look into them."

However, she pointed out Siddiqi "has attended Bush administration events with the president, and was invited to lead a prayer" at the national prayer breakfast following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The March 19 event is cohosted by USIP and the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, or CSID, a U.S.-based group that was created by board members and former staff of the American Muslim Council, a radical pro-Saudi group that largely ceased operations after its former chairman, Abdulrahman Alamoudi, was jailed last October on terrorist-related charges.

Pipes raised his concerns with USIP Chairman Chester Crocker and President Richard Solomon over the "extremist nature of CSID itself" starting last November.

In addition to board members and an executive director who shifted over to the new group from AMC, Pipes pointed out that CSID fellow Kamran Bokhari has ties to al-Muhajiroun, an al-Qaida support group. Until last year, Bokhari was the self-acknowledged North American spokesman for al-Muhajiroun.

Insight reported on the group's first anniversary "celebration" of the 9-11 attacks, held at the radical Finsbury mosque in London, where al-Muhajiroun showed off a poster that portrayed a burning World Trade Center under attack and called Sept. 11 "a towering day in history."

At the group's second anniversary 9-11 "celebration," its members distributed a poster with photographs of all 19 hijackers, calling them "the magnificent 19."

CSID "fellows" are not research assistants, but integral members of the leadership of the organization. According to a copy of the CSID bylaws Insight has obtained, CSID fellows are responsible for electing the group's board of directors. All board members must first be fellows.

Bokhari has issued a statement denouncing political violence and al-Qaida, and referred to himself as a "former Islamist activist." But given his leadership role with al-Muhajiroun, Pipes says, such statements were "deeply insufficient to rehabilitate him ... or make him someone suitable to be associated with USIP."

Pipes first raised concerns over the planned event in November, when the USIP initially had invited Taha Jaber Al-Alwani to speak on a panel to discuss reforming Islam. Al-Alwani was publicly identified in an affidavit by U.S. Customs special agent David Kane, unsealed just weeks earlier, as a director of "Safa Group companies including International Institute of Islamic Thought [IIIT], FIQH council of North America, Graduate School of Islamic & Social Sciences ... and Heritage Education Trust."

The IIIT offices were raided in March 2002 as part of Operation Greenquest, a joint federal antiterrorism task force. IIIT has received money and sponsorship from the government of Saudi Arabia and according to the affidavit had sponsored Basheer Nafi, "an active directing member of [Palestinian Islamic Jihad] front organizations" in the United States.

Following Pipes' objection, the USIP postponed the initial event and canceled its invitation to Al-Alwani to join the panel discussion, but continued to work with CSID despite Pipes' claims that the group included among its leadership individuals who were on the "wrong side" in the war on terror.

USIP spokesperson Kay King says the institute has "done due diligence" on CSID and found the group to be "moderate" and "responsible."

"We know that CSID has gotten grants from the State Department and from the National Endowment for Democracy," she said. "They are an organization that has been found appropriate by U.S. government agencies."

CSID showcases moderate Muslim thinkers such as Professor Abdulaziz Sachedina of the University of Virginia. However, many board members have either led or worked for groups that were targets of a federal antiterrorist task force raid in March 2002.

CSID founding board member Jamal Barzinji headed the "500 Grove Street" charities in Herndon, Va., that were the target of the Greenquest task force. He left the CSID board in April 2003.

Another CSID founding board member, Louay M. Safi , is director of research at IIIT, according to the biography posted on the CSID Website. He is reported previously to have worked at an IIIT offshoot in Malaysia.

The CSID board also includes Muslim leaders who are former or current board members of the American Muslim Council, starting with CSID chairman Ali A. Mazrui.

"CSID is part of the militant Islamist lobby," Pipes tells Insight. "It is well-disguised, and has brought in all the Islamist trends, giving them a patent of respectability."

The group's executive director in 2002 was Abdulwahab Alkebsi, a former AMC staff member. Alkebsi also is reported to have worked for the Islamic Institute in Washington, and now runs democracy programs in Iraq for the National Endowment for Democracy that have promoted, among others, the Iraqi Communist Party.

Posted by Robert at March 20, 2004 9:19 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments
(Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jihad Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.)

It is somewhat difficult to comprehend that a man with Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi`s extensive background would be part of, or demonstrate any hostilities towards America.

Posted by: Mackie at March 20, 2004 10:00 AM

it just goes to show you, how stupid and confused we are of who's who in the islamic world.

Posted by: christian at March 20, 2004 10:42 AM

This agenda item is taken from this website www.muhajiroun.com/:

"The obligation of inciting religious hatred
This Saturday's LIVE talk on Paltalk will discuss one of the greatest
forgotten obligations in Islaam - Inciting religious hatred. Allaah (swt)
orders the believers to hate all other religions, way of lives, creeds,
doctrines and beliefs that contradict with Islaam, and one cannot be
Muslim without to declare animosity and hatred towards kufr, bid'ah,
shirk and nifaaq (Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Sikhism,
Buddhism, Democracy, Freedom etc.).
Date and time: 20th of March 2004, from 6pm to 7:30pm GMT
Room: LIVE - Inciting religious hatred
Speaker: Abu Muwahhid"

Also on the website was a touched-up photo showing a explosion taking place at the U.S. Capitol on the Senate side.

