Talking about boycotts why doesn,t the west do one on muslim immigration and refugees,it would sure go a long way in defeating the muslim Crusade into the western world.

Posted by: stevenz at March 5, 2006 1:39 AM

Promises, promises.

The Texican.

Freedom, the only choice at any cost.

Posted by: Texican at March 5, 2006 1:44 AM

And Zawahri is right in the backyard of US's "staunch" ally against terror, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Go figure!

Posted by: Alert at March 5, 2006 2:00 AM

They keep calling this a crusade against Islam, their ignorance knows no bounds. The crusades were in response to Muslim aggression, so is this war...hmmm maybe he is right?

Posted by: disciple at March 5, 2006 2:45 AM

"It is our duty to take part in a mass economic boycott of Denmark, Norway, France, Germany, and all countries that take part in this crusader attack against Islam," he said, referring to the cartoons first published in a Danish newspaper last year.

If all the "free" countries would have published these "cartoons", we would see what is what. Rise up Infidels! Stop supporting Muslim nations, they're all oil rich. Let them support themselves. It's a'coming.

Like Texan says, be prepared, be armed.

Posted by: watcher at March 5, 2006 2:49 AM

If I had a gallon of gasoline for every time one of these jackasses said 'crusader'...

Posted by: Eisenhund at March 5, 2006 3:01 AM

Can't wait to hear Osama expressing his anger over the cartoons :)

Posted by: odin, king of gods at March 5, 2006 3:04 AM

I've just scoured all the on-line shopping sites for a white tunic with a big red cross on the front. Maybe there is still a bricks and mortar store somewhere in England that still carries this fashion.

Posted by: Lisa at March 5, 2006 3:20 AM

None of these terrorist leader have the power to issue just than fatwas. Than many muslim already make up their mind to not buy anything Danish it their can help it(exception is medine for sick people). Islamist law doesnot allow the use of terrorism on people in general. Fatwas are either ever specific than they apply only to one person or a very small goup like a family, the second type is than general ruleing in broad term which apply to the entire world or groupies larger than a familty.

The West could allow the caliphate to come back again than Caph than do something which the western cannot do with all they military might that is to delegalism some of these terrorist groups in the eyes of the muslim around the world.

The Crusade where not than defendist war like that perjury auther of that book, all legalism history book say the crusade where than offendist war by Western Europe to conquest the Holy Land.

Posted by: DefenderofIslam at March 5, 2006 3:53 AM

DefenderofIslam wrote: "The Crusade where not than defendist war like that perjury auther of that book, all legalism history book say the crusade where than offendist war by Western Europe to conquest the Holy Land."

You seem to forget that most of the Middle East was originally christian untill it was conquered by muslims from The Byzantine Empire in the 7th. century. The muslim aggression continued throughout North Africa and Europe with the invasion of Spain in 711, followed by attempts to conquer all of Europe, by repeatingly attacking Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, The Byzantine Empire, ect. When the crusades began Europe had endured more than 450 years of attacks from Islam and had finally had enough. The crusades were an attempt to reconquer the Holy land after centuries of muslim domination. So it was indeed selfdefence and ligitimate. I recommend you read this book about the subject:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0742538222/qid=1141549139/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-7553530-6232742?s=books&v=glance&n=283155

Posted by: odin, king of gods at March 5, 2006 4:09 AM

"The Crusade where not than defendist war like that perjury auther of that book, all legalism history book say the crusade where than offendist war by Western Europe to conquest the Holy Land."
-DefenderofIslam

So if the West just decided to go and take over Mecca it would be cool with you guys? How many times do you friggin' retarded Mohammedans have to be taught the same lesson? Holy land was Christian/Jewish. Invaded and stolen by Mohammedans. Crusades waged to take it BACK. Simple. Only your simpleton-authored Islamic 'legal' books say you cockroaches have any right to it. The Pali-infestation won't last the end of this century.

"Than many muslim already make up their mind to not buy anything Danish it their can help it(exception is medine for sick people)."

-DefenderofIslam

How about you people making your own damned medicine? Or maybe Allah can cure you. Bunch of GD whiny babies.

