| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Palestinian National Council Member Mamoun Tamimi on the London Bombings from MEMRI:
The following are excerpts from an Al-Jazeera television interview on the London bombings, with Palestinian National Council member Mamoun Al-Tamimi...The interview aired on July 12, 2005 on Al-Jazeera TV.Host: We heard the British Home Secretary say that what happened in London has nothing whatsoever to do with the British policies or Iraq. What do you have to say to him?
Al-Tamimi: "Obviously, he wants to defend himself, because this operation will bring down the government. Blair will fall just like Aznar did. When Spain was attacked, Aznar immediately tried to pin it on ETA and the Basques. Then it turned out that Al-Qaeda was behind the attack, and he immediately lost the elections. Blair will follow Aznar. This is certain. Therefore they want to cover up...
"First of all, they prevented the media from filming the attacks. The attacks were enormous, a thousand times greater than what was reported. Why did they do this? Because of the fear that overcame the British people and government, and because they know that they are paying a steep price for the mess Blair got them into. They understood that this is because they treat the Arabs and Muslims with disdain and spill their blood. They understood that this is war. In war, you hit and get hit. That's the equation. It is just like Albright said when she was asked whether two million Iraqis were killed because of the decade-long siege on Iraq. She responded, 'That's war.'
"Since this war is ongoing, the people you strike have the right to strike back at you, in your home, your country, anywhere. That's the equation."
Host: When Spain suffered a terrorist attack, it immediately withdrew its forces from Iraq...
Al-Tamimi: "As for Britain's humanism, Winston Churchill once said: 'Defend freedom, for it is the reason for our existence.' After Hitler's fall in Germany, Winston Churchill ordered the army and the air force to continue bombing. The bombings continued three weeks after Hitler's fall, and military historians say that the casualties sustained by Germany after Hitler's fall were greater than the casualties from the war. Germany had 25 million casualties, and in Britain there were 18 million dead. In other words, Britain totally annihilated Germany after Hitler's fall...
Al-Tamimi: "Britain caused infinite destruction to the Iraqi people. Now that the political and social map of Iraq has been completed, there will be no civil society there. He said that there was no civil society in the days of Saddam. Is there civil society now in Iraq?!
Al-Tamimi: "I say that people who blow themselves up... There are already dozens of them. If you say that they are cowards, then you are a mental pervert. They love death like that man loves life. Who made them love death? Britain and the U.S. with their actions. And the American and British peoples will pay the price if they don't put an end to these governments."
Posted by Rebecca at July 18, 2005 8:27 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
18 million dead in Britain in World War II? With "facts" like this, who needs the truth?
Posted by: Jen![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at July 18, 2005 8:46 PM
Well, you can't accuse Al-Salami of being the sharpest tool in the box, that's for sure.
Posted by: disillusionised_german at July 18, 2005 8:49 PM
Mamoun actually touches on something that I have harped on to others, namely the overt attempt of both governmental leadership and media (mostly the media) from showing the horrendous nature of these attacks.
No pictures of people jumping off of buildings, no video showing people running out of elevators engulfed in flaming jet fuel (which does indeed exist). We do, however, get wall to wall coverage of civilian casualties in Iraq and in Palestinian terrorist controlled areas. We also get pictures of terrorists with underwear on their head which is, of course, meant to show our monstrous nature.
The media tries to make it look as if nothing more than a bad storm happened.
Posted by: Dilophos at July 18, 2005 8:54 PM
I guess his last words that didn't make the translation were 'Where's my $3 billion?'
Posted by: reset at July 18, 2005 8:54 PM
WWII Dead
http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~jobrien/reference/ob62.html
at July 18, 2005 8:56 PM
Fact time (i know muslims cant deal with facts)
but i thought i would try...
Hostilities ended almost immidiatly after germany's surrender. There were some fire fights reported up to 6 months or more from various units and die hard officers who had nothing to loose by continuing fighting but these were rare.
But massive air bombardments killing 25 million?
Does he realize that even the firestorm bombing orchastrated by Army Air corp General Ley May that we managed to hit Japan for only 10 days before LeyMay ran out of bombs..
This was the firestorm bombings and even then the casualties while horrendous on the japan main island were at the most 100,000 in a night.
The max our entire airforce could hit them with is simple math.
take 100,000 * 10 days = 1,000,000 Max casualties.
Britian was hanging on by its teeth for years and suddenly after slugging it out across africa and europe they magically come up with a way to kill 25 times the amound our entire airforce was capable of..
No wonder Islam is growing all of them seem to be IDIOTS...
Posted by: jingoist at July 18, 2005 9:18 PM
WE NEED TO THANK THEY GUYS WHO SAVE THE USA AND OTHERS FROM THIS FALLING INTO THE HANDS OF ISLAMIC TERRORIST LIKE THIS GUY!!!
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/7/17/171214.shtml
Sunday, July 17, 2005 5:08 p.m. EDT
The Uranium Joe Wilson Didn't Mention
By April 2003, when the U.S. invaded Iraq, Saddam Hussein had stockpiled 500 tons of yellowcake uranium at his al Tuwaitha nuclear weapons development plant south of Baghdad.
