![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Update on the situation in Chad from the TimesOnline:
CHAD severed diplomatic ties with neighbouring Sudan yesterday and threatened to expel 200,000 Sudanese refugees, the day after government troops beat off a fierce rebel attack on its capital, Ndjamena. President Déby accuses Sudan of arming rebels who had sped across the vast desert country from bases in Darfur in a fleet of pick-up trucks. “The international community has been totally deaf and dumb on the situation,” Mr Déby said after a cabinet meeting. “Enough is enough.”Sudan helped Mr Déby to gain power in a 1990 coup, but he fell out with his neighbour over his handling of the Darfur crisis. Since then he has faced a coup attempt, several high-level defections from his armed forces, and a spate of increasingly bold rebel attacks.
With the two giant but impoverished African countries now on the brink of war, he told cheering crowds at a rally in Ndjamena that if no international solution were found to the Darfur crisis by the end of June, Chad would no longer shelter refugees from the area. Thousands of people fled into Chad after Sudanese government forces cracked down on a rebellion in Darfur in 2003, massacring local black African tribes they said were sympathetic to the insurgents [insurgents in this case are non-Muslim Sudanese -RB]. Many Chadians, including the President, belong to the same nomadic desert tribes that straddle the common border.Sudan suspected Mr Déby of supporting the aims of Darfur rebels opposed to government-supported dominance by Arab tribes [and opposed to the imposition of Islamic law -RB]. Khartoum reacted by backing Chadian groups who were against the President and a move to change the constitution to allow him a third term.
For months, international observers have said that failure to settle the conflict in Darfur risked destabilising the entire region, especially Chad...
And this from VOA:
Now, President Deby is threatening to shut down the country's oil production, which some analysts say is an attempt to strong-arm the World Bank into releasing at least $124 million in promised aid.The aid was frozen after President Deby reneged on a previous agreement with the World Bank to use most of the country's new-found oil wealth to improve the living standards of ordinary Chadians, who are among the world's poorest.
Chad's oil revenue has netted about $307 million since October 2003, when it began shipping oil.
Instead of using that money to reduce poverty, critics say, Chad's government has spent millions on its military and weapons, as rebel groups in the country's east seem more intent than ever on ousting President Deby, who took power himself in a coup 15 years ago.
Posted by Rebecca at April 15, 2006 8:44 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
Thanks for the useful parentheses Robert - it does help understand what is going on. I listened to a BBC radio report on Thursday - and it was so mired in language of 'rebels' without saying who these rebels were and general obfuscation that it was impossible to know who was doing what to who and why. As with so any of these reports the underlying jihadi intent is deliberately (or ignorantly) obscured. It goes without saying that the UN/African/international inaction in the face of genocide and ethnic cleansing in Sudan remains one of the biggest under-reported scandals in the world.
Posted by: Jinnee
at April 15, 2006 9:47 AM
Cometh the hour, cometh the man.
Is not the moment approaching when the American forces -- a very small force would be needed -- could seize the southern Sudan, and Darfur, and hold them, in order to protect the black African inhabitants from further Jihad against them, by Arab Muslims, and to bring in that "humanitarian aid" that, when it comes to certain others, the Americans seem so very keen to continue.
Posted by: Hugh
at April 15, 2006 9:59 AM
The whole of the African continent has a long history of tribal conflict.
We in the industialised nations (Russia and China included) are now aiding this conflict by allowing the sale of arms to what is essentially still a tribal culture.
Hugh, your idea is interesting, but we are a little overstretched in Afghanistan and Iraq and we have to leave enough for the up an coming conflagration with Iran.
Posted by: Peter
at April 15, 2006 2:50 PM
It seems that the Darfurians in Chand are in the same position that the Jews of Europ were in during the Nazi Era. Whenever they fled their countries, other nations would not accept them and forced Jews who did escape to return back to Europ where most of them died. I hope the president of Chad reads history before making his decision to return the refugees back to Sudan.
Posted by: Christian
at April 15, 2006 4:06 PM


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)