Posted by: Eisenhund at March 5, 2006 4:12 AM

defenderofislam

You stared by saying that terrorists don't have the power to issue a fatwa (I think ) then wnt on to describe that they can.
My friend if you want to boycott Denmark do us all a favour and include medecine in that boycott, we really don't want to make you better

Posted by: marilyn at March 5, 2006 4:16 AM

Muslims called for boycotts against Danish goods in response to cartoons rather then boycotting the newspaper that published the cartoons. Thus they are calling for the punishment of all Danish people for the actions of a few.This shows that Muslims believe in collective guilt.In contrast, when 9/11 happened and a group of Muslims killed thousands of Americans the US government went out of its way to say people should not blame all Muslims for the actions of a few.Since Muslims have shown in their reaction to the cartoons that they believe in collective guilt, why not expell all Muslims from the West even if only a few have committed terrorism? That would be in keeping with the Muslim belief that all are guilty for the actions of a few.

Posted by: Roxane at March 5, 2006 4:19 AM

I hear heavy consumption of sand and seawater do wonders to cure what ails ya. Y'all don't need no Danish meds.

Posted by: Eisenhund at March 5, 2006 4:21 AM

Roxane, you trying to scare away the Mohammedan troll? Throwing their own hypocracy at them is the quickest way to do it.

Posted by: Eisenhund at March 5, 2006 4:28 AM

hypocrisy, that is.

Posted by: Eisenhund at March 5, 2006 4:48 AM

Hey, DefenderofIslam, isn't it time the Muslim world started producing medicines for itself. Yep, boycott the West but still take its medicines. if you're going to boycott the West, then go the whole hog and boycott Western technology, medicines and vaccines. We'd love to see that.

Posted by: Spirit Of 1683 at March 5, 2006 4:51 AM

Just to follow up on my post about the crusades above, here is a good article about the subject:

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3724/is_200001/ai_n8902196

Posted by: odin, king of gods at March 5, 2006 5:12 AM

And what is the Western or bog-standard al-BBCeera response to this? You've guessed it. We've just been treated to Joan Baez singing her anti-Vietnam song "There but for fortune", and now, as I write, we're about to hear the anti-Gitmo ramblings of the Archbishop of Canterbury. Thanks to PC-spinelessness and delusion, we really are committing collective mass suicide in the style of the Jim Jones cult.

Posted by: Spirit Of 1683 at March 5, 2006 5:27 AM

Seems like it may be time to bring back the Teotonic Order and the Knights Templar. The Mohammedans want to keep yammering about Crusaders all the time, fine. Arm them with M1s and Leopards, G36s, and kevlar body armor. There are plenty of former military guys out there who wouldn't mind wearing the black or red cross.

Posted by: Eisenhund at March 5, 2006 5:44 AM

I guess the scum has failed to notice that oil is the only thing these countries have to sell to make money!
Without the 'oil stealing' West Muslim's coffers would be as bare and empty as this freak's soul.

----Fatwas are either ever specific than they apply only to one person or a very small goup like a family,----

OH WELL...That's alright then!
As long as they only call for death on individual families all is sweet and lovely!

What a sick religion this truly is!

Posted by: DaveyFreak at March 5, 2006 5:56 AM

Jeez, these people just don't know how to relax and enjoy life!

Posted by: Dumbo at March 5, 2006 6:32 AM

Assalma laikim everybody

Al-Z said "We have to prevent the crusader West from stealing the Muslims' oil which is being drained in the biggest robbery in history,"

Islam is very much based on the colour black. Here are some examples.

1) One day, when the Prophet (p.b.u.h) was around 4 years old and he was wandering in the
desert, 2 angels appeared to him. They opened his chest, took his heart out, and from his
heart, they took what is called mud-rassa black muscle. They washed it with some fluid, that some called 'imam '. They blessed muhammed to have the purest black heart globally.

2) Later on in his life the Messenger of Allah offered his Prayers in the sacred precincts of the Ka'bah facing the corner in which the "Black Stone" is fixed.

3) Muhammed talks a lot about avoiding the jinn & black magic in the Koran & how the muslim must protect himelf.

4) Allah made the foundations of the ground of holy Islam black. He filled the ground with oil.

5) The flag of Islam is black.

6) Muslims also say that Islam is the religion of the black man, that Islam is African.

This is why I implore people like Ironman Hondo to take up Islam. It is a natural fit.

How about a change of name to Muhammed Hondo as a celebration to the conversion to Islam....or atleast take a nice Afican name like Muapu or Muanga.