That intriguing little detail is almost never mentioned by the big media, who prefer to chant the mantra "Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction" while echoing Joseph Wilson's claim that "Bush lied" about Iraq seeking more of the nuclear material in Niger. The media's decision to put the Wilson-Plame affair back on the front burner, however, may turn out to be a blessing in disguise for President Bush - giving his administration a chance to resurrect an important debate they conceded far too easily about the weapons of mass destruction threat posed by Saddam Hussein.
First, the facts - from a reliable critic of the White House, the New York Times, which covered the story long after the paper announced it was tightening its standards on WMD news out of Iraq.
"The United States has informed an international agency that oversees nuclear materials that it intends to move hundreds of tons of uranium from a sealed repository south of Baghdad to a more secure place outside Iraq," the paper announced in a little-noticed May 2004 report.
"The repository, at Tuwaitha, a centerpiece of Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons program until it was largely shut down after the first Persian Gulf war in 1991, holds more than 500 tons of uranium," the paper revealed, before insisting: "None of it [is] enriched enough to be used directly in a nuclear weapon."
Well, almost none.
The Times went on to report that amidst Saddam's yellowcake stockpile, U.S. weapons inspectors found "some 1.8 tons" that they "classified as low-enriched uranium."
The paper conceded that while Saddam's nearly 2 tons of partially enriched uranium was "a more potent form" of the nuclear fuel, it was "still not sufficient for a weapon."
Consulted about the low-enriched uranium discovery, however, Ivan Oelrich, a physicist at the Federation of American Scientists, told the Associated Press that if it was of the 3 percent to 5 percent level of enrichment common in fuel for commercial power reactors, the 1.8 tons could be used to produce enough highly enriched uranium to make a single nuclear bomb.
And Thomas B. Cochran, director of the nuclear program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told the Times that the low-enriched uranium could be useful to a nation with nuclear ambitions.
"A country like Iran could convert that into weapons-grade material with a lot fewer centrifuges than would be required with natural uranium," he explained.
Luckily, Iraq didn't have even the small number of centrifuges necessary to get the job done.
Or did it?
The physicist tapped by Saddam to run his centrifuge program says that after the first Gulf War, the program was largely dismantled. But it wasn't destroyed.
READ THE WHOLE THING THEN REMEMBER IT WAS BUIRED IN HIS GARDEN??
THEN THINK OF THE DAMAGE THIS COULD HAVE DONE IN THE HANDS OF ISLAMIC TERRORIST??
Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
GOD BLESS THE USA AND HER FIGHTING FORCES AND ALL WHO SUPPORT HER GIVE THEM STRENGTH, WISDOM, SIGHT, AND COURAGETO STAY THE COURSE TO DESTROY ALL ISLAMIC TERRORIST AND ALL WHO SUPPORT THEM AMEN
PS
Great shopping today lots of short skirts and some pretty little blue shoes whith the toes out??
Talked to a lot of Grannys with guns??
at July 18, 2005 9:22 PM
I take it Tony stopped the cheque before the Abbas has cashed up?
Posted by: Sebastien at July 18, 2005 9:36 PM
The problem is that we still do not consider them a serious enough threat -- in other words we do not want to kill a bug with a canon. The Palestinians have shown themselves very good in exploiting this fault in our thinking by alternating between beggar and bully. At some point, I am afraid, we will need to do some serious killing. The sooner we do it, the fewer we will have to kill.
Posted by: Iron Teakettle at July 18, 2005 9:40 PM
"They love death like that man loves life. Who made them love death? Britain and the U.S. with their actions."
Well, in this war on terror we have a match "made in islamofascist heaven". They want to die and we want to kill them. This happy solution to the global war on terror will, apparently, please all involved. Mamoun, you are a bloody genius!
Posted by: THw6kds at July 18, 2005 10:12 PM
Hot Dog! Another islamoidiot that wants to talk. Hand him a microphone and let the public listen. Make a transcript. Put him on TV (al jazeera dowsn't count, cause all the listeners are either crazy, illiterate, or both).
When this guy has played out, jail his butt and find another spokesman.
at July 18, 2005 10:38 PM
Oh, sorry. He's already in jail. Well, find another spokesman.
Posted by: texan at July 18, 2005 10:39 PM
Give that man, no give the entire "Palestinian people" who have so tirelessly been making that Gaza desert bloom ever since they obtained complete control of it (save for a handful of Jewish villages, a/k/a settlements) a few years ago, $3 billion dollars a year, as a token of Infidel affection and esteem. No, make that $3 billion a year for the next 3 years. They deserve it. They've done so much. They are bound to do even more wonderful things in the future. And the money is sure to make them eternally grateful to the Infidel donors. Oh, and about that $6.5 billion that disappeared when Arafat died, that came from previous Infidel donations? Don't even think about it. Don't worry about it. When a great man dies, it's understandable that in the full tragedy of the moment, one can lose sight of little things like $6.5 billion in Infidel aid.
