| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Jihad Watch Board Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald reveals what he will tell the President of the United States when George calls him in, offers him a sparkling water, and asks him for some advice:
"What serious advice by the numbers would you give the president as to how to deal with the ever encroaching threat of fundamental Islam?" -- a question to me from a posting at Jihad Watch1. Education: Make sure that the 5-10 most relevant books are read by generals, other officers, and men -- beginning with those at the War College. And make sure that those in the Department of Justice, civilian employees in the Department of Defense, upper-level employees in the Department of Health and Human Services, and members of Congress and state and local government are properly educated on the subject of Islam. Stop misrepresenting Islam as a doctrine that encourages "peace" and "tolerance." Stop continuing to insist that those who conduct Jihad are doing so despite Islam, and not quite properly prompted by, and in the name of, and in the spirit of, Islam.
Attempt on every occasion to raise the matter of what Islam teaches and how Muslims intend to deal with these teachings, or not to, at every meeting with Muslim ambassadors and leaders. Never leave it out of any speech -- and make sure that from the top down, everyone is echoing the same sentiments, asking the same questions, wondering the same things aloud.
2. Establish a War Board which, once it has been clearly understood that the menace threatening all Infidels everywhere is properly called a "Jihad," then that War Board will seek to identify and bring to the attention of Infidels everywhere the various instruments of that Jihad. While military means are part of Jihad, whether acts of terrorism or battlefield combat (qital), they are not the most effective or most threatening instruments of Jihad. These others include "wealth" (i.e. oil revenues), "pen, speech" (propaganda), and the latest weapon, the demographic weapon. It is important to produce evidence from Muslim press, radio, television, and websites, that there is a clear understanding among Muslims of how, for example, "demographic conquest" can -- and has in the past in various parts of the world -- succeed in islamizing a place.
3. Establish a Propaganda Unit whose aim will be to make clear to non-Arab Muslims that within Islam there is an Arab supremacist ideology that is not only political (so that non-Arab Muslims are always enrolled in whatever political demands the Arabs make, but not vice-versa), but cultural and linguistic: the taking of Arab names, the turning five times a day in the direction of Arabia, the insistence that the model for all mankind, for all time, is Mohammad, a seventh-century Arab, and in addition, his Companions whose mores and manners were those of 7th-century Arabs, so that Kurds, Berbers, Persians, Malays and others are made to forget, or despise, as much as possible, their own history, language, and culture. There should be no let-up in attempts to bring the real nature of Islam home to these Muslims.Another part of this propaganda unit would emphasize the way in which Islam stunts civilizational development and individual mental growth. The habit of mental submission, the system of Total Regulation (of what you eat, of what you wear, of how your hair is done, of how you wash yourself, of absolutely everything under the sun) and, in addition, the setting up of the Qur'an as containing all of Science, so that in the end human curiosity is stifled, and one is discouraged -- forbidden, in fact -- from exercising free and skeptical inquiry needs to be noted. Mothers need to realize that Islam will hold their children back. Some will ignore this, but many will not.
The many prohibitions in Islam, on music, on painting of living creatures, on sculpture, on much else, also needs to be given attention, and emphasis.
If Islam can be seen as an enemy of human freedom and thought -- which it is -- it will be easier to cause those who might otherwise be inclined to be tolerant, those for whom that art and that science and that mental freedom are supposed to be important, to enroll in the anti-Jihad. That anti-Jihad, of course, needs every conceivable recruit, however those recruits may find one another to leave something to be desired.
4. Identify places where natural fissues within Islam can be exploited at little cost and with great benefit. Obvious example: Iraq. Other examples: black Africa, where the treatment of black Africans by Arabs should evoke, and can be made to evoke, the centuries of the Arab slave trade. That trade began earlier than the European slave trade, and ended, most unwillingly, later under European pressure. It has more or less been re-begun wherever Arab Muslims have been free from such pressure or prying, in the Sudan, in Mali, in Mauritania, and even, one has reason to believe, in Saudi Arabia. It needs to be constantly emphasized that slavery cannot be outlawed in Islam, that it is part of Islam, that its victims have been black Africans and Slavs in south and eastern Europe, and people catpured on raids in Western Europe. This is not a case of blackening an image, but merely of presenting the true face of what has been so carefully hidden from view.