Well I'm not sure about Al-Z "stealing tag" ....but he may have a point about the oil. What Al-Zaharawi is hinting at is that it is literally "holy muslim ground" that is being sold to the crusader of all people.

If Western economy is slowed down....then it won't use as much of the muslim holy land.

Thing is that it is fast running out. Muslims countries have little else to to run their economy on once hold ground is exported....

so I'm afraid that you must expect more attacks and a possible slow down of export of oil to the crusader West.

Posted by: Naseem at March 5, 2006 8:15 AM

Purest black heart

Hehheh... no arguments there.

4) Allah made the foundations of the ground of holy Islam black. He filled the ground with oil.

Cool. Then, Texas must be really holy, too.

6) Muslims also say that Islam is the religion of the black man, that Islam is African.

One word: Darfur.

What Al-Zaharawi is hinting at is that it is literally "holy muslim ground" that is being sold to the crusader of all people. If Western economy is slowed down....then it won't use as much of the muslim holy land.

And a hell of a lot of good it'll do them sitting idly under the sand.

Posted by: Shinoliite at March 5, 2006 8:43 AM

Nasseem you are again so funny, you should be a muslim comedian! l can see you on the stage in your burka and head gear..the audience sipping what ever non alcoholic beverage, camel milk maybe? but a black heart you are right your muhammad had a black heart, and you are following a leader with a non human heart,, but a freakin black heart!
the ages of computer invented by the west will destroy islam as it is now. reform now if you want to join humanity Nasseem!!

Posted by: Lulu at March 5, 2006 9:30 AM

Roxane put her finger on a problem with Islam that is too ofen overlooked. They believe in collective punishment [12 Danish cartoonists and one newspaper published some mostly mild cartoons; and Islamic fanatics want to kill all Danes, boycott all Danish products]. Then they turn around and complain, with their Western fake "humanitarian" allies about "collective punishment" supposedly inflicted by Israel. If the EU accepts collective punishment being imposed on EU countries, then it is doing something as dangerous as curtailing freedom of speech.

Posted by: Eliyahu at March 5, 2006 9:34 AM

What a laugh. Zarwahiri says the "west" is stealing "Muslims' oil".

We (and Russia, and China, which are not "the west") buy their oil at a handsome price. We provide the science and technology and professionals without which there would be no access to the oil. They would not be access and use the oil themselves without our help. They (Muslim leaders) get rich, skim off all that money for themselves buying gold faucets for their multiple palaces, buying jets and fighter jets, paying for prostitutes, funding the building of mosques in non-Muslim lands, buyin off academics in the west, surreptitiously funding terrorists (such as Zarwahiri) and the Islamic terrorists blame the west for the poverty of the average Muslim. I doubt that even Zarwahiri believes any of his own words on this one.

As for the boycott of Denmark etc. over the cartoons, Zarwahiri is perfectly consistent with a countless number of imams and indeed a large percentage of Muslims (58% in Britain) who want to see the cartoonists punished. This evidence of agreement between Zarwahiri and so-called moderate Muslims who advocate boycotts over the cartoons exposes once again how both the hard-liners and so-called moderates are working toward the same goal: Imposition of at least some significant elements of sharia law. The restrictions on freedom of expression are a crucial part of Islamic law. Once those restrictions are imposed, our ability to fend off the attempt by Islamists to establish sharia law will have been severely restricted.

Terror is but one tactic; other powerful, influential Muslims are using other tactics. Not all Muslims want sharia law. But those who do will use jihad that is physical, political, economic, social, demographic, and psychological--whatever options are available. The end result would be the same: Imposition of sharia law, and of course this means a state of terror at all times for non-Muslims living under it. Although this seems far-fetched to some, especially those who don't follow sites such as JW/DW, faithfreedom, islam-watch, etc., reflect on the fact that almost all newspapers and politicians in the western countries have conformed to sharia law with regard to the cartoon issue. Unbelievable, crazy, but true.

