For the sheer terror of it - the worst thing you can do to people is aim at their children."
..........NOT EVEN A SHOELACE...EHUD OLMERT.....Many dont agree with Mr Olmert but that line broke my heart.....it's the children we should focus on...they die in cafes and on the bus...killed by fathers or brothers for not being good muslims....this Demon god allah has asked for CHILDRENS BLOOD FROM AROUND THE GLOBE...we must fight harder....these CHILDREN SHOULD NOT DIE IN VAIN....MAY GOD BLESS ALL VICTIMS OF ISLAM...AND I PRAY FOR THE REAL GOD TO TOUCH THE HEARTS OF MUSLIMS WHO ARE FED UP WITH SLAVERY.for the BIBLE speaks to the heart not the mind.

Posted by: storagemanager at May 25, 2006 11:02 AM

It's just too bad to be false, is'nt it?

Posted by: eloivsdiablo at May 25, 2006 12:16 PM

Is this not considered at least a hate crime?

Posted by: Carolyn2 at May 25, 2006 1:14 PM

And here yet again is more hard proof that Islam incorporates first-degree murder into its basic ideology. Chilling.

What is it going to take to convince Americans and others that it is THEY who are the planned targets of such murder???

Will the media moguls ever figure it out?

If so, when?

Posted by: pythagoras at May 25, 2006 1:32 PM

Why has our mainstream media said nothing about this?

Shouldn't Malvo and Muhammed be tried for a hate crime? Should't they be tried for violating their victims' constitutional rights. It seems that these cards were pulled out in the past to go after certain people the DA's wanted in particular cases.

Posted by: DesertDawgN29 at May 25, 2006 2:54 PM

Will the MSM pick up on this?

The Washington Times ran a story about Malvo's testimony against Muhammed including the Jihad references.

Posted by: Roxane at May 25, 2006 4:11 PM

"Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah,

I take that as a direct reference to Christians, so it is know wonder the MSM wont pick it up.

I do note that it does seem the anti-Christian attitude grew greatly only after a Republican occupied the White House, when President Bill Clinton said he was a Christian it was ok, is it because we knew he was a lying panderer?

Only a white person committing a crime against non-whites gets the "hate crime" status in America, which is ironic, because I never heard of any crime being committed because of "love".

Posted by: Bar at May 25, 2006 4:42 PM

Where are the usual Mohammedan trolls who frequent this site to refute these quotes and reassure us that "Islam is a religion of peace"? Their silence speaks louder than their usual cries of denial.

Posted by: Bohemond_1069 at May 25, 2006 4:55 PM

because I never heard of any crime being committed because of "love"....

I should add, except those crimes committed by Moslems, they do it for the “love” of Allah.

Posted by: Bar at May 25, 2006 5:26 PM

Storeagemanager,
It's the sniper Muhammad who wants the blood of the children, not Allah. Let's not mix up the words of a sick murderer with those of God.

Bohemond_1069,
Islam is a religion of peace at peace time. You naturally fight during war time. (Or do you turn the other cheek?) But I said 'war time'. It's a terrible thing what these two snipers had done. I don't understand why they are not executed yet?

Posted by: Oben d'Imishte at May 25, 2006 5:56 PM

Let's not mix up the words of a sick murderer with those of God. ~ Posted above

But didn’t this word of "God" (the Qur’an) come from a sick murder (Mohammed)?

Posted by: Bar at May 25, 2006 6:09 PM

Oben, Islam has been waging war against the infidel world for almost 1,400 years, and will do so for as long as there are any infidels left. Islam is not a religion of peace. It is a cult of extreme barbarity, cruelty, prejudice, misogyny, backwardness, lying, duplicity and intolerance which seeks global domination and wants to drive the entire world into a new and savage dark age of Sharia law - an age which would have made a planet living in the aftermath of a Third Reich and Imperial Japanese victory look like a funfair. You can't kid us - we know that. And these snipers did terrible things because the Koran, hadith and Sira instructs Muslims to do terrible things - like the Washington Sniper, his acccomplice, plus the perpetrators of 911, Bali, Beslan, London, Madrid, the murders of innocent Israelis over the years, plus the 5,000 fatal terrorist atrocities carried out by Muslims since 911 alone.

Posted by: Spirit Of 1683 at May 25, 2006 6:12 PM

Oben-

It is never "peace time" in Islam... until all infidels are subjugated.