5. Do everything possible to unite Infidels everywhere -- all non-Muslims, some of whom have had more immediate or recent experience of Muslim rule, as Hindus in India, and whose historical experience (60-70 million killed by Muslims) could help in changing the natural tendency toward appeasement of so many Western Europeans.
6. Keep all major weapons systems out of the hands of Muslim governments -- no matter how seemingly friendly or "moderate" that government may, at the moment, profess to be. No exceptions, for "moderates" can always become "immoderate."
7. Keep Turkey out of the E.U., for its presence would guarantee the future islamization of Europe -- which must be stopped.
8. Seek ways to militarily reverse Muslim encroachments, wherever results can be surely achieved at little cost, and where the benefits would be great -- as would happen if the Americans were to seize the southern Sudan and Darfur, only in order to hold a referendum on indpendence from the northern Arab Muslims, and not to bring "democracy."
9. Work to reverse the Russian suspicion and resentment of the United States, and continually point out to the Russians that it is they who have the most to fear from Iranian or other Muslim possession of nuclear weapons, unless Russia is prepared not only to surrender the entire Caucasus, but to throw both Georgia and Armenia to the Muslim wolves. In the end, Russia itself, given its own birth-rate, and that of the Muslims within it, has to begin to grasp that this is not a mere matter of swarthy southerners -- the "chornyie" who arouse Russian suspicions -- not a matter of skin color but of ideology: a matter of Muslims, whether swarthy or white as the snow in the lands of the Evenks.
10. Understand how very useless is the concept of the "moderate" Muslim -- because it is impossible to know when someone's "moderation" is real or feigned. Experience shows that Muslim dissimulation -- whether called taqiyya, kitman, or simply dissimulation -- comes naturally. Also, by his mere presence a "moderate" Muslim can swell the ranks, and hence the perceived power, of Muslims and thereby help even the "immoderates" obtain their demands on craven Infidel politicians. And also because even the "moderate" can be transformed, sometimes very quickly, into the "immoderate" Muslim, or can have children who themselves will turn out, in a seeking-your-roots or disaffected-from-the-West attitude, to become "immoderate."
11. Work to stop further penetration and settlement behind what Muslims themselves regard as enemy lines. This requires not a general attack on immigration, but specific moves to limit Muslim immigration. This can only take place if the Idols of the Age, about Diversity and Everyone Wants the Same Thing and Tolerance is Always the Only Conceivable Policy, are undermined, mocked, and shown up as the dangers they are.
There are 11 points. They took about 15 minutes. I was actually going to stop at 10, but I noticed I had misnumbered them, so there is one more, by way of lagniappe (do stop in at the store again). In another fifteen minutes, I could do another 10, or if I remain so bad at counting, another 11. And so can you. And so can any man.
But will those who rule over us come? I don't know. But it doesn't require everyone to get with the program. It only requires enough.
Posted by Robert at October 23, 2005 8:09 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
Cheers to you Sir.
Posted by: Gorkhali![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at October 23, 2005 8:25 AM
2. Establish a War Board which, once it has been clearly understood that the menace threatening all Infidels everywhere is properly called a "Jihad," then that War Board will seek to identify and bring to the attention of Infidels everywhere the various instruments of that Jihad.
______________________________________________
To formulate tactics and strategy this has to be considered:
"Thus, the concept of jihad has become a destructive terrorist concept… This idea is a formative and decisive idea in the platform of the modern Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya. In his call to murder – which they consider jihad – Abu Muhammad Al-Maqdisi is a criminal and a murderer. How can we find him innocent?..." [4]
http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD100705
That is from a muslim. The war has to be taken to the clergy. A few determined pluggings of the clergy should get the message to them to start reforming.
It will also save countless lives in wasteful war. Special Ops is needed.
at October 23, 2005 8:29 AM
This is great to see whether advisors get a whif at these suggestions or not, rather than trying to browbeat the president for whatever action, or inaction he may have or will take in dealing with this very different, and difficult kind of war that comes at us from all kinds of directions.