Posted by: Archimedes at March 5, 2006 9:38 AM

This business of "stealing Muslim oil" is extraordinary. The oil of the Middle East was discovered by Western geologists, and it was the technology of the Western world that first found uses for that oil. On their own, not a single Arab or Muslim state could have discovered, pumped out, or distributed such oil. As it is, through thirty years of oligopolistic pricing, the Arab and Muslim oil states have received ten trillion dollars, and several trillion of that might never have been received had the American government not been in thrall to Western hirelings on the Saudi take, who kept insisting that trust in a moderating Saudi influence on prices, rather than gasoline taxes and taxes on other uses of oil, made sense. It was possible, beginning back in 1973, had the nature of Saudi Arabia been correctly gauged, to implement policies that would have allowed the recapture of oligopolistic rents. No such policies were ever proposed. Not then, not in the thirty-three years since. Not now.

Posted by: Hugh at March 5, 2006 9:55 AM

Where's the Muslim Outrage against those countries that show this "hijacker" of "peaceful" Islam on their TV's, or whose newspapers report on him?!?

Which is worse, cartoons or a live-action figure actively promoting peaceful Muslims to become pieceful Muslims???????????

Posted by: perpster at March 5, 2006 10:01 AM

Roxane, Eliyahu, and others raise the important point about collective punishment. Not only all of Denmark is to be punished, but all of the west and all "crusaders." This reflects Mohammad's approach in the Koran and Hadith: Punish an entire group due to what a few people have done.

It also shows that there is no way to appease Islamists. Appeasement only makes them worse. It's like dealing with a spoiled child. Several countries apologize, the governments of U.S., Britain, and Canada all condemned the cartoons and professed their respect for Islam, the E.U. and U.N. said they'll get working on imposing some kind of soft blasphemy law to protect Islam...and all of that is not enough. On the contrary, it rewards them and inspires them to create more violence and put more pressure on us. The only proven successful approach in dealing with Islam is to take a hard line, get started on it quick, and maintain it.

In one sense, I prefer that Islamists expose their true colours, such as with the extensive cartoon fury. It exposes the general public to just a bit more of the ugly truth about how extensive these problems are in Islam. The true moderate Muslims now are gradually being revealed to be in the minority and unfortunately don't have much influence. The most important thing is that the general public in the west wakes the heck up about Islam.

Posted by: Archimedes at March 5, 2006 10:08 AM

Going way back to alert in spot 3, you bring up a most interesting and debatable point. We call Saudis' Yemenites, Pakastanis, residents of the UAR, and other governments with somewhat questionable loyalities allies. And granted, I personally would not want to turn my back on any one of them to reach for a fresh beer. However, this is nothing new. As I recall, one of our biggest allies during The Second World War was a confederation of nations known collectively as The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. This confederation had agreements both with Germany and Japan to assist in their defence if needed. as both of these nations turned on Russia, and when we were attacked, the U. S. and Russia had a common bond, temporary as it might be. Often, one must ally with those one disagrees with in order to defeat a greater danger; i.e. Sadaam against Iran and the talaban against the Russian invasion. Nothing wrong with this as long as you can look into the mirror and see who is comming at your back.

Posted by: johnnycab23513 at March 5, 2006 10:14 AM

Naseem says:

"6) Muslims also say that Islam is the religion of the black man, that Islam is African.

This is why I implore people like Ironman Hondo to take up Islam. It is a natural fit."

Which fit would that be--the collar of slavery still practiced today by Islamists in Africa by the schoolyard bully Arab Aryan "nations"?

Maybe the correct saying is "the religion of enslaving the black man." For are black Muslims EVER recognized as equal to Arab Muslims? Not on your smited neck they aren't! As a radio talk show host says: "Hitlers in Headscarfs" is all they are.

Actually, while typing this and thinking of the "theft of oil" BS, it occurs to me that Islam is just a big Ponzi scheme, and the Arabs at the top of the pyramid keep all the wealth from this horrific theft of oil.

Let's get energy independent and let them bathe forever more in the unstolen oil they have left!!!

Posted by: perpster at March 5, 2006 10:24 AM

"Punish an entire group due to what a few people have done."

Yes, and doesn't this fit right in with the terrorist modus operandi of Islamic Terror? Typical of the schoolyard bully "religion" of Islam. And how does one stop a schoolyard bully? By standing up to him/her, not caving in.

Posted by: perpster at March 5, 2006 10:27 AM

Archimedes

Of course Z. does not believe what he says. He's lying. The only time when these people mean what they say is when they threaten us with violence, with terror, when they say they seek our destruction.
The rest, the "reasoning" is either out and out lying/taqiya or logical fallacies that even a fifth grader here would recognize.

