test

Posted by: AIG at July 9, 2006 5:36 AM

The basic problem in the Islamic world is the existence of the Zionist regime

No, there's way, way, WAY more that's the problem with the Islamic world than the existence of a tiny territory of Jews in the midst of you. But so typical of the Muslim mindset. Their problems are always due to something or somebody else. Nothing to do with Islam, of course.

And if Israel ceased to exist, they'd still have problems, and then they'd be calling for the elimination of everyone and everything non-Muslim. And if they managed that, they'd still have problems, and turn on one another like a pack of rabid dogs. It's such a feral belief system. It reduces humanity to wild animal state. Worse.

Posted by: feralee at July 9, 2006 5:37 AM

Gosh that bloke is full of Shiite!

Thats my constructive remark for the night.

Posted by: payingattention at July 9, 2006 5:42 AM

And the EU continues to indulge this Nazi, the way Britain and France appeased hitler in the 1930s.

Posted by: Eliyahu at July 9, 2006 5:42 AM

Once old lessons are forgotten, history is destine to repeat itself. Lets get ready toooo rummmmmbbllllllleee, coming soon WW1111

Posted by: AMartinez at July 9, 2006 6:18 AM

dang forgot the uuuu

Posted by: AMartinez at July 9, 2006 6:19 AM

Boy, that little turd sure brings the concept of 'obsession' to a whole new level.

Posted by: Kim Hartveld at July 9, 2006 6:29 AM

"The basic problem in the Islamic world is the existence of the Zionist regime, and the Islamic world and the region must mobilise to remove this problem," the president said in a speech to regional officials.

Remove this problem? He talks like he has to remove a tick from a dog.

What would we do if the entire Islamic world decided to "mobilise" against Israel?
Does he mean sending in the usual pesky suicide bombers here and there, or a full-scale military attack?

Surely we wouldn't just idly by and watch it happen! Would we?

Not only that, but I can't see what additional problems the "Zionist" regime has caused in the islamic world, besides the obvious problems with the Palestinians of course.
The islamic world (whatever exactly that is supposed to represent) would have problems regardless, only they'd find someone else to blame.

Posted by: AIG at July 9, 2006 6:37 AM

Kofi Annan is also put out by Israel's attempts to defend itself.

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has demanded that Israel take urgent action to prevent a humanitarian disaster in the Gaza Strip. ...

The BBC's Richard Galpin at the UN in New York says Mr Annan is clearly becoming increasingly alarmed by what is happening and is becoming increasingly blunt in his statements.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5162062.stm

Apparently, a sovereign state's defending itself from rocketing by terrorists and taking action after the kidnap of one of its citizens is just not on.

The man's a crook, anyway.

Posted by: Yojimbo at July 9, 2006 7:11 AM

Go on Muslims - mobilise against Israel and get another thrashing.

And lastly, I notice that Kofi Annan is becoming increasingly deranged and detached from reality.

Posted by: Spirit Of 1683 at July 9, 2006 7:21 AM

And the EU continues to indulge this Nazi, the way Britain and France appeased hitler in the 1930s...

I concur; do they believe he will not come for them next?

Hitler didn't stop in Austria or Poland if my history lessons are correct; and I see no reason to believe that Ahmadinejad plans to stop in Jerusalem.

There is only one logical conclusion that can be drawn based on the lessons of history if world affairs continue as they are; all out global thermal nuclear war at some future point, is sadly, unavoidable.

Posted by: witness at July 9, 2006 7:29 AM

To call President Mahmoud a nut-ball, fruitcake, or ding dong would not be right, unless you’re ready to make the same charge against not only Mohammed, but Allah himself. And doing that would be a hate crime felony in most of the EU, if the 6th Pillar didn’t get execute you first.

610 * 623 * 732* 1066* 1215 * 1453 * 1492 * 1683 * 1928 * 1938 * 1948 * 1996 * 2001

The Jews are a nation of liars. The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people.
--- Bad boy Mo showing a lack of cultural sensitivity in Ishaq 240

The bestial transformation occurred when Allah turned Jews into apes, despised.
--- Mo revealing that God is a virulent antisemite himself in Ishaq 250

Sufficient for the Jew is the Flaming Fire!
--- God himself lusting for a thermonuclear explosion over Israel in Koran 4:55

Allah took down the Jews. He cast terror into their hearts. Some you slew, and some you made prisoners.
--- God talking about himself in the 3rd person in Koran 33:26

Just issue orders to kill every Jew in the country
--- Mo totally agreeing with God in Bukhari V1:B1:N6

Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive.
--- God correcting Mo’s error in Koran 33:26; imprisoning and enslaving them is ok too

Allah’s Apostle said, “You Muslims will fight the Jews till some of them hide behind stones. The stones will betray them saying, “O Abdullah (slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.”
--- Mo revealing that even Middle Eastern plant life is anti-Semitic in Bukhari V4:B52:N17

610 * 623 * 732* 1066* 1215 * 1453 * 1492 * 1683 * 1928 * 1938 * 1948 * 1996 * 2001

President Mahmoud is not insane; he’s just a Moslem.

Posted by: Alarmed Pig Farmer at July 9, 2006 7:52 AM

WOW!!!
That is all I can say! Who would think the Israeli's had so much power over the muslim world.

I have read somehwere that if the muslim lands are the size of a football field, then Israel takes up one square inch!

I bet they don't even know themselves just how frightening they are.
Takes number 1 moron of the world to make this claim.
Are the mo's that desperate? I hope so!

This piece was emailed to me. I am sorry I don't have the source.An interesting perspective!

