| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
1938 update from DPA, with thanks to Jihad Watch News Editor Eric Schwappach:
Teheran - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has ordered the conditional suspension of the additional protocol of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Fars news agency reported Saturday.In a written order to his vice-president Gholam-Reza Aqazadeh, who is also head of the country's Atomic Energy Organization, Ahmadinejad called for the implementing of the recently approved law to suspend all voluntary cooperation with the IAEA if the Iranian nuclear case is referred to the United Nations Security Council.
The Iranian parliament last month approved a bill urging the government to conditionally suspend the IAEA additional protocol.
According to the bill, the government will be urged to limit or even stop IAEA inspection of Iranian nuclear sites if Teheran is referred to the Security Council.
Ahmadinejad said last Wednesday that there should be no doubts whatsoever that the government will not retreat one inch from realising the legitimate right of the Iranian nation to have nuclear technology.
Posted by Robert at December 17, 2005 4:06 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
I think it high is time for the UN security counsel to issue a no confidence vote on Iran immediatley accompanied with some serious condemnations. The EU is also reaching a serious point of impatience with this fanatical regime and its President and the efforts of diplomacy are beginning to collapse. The constant threats by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad must be taken seriously at every turn as this fanatic continues to stir the pot almost daily.
Posted by: Mackie![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at December 17, 2005 4:39 PM
The sad thing is Mackie's post would be wholly appropriate in 1976.
Posted by: kevin at December 17, 2005 5:20 PM
Mackie's right. There is only one way to head off the inevitable: for the international community to sanction Iran right now for its lack of cooperation and to pledge a full-fledged economic embargo if Iran doesn't reverse itself and fully comply within 30 days.
Fat chance.
Posted by: Cornelius at December 17, 2005 5:38 PM
The EU and UN should should put in consideration the fact that because Iranian president has called for the destruction of Israel and call for Iran to the security council, and impose serious embargo, what ever it can muster if Iran fails inspections. Iran has always whinned that other countries have nuclear arms, but because of Iranian statements to the effect of destroying another country, they have no right to have any nuclear capabilities!
Posted by: Lulu at December 17, 2005 6:12 PM
Meanwhile, see the life and times of the greatest Nuclear Proliferator the Islamic World and Kafir World have ever seen:
http://media.putfile.com/Photochor
The Great Chor (thief) himself - Dr A Q Khan!
Posted by: sanman at December 17, 2005 6:20 PM
Cuz, you know, sanctions worked so well in Iraq.
While we're at it, there's a lot of poor people in Iran. The UN should set up some kind of program to make sure that those people are not adversely affected by the sanctions. Perhaps Iran has something of value that could be traded for food and medicine. The UN could call the program the _____-for-food program. Now, anybody have an idea what Iran has that we could use?
Gee, I wonder how many bombs Iran will be able to build over the next twelve years.
at December 17, 2005 8:02 PM
Thia is hardly suprising considering the sword wielding effluent pouring out of Teheran.
Like in the embassy kidnappings, reason and diplomacy have no role to play with these scum who only understand Qur'anic violence.
Maybe they will come to see reason when Qur'anic violence is applied en masse to them, and soon.
As for sanctions: with half of the world at least run by governments of convenience and most of the remainder being eunuchoid, what is the point?
Direct military action is the only choice but the gutless EU will never stop being selfish and parochial long enough to ever pull their weight. However when the EU becomes Eurabia expect much more agressive stances by the EU although this time it will be proIranian.
Posted by: Zathras at December 17, 2005 8:31 PM
Gee, I must have missed something..... Why wait for the IAEA, UN, EU or any other acronym group for permission. Crap, the USA is a sovereign nation, and the most powerful in history. We are at war! The Ishmaelites declared war on us from ages past and continually today.
The MSM is not in charge of our safety.
'Tolerant' people are not worried about our safety.
Hollywood is more worried about a tsunami.
All citizens need to remind our representatives weekly about out concerns for our safety.
If we do not shout louder and more frequently than the infiltrators, traitors, and seditionists then we will experience new meaning in the phrase 'a knockout punch'.
Why wait. Demand action from our leaders. We have paid many a dear price in soldiers lives, money misspent in foreign aid, and our country's security through group apathy (simply to name to name three areas of costs).
There must be more patriots than the few that we hear from like Tom Tancredo.
Write your representatives, meet with them when they come to your home area. Demand accountability. Not the fluff that is offered as 'what your rep. has done this week, month, or quarter. Demand to know why they are being 'shouted down' or these critical issues are sent to a 'committee'.
As a Christian I reminded my rep's that, God forgive me, that "God so loved the world that He DID NOT send a committee".
And do not listen to your rep's staff. We did not vote for them.
Regards,
at December 17, 2005 8:34 PM
BREAKING
Worldnet daily is reporting an assasination attempt on Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, at least two where killed.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47956
at December 17, 2005 11:34 PM
The mullahs in Iran think that they are invunerable, playing Russia off against the U.S., and toying with the impotent E.U.
America, at this point, does not need another major war; maybe a minor one, like freeing Syria from Bashir the Blind, but not a war with Iran.
The Kurds would like to free their people from Iran; the Balochs and other Sunni arabs in the south, would like to free themselves from Iran. With American air support, those groups, appropriately armed, could dismember the Iranian state - let's get on with it before Iran gets nuclear weapons.
Doubtful if any other nation would stand up to defend Iran, except Bashir the Blind, whom we will have taken out before Iran's oppressed minorities, Kurds, Ballochs etc, are given the go ahead.
Iran must be taken down, before the mullahs put atomic weapons at the service of allah, and their own greater glory.
at December 18, 2005 4:08 AM
I imagine that the closer to nuclear proliferation Iran gets the more our missiles will be targeted to Iran,and so will the EU as well as Israel and like in the ol' Clint Eastwood movie the feeling will be "go ahead make my day", one false move and we will unleash upon you the very end of your existance in this world.
Posted by: chuck at December 18, 2005 10:12 AM
Shouldn't this be a "1936 update" (not 1938)?
Seems more like Hitler marching into the Rhineland than into Austria.
Either way, it deserves to be taken seriously.
Posted by: spect8or at December 18, 2005 9:58 PM
In case there were any doubts about the good Dr. El Baradei's (head of IAEA) intentions regarding Iraq, here is a quote from him from a couple of days ago (Dec. 10, 2005):
"You cannot use force to prevent a country from obtaining nuclear weapons. By bombing them half to death, you can only delay the plans. But they will come back, and they will demand revenge."
So, resistance is futile. We may as well give in. We surely don't want to anger the Iranians, thereby giving them justification for revenge. For such brave logic, El Baradei wins the Nobel Prize.
Posted by: special_guest at December 19, 2005 1:14 AM
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)