Roxane, Elyiahu

Islam makes Muslims think in conglomerates, in colonies. Once humanity was devided into Muslim and Infidel, an absolute division until the end of times when only the Muslims will inhabit the earth, other distinctions are meaningless. Perhaps the only individual in the Western sense of the word in Islam was Mohammed himself. All the other Muslims are or are supposed to be clones of that initial and eternal matrix.

Posted by: ovidius_naso at March 5, 2006 11:15 AM

So the West is stealing the Muslim's oil? Stealing it? If this is the case, I might go and join in myself, for the ammount of money I put in my car each week it would probably be worth it.
No Islam, we are not stealing "your" oil we are buiying it, in somethign called a world market.
It may not fit in with your archaic beliefs on how the world should be run, but nowadays we have things called cars, boats and aeroplanes (but you knew about the last ones didn't you- We will NEVER forget)that all run on things produced by oil. You have it, you give us a price, and we buy it. Simple really. Its sort of like how you get weapons that are made in the hated West, but of course that is all denied and swept under teh carpet.

As for the cartoons- how powerful can an entire religion be if it is that insecure about a few drawings. Had the cartoon been about Christianity in any way shape or form, it would have been read, and forgotton about by the times the reader had got to the Sports section.

Some might say that the new Islam is just a long list of fanatical, bitter, twisted, sick, perverse, mindless idiots spoiling for conflict with anyone, anywhere.

There will always be an England, and England shall be free...

Posted by: presh at March 5, 2006 11:58 AM

Interesting that a Naseem should be boasting today about Mohammed's miraculous black heart and how important the colour black is in Islam. Because when Will Cummins wrote 2 years ago that "It is the black heart of Islam, not its black face, to which millions object" there was outrage from all the Muslim groups, such that one of his employers, the British Council were pressured into sacking him.

I thought the Islamic "colour" was green. Envy and biliousness.

Posted by: Granny Weatherwax at March 5, 2006 12:34 PM

"We have to prevent the crusader West from stealing the Muslims' oil which is being drained in the biggest robbery in history," he added.

Hugh is 100% correct. It is westerners (Americans, British, and the French) who discovered oil in the Middle East and developed the technology to build refineries.

The greatest robbery in history???

No way.

Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait are making loads of oil revenue $$$$$ from westerners who PAY for the oil.

There is no robbery.

It sounds like misinformed propaganda to me disguised as truth to unite Muslims to despise the west.

Yawn.

Posted by: Johnathan at March 5, 2006 12:50 PM

You folks would do well to take a look at economic and foreign policy trends rather than following Zawahri's example of running his mouth off at the hinge....

http://www.businessdayonline.com/?c=125&a=4521
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/01/26/business/saudi.php

Al-Anzy is at least is running his mouth off at the hinge after reading the papers:

http://money.canoe.ca/News/2006/03/02/1469722-ap.html

Unlike most posters here, he is going to have supporters who back his words up with actions that will have severe effects for all of us. What are you going to do to counteract them?

I would suggest investing in energy stocks now to finance your efforts.

Posted by: jehana at March 5, 2006 3:03 PM

----This business of "stealing Muslim oil" is extraordinary. The oil of the Middle East was discovered by Western geologists, and it was the technology of the Western world that first found uses for that oil. On their own, not a single Arab or Muslim state could have discovered, pumped out, or distributed such oil. As it is, through thirty years of oligopolistic pricing, the Arab and Muslim oil states have received ten trillion dollars,----

Perfectly put! These people just hate The West full stop. And any and all reasons to justify that hate, no matter how hypocritical, will do.

Posted by: DaveyFreak at March 5, 2006 3:28 PM

Lisa-

You can buy Crusader white tunics -with the red cross on it- through various "re-enactment" sites. Along with Hobbit regalia, Saracen blades, etc. I received a catalog for one in the mail last year... -clearly as a result of buying an item online utterly unrelated to such anarchronistic past-times, but which got me on a list of "likely suckers" for Viking dragon helmets, curling-toed Caliph shoes and Roman short swords. (Although, I have to admit, the gold-plated hippogryph rhytons looked like a nice way to quaff a pint of mead.)

Best of luck.

Or, as Richard the Lion-Hearted said:

"Haram!?! I thought you said harem!"