And hell will freeze over sooner.

Haven't you read the Koran yet?

(Or, just being cheeky are you?)

Posted by: profitsbeard at May 25, 2006 6:12 PM

To the Mohammedan poster above:

'Allah' is Mohammeds invention. The sniper Muhammad got his inspiration from the bloody pedophile Mo. Mo & Allah is one and the same...

Mohammedans are 'oppressed' while living in the dar al harb, especially when infidels don't 'surrender' to Islam and that is reason enough to wage war, violent jihad against them.

Mohammedans are 'humiliated' and need to 'defend' the filthy 'prophet' - over cartoons, over korans, or simply because infidels happen to live happily and prosper.
Mohammedans remain stupid and poor while banging their heads on the floor 5 times a day.

Aren't Mohammed's followers obliged to go on 'raids' and terrorize infidels at least once a year?

Posted by: sheik yer'mami at May 25, 2006 6:19 PM

Oben d'Imishte.....allah is not my GOD...allah is a demon who demands blood...GOD will save ISRAEL because they are his PEOPLE.never tell me allah is GOD!..sorry...but i hate the very idea of islam.

Posted by: storagemanager at May 25, 2006 7:05 PM

Bar,
Mohammad (PBUH) did not murder anybody. He would fight and kill during war, or execute when necessary during peace, just like your patriot soldiers in Iraq and the governor of Texas respectively.

Spirit of 1683,
You are listing terrorist acts, which I wouldn't even call 'dirty war'. War has its rules, though many don't obey them. But these baby killers are not soldiers, just terrorists. My wife was one second away from death as she was about to push a (wired) paper bag away from the ATM, when the security guard told her not to touch it. I lost a friend during college, shot by terrorists. Can we just classify terror as religion-independent? IRA, ETA, Baader Meinhof, PKK, etc. None approved.

Profitsbeard,
Peace is of course possible and there were times of peace, with the non-muslims living inside the Muslim community. According to the Sheria, a Muslim who is killed while defending the right of a non-muslim in Muslim land (a dhimmi) is a accepted as a martyr.

Sheik yer'mami,
I didn't feel oppressed when I was in the States. I rather felt very sorry for my friends and tried to answer their questions as much as I could, hoping God would guide them the right way. All I can do is talking, writing and living a good life constituting a good example. BTW, bowing and putting down your head 5 times a day is healthy, plus washing your hand-face-feet before each time ensures you to be a clean man. Sitting in front of a computer screeen the whole day, I find it a useful exercise other than being a spritual sanctuary.

(I won't be able to write any more today. It's kinda late here. God be with you.)

Posted by: Oben d'Imishte at May 25, 2006 7:20 PM

This will get zero play in the mainstream media because liberals see Islam as a useful ally in the war against traditional religion and the values of Western Civilization... sort of the way the German industrial barons saw Hitler as a useful ally in the war against Bolshevism!

Good luck with that.

D. Ox
http://thomistic.blogspot.com

Posted by: Dumb Ox at May 25, 2006 8:06 PM

Oben d'Imishte

Are you sure about that?

This is what your murdering prophet contended his factitious god told him.

Bukhari:V4B52N270 “Allah’s Messenger said, ‘Who is ready to kill Ashraf? He has said injurious things about Allah and His Apostle.’ Maslama got up saying, ‘Would you like me to kill him?’ The Prophet proclaimed, ‘Yes.’ Maslama said, ‘Then allow me to lie so that I will be able to deceive him.’ Muhammad said, ‘You may do so.’”

Tabari IX:69 “Killing disbelievers is a small matter to us.”

Tabari VIII:178
Ishaq:550 “Muhammad ordered that certain men should be assassinated even if they were found behind the curtains of the Ka’aba. Among them was Abdallah bin Sa’d [the Qur’an’s one and only scribe]. The reason that Allah’s Messenger ordered that he should be slain was because he had become a Muslim and used to write down Qur’an Revelation. Then he apostatized [rejected Islam].”

Tabari VIII:179
Ishaq:550 “Among those who Muhammad ordered killed was Abdallah bin Khatal. The Messenger ordered him to be slain because while he was a Muslim, Muhammad had sent him to collect the zakat tax with an Ansar and a slave of his.... His girls used to sing a satire about Muhammad so the Prophet ordered that they should be killed along with Abdullah. He was killed by Sa’id and Abu Barzah. The two shared in his blood. One of the singing girls was killed quickly but the other fled. So Umar caused his horse to trample the one who fled, killing her.”

