"Vote early and often!"

So that's how it works, is it? No wonder I voted in the minority most of the time here.

Robert, you must reconsider running for office. In that case I'll vote at least once. And better: I'll vote for you.

Posted by: sonofwalker at December 9, 2005 4:53 PM

Robert:

Maybe you need to provide subcategories with special prizes. I mean Al-Galawi is in a class all by himself no matter how you want to look at it, toadying up to both Saddam and now Bashir Assad and talking about Damascus and other Middle Eastern points of interest as "our cities", and of course, there's his direct implication in the oil-for-food ponzi scheme. But as a lowly backbencher, rather than a head of government or very senior beaurocrat, he's not nearly as influential, and he's so blatantly obvious to all but the most blind. The others are either far more insidious (Chiraq, Patten) or more self-deceived (Annan, Blair).

Posted by: waterdragon52 at December 9, 2005 4:54 PM

*Ditto, but slightly less so.

Posted by: Hugh at December 9, 2005 5:06 PM

IMO Galloway doesn't belong in this group as he is certainly playing for the other side and is a Quisling, not a dhimmi.

Kofi is just corrupt. Prince Charles is an idiot, the product of royal inbreeding and upbringing. Chirac - same as Kofi plus he's French so it's in his genes.

Hmm - I'm narrowing the choices down. I think Patten deserves the award for consistency.

Posted by: johnb at December 9, 2005 5:17 PM

I guess you find some relief in organizing "polls" like this, because I understand that insulting and mocking the people who does not agree with you, including nation leaders, mitigates you frustration because those people do not listen to you, and surely (and fortunately) never will.

Posted by: Ispanan at December 9, 2005 7:21 PM

You're right Ispanan, we should be so fortunate to live under sharia law. Who needs art, music, philosophy, and cutting edge technology when we could settle for the adhan 5 times a day and hubble bubble pipes. I'm so glad these dear leaders are not listening to Mr. Spencer.

Posted by: igor at December 9, 2005 7:42 PM

Ispanan: "I guess you find some relief in organizing "polls" like this, because I understand that insulting and mocking the people who does not agree with you, including nation leaders, mitigates you frustration because those people do not listen to you, and surely (and fortunately) never will."

Mocking people who do not agree with us? Where have you been my dear? The soldiers of Islam intend to kill us in the long run if we refuse to accept their delusions about their pathological lying, murdering prophet and if we refuse to live as dhimmis under their iron-fisted control. This goes beyond a small matter of "disagreement" wouldn't you say? Or are you more offended by people "mocking" their fellow men than you are by people killing and enslaving them?

Posted by: Caroline at December 9, 2005 8:02 PM

A toss up between Galloway and Chirac. I went with Chirac. I am quite persuaded by arguments that Galloway is far beyond dhimmitude and has actually gone over to the other side. (He was married to one of Arafat's nieces wasn't he? Can a Muslim woman of that prominence marry a non-Muslim man? Plus, his speeches to Muslim audiences always refer to "us" - meaning the Muslim POV. It's very bizarre but I get the impression that Galloway has gone beyond "dhimmitude" to actually, for all intensive purposes, being an outright Muslim. But he isn't even a "moderate" Muslim. He's an extemist one!). I am, however, totally sympathetic to those who have nominated him for this award.

Chirac, in contrast, might well have been dismissed as a Passe' dhimmi, if it weren't for the French riots, which made major international headlines this year (2005!) Chirac isn't a closet Muslim. He's a true TRUE dhimmi. And his actions during the French riots - such as sidelining Sarkosky politically - proved it. He is literally leading the French nation to suicide in the face of Islam. Galloway doesn't have that degree of power over Britain but Chirac DOES currently have that degree of power over France to actually lead it in a suicidal direction. For that, and for his dhimmi response to the French riots of 2005, he gets my vote for Dhimmi Internationale 2005.

Posted by: Caroline at December 9, 2005 9:03 PM

I voted for Kofi Annan here. It is NOT just a simple matter of corruption.

Posted by: jay at December 9, 2005 9:20 PM

Charoline:

At the contrary, I condem all sort of terrorism, including islamist terrorism and also state terrorism. But you see, the "solutions" suggested in this site will not do aything against it, at the contrary. Oh and btw Im not your dear.

Posted by: Ispanan at December 9, 2005 9:32 PM

"Terrorism" is not the main concern of this site.

Posted by: igor at December 9, 2005 10:07 PM

Ispanan: "Oh and btw Im not your dear."

I've read enough of your posts to realize that your're either a Muslim or a dhimmi. If Muslims can presume to address me with "inshallah" and if you have no objections to that presumptuous address, then I assume you will have no objections to my chosen "pet" form of address, my dear.

Posted by: Caroline at December 9, 2005 10:10 PM

I agree with a previous post. Kofi Anan is NOT just a corrupt official. He is the leader of the UN and has done NOTHING to try and redirect the nations in their definition, much less actual, terrorism.

He runs an organisation that is so anti-semitic and pro MUSLIM and Arab that they should be getting financed wholly by the Arab Oil producers.

The decisions made at all levels in the organisation make this clear on a daily basis.

Posted by: KuhnKat at December 10, 2005 12:16 AM

I believe Galloway is an actual Muslim and therefore isn't properly qualified. If he hasn't become a Muslim, his impersonation in public is very convincing.

Posted by: Beagle at December 10, 2005 12:30 AM

1. Galloway is an actual Muslim? How do we know?

2. Robert, did you have this poll last year? If so, who won? I would have voted for Pope John Paul II, especially after some of the article I wrote about Vatican appeasement in the face of jihad.

Posted by: Joseph D'Hippolito at December 10, 2005 1:32 AM

Caroline:

"Chirac is literally leading the French nation to suicide in the face of Islam".

Chirac (or Shirak as we write it now) has brain problems... one can notice it easily when he speaks now. He got a brain accident, as you know. He is very strange... But more importantly, it is not Chirac who rules France, it is his daughter (Claude), a shy, complexed, irrascible character, almost a Yvonne Ridley. They are all trembling in front of her. She is a fierce socialist (which in French means communist).

Hi, Ispanan, how are you my dear ? (sorry, could not help it !)

Posted by: joiesauvage at December 10, 2005 11:37 AM

where is bush? Bush created this mess, he is the a.q. favorite son..why dont u put him on the list? also please include all those that want the barbaric turkey in eu (well u have tony blair, so i ll vote tony for supporting so much the turkish bid)

Posted by: chris at December 11, 2005 6:54 AM

I think the presence of a Muslim on a poll about dhimmi's skews the results.

Galloway HAS to be a Muslim, he married Arafat's niece..a kaffir male cannot marry a Muslim woman, without converting and accepting Islam.

Posted by: Nariz at December 11, 2005 7:15 PM

What? No Ken Livingstone? Better be a good reason.

Posted by: max at December 12, 2005 2:20 PM