Posted by: profitsbeard at March 5, 2006 3:35 PM

The current leaders that represent the islamic faith need to be removed and the moderates need to step up to the plate and quit being so quite, or their self proclaimed peaceful religion will be continued to be dragged through the mud. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by the fanatics. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because people from Germany, they will awake one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun. Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, [Serbs], Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others, have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.

Time to step up and defend your religion, sitting on your hands while fellow muslims use your faith as a tool of terrorism, the question is who and when.

Posted by: Denver at March 5, 2006 5:07 PM

I was a little surprised the cave man of the border regions brought up homosexuals. What was that about? I wish he would have brought up the Hindus and Buddhists and secular west as well. He also brought up the secular Palestinians as well. I note with interest that these guys are issuing more and more press videos. More frequent as of late, meaning something big is in the works, OR they are afraid of being overshadowed by the more productive brothers in Iraq. This issue of the cave man bringing up the homosexuals is instructive. This is not just divide the west with deception, not just rile up the Arabs ect... but once again represents an embrace of the caliphate where the dhimmis will have their place, and anything considered abberant to Islam will be dealt with accordingly. This is why the menace of Jihad effects us all: rich and poor, liberal and conservative, secular France and red-state North Carolina. On a related topic, I look with satsifaction that the republicans and democrats are putting a united front againt Dubai. The head of Dubai Ports comes accross as quite a sarcastic, condescending fellow in interviews today IMHO.

Posted by: biorabbi at March 5, 2006 5:14 PM

The personality of Mo? Poster child for sociopath he was.

I find it very difficult to take the zee man seriously especially if I'm looking at that bump on his forehead at the same time. I find myself wondering "What IS that thing? Did he get it by smacking his head on the floor too hard or is it a horn trying to come out?"

More to the point why doesn't he strap on a belt and do the suicide routine? He could take a bunch of others of his group with him.

Has the zee man ever done anything but make stupid tapes? AND what IS that thing on his forehead?

Posted by: fireangel at March 5, 2006 5:20 PM

Everybody's pal Al Z. also raged against the Italian government Minister for Reforms who was forced to resign last week over showing the cartoon (barely) on his undershirt. He says now: It's an honor to be hated by Al Quaeda.

BIG NEWS: Brits announce total withdrawl of coalition forces from Iraq beginning Spring 2007.

Get the full stories, and all the European Headlines, on The Dumb Ox.

http://thomistic.blogspot.com/2006/03/weekend-european-news-round-up.html

All the best,
D. Ox
http://thomistic.blogspot.com

Posted by: Dumb Ox at March 5, 2006 5:56 PM

He also called on Muslims to boycott countries where satirical cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad had been published, including Denmark, Norway, France and Germany, 

I'm with the Z man on this one. When will this boycott go into effect, with Muslim immigrants leaving these nations? Dear Allah make it soon!

and said that Muslims should prevent the West from "stealing Muslims' oil."

LOL Since when is paying $60/barrel stealing? If anyone did stealing it was the worthless indolent Arabs who seized-nationalized the fields, refineries and ports that the West built in their sand pit nations

Posted by: dennisw at March 5, 2006 5:59 PM

Nasseem:

Allah wants the infidel to have your oil. Why else would he have given the infidel all those cars trucks and airplanes, while Allah gives the muslim camels and donkeys? It is the will of Allah.

Posted by: GFB at March 5, 2006 6:12 PM

Naseem says:
"6) Muslims also say that Islam is the religion of the black man, that Islam is African.
Sure Naseem. Since when is Saudi Arabia part of Africa? That's why Muslim countries like Sudan, Sennegal and Mauritania still have slavery and why the Arabic word "abeed" means both "slave" and "black". Muslims in old days had slaves who they forced to convert to Islam. Simple. After all, Mohammed (Pigs Be Upon Him) had slaves. He called them "raisinheads" and he even said that Satan looked like one of his black slaves. It is only natural that Islam would want Africa so they could have more black slaves.

Posted by: Bohemond_1069 at March 5, 2006 6:54 PM

Dear Rox boycott are legal expression of the people against a nation, than group of people, than government. The muslim have than legal right to boycott Danish goods expect for medines and other vital thing to stay alive. The doctor change my medine to than germany company. It isnot collect pruminion as you thing or collect guielt. The Genva cont which ban collect pruminion of than people as done by Israel, it state that boycott are expemt as they are legal.