That is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end, it is perhaps the end of the beginning. ~ Sir Winston Churchill.

Posted by: Bar at May 25, 2006 8:41 PM

Even if Oben wa Canoli was correct (which he is not), a military general who wants to conquer the Earth to make Islam supreme is not a spiritual leader for a humane world based on human rights and tolerance & equality for all peoples -- all peoples except, of course, for supremacist groups who attempt to spread and grow (i.e., attempt to become supreme) by using violence.

Posted by: Television at May 25, 2006 9:34 PM

Oben-

Spare me the taqiyya.

I'm so fed up with the excuses, excuses, excuses for Islamic Imperialism's 1350 years of totalitarian, despotic warmaking (how did Islam get out of Arabia, I wonder?), called Muslim "peace", (AKA- "they create a desert and call it 'peace'" ) that if I have to bear the weight of one more drop of this "holy" b.s. and I'll need an industrial-strength truss.

Was Mohammad not a pedophile, lying, thieving, plundering, murderous warlord who approved the assassination of a woman poet, with her baby at her breast, because she wrote mocking verses about him, or not?

How could one, in good conscience, follow such a depraved maniac?

Or any "religion" he invented?

Spare me.

Posted by: profitsbeard at May 25, 2006 9:56 PM

profitsbeard!!!
Shame on you for calling that Sado Masochistic Cult a religion. What the heck is wrong with you?

Posted by: tgusa at May 26, 2006 12:35 AM

I forgot to add the sarc.

Posted by: tgusa at May 26, 2006 12:36 AM

Is bowing to the floor the way they get blood to their brains?

Posted by: freewoman at May 26, 2006 1:25 AM

Oben, I hope you wash in between bowings. Hygiene is very important.

So why don't y'all just jump in the shower before praying? This way you'd be clean all over!! Cleanliness is next to Godliness!

Posted by: freewoman at May 26, 2006 1:29 AM

Oben d'Imishte,

You are plagued by the Muslim (and very modern Western) inability to distinguish between essential differences and superficial similarities. Rather ironic that.

Mohammed's wars (and the perpetual warring of his heirs) were wars of conquest, expansion, religious tyranny. Duh!

You are living in a primitive, bedouin cosmology that leaves no room for love or civilization, for authentic tolerance or human moral development. Quite ironic how much you have in common with the socialists.

(Not odd at all, actually. Cf. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit.)

D. Ox
http://thomistic.blogspot.com

Posted by: Dumb Ox at May 26, 2006 9:08 AM

"We showed this to Muslim customers in Burger King and they were disgusted. We went to the manager. “Is this true?” we asked. He said, “Yes, my brother. It is true.” I spoke to two other Pakistani Muslim guys there and they said, “We are sickened.” They were cussing Burger King."

Excuse me? I wasn't aware that Burger King served halal food. Even their vegetarian option may not be strictly halal, since they may have been in contact with unclearn meat or meat juices, or something else najass. If you were really an observant Muslim you would keep away from Burger King or Macdonalds.

You are yet another example of a paranoid extremist crackpot being given the oxygen of publicity rather than being slung into jail for threatening behaviour. You give Muslims a worse name than they already have. Get over yourself, you idiot!

Posted by: soovey at May 26, 2006 9:48 AM

Bar,
The examples you gave do not contradict with what I had said. Mohammad (PBUH) was using all three powers (legislation, execution & jurisdication) according to the Sheria. He was imposing the law. They just didn't have lethal injection at that time.

Profitsbeard,
The prophets never lie, nor sin. That's a common property of all. When Abraham (PBUH) was asked who broke the idols, he showed the big one he had spared and said (something like) "That's the biggest one", he didn't say it broke the others.
I am surprised at your using the word taqiyya, which has newly been introduced into our political jargon. Of course, it had been being applied all the time :-)

Freewoman,
I don't think anyone would have a problem with cleanliness. A lazy person like me wouldn't wash his feet 5 times a day, were it not compulsory. God, knowing the best for us, leads us to the right way and sets the guidelines knowing where we will fail.

