FrontPageMag.com Articles By Robert Spencer Articles By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Robert Spencer Bio
 
« Missing Marine mystery deepens: Pentagon investigating hoax possibility | Main | Belgian police arrest Dutch resident on terror charges »

July 8, 2004

Al-Qaeda: Italy is Next Target

Al-Qaeda wants Silvio to find out something only dead men know. They no doubt disapprove of Italy's troops in Iraq, but they're probably also still smarting over his post 9/11 remarks: "We must be aware of the superiority of our civilisation, a system that has guaranteed well-being, respect for human rights and — in contrast with Islamic countries — respect for religious and political rights, a system that has as its value understanding of diversity and tolerance." Now will they attempt to prove Berlusconi wrong by wreaking mayhem in Italy?

From Novinite.com, Bulgaria's Sofia News Agency, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm:

A purported Al-Qaeda statement has threatened Italy will be its next target in retaliation for the policy of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

The statement, written in poor Italian and believed to be by Osama bin Laden, has been published in an Islamist site and included in the evening news broadcast of an Italian TV channel.

Posted by Robert at July 8, 2004 6:53 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

Is anyone surprised? Have just been visiting one of my favourites El Margarine (Al Muhajiroun] and reading those lovely holy men's comments about bombing and terrorism.Yes, any true Muslim worthy of the name must get out there and kill kuffar A real Muslim lives in a constant state of terrorising his neighbours and wiping them out if they refuse to join this 'peaceful' and 'tolerant'
religion. By the way all Gays and Lesbians are to be killed if they continue their 'evil' lifestyle.
Look who is talking!!! What about Mohammed, a man of 51yrs raping a 9yrs old child!! Are these people MAD to be following the teachings of a depraved monster... Suspect after success in Spain, Al Quaeda will be going after the country who they believe to be the next weakest link...
Let's hope Italy will prove them wrong and foil their murderous plots.

Posted by: Morgane [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 7:50 AM

Evviva La Bell'Italia! It seems that whatever his faults as a man and leader, Silvio Berlusconi said something that needed saying. I note that one of the first voices on the Left to bolt after 9/11 and emphatically condemn the attacks was also Italian--Oriana Fallacci.

If Italy gets hit, I will mourn with her; if her law enforcement people foil a plot, I will cheer.

Posted by: Kepha1 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 7:59 AM

Morgane, I've visited the Al Muhajiroun website and as a Muslim I'm sickened by their literature and beliefs. Thank God that most Muslims don't adhere to their teachings. That being said, it's ridiculous the charges non Muslims press upon our beloved prophet about his marriage to Aisha. His marriage to her was purely for sociopolitical reasons. Many marriages were taken place for creating bonds between tribes. He married Juwayriyyah so that he'd gain the support of Bani Al-Mustaliq and their ally tribes. He married Safiyya in order to ease tensions with hostile Jews in Arabia and married Mary the Copt (who embraced Islam coming from Egypt) to create strong bonds with the king. Second of all, Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) had already been proposed to by Jubair ibn Mut`am but declined his marriage proposal. This wasn't anything out of the ordinary. Hala, the cousin of Amina bint Wahb was married to Abdul-Muttalib on the same day his son `Abdullah married Aminah bint Wahb who was at Hala’s same age. Also, the Companion `Umar ibn Al-Khattab married the daughter of Ali ibn Abi Talib, may Allah honor his face, while he was at her grandpa’s age. If the prophet was a pedofile he could've fulfilled these desires when he was a young man. Even before he was a prophet he was known to everyone by his outstanding character and sense of social justice as Al Ameen (the trustworthy). After his death many of his companions would come to Aisha for religious knowledge. Even when he was asked for Aisha's hand in marriage he didn't immediately accept but took into consideration his relationship with Abu Bakr. He specifically waited until the emigration to Medina to consummate the marriage when she was mature. Many orientalists try to smear our beloved prophet by applying 21st century norms to 7th century Arabia. (islamonline)

Salaam Alaikum

Posted by: Adam [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 10:19 AM

I will grant Adam this one point- there were socio-political marriages in All countries, for many centuries, and the kids were often... Kids, when they got married.

And he may have married her so young so as to insure a good overlap to the next couple of generations. He is said to have been pretty shrewd.

And you guys Know where I stand on all of this, so please don't be jumping on me? I don't need brusises for the wedding.