Posted by: DefenderofIslam at March 5, 2006 8:20 PM

My take on the "thieft of oil" statement is to give the average Muslum the rage to fight against the west.

By saying the west is stealing it, the average muslum can find a enemy of sorts. Zawahri says we are stealing it, and the people have a basic way of life, so it is the west's fault.

This keeps the people from looking at the wealth being consumed by the muslums in the leadership, in the saudi head of state, etc. The indeed live like kings, as "kings" always do.

By taking the riches of the people of the "kingdom".

Posted by: Islofob IS-1 at March 5, 2006 8:40 PM

Defensive About Islam-

I agree.

The boycott of all things Western should begin with the computer (that haram device of temptation to peek at infidel porn) when one should be reiterating Koranic suras from memory while helping the sick, clothing the poor, soothing the widow, and educating the orphan. Or didn't the Tsunami leave enough for the average prosperous Muslim to do in the world?

Dispense with the distractions of the kafir dogs (internet, motorized vehicles, i-pods, etc.) and build up the Umma in person, first-hand.

Inshallah.

Posted by: profitsbeard at March 5, 2006 9:17 PM

the little man in the cave has no power, and needs western technology to make believe he has power! l say we boycott muslims! l think the little man in the cave got a piece of coal in stocking for Christmass and he is more pissed off!

Posted by: Lulu at March 5, 2006 10:05 PM

'Disciple'makes a good point about "who" started which war(s). And the same point can be applied to the cartoons - who started what!

Generally - cartoons simply emphathize the obvious - they make us chuckle because they exaggerate what is already known; they exaggerate traits that are already "there" in someone or something.

It isn't as though the cartoonist LIED by creating a false terrorist image - the cartoons simply pointed out what we already knew!

Posted by: champ at March 6, 2006 1:10 AM

I thought the Islamic "colour" was green. Envy and biliousness. Posted by: Granny Weatherwax

Exactly. Naseem, wht are the only colours in the Paki flag green & white, but no black? Ditto Saudi Arabia. And why was the Taliban flag white?

Posted by: Infidel Pride at March 6, 2006 2:24 AM

The Mohammedan boycott could be useful. We should immediately facilitate it. No more Russian and German rifles, French artillery, American and British jets, Czech Semtex, etc.

Always seemed to me that the Mohammedan flag should be plain khaki with a blood red sunburst in the middle of it. It would clearly illustrate the contributing factors of sand, oppressive heat, and violence that led to the development of the Islamic mind set.

And profitsbeard? The computer's okay for them. Remember, an Islamic "scientist" invented the computer in the 10th century. Along with the airplane, microwave popcorn, sliced bread, the remote control, spoons, rocks, air, etc., etc...

Posted by: Eisenhund at March 6, 2006 3:31 AM

Dear Rox boycott are legal expression of the people against a nation, than group of people, than government. The muslim have than legal right to boycott Danish goods expect for medines and other vital thing to stay alive. The doctor change my medine to than germany company. It isnot collect pruminion as you thing or collect guielt. The Genva cont which ban collect pruminion of than people as done by Israel, it state that boycott are expemt as they are legal.

Yes boycotts are legal but the people who Muslims should be boycotting are the owners of the newspaper,not all Danish people or the Danish government.That point has been made to Muslims by the EU. The Danish government has also made it clear to Muslims that they have no control over the actions of an independent newspaper.Individual Danes also have no control over what one newpaper does.Yet Muslims choose to harm innocent Danes over a dozen cartoons. By boycotting all Danish products Muslims are engaging in collective punishment, holding all Danes responsible for the actions of a single newspaper.You always reap what you sow and Muslims have shown that they believe in collective punishment. The world is watching so don't be surprised when your immoral acts come back to haunt you.Since Muslims worldwide have shown they believe in collective punishment that tells me it's perfectly acceptable for people in the West to withhold medicine or humanitarian aide to Muslims in Pakistan if an embassy is burned by Muslims in Iran.That's in keeping with the Muslim standard of morality and decency and their belief in collective punishment.

Posted by: Roxane at March 6, 2006 5:25 AM

Lisa:

Don't know if you'll see this, but this might be what you're looking for:

http://www.museumreplicas.com/webstore/eCat/Period%20Clothing%20Mens/Tunic%20%20%20Belt%20Of%20Guy.aspx

CGW

Posted by: CGW at March 6, 2006 8:45 AM

All this talk about the greatest robbery of all time really makes my oil boil.

