FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Dhimmi Watch Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Raymond Ibrahim Robert Spencer
 
« More evidence of al-Qaida nukes | Main | Muslims to join pro-illegals protest in L.A. »

April 28, 2006

West: We need an Islam Study Group

The nonpareil Diana West once again speaks truth to power, and even does me the honor of including me on a short list of people she thinks should be part of a presidential advisory council instead of the one just constituted. And I couldn't agree more, both with her selections for the group and with the need for such a group in the first place.

"Shariah nations," from the Washington Times, with thanks to the Constantinopolitan Irredentist:

Certainly, we didn't put up all those ballot boxes across the Middle East to mandate a rollback of freedom. But in failing to assess the ideology central to Islam that makes Western notions of liberty fatally heretical, this is increasingly what is happening. Which gives a head-hurting circularity to our policy. Maybe such dizzying confusion should make us welcome the advent of the Iraq Study Group, a presidential advisory council created, as the New York Times put it, "to generate new ideas on Iraq."

But new ideas on "Iraq" are the last thing we need, particularly as generated by a bipartisan snooze of a group that includes James Baker, Vernon Jordan, Charles Robb, Sandra Day O'Connor, Alan K. Simpson and Lee Hamilton — I can hardly tap out the other names because they're so solidly and venerably uninspiring (with the notable exception of Rudy Giuliani).

Framing their study around "Iraq" reveals how blinkered government thinking is. Iraq is only a small piece of our troubles in this period of resurgent Islamic jihad, from Osama bin Laden's cave to downtown Tehran, from worldwide Danish cartoon protests to Tel Aviv falafel stands, from Paris banlieus to Zacarias Moussaui's courtroom hot seat. Squeezing big brains for "new ideas" about winning Iraq is sort of like planning the Normandy invasion to win France. We need something bigger. We need new ideas about Islam.

My list of idea men and women would include Hirsi Ali, Bat Ye'or, Bruce Bawer, Andrew G. Bostom, Walid Phares, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Wafa Sultan, Ibn Warraq and other experts and observers unbowed by the strictures of political correctness that strangle debate on Islam — its teachings, its demands, its history.

Iraq would figure into such a curriculum, but from a broader perspective that would allow us to size up the global battlefield in terms of the two great threats to the Western way of life: the spread of shariah through active jihad (war, terrorism), and the spread of shariah through Islamization (demographics, multicultural correctness). Of the two, the second — quiet jihad — is the more serious threat, as the continuing Islamization of Europe shows.

We need an Islam Study Group.

Ms. West, I would be happy to participate. But I won't be waiting by the phone for Mr. Bush to call.

Posted by Robert at April 28, 2006 4:46 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

That's a study group of nonpareils. We need all the nonpareils we can get.

Posted by: Interested [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 28, 2006 5:44 AM

For the nonce.

Posted by: Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 28, 2006 1:30 PM

But in making such ignorance inviolate, we end up making the world safe for Shariah.

And therein lies the key to this whole mess.

But West badly understates the situation. It's not just ignorance, it's fake reporting, fake teaching, the 6th pillar and the self-censorship it enforces, and as we're seeing right now with the trial in England, it's even a felony to make accurate predicitons about Moslems.

Posted by: Alarmed Pig Farmer [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2006 9:47 AM

"...But new ideas on "Iraq" are the last thing we need, particularly as generated by a bipartisan snooze of a group that includes James Baker, Vernon Jordan, Charles Robb, Sandra Day O'Connor, Alan K. Simpson and Lee Hamilton — I can hardly tap out the other names because they're so solidly and venerably uninspiring (with the notable exception of Rudy Giuliani). ..."

Unbelievable. I doubt that anyone in this “new idea” group has read any of the books about Islam considered seminal at this site. Baker might have ready Karen Armstrong or one of that ilk, but that is worse than nothing. Sandra Day? Alan K? Good Lord. They are all beltway pols. They know all the streets in DC. Robb has been engaged in some Intel agency for a few years, but that may be as bad a qual as having read Armstrong.

This group seems to have been selected based on the same book on management staffing that led to the Harriet Meyers nomination, not to mention the appointment of that world renown hurricane expert and FEMA director, Michael Brown. Their scope should be limited to making a list of the best DC Middle-East Restaurants. Anything else they might come up with will only worsen the perspective on Islam held by this Administration. How much money will go down this tube?

Should we have any hope that Tony Snow might introduce some ideas on staffing like oh say, qualifications? West’s nominations would be great!

Posted by: Jimmy Bones [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 29, 2006 12:59 PM

Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


Web Site Counter