Dumb Ox,
The wars of Mohammad (PBUH) and his successors were inevitable in the political conjuncture of his time. All the neighbours were hostile, because they knew that this new religion would swallow and digest their countries, so it had to be crushed. Expansion was necessary for the Muslim State to survive. As justified as the Crusades are from your point of view.

Posted by: Oben d'Imishte at May 26, 2006 2:58 PM

Except for the fact that the Crusades were not about conquering land that had always been mohammedan. They were about taking back land that had been invaded by mohammedans. Read history or don't comment about it. In either case, don't try to rewrite it. I hate to break it to ya, but you islamists are not smarter than the rest of us, however much you wish it were otherwise.

Posted by: Eisenhund at May 26, 2006 4:18 PM

"All the neighbours were hostile, because they knew that this new religion would swallow and digest their countries, so it had to be crushed." -- Oben-wa-Canobi

Swallowing and digesting can be good, or it can be bad: when the entity that swallows and digests supports human rights, tolerance, a secular framework for separating religion & poltics, and equality of all peoples, then it is good for that entity to swallow and digest.

When, however, the entity that would swallow and digest other entities is based upon a supremacist doctrine that is hostile to human rights / tolerance / equality / separation of church-&-state, then it is bad for that entity to swallow and digest -- and it becomes incumbent upon all peoples to try to stop it from expanding.

Posted by: Television at May 26, 2006 4:22 PM

The media will never tell the truth about this.

Posted by: londongirl at May 27, 2006 8:03 AM

Eisenhund,
I am aware of the differences between the Crusades and the wars of Islam. My point was about the justification of war from the points of view of either sides. As for reading history, check the books for the crusade which turned into the looting of Constantinople. What a holy war that was! Which one was it? ...eh....... OK, I admit I haven't been reading history for a while. But I'm not trying to rewrite it for sure. (That's what the French Parliament is up to nowadays, regarding the Armenian claims of Genocide.)

Television,
Is the US invasion of Iraq an example for your first paragraph or the second?...

Posted by: Oben d'Imishte at May 27, 2006 8:32 AM

"Is the US invasion of Iraq an example for your first paragraph or the second?..."

The US invasion of Iraq is an example of a grievously botched and incompetent attempt at a good swallowing-&-digesting: good intentions, poor execution: the execution is poor due mainly to two facts (as Hugh Fitzgerald has noted time and time again):

1) the fact that Islam is an organism that viscerally and powerfully rejects all good influences with its fundamental antibodies

2) the fact that Bush and his Administration are naively oblivious to fact #1.

Posted by: Television at May 27, 2006 1:11 PM

As sala'amu alaikum, Oben d'Imishte

I hope we can live in peace, for you and I are alike in many ways.

."The prophets never lie, nor sin. That's a common property of all."

Now that's why I don't believe in them. If someone orders a mother to be killed with her baby in her arms, just for writing scurrilous words, that is Evil, regardless of whoever does it.

That is not to say that all followers of such a man are evil. Given that the Arabic that is used today is an invention only 1100 years old, hundreds of years after the time of the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and given also the different versions of the Holy Quran found in Yemen in 1970, one written on top of another, but older and more original versions still partially legible, there is considerable doubt about the currently accepted Quran, and even more about most of the hadiths.

Never mind, both Christianity and Judaism have even more problems with their Apocrypha.

The basic problem is this:

The Qu'ran is easily interpreted in a number of different ways. Your interpretation differs from many other Muslims, and their interpretation leads them to consider killing all kuffar anywhere as a noble act. Many of them would consider you kuffar too, for not following their interpretation.

The Christian Holy Books are far less susceptible to this kind of "kill the infidel" problem, but even then, they've been used to justify pogroms and crusades, not to mention the 30 years war.

The Jews stopped this kind of evil about the time of Josephus, but just read Leviticus for some barbaric practices.

Some people see Muslims shouting "Allahu Ackbar" while slowly and ritualistically sawing someone's head off, and consider that Islam is at fault. I don't agree, but I can't blame them for thinking that. Certainly the interpretation of Islam that the ritual killers follow causes them to be hostis humani generis, enemies of humanity.

You are in a bind : for are not all Muslims your Brothers, and to be defended against the Kuffar, regardless of the rights and wrongs of the situation?

I wish you well reconciling your Faith and your Conscience.

Posted by: Zoe Brain at May 31, 2006 1:57 AM