Posted by: Gary [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 10:48 AM

Gary:

The difference is that muslims hold up muhammad's behavior and practices as the standard for all time and in all places.

Posted by: CGW [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 11:01 AM

Adam
You are the rare one! look all over the world the mulsums are killing non-believers!!! so don't pull your lies here we see the truth!!


." Qur'an 9:97 "The Arabs of the desert are the worst in unbelief and hypocrisy, and most fitted to be in ignorance of the command which Allah hath sent down to His Messenger. Some of the Bedouins look upon their payments (for Allah's Cause) as a fine and wish disasters to fall on you (so that they might not have to pay). Yet on them be the disaster of evil." Qur'an 9:101 "Among the desert Arabs are hypocrites. They, like the people of Medina are obstinate in hypocrisy. We know them. Twice shall We punish them, and in addition they shall be brought back to a horrible torment." Qur'an 9:120 "It is not fitting for the people of Medina and the Bedouin Arabs to refuse to follow Allah's Messenger (Muhammad when fighting in Allah's Cause), nor to prefer their own lives to his life. They suffer neither thirst nor fatigue in Allah's Cause, no do they go without reward. They do not take steps to raise the anger of disbelievers, nor inflict any injury upon an enemy without it being written to their credit as a deed of righteousness."

Yes your army has shot their wad early and you can not put it back in the box!!!


America has Awakened! We have not rolled over to hit the snooze button this time you will be defeated We see your Lies we know that in mulsum law it tells you to lie and hide behind these lies!!!


Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen

Posted by: Catherine [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 12:13 PM

And don't forget the great Oriana Fallaci. They took her to court in France; they have threatened to kill her. God bless her. The Jihadis hate for her, a woman who makes them all look like the sickest little cowards on earth, must eat them alive.

Looking back on WWII and the Holocaust: those hated from the very gut of Nazi ideology should be praised simply for being who they are. Likewise we should be proud to be high on the hit list of global jihad. Hate from Jihadis is a sign that we are close to the good, which in times of horrible war easily becomes distorted and confused, because many uncommon virtues, like courage, suddenly become more important than they are in normal life.

And God bless Italy and the Oriana Fallacis of the world, women of courage who refuse to submit and dare to speak out against radical Islam and the Jihad, whether they be French, Asian, American, atheist, Christian or Muslim!

Posted by: JTF [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 12:13 PM

Wretchard posts excellent article on parallel declines in French and Muslim power both now and then, and the rise of America at Belmont Club:

...The truly terrifying thing about the American sword is that it is genuinely two-edged. The front edge consists of military power unparalleled in human history. Yet it is the weaker side; the back edge consists of a system with an an uncanny ability to absorb almost any sort of human, scientific and engineering potential and convert it into unimaginable wealth. The front edge is used but to ward; but it is the back edge that truly destroys rival societies. Osama Bin Laden struck New York first of all and the Pentagon only as a secondary target. The McDonald's hamburger is hated by the French elite more ardently than any Nazi SS division. Both fear the back edge more than the front.

The real strategic problem of the Jihadis is that their power is so one-dimensional. They have the ability to slit throats, burn with acid, stone or destroy with explosives but none whatsoever to produce abundant food, medicine or clothing. One might join the Jihad to act out one's hate or satisfy a sense of adventure, but not to pay the rent. Analogously, the strategic problem of Europe is that it is in monotonic decline. It is shrinking in population and aging; growing at a slower rate than America and much slower than either China or India. Yet both are proud and ancient visions who imagine that they can reverse their fortunes with a few telling blows. Yet just as Osama Bin Laden discovered that destroying the World Trade Center only causes a new and taller one to be built, in addition to the loss of Afghanistan and Iraq to the Jihadi cause, the French may discover that not even the election of John Kerry -- which is by no means foregone -- will alter the underlying tale. Only by changing themselves -- and not by watching Michael Moore -- can they recover their dynamism and become competitive again...

http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Bob Owens [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 12:29 PM

adam
what do you say about this in your book??

Ishaq:587 "Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have mutilated every opponent. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them, for they must suffer disgrace."

Tabari VII:7 “The Prophet married Aisha in Mecca three years before the Hijrah, after the death of Khadija. At the time she was six.”
Mahammad forced himself on her. This is how it happened:
Tabari IX:131 “My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left. The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old.”