I applaud Hugh for starting off with a "suggestion box" on the jihadwatch website.
If you think you have got some ideas no matter how they may seem at the time, take a moment and add them to the terrific suggestions that Mr. Fitzgerald is putting forth.
Posted by: Mackie at October 23, 2005 9:22 AM
And let's put hair on our chests and call it what it needs to be called > "The Crusades II"
Posted by: learjet0450 at October 23, 2005 9:40 AM
Hugh - Good advice. Now we need someone to slip a copy under his door as his advisors are putting layers of misinformation between him and reality.
Posted by: epg at October 23, 2005 10:13 AM
(W)ahabbster has no intention of taking any advice nor does he have any intention of effectively combatting muslim terrorism.
Let's look at what he HAS done:
- Years of calling the satanic cult of death a "noble religion," a "religion of peace," and lecturing "we all worship the same god."
- Continues to allow saudi funded schools and terror mosques to openly recruit, train, and motivate the next generation of muslim terrorists right here in the 48.
- Created another arab, muslim, terror-state. Where? Why, in the Holy Land -Israel- naturally.
- Has terror financing saudi leaders (mecca, birthplace of islam) over to his private home.
- Has arab muslim terrorists over to the White House.
- Restricts OUR liberties while giving special consideration to protect the "rights" of illegals, including those here to kill us.
- Steadfastly refuses to secure our border.
- Allows hamas to operate openly here in the US under the guise of a "civil rights" group.
- and on and on and on.
Posted by: Itai at October 23, 2005 1:05 PM
hey, can I add afew?
12) Begin a Manhattan-project-like effort to rid ourselves of dependance on Saudi Oil. This would be good for the planet, and for Judeo-christian civilization. (Mr Spencer mentioned this in his book)
13)convene a senate select committee on Saudi influence in American governement and business. (I'm sure W would love this)
14)BAN THE BURKA. (Not the hajab): The burka, which robs muslim women of an identity outside of their husbands, contracdicts every western notion of equality for women. Becuase it implies an inequality of women, it should not be protected by freedom of religion clauses. The hajab is a totally different story.
15)state openly than any "dirty bomb" attack on a western city would guarantee an H-Bomb retaliation on mecca and medina. Why the hell should'nt we hit these bastards with everything we got?
GOd bless Jihad watch!!
at October 23, 2005 4:07 PM
president@whitehouse.gov
use the link at the end of the article please
at October 23, 2005 6:09 PM
SUPERB!
Posted by: jsla at October 23, 2005 6:28 PM
Hi Hugh,
It is interesting to hear you echo my inclination to try to work with the Russians against Jihad, notwithstanding Putin's increasingly iron fist. I do have some qualms about that. Is he turning into another Stalin (or Stalin-lite)? I am not erudite enough to know, but my basic impression of him is that he is at least intelligent, honest and without a big ego (just an impression). He does have some pretty awful problems, so my impulse is to give him a break. Is this an unprincipled and dangerous impression on my part?
Posted by: Benjamin at October 23, 2005 7:17 PM
templar
Restrictions on islam of one sort or other are helpful as a temporary measure. In the final analysis it will be demographics that will decide. Even if immigration of muslims is stopped, given their high birth rates, muslims will be a majority in Western countries.
at October 23, 2005 7:26 PM
Excellent posting by Hugh. Also good additions by Templar.
To Benjamin - yes, it's an unprincipled and dangerous impression on your part. I trust Putin as far as I can pick up and throw my house. If I remember correctly, he's ex-KGB (or similar) and,
while he's probably intelligent, he has a considerable ego (as he looks to consolidate power for himself) and is not necessarily honest. Until the problems he and Russia face with their own renegade bands of Muslim lunatics reach fever-pitch, he won't be open to any move toward cooperation with us. Then again, he may just step forth and use major force to crush the jihadists, a move that we had better keep in mind as a future possibility.
