FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Dhimmi Watch Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Raymond Ibrahim Robert Spencer
 
« Spencer on the Right Balance this morning | Main | Grand Jury Indicts Two N.Y. Mosque Leaders »

September 30, 2005

Jihad leader killed in Sri Lanka

"Jihad militant leader killed in Muttur," from TamilNet, with thanks to the Constantinopolitan Irredentist:

An unidentified gunman shot and killed Abdul Hakeem, the leader of a Muslim armed Group. The incident took place at Palainagar, Mutthur, around 7.50 p.m., Thursday. His body was found riddled with eight bullets, the Police said.

Abdul Samadhu Abdul Hakeem, alias Madukara Hakeem, 42, was alone on his way to his Halal stall on his motorbike when he was shot at. His usual team of six bodyguards were not with him when he was gunned down....

The Jihadi leader was allegedly involved in Tamil - Muslim clashes that took place between years 1985 and 1995 and later in 2002.

Posted by Robert at September 30, 2005 6:45 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

Here's a little Shadenfreid (sp.?)

Whenever one of these angry (mad) fist waving bastards get the right end of a bullet or missile trajectory one has to have some satisfaction in scoring one for the good guys (the West).

Posted by: dgene [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 9:05 AM

Hmmmm ..."his bodyguards weren't with him"...... Well, hopefully the shooter will get them next time. Sounds like he had enough bullets. Think somebody tipped the bodyguards off that he was going to be hit?

Posted by: Bohemond_1069 [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 9:17 AM

dgene:

schaudenfraude may be closer, if not bang on.

bohemonde:

I guess the jihaddists must not have noticed that the Tamils know a thing or two about waging terror campaigns themselves.

Posted by: waterdragon52 [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 9:38 AM

Re: “The Jihadi leader was allegedly involved in Tamil - Muslim clashes that took place between years 1985 and 1995 and later in 2002.”

The Tamil Tigers, by and large, wrote the book on modern terrorism including the suicide bomber. I doubt this Hindu ethnic group has much sympathy for the “Religion of Peace”

Posted by: johnb [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 10:30 AM

"unidentified shooter" --this is what happens when the gov't fails to catch or do anything about terrorists...
vigilantes will have to do the dirty work.

Posted by: helox [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 10:45 AM

johnb... tamil tigers are largely agnostics. non-Tamil Hindus generally do not support their cause. Its not a religious conflict but a Sinhalese-Tamil ethnic war. Their being Hindu has lil to do with the muslim-tamil tensions in Sri Lanka. Its highly uncharacteristic for Hindus to actively fight jihadis. Those Muslims are Sinhalese hence, Tamils r fighting them.

Posted by: Vikrant_Camberleykar [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 10:59 AM

I THOUGHT I smelled Islamic jihad activity lurking inside Sri Lanka's Tamil Tiger Movement.

It's extremely unusual that anyone OTHER than a Muslim would involve himself/herself in suicide bombings and repeated terrorist activities. But that's what the world was told had been going on in Sri Lanka during the past 20 years or so. No international authorities that I know of came out and said Muslims were playimg a major part of this horror, as the Tamils are not Muslim majority. But I wondered and wondered---

I had begun to believe I was imagining things with regard to Sri Lanka's violent insurrectionist problem. But as I see here, no. I wasn't.

Posted by: pythagoras [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 1:09 PM

Vikrant:

Thanks for the heads up that the Tigers are mainly agnostic. I knew this wasn't a religious war but that piece of information I did not know. If those Muslims are Sinhalese (who I believe are mainly Buddhist) do you know how or why they have converted and what their numbers might be? Thanks in advance.

Posted by: johnb [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 1:18 PM

Posted by: Vikrant_Camberleykar at September 30, 2005 10:59 AM

You are probley right I mean why would they fight the MONSTERS who are raping their women and cutting of the heads of their people??


My big Q? is?

This Halal stall thing is this now a trend think about goat boys father and didn't someONE get arrested in the USA something about a front store and money??

Well the the other big Q? is is all that meat spoiled because of the isl;amic terrorist blood spray?? how many will starve now??

Maybe this is a meat and bread war we find islamic terrorist with meat stores and we see how many bakerys the islamic terrorist have blown up in Iraq??

so what you are saying this is meat eaters against veggies eaters??

Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
GOD BLESS THE USA AND HER FIGHTING FORCES AND ALL WHO FIGHT WITH HER GIVE THEM STRENGTH, WISDOM, SIGHT, AND COURAGE TO STAY THE COURSE TO DESTROY AL ISLAMIC TERRORIST AND ALL WHO SUPPORT THEM LET NOT THE WORLD BE DECEIVED BY THEM AMEN

Posted by: Catherine [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 1:19 PM

pythagorus:

I don't think that's the point here. Vikrant says the ethnic Tamils are secular Hindus whereas some of their enemies, the majority Sinhalese are Muslim. The Sinhalese are, however, majority Buddist, not Muslim.

I'm no expert on the grievance the Tamils bear toward the Sinhalese, but my recollections (and we have a large Tamil population in Toronto) are that it falls along political lines: with the Sinhalese firmly in control of the country.

Posted by: waterdragon52 [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 3:19 PM

johnb,

7% of Sri Lanka's population is Muslim. It seems they've been converted by Indian Muslims. Actually Tamil Tigers are a dangerous mix of Tamil nationalism and terrorism. The Sinhalese-Tamil conflict is projected as "Aryan"-Dravidian problem to evoke sympathies amongst Indian Tamils. Though facial features of Sinhalese are similar to Tamils, they're descendents of North Indians.

Posted by: Vikrant_Camberleykar [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2005 12:36 AM

Catherine,

Yes Hindus rarely fight Muslims. Look at Kashmiri Pandits,Sindhis and Bangladeshi Hindus. They'd simply suffer in silence rather then answer their tormentors. I guess its something in our genes that makes us cowards.

Posted by: Vikrant_Camberleykar [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2005 12:39 AM

Good riddance!

Posted by: sheik yer'mami [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2005 6:54 AM

Web Site Counter