Tabari VIII:116/Ishaq:511 “So Muhammad began seizing their herds and their property bit by bit. He conquered home by home. The Messenger took some of its people captive, including Safiyah and her two cousins. The Prophet chose Safiyah for himself.”
Ishaq:511 “When Dihyah protested, wanting to keep Safiyah for himself, the Apostle traded for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins. The women of Khaybar were distributed among the Muslims.”

Just a bunch of Rapist!!! and this is what your people are doing today in Africa and other places in the world oh how you should be so proud ??

well here in the USA we have guns and will use them our Grandparents rounded up those who we could not trust and did they feel guilty NO and we will not either!!!


Part of the American Tribe

God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the curse to Victory Amen

PS We Are not French and do not care what they think and we don't care what the Lib's think they aint got no gun??

Posted by: Catherine [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 12:47 PM

Gary:

Don't forget that the marriageable age for girls in Iran was lowered to and currently is nine years of age to follow muhammad's example.

Posted by: CGW [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 12:51 PM

adam

And what are you doing to fight this evil?
Just because you don't see people in the Streets in the USA do not think they are not Awake you hang with the libs they are not what we call the silent majority these are the people who you have under estimated once again these are the Grand Children of those who won WW2 and do not go to the streets to march but learn to shoot yes the fastest growing sport in the USA is Shooting!!!

Have not read today all the lies you shot about bombing mecka or any talk about camels or rag heads except from you your Bulling here does not work!!!!


Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen

PS Woman vows revenge against squirrels

Associated Press
June 16, 2004

LAPORTE, Ind. -- A 78-year-old woman tired of squirrels raiding her bird feeder got out her shotgun to kill the critter,
This is the America you never see!!! We are all Squirrel hunters!!

Posted by: Catherine [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 1:07 PM

Catherine,
Our religion permits us to fight when we are oppressed. Our beloved prophet and his companions were kicked out of their homes, tortured, starved, and killed. They had every justifcation to fight. Today Muslims are oppressed too, mainly by regimes who enjoy the support and backing of the West. Why do you think 9-11 happened? Do you really believe Bush when he said it happened because they're jealous of our freedom? After 9-11 there were outright condemnations from some of the most eminent islamic scholars which you fail to acknowledge. There were moments of silence all across the globe. But how many Americans hold a moment of silence when atrocities happen in other countries? I didn't see any candlelight vigils after the madrid or bali bombings.

P.S. Spare me your stories of Grannies with Guns, it's not that intimidating.

Posted by: Adam [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 1:49 PM

Adam appears to be a CAIR Muslim, a contemptable creature akin to Kweisi Mfume, or other, more famous racists.

They are not interested in equality for all, only in preferential treatment for themselves. He may not directly support the killing of non-Muslims, but notice he didn't say he was against the practice either.

Like most of the breed, he cannot and will not accept that the inherent coruption that is his belif sytem is at fault for the majority of the ills within his society. It is much easier for him to blame America and Israel than to admit the failure of his ideology.

Posted by: Bob Owens [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 1:52 PM

Adam says:

"The US has to stop propping up these Arab dictators (saudi arabia specifically) and hold them accountable to reform."

But that is exactly what the US is doing in Iraq and Afghanistan for instance -- routing out dictators and trying to promote responsible governents in their places. US is also trying to pressure the Sudan government to stop murdering people -- including your fellow Muslims -- in South and West Sudan.

And the Saudis have opposed all of these efforts tooth-and-nail.

Face it, Adam, the only reason Muslims despise the US is because we are infidels attacking/fighting back against (some) Muslims. Muslim dictators who attack and kill non-Muslims and Muslims alike are considered heroes in the Muslim world. Muslims who are slaughtered in great numbers by other Muslims (Somali warlords, Sudanese militia, Talibans, Al-Qaeda car bombs in Iraq, anti-democracy forces in Kashmir, etc) -- none of these matter to the average Muslim.

You show it yourself -- when you talk about Muslims being attacked by non-Muslims with great bitterness while ignoring the huge slaughter of Muslims by Muslims in many countries.

Muslims just do not seem to care what the quality of their governments are -- they only seem to care about hating and killing infidels.

Posted by: Suzan [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 1:59 PM

"His marriage to her was purely for sociopolitical reasons" this muslim has to decide between "Mohammed is a rapist" or "islam is a political ideology" he has chosen the second. Well I think both options are true anyway. Mohammed beloved? for me is a follower of demons like moslems.

Posted by: josé maría [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 2:29 PM

adam
what about the 300,000 saddam killed I guess you want him to rule you??