Nuke Mecca and Medina in the case of a "dirty" or even nuclear bomb in one of our own cities? Threathen to do it if anyone happens to be thinking about it? Yes, I'm all in favor of it. To hell with international opinion. These bastards are only impressed with force, not with namby-pamby negotiating. If you come after me with a club or knife and I shove a 9mm Glock up your nose, you certainly are going to back down, falling all over yourself wimpering and apologizing. "The weak shall inherit the earth"?? NOT in this case! Not now, not ever.
Posted by: jimbj at October 23, 2005 7:33 PM
Hugh
All the points you listed can be put in place but they will only make a temporary halt to the march of islam.
Muslims will simply keep their heads down, say and do what is required as long as the Infidels hold political power. Once their numbers are sufficient, and this will be felt at each election with increasing muslim representation in parliament and other offices, the efficacy of your proposals will start to wither. Sooner or later as muslim political grows, they will be abolished and their counterpart, sharia will become the law (slowly ofcourse so that it does not frighten children, and pets such as dogs).
Posted by: DP111
at October 23, 2005 7:36 PM
Mackie
Where is the suggestion box? Is it the comments section here?
at October 23, 2005 7:41 PM
My view, long held, is that we need to have a separation from the islamic world. As a start one neesd to take them at their own words and agree wholeheartedly that there is indeed a dar ul islam and a dar ul harb, and for the good of humanity, infidels and muslims alike, it is better to live apart in respectives dars.
It is a sad fact that muslim presence anywhere leads to discomfort of other already established communities. Soon the established community will leave or forced out by Jihad by mob violence, and yet another region becomes dar ul islam.
Muslim nations, left to their own devices, unable to export their excess population, an ever deteriorating infrastructure, increasing poverty and diminishing military power, will have no alternative but to reform islam. And even if they do not, they will not be a menace to the safety and security of the rest of the world, for the simple reason that they will not have access to harvest infidel lives.
Harsh as this is, it is the most humane way to progress. Else we are looking foward to a Three Conjecture scenario leading to deaths on an unprecedented scale.
Separation leaves hope for the future for everybody. Islam will collapse quite quickly in historic terms if it is unable to expand (that is afterall its main reason), and thus release the 1 billion souls in its enslavement.
Politically impossible at the moment?- Yes. Yet precedents are there in recent history, where exchanges of populations was considered the only way to secure a reasonably peaceful outcome.
at October 23, 2005 8:00 PM
Poster above says:
"The war has to be taken to the clergy. A few determined pluggings of the clergy should get the message to them to start reforming.
It will also save countless lives in wasteful war. Special Ops is needed."
Spot on, I think you have found the cure. Notice that these rabble rousing Jihad calling Imams, and the top leadership of the Jihadis', are loath to put their bodies where there mouths are, they call for "martyrdom" operations but never strap on a bomb, they exhort others to stick their necks out, but never stick out theres, and when they are called to account, they whine about something they don't afford the kufr and apostates "freedom of speech" and human rights.
Two days ago Shiva posted a link to a Swedish site, islamrising, in it was noted that when Muslims are dealt that which they deal others, they back off. I don't think that they are immune to terrorism, and I think that the reason they so easily resort to terrorism is because terrorism works on them, after all isn't that how Mo's merry band of madmen spread Islam in Arabia.. by effective use of Terrorism, and it worked so well there that it has become an Muslim family tradition.
at October 23, 2005 8:09 PM
What frightens me is that we are moving towards a new world war that is quite unlike previous world wars. This world war will be a civil war ie a global civil war - the very worst type imaginable.
Posted by: DP111 at October 23, 2005 8:10 PM
1. Education: Make sure that the 5-10 most relevant books are read by generals, other officers, and men -- beginning with those at the War College. And make sure that those in the Department of Justice, civilian employees in the Department of Defense, upper-level employees in the Department of Health and Human Services, and members of Congress and state and local government are properly educated on the subject of Islam
What exactly are the 5-10 most relevant books?
at October 23, 2005 8:53 PM
"...offers him a sparkling water, and asks him for some advice:"
Oh, if only it were so. It seems George Bush doesn't have the common sense to consult someone like Hugh Fitzgerald. He has wizend advisors like Harriet(Gee Wiz)Miers, Karen (I'm ur Dhimmi) Hughes, Condi( Shotgun)Rice, and Grover( Allah Akbar) Norquist.