The site has been revised to remove the photo and the lecture caption has been altered to refer to hatred of False Religions.

Posted by: Fran at March 20, 2004 11:16 AM

Fran:

For details on the material you mentioned, see:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/001163.php

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/001152.php

Posted by: Robert Spencer at March 20, 2004 11:29 AM

OT-Sorry Robert

Folks,
Want to get back at the Saudis? Want to redistribute wealth from THEM to US for once? It is well known that the House of Saud funds efforts in the US and elsewhere to promote Islam. They do this by constructing "Islamic Centers", by helping defray the cost of paying Imams, and through other activities.

A few of us have noticed that some Islamic groups run Google ads promoting Islam. The way Google ads work is that every time they are clicked, the advertisor pays the website a small amount of money (usually a few cents). If you come across a site that is critical of radical Islam, but happens to have ads promoting Islam, please click the ads as many times as possible. The result will be a transfer of money from the Islamic group (which probably is indirectly funded by the Saudis in one way or another) to a web author who is critical of radical Islam.

If any of you come across a site with these ads, please e-mail me. I am compiling a master list so that those that wish to help in the campaign can have one spot to help out.

email: mypetjawa@yahoo.com

Posted by: R. Shackleford at March 20, 2004 11:53 AM

R. Shackleford:

Brilliant. Post the list asap. Incrementally, we can collectively make a difference... (my God, I sound like Hillary)

Posted by: Earl at March 20, 2004 5:33 PM

There really must be Congressional investigation of the USIP and CSID, beginning with the meticulous and damning beyond doubt evidence from Daniel Pipes. The farce has got to end. In early 1941 -- or 1943, since the current Jihad started long ago -- it would not have been possible to have William Pelley's Silver Shirts or Fritz Kuhn's Bund -- two antisemitic and pro-Nazi organizations -- have had its speakers funded by Congress. What in god's name is going on? Who is Richard Solomon, that he is "not aware" of these things and "will look into them." And everyone knows that in those assorted prayer breakfasts held immediately in the wake of the September 11 attacks, all sorts of quite sinister characters, their crocodile tears flowing from their liquid brown eyes, were invited by an utterly naive staff. But no one can afford the slightest naivete any more; there is no excuse. If the board members of the USIP have not thoroughly understood what the central tenets of Islam are -- and spare us, please, their "education" in this matter by Muslims; let them be educated by ex-Muslims, such as Ibn Warraq and Ali Sina and the contributors to the book of testimonies Leaving Islam, as well as by Western scholars of the non-apologetic school (Bat Ye'or, Anne-Marie Delcambre, Jean-Paul Charnay, and a few others come to mind).

Even one of the most celebrated historians of Islam might usefully enlighten the USIP members, no matter how guarded and tortuous he has allowed himself to be in many of his recent pronouncements. That historian -- we all know whom I am talking about -- really must begin to say publicly what he knows in the depths of his being. He has acolytes; they will listen to him. He must stop scanting the treatment of dhimmis (and Bat Ye'or), stop having recourse to the idea that there are huge numbers of "moderate" Muslims, that their existence entitles them to demand of Western students of Islam that the full and unsettling truth about this ideology should not be told, for fear of offending those who do not, it is argued, fully accept the tenets of Islam (which is to say, from the Infidel point of view, the "only good Muslim is a bad Muslim.")

the continued sanitized presentation of Islam, which even the doughty and learned historian who undoes before our very eyes, and with a bare bodkin, the likes of that thug Edward Said, or that member of the Islamintern, Esposito, still needs to exhibit far greater candor on the matter of Islam than he has done to date. He must put aside thoughts ofthe effect a real truth-telling would have on his occasional host Prince Hassan ibn Talal, or others who may curry his favor, as the Jewish-historian-who-doth-bestride-the-world-like-a-colossus, by hanging on his every bon mot,nor how such truth-telling will effect his old friends and colleagues among the Turkish Ottomanists. No, it is really too late for that. After all, he knows he was wrong to become an enthusiastic promoter of the Oslo Accords -- indeed, he had not the excuse of ignorance, for he knows perfectly well the basis of Islamic treaties with Infidel states. He must know he ought not to have denied the existence of the "Armenian genocide" when even Turkish historians are coming to recognize it. Posterity demands a greater candor, and a public demonstration, to those in Washington who respect him, of the great threat, and of its basis in orthodox, mainstream Islam.

Posted by: Hugh at March 21, 2004 12:05 AM

We should all email the President at president@whitehouse.gov and any other Republican leaders we know about the dangers of this guy. This could be used by the opposition to undermine the President's re-election campaign.
I'd use it against him if I were them.

Posted by: Christina at March 21, 2004 11:09 PM

To bad we are so civilized ... I think the Israelis have the right idea .... hopefully Yassin won't be the last jihadist/Islamist to be blown to bits.

Posted by: Cosmo at March 25, 2004 12:25 AM