Maybe you should go to the mulsum land of your dreams and get out of the western country that you are in. We are taking a stand either get along or get out you have not seen our might yet and for you it will be to late when it happens!!!


We do not care about your PC or your Arab friends add in a paper in N.J. if you want to help catch terrorist Great if you want to be a Terrorist then kiss your ass by!! I am not trying to do anything to you. You have proven yourself to be a liar and we don't like liars. That is against one of the only laws that God Wrote Yes the Laws he Gave to the Jews!!

You come to this sight for what to show how you can not get along? How it is your way or you will cut someone’s head off?

Part of the American Tribe
God Bless the USA and her Fighting Forces and All who Fight with her give them Strength and Courage to stay the course to Victory Amen

Posted by: Catherine [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 2:34 PM

Many Muslim websites refer to a hadith in which Muhammad supposedly foretold that Islam would one day conquer Constantinople, and after Constantinople, Rome. It seemed fantastic, the hadith implies, and yet, as all Muslims know, Constantinople was conquered, falling to the Ottoman Turks in 1453. This hadith is no doubt modeled on something borrowed from Christianity – in this case, it would be the Dream of Constantine, the vision in which the Emperor foresees the triumph of Christianity, the religion to which he himself will convert, that vision of him under the “in hoc signo” sign of the Church Militant and Triumphant. The Vision of Constantine is best-known to art lovers through its being part of a famous fresco cycle, by Piero della Francesca, in the church at Arezzo, frescoes recently restored and to be seen while they are still there, as yet undisturbed. (This must be added, on the very day when the news has arrived of the decapitationof the statues of Jesus and Mary, that had been spared during the Revolution, and had been the pride of the church of “Notre Dame de Consolation” in the village of Floing where at present “l’emotion des habitants, qu’ils soient croyants ou non, est d’autant plus grande que l’erection de ces statues a l’interieur du sanctuaire…” )

