![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
From the UK Telegraph, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm.
Insurgents in Iraq attached explosives to a dog and tried to blow up a military convoy near the northern oil centre of Kirkuk.The canine bomb went off but the only casualty was the unfortunate animal, said police. The militants wrapped an explosive belt around the dog and detonated it as the convoy passed through Dakuk, 25 miles south of Kirkuk, said the town's police chief, Col Mohammed Barzaji.
"The dog was torn apart by the explosion which caused neither injury among the soldiers nor any damage."
Col Barzaji said the bomb had been detonated outside a Shia mosque. "Eight suspects have been detained."
This was not the first time that animals have been used in insurgent attacks. In 2003, donkey carts were used to conceal makeshift multiple rocket launchers in a flurry of attacks in Baghdad. Animal carcasses and human corpses have been used to conceal explosives.
Posted by Rebecca at May 29, 2005 10:10 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
a character trait of most serial murders a.k.a. sociopaths/psychopaths - is horrible cruelty to animals
could it be - the 'relgion of pieces" produces an overabundance of serial murders - a.k.a. terrorists (or PC - "militant", "insurgent")
Posted by: PCKills!
at May 29, 2005 10:52 AM
Where, oh where, are the animal rights activists on this one?
A crazed animal rights activist shot and killed pim fortuyn in holland in 2002, all too prematurely ending a promising non-dhimmi political career in euroland.
Just imagine the pull a greenpeace would get making a documentary of how the killers acted against animal rights in this instance....
Posted by: voletti
at May 29, 2005 10:53 AM
p.s.
indiscriminate slaughter/murder of human beings doesn't get the attention of the PC world,
maybe the mistreatment of poor dog will?
at May 29, 2005 11:00 AM
Feminists are apparently unmoved by the Grislamic oppression of women.
Gay rights activists are a little more vocal about the oppression of Homosexuals in Grislam.
Perhaps the Animal Rights terrorists will take some direct action in protest.
Has this been done much before? Using dogs to hold explosive I mean.
From the 25 May 2005 thread
Watson: Are we becoming our enemy?
Posted by: Vikrant_Camberleykar at May 25, 2005 07:31 PM
"You may have become a Muslim fanatic if you have, at any time....
Feed your pet dog with 2 kg RDX and leave him by an army post."
I thought at the time it sounded like a very Grislamic MO but I didn't ask Vikrant for details.
Posted by: Granny Weatherwax
at May 29, 2005 11:03 AM
is this the type of "innovation" that the islamists' "civilization" is noted for
finding new ways to kill, maim, destroy, all that does not bow down to the "relgion of peace" ?
Posted by: PCKills!
at May 29, 2005 11:03 AM
Remember that all things are permissible to further the aims of Islam!
Hiding bombs in brassieres and allowing children to carry them is permissilbe, and the use of animals is nothing new.
Posted by: epg
at May 29, 2005 11:24 AM
We had the same thing happen about 7 months ago.
for the record,the swedish word for pig,happens to be
GRIS
at May 29, 2005 11:55 AM
What did you expect, all Muslims hold dogs to be unclean.
Posted by: abad
at May 29, 2005 12:48 PM
Violetti,
About the murder of Pim Fortuyn, I heard that the killer said that he had done it for the Muslims but that was hushed up.
--------------------
About two years ago Arab terrorists strapped a bomb to a donkey to use against Israelis.
Posted by: Elephant
at May 29, 2005 3:11 PM
Granny W.:
In WW II, Germans experimented with using dogs as an anti-tank weapon. The idea was to train a dog carrying a contact detonated explosive backpack to crawl under a Soviet tank. They trained the dogs by feeding them under their tanks. The Germans dropped the idea when they realized that the dogs could not tell the difference between German and Soviet tanks.
Posted by: jay
at May 29, 2005 3:12 PM
that laugh was needed Jay
actually those WWII German dogs knew exactly what they were doing
at May 29, 2005 4:39 PM
The sort of person with a good enough rapport with the animals to train them to such a level is frequently not the type to let them be killed either.
Posted by: Granny Weatherwax
at May 29, 2005 5:33 PM
Granny W.-
Hitler supposedly "loved" dogs, and his last German Shepherd was used by him to test the cyanide pills that he and his new bride Eva Braun were going to bite soon afterward. The pills were effective, dog died, and then the two uber-dogs also died.
I only mourn the pooch. As I mourn this Iraqi poor critter, abused by the standard issue Muslim psychopaths in this instance.
I don't think these subhumans deserve anything when they die except 72 dobermans.
Now that would be Paradise!
Posted by: BigSleep
at May 29, 2005 6:14 PM
72 chihuahuas would be more their stamp.
Posted by: Granny Weatherwax
at May 29, 2005 6:36 PM
Jay,
"The Germans dropped the idea when they realized that the dogs could not tell the difference between German and Soviet tanks."
Nien! Nien! Nien! KABOOM!!
LOL!!
at May 29, 2005 10:19 PM
AI (Animal International) has already their hands full regarding the dog pen at Gitmo.
Posted by: boma
at May 30, 2005 8:51 AM
Big Sleep: Now I am offended:
My Dobermann would never do it with a Muzzie, shame on you!
(when I told him he was so upset he barked half the night!)
Posted by: Terminator
at May 30, 2005 10:14 AM
I am not an animal rights activist, but I have one question? Why aren't the animal rights groups saying anything. If they don't know about this, their silence is understandable. However, if they do know about this incident and are choosing not to say anything, then they are hypocritical.
Posted by: Christian
at May 30, 2005 4:39 PM
Wow...you would think PETA would be outraged
by this cruel treatment to a Dog.
Forcing the poor pooch to be touched by a Muslim and not even get a bath before strapping on the belt to be a suicide bomber.
NO ISLAM - KNOW THE VALUE OF LIFE
at May 30, 2005 5:09 PM


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)