Who cares?
Posted by: Hugh at July 18, 2005 10:41 PM
Mr. Bologna gives morons a bad name.
Posted by: PRCS at July 18, 2005 11:23 PM
ok, fine, Muslims are entitled to their perverted logic, but why to we need to import those turds into our home when we see how they fcuk-ed up they are.
Can sombody give me a good reason why. Why the hell are we doing this?
at July 19, 2005 7:10 AM
I see this kind of crap on the internet all the time. I don't consider myself a racsist as I think all other religions are kosher (whatever's your bag innit?) but Islam as a faith is complete bollox in my book. Jihad is revered as the 6th pillar of Islam and the 2nd most important thing to a Muslim. It sickens me to think that a faith that has such extreme views (The whole world was created by Allah so the whole world should be Islamic blah, blah, blah) can pretend to be peaceful. I'm sorry to any Muslim scumbags out there, but you aint a patch on the Hindus! Take off your rags and take up a less violent faith that doesn't condone the rape of women, nor the killing of civilians. I doubt very much that Jesus/Moses/Vishnu/God/Allah (whatever you like to call him) would want any of the acts Muslims commit carried out in his her name.
Posted by: Shark UK at July 19, 2005 7:22 AM
I see this kind of crap on the internet all the time. I don't consider myself a racsist as I think all other religions are kosher (whatever's your bag innit?) but Islam as a faith is complete bollox in my book. Jihad is revered as the 6th pillar of Islam and the 2nd most important thing to a Muslim. It sickens me to think that a faith that has such extreme views (The whole world was created by Allah so the whole world should be Islamic blah, blah, blah) can pretend to be peaceful. I'm sorry to any Muslim scumbags out there, but you aint a patch on the Hindus! Take off your rags and take up a less violent faith that doesn't condone the rape of women, nor the killing of civilians. I doubt very much that Jesus/Moses/Vishnu/God/Allah (whatever you like to call him) would want any of the acts Muslims commit carried out in his her name.
Posted by: Shark UK at July 19, 2005 7:22 AM
I see this kind of crap on the internet all the time. I don't consider myself a racsist as I think all other religions are kosher (whatever's your bag innit?) but Islam as a faith is complete bollox in my book. Jihad is revered as the 6th pillar of Islam and the 2nd most important thing to a Muslim. It sickens me to think that a faith that has such extreme views (The whole world was created by Allah so the whole world should be Islamic blah, blah, blah) can pretend to be faithful. I'm sorry to any Muslim scumbags out there, but you aint a patch on the Hindus! Take off your rags and take up a less violent faith that doesn't condone the rape of women, nor the killing of civilians. I doubt very much that Jesus/Moses/Vishnu/God/Allah (whatever you like to call him) would want any of the acts Muslims commit carried out in his her name.
Posted by: Shark UK at July 19, 2005 7:23 AM
Al-Tamimi: "I say that people who blow themselves up... There are already dozens of them. If you say that they are cowards, then you are a mental pervert. They love death like that man loves life.
They are scum same as you. Brainwashed scum. Brainwashed into your Muhammad worshipping death cult. You glorify mass murder you hell bound bastard
Posted by: dennisw at July 19, 2005 7:57 AM
"First of all, they prevented the media from filming the attacks. The attacks were enormous, a thousand times greater than what was reported.
Ever notice how muslims always exagerate the numbers. A thousand times greater damage would have been noticed by everyone and could not have been kept secret. He's not a very good liar but he tries hard...
at July 19, 2005 7:58 AM
Re:
".... and military historians say that the casualties sustained by Germany after Hitler's fall were greater than the casualties from the war. Germany had 25 million casualties, and in Britain there were 18 million dead. In other words, Britain totally annihilated Germany after Hitler's fall..."
And this is the cult that claimed to have invented modern mathematics. These creeps and idiots couldn't count using their fingers and toes.
at July 19, 2005 11:25 AM
According to this Islamic genius, Britain & Germany sustained around 80% of the casualties of the entire war. What of the Russians and the Jews and the Poles?
The following is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II#Casualties:
Estimates on the precise number vary widely, although most experts calculate the full civilian and combatant losses at 55 million, including the estimated 11 million lives lost due to the Holocaust, consisting of 5.6–5.9 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews made up of Poles, Roma, homosexuals, communists, dissidents, Afro-Germans, the disabled, Soviet prisoners as well as others.
Specifically, Allied forces suffered approximately 14.2 million deaths, and Axis forces suffered approximately 6.8 million deaths, Germany specifically had 5 million. The Soviet Union had the largest death toll, suffering an estimated 20 million civilian casualties along with 8 million Soviet soldiers killed.
In total, about 12 million soldiers lost their lives in the Second World War along with about 45 million civilians.
Posted by: ted at July 19, 2005 11:46 AM
Ted:
What of the Russians, Jews and Poles?
Can't speak as to the perception this cretin would have of the Russians or Poles, but it's more probable than not that he is also a Holocaust denier.
Posted by: waterdragon52 at July 19, 2005 12:29 PM
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)