In this hadith, Muhammad sees that the Two Holy Cities (as a Muslim would no doubt regard them) of Christendom – Constantinople the capital of the Eastern Empire, and Rome the capital of the Western Empire, would eventually fall to Islam. It seemed fantastic, but when, after many centuries of Seljukid and then Ottoman Turkish pressure, Byzantium was conquered, and Constantinople itself fell in 1453, Muslims might take pleasure. If the mighty empire took seven centuries to completely fall, well – patience, patience. So too can what are now seen as the capitals of the weakened, decadent peoples of what is difficult to still call Western Christendom – even if Muslims regard it as such -- as represented first by Rome, and by Italy.
Islam need not be spread, or imposed, by outright military conquest. The country with the largest population of Muslims, after all, is Indonesia – where the indigenous pagans, Hindus, and Buddhists were, little by little, simply overwhelmed by those who, converted through the efforts of an Islamic presence that began with Arab traders from the Hadramaut (Hadramis, curiously, were also important at the court of the Nizam of Hyderabad), gradually created the conditions that favored and promoted Islam, and put those practicing other religions always on the defensive. If Indonesian Islam is widely regarded as less aggressive, and more syncretistic than any other version of Islam, that is because it had to present itself, at least until recently, in a softer version that would be palatable to the entirely non-Muslim indigenous population. And under the Dutch colonial administration, so ably advised by the Orientalist Snouck Hurgronje, Islam was kept on the run, and the peoples of Indonesia understood that, for worldly success, as in Kemalist Turkey, great interest in Islam was not an advantage. When the Dutch East Indies became Indonesia, that brake was off political Islam. And now, of course, the Muslims have been on a virtual rampage, beginning with the massacre of 600,000 non-Muslim Chinese in the 1960s, 200,000 Christian East Timorese in the 1980s and 1990s, and Christians in the Moluccas, and elsewhere – with several thousand churches burned down in 2003 alone (see the report of the Barnabas Fund). That is what Italy can expect – not military conquest, but the slow conquest, through population changes, and through appeals to the economically and psychically marginal (of which Western society has a goodly number), and then, little by little, increasing demands on the non-Muslim population to make accommodations for Islam that no other belief-system would dare to make, much less demand.
Outright combat, of course, is only one way to spread Islam, and today it is not the best way, except in dealing with helpless black Africans. It is worth noting that the most violent Islamic movement in North Africa is called the Salafist Movement in North Africa takes, as its full name, the Salafist Movement for Call and Combat, or Da’wa and Qital. In Italy, it scarcely matters whether the land is claimed for Islam by outright military conquest, or by demographic conquest from within (immigration, and conversion of locals over time). It took many centuries of steady pressure, but ultimately Byzantium, and Constantinople, were conquered, seeming to fulfill that supposed vision of Muhammad – or at least the first part of it. The position of the non-Muslims in Italy is not helped by the idiocy of the donation of 8 acres of prime Rome real estate not a mile from the Vatican, more than ten years ago, by a pliant Italian government (Andreotti, a crook whose Sicilian representative was tight with the Mafia, but was also a hireling of the Arabs; one look at his Middle Eastern policies, and his justification for them, demonstrates this). Pertini and some in the Vatican undoubtedly deluded themselves into thinking that, by giving this land for a mosque, they might even earn some better treatment for Christians in the Middle Eat. Buona notte, boys. Of course it had no effect on implacable Muslim hostility. Andreotti himself, although he was, as a crooked Christian Democrat, widely known as the Vatican’s loyal servant at the Quirinale, or the Campidoglio, or the Viminale, or whatever damn eponymous Roman hill his office was supposedly on, and he served, and then left office, and then came back into office – in the post-war Italian game of who’s-in-who’s-out-who’s-in-who’s-out (the record in this regard is held, I think, by Amintore Fanfani, the Perdurable One). Andreotti has been unrepentant about that land donated for the Mosque, and about the Mosque himself; like Chirac, another crook, he is not terribly concerned about the Muslim penetration of his own country, or of what this must mean for that country’s people and its artistic treasures and its civilization. One can imagine Andreotti, or Chirac, and how swimmingly they would have gotten on in the regimes of Mussolini, and Le Marechal, respectively. So it should be no surprise that in this undeclared but fateful world war, they have often helped the wrong side.
Rome, as the center of Christianity, has great significance. If Rome and Italy can be conquered through demographic means, that would not only fulfill the “vision” of Muhammad, but would hearten and embolden Muslims everywhere – and the promise of taking possession of the land, and of the modern arms of the Italian state, mean a good deal. But no one should worry that the Muslims will seize and ship to the Middle East all the art treasures of Venice and Florence and Rome,, and Perugia and Naples, and Siena, and Orvieto, and Ferrara and Verona and Padova and….Yes, two-thirds of the art treasures of the Western world are in Italy. No, they won’t be going anywhere. The Muslims are indifferent to those treasures of classical antiquity, and of Western Christianity. Or rather – indeifference at best, but more likely they are simply filled with a desire to destroy.

After all, the history of Muslim conquest is also the history of destruction of churches and synagogues, of Hindu temples and Buddhist temples, of statuary and artifacts. In the last few years, Joseph’s Tomb has been reduced to rubble – have you bothered to see the pictures of how the “Palestinians” left it? The Bamiyan Buddhas, preserved from the destruction wrought on so many artifacts of the Greco-Buddhist civilization of Central Asia by Muslim conquerors only because they were too difficult to destroy, finally succumbed to the dynamite of the Taliban. An entire library of books could be devoted just to the pagan, Jewish, Christian, Zoroastrian, Hindu, and Buddhist artistic legacy, in all of the lands conquered by Islam, that were destroyed by Muslims, or vandalized, or effaced (just go to the Hagia Sophia, and take a look around --- and then ask where are the tens of thousands of churches, and their fabulous art treasures, that once could be found all over Byzantium?) .
Western civilization is unthinkable without easy access to Italy, without the pleasures and treasures of Italian art available to Western travelers, Western students, Western connoisseurs. A West without Italy is as unthinkable, indeed, as it would be without Israel (though few seem to have given this prospect much thought), for if the Jewish State were to disappear into the dar al-Islam, does anyone really believe that Muslims would allow free and unhindered access to the Holy Land, which only now, under Israeli sovereignty, is guaranteed as it has not been for a millennium, in the brief period of the Crusader kingdoms. And that loss would be felt far more keenly now, when the technical means of travel are widely available, as they were not even a century ago.

It is not because of Berlusconi that Itlay is under attack. Italy is under attack because it is there, and because it is rightly regarded as the center of Western Christendom. Berlusconi is merely an excuse, just as "cowboy Bush" is an excuse when, in fact, it is the Infidel United States, and its Infidel people, who are threatened not only by Al-Qaeda, nor a hundred other groups, but by all those who are adherents of the doctrines of Jihad and dhimiitude -- which is, of course, almost all of the world's Muslims.