G-d help them and us.
Posted by: Kemaste at October 23, 2005 9:37 PM
More proof (as if more were needed) of what (W)ahabbster's true intentions are - 10,000 filthy arab, muslim terrorists to enter the U.S.
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=17968_Here_Come_10000_Saudi_Students#comments
Of course they will need wahabbi mosques to worship in, and representation from CAIR and MSA...
bush is a terrorist every bit as much as mohammad atta - same goal, different tactics.
Posted by: Itai at October 23, 2005 9:45 PM
Hi jimbj
I know what people say about Putin. Yet my point was that Hugh suggests working with Russia, so maybe he doesn't think Putin is so bad after all. I hope Hugh elaborates a bit.
Look, Russia has suffered a humiliating political and economic collapse, been plundered by oligarchs, had possibly the most horrible terrorist incident of all in Beslan (all those children), has a vicious mafia running loose... In extreme circumstances, you might need a strong man to crack down. Lincoln suspended habeas corpus. Also, in Putin's body language, I don't see the gloating of a Stalin, but just a cold and determined bureacucrat (also potentially dangerous of course).
Posted by: Benjamin at October 23, 2005 9:58 PM
Putin is terrible. Just read the Russian newspapers and magazines as, over the past year, they have been slowly but steadily putinized. Keep in mind that the most decent of the assorted scoundrels and crooks who have taken over much of the economy, Khodorkovsky, had -- it appears -- a soul, and was also intelligent, and was trying to do some good for Russian culture, and for Russian politics, with some of his wealth, which in its preposterous size was of course unmerited. Since the only conceivable justification for the kind of wealth that some in both Russia and America are permitted to accumulate is either to support the diffusion of knowledge, the enterprises of science and art, both rightly understood, and some greater degree of justice in the political system, the treatment of this Khodorkovsky has been both cruel and crazy. Why single him out when he is the best of the lot? And why single him out when it was his management of Lukos which was such a spectacular success, and success is what the Russian oil industry needs, even if here and there someoe strikes it a little too rich -- those riches can always be cut down to manageable size through the tax system.
I don't have faith in Putin. There are, however, some Russians who are cleverer and who are not hell-bent on settling scores with the much-resented America, but rather are aware of the threat of Islam, both to Russia's territorial claims, and to Russia's cultural and linguistic survival. It is a big problem. Some are aware; others prefer the old nostrums -- a retreat into anti-Americanism and antisemitism. The mixture as before. It won't work for long -- Islam won't let it. It will keep pressing, and pressing. Even the Putins will figure it out, and make the connection between demographic trends within Russia, and Beslan or the Nord Theatre seizure in Moscow, or a thousand other acts, threats to act, worries about potential threats to act.
Reality will be recognized.
Quaere: When?
Posted by: Hugh at October 24, 2005 12:17 AM
Great article Hugh.
Russia is going down the tubes, from her Muslim enclaves to her Eastern border (lunch for China).
The fight against Islam must expand everywhere, beginning with information and ideology exposure, and proceeding to the ragged bloody edges where Islam confronts the West from the Phillipines to Thailand to Kashmir to Kosovo, to Gazastan to Africa to Leeds.
The weapons are: in proper measure whatever we got, from diplomacy to special forces, from deportation to armed attack.
But knowledge and awareness first.
Posted by: dgene at October 24, 2005 9:20 AM
I just wanted to say that it's unfortunate that people like you didn't go the way of the KKK and Nazis. My response is sheer and utter bewilderment at what you've barfed on your blog. I'm going to go as far as to say that your writings are full of xenophobia and hate for a religion you couldn't ever understand. Oh and spare the pinko-commie finding tactics... I'm not Muslim but someone who has read up enough to be able to identify an extremist nutbag.
Posted by: tempster at October 25, 2005 10:40 PM
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)