![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
In this IslamOnline story (thanks to Anthony for the link) about French Muslims' plan to build grand new mosques to rival French churches and synagogues, there is the telling quote that I made the headline here:
An IOL survey shows that most Muslim Parisians preferred to hand their Zakah to mosque officials rather than giving it to other charities.“I prefer mosques to other charities in the country, given the ferocious campaign against Muslim assets in the West driven by the [US] global war on terror,” Qadri Bin Salama, a restaurant owner told IslamOnline.net.
In other words, he'd rather give to mosques than to Islamic charities, NOT because the charities may send his money to terrorist groups, but because Americans may take the money in an effort to keep terrorists from getting it.
Also there is this interesting information about the number of mosques in France:
The number of mosques in France has increased to at least 1554 by the end of 2003, moving from rented underground rooms to owned places of worship in public places and squares.French journalist and Islamic affairs expert Xavier Ternisien said the Paris northern suburb of Saint Denis hosts alone 97 mosques while there are 73 others in north France.
Posted by Robert at November 13, 2004 7:47 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Have they confused the U.S. with the United Nations? Perhaps they haven't been informed about the Oil for Food Scandal or about Arafat's various bank accounts into which billions of charity donations can be found.
Of course they haven't been informed as the European press fails to make note of these tiny points.
Posted by: epg
at November 13, 2004 8:34 AM
This is only an excuse. They use false reasoning to justify their agenda.
Posted by: DCWatson
at November 13, 2004 8:59 AM
Speaking of Mosque-e-toes,below is a link to the usual Islamic spin to justify Jihad.
Al-Jazeera post this story about non-Muslims torching Mosques,but even after all the evidence
from eye witnesses and a Police Officer that was injured by Theo's attacker. Al-Jazeera prints it as "A suspected Islamists" that shot and stabbed van Gogh.
This type of propaganda aids the self-declared "Moderate/peaceful/Allah loving" Muslims to wage a War of silence when Churches are bombed and Infidels are being slaughtered in public by people praising Allah.
Also note the picture that is of the building used for a Mosque and had only sufered minor damage to the door,lets not forget the Iraq propaganda from Saddam,after the invasion a Doctor felt safe to revel that he was working under a death threat by Saddam if he exposed his knowledge that the dead bodies of children were kept in coolers for future use in photos of the professed 1/2 a million child deaths by US sanctions.
Saddam was sick and needed to be taken out even if the Muslim and Arab world accepted his style of rule,the world changed on 9/11/01 and people like Kerry cant see the possibility that 9/11 was the begining of the end to modern democracies. Islam may be the reason we will never go back to the way it was for a long time,the moderate Muslim have shown they are too much of a coward to defend the Quranic words from Allah.
I do find it odd that while the Muslims in France are blaming the Jews for their high unemployment rate and poverty,they seem to have an abundance of money to finance the idolatry
of erecting huge Mosques.
Do you think the Saudis might have their hand in this one?
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/B986C167-6581-4C6E-9C42-DDE7CDA32487.htm
at November 13, 2004 9:16 AM
Where are the moderates? Is there such a thing as an Islamic moderate? This guy Qadri Bin Salama, "a restaurant owner," now that's pretty "moderate," just a run-of-the-mill restaurant owner. Yet given the opportunity to do so, he makes NO distinction between radical Islam and "moderate" Islam, and in fact plays a spin on the Western attempt to reduce and remove radical Islam around the world. This is why every Muslim is an Islamist at heart, why the problem is much worse than the media portrays, and why we must continue to support Robert Spencer and continue to shed light on the situation. We must continue to tell friends and family what we're learning about Islam, whether they can face these facts or not, some will understand and begin to see how the deception is being exposed.
"...given the ferocious campaign against Muslim assets" --- this is typical behavior of an Islamist - magnified false accusations against non-muslims. Gee, from what I've heard America is the best place on Earth for Muslims to migrate to because they can hide behind our freedoms and law which is NOT based on Islam.
http://www.meforum.org/article/168
at November 13, 2004 10:16 AM
Report:
A Muslim leader in Canada felt he was one of the good Moderate people within Islam when he stated in public that "Only the Israelis over 18 are valid targets for murder by suicide bombers"
and this was because of the draft system.
He's now claiming he never even said it and this is while the comment was aired twice on Tv and the Police are looking at charging him with promoting hatred against a minority.
Today I see he now is playing the Muslims victim
by accusing the media of not reporting comments by Jews that are perceived as hateful.
He's just one of the scuzzie muzzie's that
add to the problem of Islams image that is now appearing to be seen in its real light and violence is the common denominator.
at November 13, 2004 11:11 AM
Many Infidels, hearing about the Muslim obligation to give to "charity," may not realize that the "charity" has to further the cause of Allah--i.e. of Islam. That means that Muslims give, as a matter of course, only to those groups or institutions which will "further the cause of Allah" -- by promoting, or protecting, Islam.
This is quite unlike all others, who willingly give to non-demonational charities or, where a charity has a denominational connection, may be well-known for also supporting those who have nothing to do with that religion -- for example, various Christian and Jewish groups, while they may aim their pitch at Christians and Jews, respectively, can be found sending aid to non-Christians or non-Jews. The same cannot be said for Muslims.
That being the case, should Muslims, as a group, be recipients of aid, of any kind, from non-Muslims? Purely as a matter of self-preservation, does any non-Muslim wish to further "the cause of Allah"?
A related matter is that of organ donation. Muslims do not donate organs, as a group. While of course this is an individual matter, can one say that a willing member of a group that does not have any members who offer organs for donation ought at the very least to be last on the list of those eligible, say, for liver transplants, instead of the Christian, Jew, Hindi, Buddhist, or atheist who may otherwise be prevented from receiving such a transplant? There has to be reasonable notice taken by doctors, in deciding on the order in which people will be eligible for liver, heart, kidney transplants and so on, to this aspect of the matter. Justice, or a kind of rough group justice, requires it.
Posted by: Hugh
at November 13, 2004 8:27 PM
Hugh:
I did read in the Quran that Muslim must look after other Muslims first,the recent period of Ramadan is really very telling about Islam and the Muslim mindset.
By way of self-admission Muslim and Islamic websites boast about the call for acts of charity
during that month,this really means they don't give a sh#t for the other 11 Months of the year.
I'm expected to be good to all people all year round and that includes the people I really don't like too much or have spoke badly about me.
One other thing is that I'm not to boast about the acts since they then lose the status of giving from the heart while not expecting anything back.
Ramadan looks more like a PR stunt to con the infidels into believing Islam has the same god of the other faiths. Today I saw a article by a Imam that a soup kitchen will be set up every Ramadan to show Allahs love to the homeless.
I hate to break the news to Muslims but the Salvation Army has been doing this in my City for over 70 years and are the only NGO to give free care to AIDS victims,they also run the Mens shelters and work with drug addicts to help them
deal with their problems.
Waiting 11 months for a bowl of soup while living on the streets just wouldn't impress me
very much,with that type of charity I wonder if the homeless last long enough to be a repeat guest during Ramadan.
NO ISLAM - KNOW A FREE HOLLAND
at November 13, 2004 9:10 PM
It won`t be long before the french dhimmies will start naming streets and bulevards in Paris and other french cities ,after Arafat.
Posted by: adela
at November 14, 2004 1:56 AM


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)