Posted by: Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 2:50 PM

oik,

You know, you should consider cutting loose every once in a while, instead of writing such dry academic-style prose. Try injecting a little of your own thoughts and opinions.

Let us know how you REALLY feel.

;-)

Posted by: Bob Owens [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 3:13 PM

While this doesn't really applydirectly to the subject, I thought many of you might get a kick out of this.

From http://www.imao.us/

Israel just can't seem to get a compromise between their desire to not be blown up and the Palestinians' desire to blow them up. Thus, I sent my crack research staff to find out as much as they can about one of the main players: Hamas.

FUN FACTS ABOUT HAMAS

* Hamas was founded in 1987 according to some site I found with Google. I was eight years old then and wanted to be a fireman or an astronaut. Blowing up Jews had not crossed my mind.

* Hamas is Arabic for "dumb f--ks with explosives".

* Contrary to popular belief, Hamas has nothing to do with ham. Actually, if you throw hams at them, they'll get angry.

* I don't like to loosely throw around charges of anti-Semitism, but I don't think Hamas members like Jews.

* One of the reasons that they keep attacking is that none of the Hamas members knows what "ceasefire" means and are too embarrassed to ask.

* Suicide bombings started when parents found out how much money they would save if their kids just blew themselves up instead of going to college.

* If you see a Hamas member, shout, "Hey! Look! It's a Jew!" Maybe he'll set himself off early. Dumbass.

* If a Hamas member says he wants peace, it's a trick! Shoot him the head.

* If a Hamas member says he wants to borrow the sports section from your newspaper, it's a trick! Shoot him in the head.

* Be careful; Hamas members are quite wily, ranking up there in intelligence with squirrels.

* Hamas members smell. It's not nice to say, but it's true.

* Hamas has a wing that’s devoted to charities. They need to make sure that all Palestinians children are healthy and grow up to be big and strong so they can blow themselves up.

* The French, enemies of all that is good and just in this world, are considering having some of their charities join those of Hamas. Expect more attacks from Hamas in the future that involves smelly cheese.

* Hamas members don't like contact with pigs, so I think it would be funny to feed them to pigs like in the movie Hannibal.

* That was really gross when Hannibal had Ray Liotta eat his own brain.

* I've strayed off topic.

* We should trick Hamas members into eating their own brains.

* If you're in a cafe in Israel, and someone runs in there and indiscriminately starts shooting people, he could be a member of Hamas, so be careful.

* Hamas is a big part of the "cycle of violence". They blow up innocent men, women, and children, and then Israel is like, "Hey, don't do that." And thus the cycle of violence continues.

* The cycle of violence will continue until the Palestinians stop being such a bunch of numbnuts... or if Israel finally gets fed up and nukes them all.

* Even though members of Hamas are out gunned and out smarted by Israel, they think they can defeat Israel because Allah is on their side. Isn't that cute.

* Hamas members think they go the Heaven when they commit a suicide bombing where they get 72 virgins, but instead they go to hell where they get jabbed in the ass with a pitchfork ad infinitum.

* Actually, I'm Catholic; I think everyone is going to hell. Hey you, reading this: you're going to hell. Seriously.

* In a fight between Hamas and Aquaman, Aquaman would like totally kick their asses. His fish friends would be like, "Hey, let us have a piece of them!" but Aquaman would say, "No! They’re mine!" And then one Hamas member would be like, "Please, have mercy, Aquaman!" and Aquaman would be like, "No!" and punch the guy through the chest and rip out his heart. Aquaman is a badass!

* Hamas tends to yell and complain a lot when Israel targets and kills their leaders. Someone should tell them to stop being such a bunch of babies.

* Sometimes Hamas members blow themselves up in their own apartments when they try making bombs. That makes me giggle. Hee hee.

* My grandfather was a member of Hamas.

* No, wait, he was in the IRA. They just blew up the British people who deserved it because... ah, I don't actually know anything about that conflict. I think it involves the color orange.

* I've gone off topic again.

* Maybe Isarelis and Hamas could all get along if they just hugged.

* No! Don't hug the Hamas members; it's a trick! They're just going to blow up!

* You know, Hamas could just plant bombs without blowing themselves up... or at least that's what I'd do if I were a subhuman, murderous Jew-hater.