-------------------------------------------------

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE WORLD

Dear World, I understand that you are upset by us, here in Israel.
Indeed, it appears that you are quite upset, even angry. (Outraged?)

Indeed, every few years you seem to become upset by us. Today, it is the "brutal repression of the Palestinians"; yesterday it was Lebanon; before that it was the bombing of the nuclear reactor in Baghdad and the Yom Kippur War and the Sinai campaign. It appears that Jews who triumph and who, therefore, live, upset you most extraordinarily.

Of course, dear world, long before there was an Israel, we - the Jewish people - upset you.

We upset a German people who elected Hitler and upset an Austrian people who cheered his entry into Vienna and we upset a whole slew of Slavic nations - Poles, Slovaks, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Russians, Hungarians and Romanians. And we go back a long, long way in the history of world upset.

We upset the Cossacks of Chmielnicki who massacred tens of thousands of us in 1648-49; we upset the Crusaders who, on their way to liberate the Holy Land, were so upset at Jews that they slaughtered untold numbers of us.

For centuries, we upset a Roman Catholic Church that did its best to define our relationship through inquisitions, and we upset the arch-enemy of the church, Martin Luther, who, in his call to burn the synagogues and the Jews within them, showed an admirable Christian ecumenical spirit.

And it is because we became so upset over upsetting you, dear world, that we decided to leave you - in a manner of speaking - and establish a Jewish state. The reasoning was that living in close contact with you, as resident-strangers in the various countries that comprise you, we upset you, irritate you and disturb you. What better notion, then, than to leave you (and thus love you)- and have you love us and so, we decided to come home - home to the same land we were driven out 1,900 years earlier by a Roman world that, apparently, we also upset.

Alas, dear world, it appears that you are hard to please.

Having left you and your pogroms and inquisitions and crusades and holocausts, having taken our leave of the general world to live alone in our own little state, we continue to upset you. You are upset that we repress the poor Palestinians. You are deeply angered over the fact that we do not give up the lands of 1967, which are clearly the obstacle to peace in the Middle East

Moscow is upset and Washington is upset. The "radical" Arabs are upset and the gentle Egyptian moderates are upset.

Well, dear world, consider the reaction of a normal Jew from Israel.

In 1920 and 1921 and 1929, there were no territories of 1967 to impede peace between Jews and Arabs. Indeed, there was no Jewish State to upset anybody Nevertheless, the same oppressed and repressed Palestinians slaughtered tens of Jews in Jerusalem, Jaffa, Safed and Hebron.Indeed, 67 Jews were slaughtered one day in Hebron in 1929.

Dear world, why did the Arabs - the Palestinians - massacre 67 Jews in one day in 1929? Could it have been their anger over Israeli aggression in 1967? And why were 510 Jewish men, women and children slaughtered in Arab riots between 1936-39? Was it because Arabs were upset over 1967?

And when you, dear world, proposed a UN Partition Plan in 1947 that would have created a "Palestinian State" alongside a tiny Israel and the Arabs cried "no" and went to war and killed 6,000 Jews - was that "upset" caused by the aggression of 1967? And, by the way, dear world, why did we not hear your cry of "upset" then?

The poor Palestinians who today kill Jews with explosives and firebombs and stones are part of the same people who ­ when they had all the territories they now demand be given to them for their state -attempted to drive the Jewish state into the sea. The same twisted faces, the same hate, the same cry of "itbach-al-yahud" (Massacre the Jew!) that we hear and see today, were seen and heard then. The same people, the same dream - destroy Israel. What they failed to do yesterday, they dream of today, but we should not "repress" them.

Dear world, you stood by during the holocaust and you stood by in 1948 as seven states launched a war that the Arab League proudly compared to the Mongol massacres.

You stood by in 1967 as Nasser, wildly cheered by wild mobs in every Arab capital in the world, vowed to drive the Jews into the sea. And you would stand by tomorrow if Israel were facing extinction.

And since we know that the Arabs-Palestinians dream daily of that extinction, we will do everything possible to remain alive in our own land. If that bothers you, dear world, well ­ think of how many times in the past you bothered us.

In any event, dear world, if you are bothered by us, here is one Jew in Israel who could not care less.

Posted by: Gramfan at July 9, 2006 9:31 AM

So they are just like "Professor" Griff; blame it on the Jews. Mentally and morally they are his kin.

Posted by: Dumbo at July 9, 2006 11:16 AM

-Alarmed Pig Farmer,

That Bukhari hadith you posted, the one about the talking rocks (lol!), is V4:B52:N176, not V4:B52:N17.

Posted by: Eisenhund at July 9, 2006 12:35 PM

"The basic problem in the Islamic world is the existence of ... " Islam.

Posted by: Stendec at July 9, 2006 1:05 PM

Quite an impressive speech....considering it was delivered by a neanderthal anthropoid.

Posted by: pythagoras at July 10, 2006 1:04 PM

I have posted a review of the book "Londonistan" by Melanie Phillips. Phillips demonstrates why the home-grown and imported jihadists may prevail over British culture.

She discusses why such things as multiculturalism, unrestricted immigration, and the failure to inculcate the Judaeo-Christian values of Western civilization have created a virtual Fifth Column within Britain. She documents how and why the pillars of the establishment - politicians, church, and community leaders - have remained utterly clueless to the imminent danger.

She also indicates how the jihadists are aided and abetted by the hard Left of British politics.

By the way, in the current issue of National Review magazine David Pryce-Jones has an article discussing this dreadful reality. The first sentence of his article is "London is an international center of Islamist jihad and terror."

I heartily recommend the review of "Londonistan" in Commentary and -- I'd very much like to hear some reactions.

Posted by: Topdog at July 11, 2006 12:10 AM