If we're talking about oil and robbery in the same sentence it should be about all the Arab elites who have taken the money paid for that oil and stolen it from the people they rule over. One of the greates redistributions of wealth in history has been hijacked by the few, who live like...well, kings, while the subjugated masses are hypnotized (albeit willingly) to blame everyone under the sun (well, ok, mostly Jews and Crusader Christians, but let's not forget all the other non-Muslims, too) except themselves and their thieving rulers for any and all slights, real or perceived.

These same rulers who are higher and mightier than thou when talking to their own folks live like heathens when the visit the West. Smoking, drinking, whoring, partying and spending the stolen oil money lavishly.

The West stealing oil? GIVE ME A BREAK!

Posted by: perpster at March 6, 2006 9:42 AM

Al Z says the US steals the oil? the people whom he tells this garbage to and believe it are as ignorant as they come. Are they really this stupid? they don't know how the oil is purchased on a world market. The people should revolt against AL Z for he is depecting them as cave dwelling morons that believe anything.

Posted by: Denver at March 6, 2006 12:17 PM

Dear Roxane Boycott arenot legality collective pruminent as define by the Geven Cont on war and occuption of territies sign by over 2/3 of the nations of the world so it is totaly legality binding on nations that didnot signed it. Boycott have alway effect and hurt inornent people, the word Boycott is over 200 year old named after than inframous English Major Boycott(his last name)who was so bad in mistreating the local Irish people that they refuse to sell anything to him or buy anything from him so the saying of the Irish of that time Boycott Boycott so the methord of optesting was name after this English army officer. The local English court total refuse to stop this by saying that the court have no power over the local people who all refuse to sell or buy from this Major who badly mistreated the local people.Even other Engish people join in the Boycott of Boycott. Labor Unions and Nations have use the Boycott methord. Since I think you are than America like me what about use of America Boycott against Cuba is that a form of collective prumnent that you are critize moslim of against Denmark. It Denmark want the boycott lift all they have to do is put that newpaper out of bussien for acting in a wrong manner. One methord is all Danish bussienes pull adverting money away from the newpaper why adverstise in a newpaper that harm your bussien, sue the newpaper for 3 time damage of loss income and 3 time damage for harm of image in the Muslim world as than bussien or do both.

Posted by: DefenderofIslam at March 6, 2006 11:31 PM

The Geneva Conventions are NOT binding on non-signatories.

Get your facts straight before posting.

Posted by: CGW at March 7, 2006 6:17 AM

I think you are than moslim? It moslim use a form of cellective pruminent to harm all un moslim, arenot totaly against Islam? It so, how? It not, whynot? It moslim in bussien for acting in wrong manner to harm all un moslim, or it tiny Major extermintist who badly mistood Islam and thereby badly mistreated the local people ON their own territies (have 9/11 for example), what methord for stopping if do you pruprose?

I always love inornent moslim people who collect stories about victimology and victimhood by saying over and over again. I love moslim critize against America or Denmark, and then invoke un moslim methord such as boycotts to harm American of Denmark freedom of speech or bussien and shut it down completely. I love inornent moslim compare America against Cuba with inornent moslim rage against cartoons, or moslim say harm "image" in the Muslim world, rather than moslim bussien of terrorism, riots, rampage, suchlike, if do much more harm of images of moslim in the moslim world than any bussien we are do.

Posted by: jsla at March 7, 2006 1:49 PM

It muslim have than legal right to boycott America, or worst it moslim can kill people of American, and tryto mow than down with SUVs, than what about boycott of send ALL medines and ALL other vital thing to stay alive of computers, cars, SUVS, etc. for moslims, and kept them away than moslim forever? If be fair? If be just? I thing so.

It moslim can collect pruminion against Denmark for printing cartoon, of America for sporting Israel such as 9/11, of collect pruminion than other country such than Bali, UK, Spain, France, and Beslan Russia, than you thing hold all moslim collect guielt if fair? Whynot? Than America ban ALL moslim in American, can American do it totaly legality binding? If seem prefectly fair I thing.

Also -- what medine to than germany company doyou take? If than psychiatrical?

Posted by: jsla at March 7, 2006 3:57 PM

(trying to use language he can understand...)

Posted by: jsla at March 8, 2006 11:48 AM