* Hamas won't rest until the Jews are pushed out into the sea. That will significantly improve the GDP of the sea.

* If you make a Mexican laugh, and he wants an encore, he'd say, "Ha! Mas!"

* I think that means I'm about out of fun facts.

* The best way to handle Hamas is to be really patient. I'm sure Arafat will deal with them... eventually. Oh, and monkeys might fly out of my butt.


Posted by: Bob Owens [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 5:37 PM

Adam

Others have verified the rape of Mohammed's nine year old bride according to Qur'an. We didn't write it!This action of your beloved Prophet has been used and is still being used to justify Muslim men
forcing themselves on children with the excuse that 'Mohammed did it so it must be holy and the victims therefore are unable to protest except with their screams.' You have the right[in democratic countries] to follow your religion of choice. If you choose to exalt a murderer who spent his life attacking peaceful tribes, stealing their property, enslaving their traumatised women and children, who engaged in numerous acts of torture, lying and perverted acts, that is your choice. But don't ask us to join you.In all Muslim countries there is ongoing
violence and poverty all linked to a single denominator - Islam. If you can tell me of a single Muslim country in the World with a free, democratic government , full rights for women, booming economy and stable enviroment including religious rights for minorities, I shall be interested to hear which country this is. Greetings

Posted by: Morgane [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 5:54 PM

I remember Berlusconi's remarks about the superiority of Western civilization after 9/11. I also remember the awkward gasps of shock & disapproval from the PC world. Basically the guy was right. One only has to look around the world today. And Italy is a good example. The Roman empire might have fallen but Italy is a beautiful, creative, productive, and economically strong country. Total opposite to any Islamic country. Look at all the wonderful things Italy produces and exports around the world. What does Islam export? Hatred, evil, misery, death.

I hope no harm comes to Italy. Stay strong and safe, Italia! And say a great big "Vaffanculo!" to the Islamics.

Posted by: feralee [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2004 11:04 PM

Adam, I don't know whether you're ignorant or just a blind faith person but anyway I'm willing to give you some explanation regarding your remarks. I want to comment you remarks one by one

Remark # 1
"That being said, it's ridiculous the charges non Muslims press upon our beloved prophet about his marriage to Aisha. His marriage to her was purely for sociopolitical reasons"

Comment # 1
"There are many Hadithes that show it was the Prophet who desired Ayesha and asked Abu Bakr to give him his then 6-year-old daughter for marriage. In fact Abu Barkr was shocked by such a request. He objected that he was a foster brother to the Prophet, which would have made such a marriage illicit. But the Prophet dismissed his concern saying that they were not real blood brothers and their oath of brotherhood was of no relevance in this case."

Sahih Bukhari 7.18
Narrated 'Ursa:
The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for 'Aisha's hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said "But I am your brother." The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah's religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."

Sahih Bukhari 9.140
Narrated 'Aisha:
Allah's Apostle said to me, "You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, 'Uncover (her),' and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), 'If this is from Allah, then it must happen.' Then you were shown to me, the angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said (to him), 'Uncover (her), and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), 'If this is from Allah, then it must happen.' "


Remark # 2
"He married Safiyya in order to ease tensions with hostile Jews in Arabia "

Comment # 2
"As for the Safiyah, it is evident that the Prophet took her for one reason only that was because she was a beautiful woman. Muhammad took it away from Dahya after seeing her. It had nothing to do with the position of her father. If the Prophet had any regards for her father and his position he would not have slew him."

Narrated 'Abdul 'Aziz:
"We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and said, 'O Allah's Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.' The Prophet said, 'Go and take any slave girl.' He took Safiya bint Huyai. A man came to the Prophet and said, 'O Allah's Apostles! You gave Safiya bint Huyai to Dihya and she is the chief mistress of the tribes of Quraiza and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.' So the Prophet said, 'Bring him along with her.' So Dihya came with her and when the Prophet saw her, he said to Dihya, 'Take any slave girl other than her from the captives.' Anas added: The Prophet then manumitted her and married her."

Remark # 3
"If the prophet was a pedofile he could've fulfilled these desires when he was a young man."

Comment # 3
"At that age, he was an orphan boy with little ambitions. Being a poor young man, no one paid attention to him. Kadijah (Muhammad's Sugar Mommy) was to him a boon. She gave him the comfort and the ease of mind from financial worries. Now he could afford to retreat to his cave and let his imagination fly; meet Jinns, battle with Satan, converse with Gabriel, and other creatures that haunted his feeble mind. However, he showed his true colors when he came to power and virtually nothing could stop him from doing what he pleased. It was then that he broke all the norms of the decency by the leave of his Allah."

