![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
From Treasury Secretary John Snow in Opinion Journal, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm:
One of the most critical things the 9/11 Commission hearings have brought to light is the important role the Patriot Act plays in helping to win the war on terror. We have heard a lot about "the wall"--a conceptual barrier that prohibited agencies such as the FBI and CIA from communicating freely with each other. That wall was knocked down when President Bush signed the Patriot Act in October 2001.Sept. 11 compelled our nation to identify the areas we needed to bolster in order to secure our homeland. We have learned a number of very important lessons about the vulnerabilities in our financial system. First, that our ability to combat terrorist financing is linked with our ability to combat money laundering. Second, that we must remain vigilant in our continuing efforts to identify new ways in which terrorists and criminals will attempt to use our own financial system to fuel their agendas. And third, that our ability to obtain and share financial information is critical to our success in identifying and bringing down terrorist networks. ...
Under the Patriot Act, banks and other financial institutions are directed to bolster defenses in potentially vulnerable areas. As we strengthen our defenses against financial crimes in traditional financial institutions, such as banks, criminals and terrorists will look to other types of financial institutions or methods through which to move or launder their money. With that in mind, we continue to bring additional types of businesses under the umbrella of anti-money-laundering and anti-terrorist-financing regulation, thereby raising awareness of the issues and equipping these businesses with the tools to protect themselves. ...
Additionally, the Patriot Act authorizes the sharing of critical information about suspected terrorist or money-laundering activity--not only between the government and financial institutions, but also among financial institutions themselves--by allowing them to register with the Treasury Department.As a first step to expand its information-sharing capabilities, Treasury has asked law enforcement authorities to provide the names of suspected terrorists and money launderers. We then review the names and, if appropriate, send them on to financial institutions to search their account and transaction records for potential matches. Matches are forwarded to law enforcement authorities through Treasury. At that point authorities must follow the appropriate legal process to take further steps.
This process has been incredibly helpful to law-enforcement officials' efforts by saving them critical time and resources. In addition, the financial community has done an exemplary job; institutions large and small have committed themselves to the task, provided valuable leads for law enforcement, and our country is safer because of it. ...
Cutting off terrorists from the financial system is fundamental to disrupting their activities. Through our efforts, we continue to make it more difficult for terrorists to move money through formal financial systems, thus exposing them to greater risk of detection. The results are crippling to the networks that want to do us harm.
Perhaps the most important result of the Patriot Act has been the strengthened partnership among the financial community, the government's financial agencies, and law enforcement, much to the detriment of terrorists. This partnership is the key to our success in choking off the blood money used by terrorists to fuel their agendas of hatred.
Posted by Robert at April 24, 2004 8:38 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
And of course, the democrats (do they Deserve a big 'd'?) would like to dismantle the Patriot Act. And if Kerry got in and did just that, whom would they blame the renewed terror strikes on?
Bush, more than likely.
Posted by: Gary at April 24, 2004 3:17 PMgood point, gary. as a descendant of many generations of southern democrats, i would not wish to quibble with the big "d" question. i would just wish to say that this democratic party is far removed from the one from whenst we came. not until my generation did any of us register as republicans.
also, a point about the patriot act and finance. in general, the more transparency we have in the financial system, the better off all of us are.
Posted by: ted at April 24, 2004 10:24 PMUnfortunately, this has been going on for a long time. Back in the early 90's, I was a claims adjuster for a major insurance company adjusting auto and home owner policy losses. We had our fraud investigators go and try to shoot down the big auto fraud rings, something that takes about 3 to 5 years minimum to do. Several of those fraud rings were developed by Muslim men and they bilked our company alone for over 1.2 million dollars each. Add that up across the country and you will see just how much of this nonsense has been going on and for how long. Yes, it is too bad that it took this long for our country to wake up and smell the coffee.
Posted by: paula at April 25, 2004 12:13 AMThe patriot act is saving america from the muslim islamic threat. It is indeed needed in this time of war; if the democrates should win, this act would be the first thing to go, as presure is put on the democrats by the aclu.
Posted by: christian at April 25, 2004 4:36 PM

(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)