Remark # 4
"Many orientalists try to smear our beloved prophet by applying 21st century norms to 7th century Arabia."

Comment # 4
"Arabs were a primitive lot with little rules to abide. Yet they had some code of ethics that they honored scrupulously. For example, although they fought all the year round, they abstained from hostilities during certain holy months of the year. They also considered Mecca to be a holy city and did not make war against it. A foster son’s wife was deemed to be a daughter-in-law and they would not marry her. Also it was costmary that close friends made a pact of brotherhood and considered each other as true brothers. The Prophet disregarded all of these rules anytime they stood between him and his interests or wishes. In our world, pedophilia is a crime. It’s a shame that the Prophet did not consider pedophilia important enough to deal with it immediately because it did not contrast the spiritual goals of Islam."

Well Adam, after seeing all these fact and if you still consider "Prophet" Muhammad as your role model, I think you have a very serious mental problem.

Sources:
www.faithfreedom.org
www.answering-islam.org
www.islamonline.org

Posted by: herman [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 9, 2004 1:52 AM

Salaam Adam: Thanks for your post. I appreciate one with a lot of historical information. Everyone else: Adam is sickened by Islamicist attacks on the rest of us. Isn't this something we've wanted to hear from Muslims for a long time?

Posted by: Kepha1 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 9, 2004 2:50 AM

Role model? That's the problem, isn't it? Look at what he got up to - even if you argue away the child abuse of Aisha as being appropriate for the times, there's all that other basic intolerance, hatred and murder. That's why we have so much strife in the world today. People being brainwashed that this guy was a great person, and a good role model for today. Like telling your kids to look up to and emulate Stalin or David Koresh.

Posted by: feralee [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 9, 2004 2:54 AM

Kepha:

Taqiyya and kitman are always in effect.

I suggest you check Adam's "facts" against a non-muslim biography of muhammad and history of islam.

Posted by: CGW [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 9, 2004 9:30 AM

Adam
"The war against terror will not be won by dropping bombs but by being smart."

The bombs are dropped to destroy enemy strongholds ,buildings of great significance to the enemy , training camps , propaganda media houses, etc, etc. Meanwhile our troops are on the ground on foot,in tanks,choppers,jeeps etc taking out insurgents. At the same time we have the most sophisticated intelligence crews as well as satellite vision (as I like to call it) so they can see what/who is coming at them and where from.

Iraq and Afghanistan may not have been the two countries directly linked with al qaeda and other terror groups, but they are certainly terror havens and had regimes which needed to be taken down before our forces concentrate on wiping the floor with the terrorist pawns. You may not think America or Europe has awakened yet, and to a degree I'd say you are correct, but a large number are wide awake and people such as the ones who regularly comment here at Jihad Watch and simular websites are working hard and constantly to ensure the rest of the western world wake up.That time is fast approaching, bare in mind we are already on top of things in the middle east and with the power and wealth behind us make a almost impossible adversary for the terrorist world, once the west fully awakens the end of radical islam is nigh.I'm not saying all muslims deserve to die, but just bear in mind if you are not with us you are against us.

The point of this comment to you is to say basically that I disagree with you and think that the war on terror is being handled pretty well, maybe not perfectly but we do have a lot of shit to deal with such as liberal media and political correctness.

As for all you said about Muhammed and his little girl wife, if thats the prophet you want to dedicate your every waking moment to then so be it . A very sad life indeed, but I'm afraid peadophilia is not a popular cult over here in the western world so don't be expecting us to convert to your blood-soaked "religion".

Oh and to answer another of your questions : 9/11 happened because we are the free world, we do not follow the sharia, and do not believe in allah, therefore are infadels and do not deserve to live.
If muslims were not so hell-bent on inforcing this kind of crap on the rest of the world, maybe there would not be so many islamic societies under "oppression" as you put it.
Just think do you really want to be part of the worlds largest death cult, or would you rather be part of a free society which encourages equality for people of all religions and nationalities.Muslims and communists are the only people on earth in this day and age that seem to be against freedom, and communism is almost extinct (just like the nazis), islam is next.

Posted by: Rikki [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 9, 2004 10:20 AM


Web Site Counter